Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(8): 2646-2651, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36805625

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2020, the Canadian Vasculitis Research Network (CanVasc) published their updated recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). The current addendum provides further recommendations regarding the use of avacopan in AAV based on a review of newly available evidence. METHODS: An updated systematic literature review on avacopan (formerly, CCX168) using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed for publications up to September 2022. New recommendations were developed and categorized according to the EULAR grading levels, as done for previous CanVasc recommendations. A modified Delphi procedure and videoconferences were used to reach ≥80% consensus on the inclusion, wording and grading of each recommendation. RESULTS: Three new recommendations were developed. They focus on avacopan therapy indication and duration, as well as timely glucocorticoid tapering. CONCLUSION: These 2022 addended recommendations provide rheumatologists, nephrologists and other specialists caring for patients with AAV with guidance for the use of avacopan, based on current evidence and consensus from Canadian experts.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , Microscopic Polyangiitis , Humans , Consensus , Canada , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/drug therapy , Cytoplasm , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic
2.
J Rheumatol ; 48(4): 555-566, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32934123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2015, the Canadian Vasculitis Research Network (CanVasc) created recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in Canada. The current update aims to revise existing recommendations and create additional recommendations, as needed, based on a review of new available evidence. METHODS: A needs assessment survey of CanVasc members informed questions for an updated systematic literature review (publications spanning May 2014 to September 2019) using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. New and revised recommendations were developed and categorized according to the level of evidence and strength of each recommendation. The CanVasc working group used a 2-step modified Delphi procedure to reach > 80% consensus on the inclusion, wording, and grading of each new and revised recommendation. RESULTS: Eleven new and 16 revised recommendations were created and 12 original (2015) recommendations were retained. New and revised recommendations are discussed in detail within this document. Five original recommendations were removed, of which 4 were incorporated into the explanatory text. The supplementary material for practical use was revised to reflect the updated recommendations. CONCLUSION: The 2020 updated recommendations provide rheumatologists, nephrologists, and other specialists caring for patients with AAV in Canada with new management guidance, based on current evidence and consensus from Canadian experts.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/drug therapy , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , Canada , Consensus , Cytoplasm , Humans
4.
Clin Rehabil ; 32(11): 1449-1471, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29911409

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:: To identify programmes involving therapeutic exercise that are effective for the management of hand osteoarthritis and to provide stakeholders with updated, moderate to high-quality recommendations supporting exercises for hand osteoarthritis. METHODS:: A systematic search and adapted selection criteria included comparable trials with exercise programmes for managing hand osteoarthritis. Based on the evaluated evidence, a panel of experts reached consensus through a Delphi approach endorsing the recommendations. A hierarchical alphabetical grading system (A, B, C+, C, C-, D-, D, D+, E, F) was based on clinical importance (≥15%) and statistical significance ( P < 0.05). RESULTS:: Ten moderate- to high-quality studies were included. Eight studies with programmes involving therapeutic exercise (e.g. range of motion (ROM) + isotonic + isometric + functional exercise) seemed to be effective. Forty-six positive grade recommendations (i.e. A, B, C+) were obtained during short-term (<12 weeks) trials for pain, stiffness, physical function, grip strength, pinch strength, range of motion, global assessment, pressure pain threshold, fatigue and abductor pollicis longus moment and during long-term (>12 weeks) trials for physical function and pinch strength. CONCLUSION:: Despite that many programmes involving exercise with positive recommendations for clinical outcomes are available to healthcare professionals and hand osteoarthritis patients that aid in the management of hand osteoarthritis, there is a need for further research to isolate the specific effect of exercise components.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise Therapy/standards , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Consensus , Evidence-Based Medicine , Hand/physiopathology , Humans , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Pain Management , Pinch Strength , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Range of Motion, Articular , Systematic Reviews as Topic
5.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0151519, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26998611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-reported health status measures, like the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), can provide rich information about the overall health of a population and its components, such as physical, mental, and social health. However, differential item functioning (DIF), which arises when population sub-groups with the same underlying (i.e., latent) level of health have different measured item response probabilities, may compromise the comparability of these measures. The purpose of this study was to test for DIF on the SF-36 physical functioning (PF) and mental health (MH) sub-scale items in a Canadian population-based sample. METHODS: Study data were from the prospective Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), which collected baseline data in 1996-1997. DIF was tested using a multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) method. Confirmatory factor analysis defined the latent variable measurement model for the item responses and latent variable regression with demographic and health status covariates (i.e., sex, age group, body weight, self-perceived general health) produced estimates of the magnitude of DIF effects. RESULTS: The CaMos cohort consisted of 9423 respondents; 69.4% were female and 51.7% were less than 65 years. Eight of 10 items on the PF sub-scale and four of five items on the MH sub-scale exhibited DIF. Large DIF effects were observed on PF sub-scale items about vigorous and moderate activities, lifting and carrying groceries, walking one block, and bathing or dressing. On the MH sub-scale items, all DIF effects were small or moderate in size. CONCLUSIONS: SF-36 PF and MH sub-scale scores were not comparable across population sub-groups defined by demographic and health status variables due to the effects of DIF, although the magnitude of this bias was not large for most items. We recommend testing and adjusting for DIF to ensure comparability of the SF-36 in population-based investigations.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Osteoporosis/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Canada , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis
6.
J Rheumatol ; 43(1): 97-120, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26523024

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims is to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in Canada. METHODS: Diagnostic and therapeutic questions were developed based on the results of a national needs assessment survey. A systematic review of existing non-Canadian recommendations and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AAV and studies of AAV published after the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism/European Vasculitis Society recommendations (publication date: January 2009) until November 2014 was performed in the Medline database, Cochrane library, and main vasculitis conference proceedings. Quality of supporting evidence for each therapeutic recommendation was graded. The full working group as well as additional reviewers, including patients, reviewed the developed therapeutic recommendations and nontherapeutic statements using a modified 2-step Delphi technique and through discussion to reach consensus. RESULTS: Nineteen recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management were developed, as well as appendices for practical use, for rheumatologists, nephrologists, respirologists, general internists, and all other healthcare professionals more occasionally involved in the management of patients with AAV in community and academic practice settings. CONCLUSION: These recommendations were developed based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence, and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context, with the intention of promoting best practices and improving healthcare delivery for patients with AAV.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/diagnosis , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Canada , Delphi Technique , Disease Management , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Male
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26557369

ABSTRACT

The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties, including rheumatology and nephrology and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims was to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides in Canada. This executive summary features the 19 recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management, developed by CanVasc group based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context.

8.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 43(2): 273-8, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23608542

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chikungunya fever often presents with severe arthritis/arthralgias, high fever, myalgias, headache, and maculopapular rash (Chow et al., 2011 [1]; Das et al., 2010 [2]; Mizuno et al., 2011 [3]; Powers, 2010 [4]; Sissoko et al., 2010 [5]; Staples et al., 2009 [6]). Persistent arthritis/arthralgias commonly develop after symptomatic infection and are the most common long-term complication (Chow et al., 2011 [1]; Powers, 2010 [4]; Sissoko et al., 2010 [5]; Staples et al., 2009 [6]). The small joints are most often affected in a symmetric pattern that can mimic adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Mizuno et al., 2011 [3]; Bouquillard and Combe, 2009 [7]; Chabbra et al., 2008 [8]; Jaffar-Bandjee et al., 2009 [9]; Simon et al., 2007 [10]). OBJECTIVE: We present a case of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV)-induced arthritis and review the literature surrounding Chikungunya-induced arthritis/arthralgias and associated musculoskeletal (MSK) manifestations. METHODS: A Medline search was completed from 1946--November 2011. Key words included Chikungunya virus and arthritis. A PubMed search was completed from 1996--November 2011. Search terms included Chikungunya virus, etiology, and fever. Searches were limited to humans and English language publications. Additional relevant articles were obtained from the reference lists.


Subject(s)
Alphavirus Infections/complications , Arthritis/virology , Chikungunya virus/isolation & purification , Chikungunya Fever , Female , Humans , Young Adult
10.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 37(1): 19-27, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22157741

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A better understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic postsurgical pain is needed in order to develop effective prevention and treatment interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. METHODS: Pain characteristics, opioid consumption, and psychologic factors were captured before and 6 months after surgery. Analyses included univariate statistics, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and modified Poisson regression for binary data. RESULTS: Pain and pain interference 6 months after surgery was reported by 14% (n = 60/433) and 12% (n = 54/433), respectively. Chronic postsurgical pain was reported by 23% (n = 39/172) with preoperative pelvic pain, 17% (n = 9/54) with preoperative remote pain, and 5.1% (n = 10/197) with no preoperative pain. Preoperative state anxiety (RR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8), preoperative pain (pelvic RR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9-7.2; remote RR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.9), and moderate/severe in-hospital pain (RR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.0-9.4) independently predicted chronic postsurgical pain. The same 3 factors predicted pain-interference at 6 months. Participants describing preoperative pelvic pain as "miserable" and "shooting" were 2.8 (range, 1.3-6.4) and 2.1 (range, 1.1-4.0) times more likely to report chronic postsurgical pain, respectively. Women taking preoperative opioids were 2.0 (range, 1.2-3.3) times more likely to report chronic postsurgical pain than those not taking opioids. Women with preoperative pelvic pain who took preoperative opioids were 30% (RR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9) more likely to report chronic postsurgical pain than those with preoperative pelvic pain not taking opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pain, state anxiety, pain quality descriptors, opioid consumption, and early postoperative pain may be important predictors of chronic postsurgical pain, which require further investigation.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Adult , Anxiety/complications , Chi-Square Distribution , Chronic Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ontario , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
12.
J Rheumatol ; 33(3): 567-73, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16511925

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating a new topical diclofenac solution (Pennsaid) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: RCT were identified by searching electronic data sources as well as by contact with the manufacturer of Pennsaid. Details of study demographics, methodology, quality, and outcomes were analyzed. A metaanalysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of Pennsaid in OA of the knee was performed. RESULTS: Four RCT were analyzed in this systematic review (3 published reports and one published abstract). Mean trial duration was 8.5 weeks. Generally, these RCT were of excellent quality. The mean Jadad quality score was 4.5 out of 5. Many indicators of high quality in a RCT were found in these RCT, including adequate descriptions of the methods used for randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment. In comparison to a vehicle control placebo (VCP), the standardized mean differences (SMD) for the WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function subscales, as well as for patient global assessment, were all statistically significant in favor of Pennsaid, with SMD ranging from 0.30 to 0.39. Pennsaid was as safe as VCP, with the only exception that it was more likely to result in minor skin dryness at the site of application (relative risk 1.7). In a 12 week equivalence trial that used the WOMAC subscales to compare treatment response, Pennsaid was as effective as oral diclofenac, but was much better tolerated. CONCLUSION: Pennsaid is an effective topical NSAID in patients with OA of the knee. Apart from minor localized skin reactions, Pennsaid was as safe as VCP. It is not known whether the favorable results of Pennsaid can be extrapolated to other topical NSAID preparations. Pennsaid deserves further consideration when the existing treatment guidelines for OA of the knee are updated.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Administration, Topical , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Disability Evaluation , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Rheumatol ; 32(12): 2337-42, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16331759

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess driving problems experienced by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to examine the relationship between functional status and driving difficulty. METHODS: Using the South Eastern Ontario Medical Organization (SEAMO) database, we identified 721 patients with RA from both urban and rural backgrounds. They completed a cross-sectional, self-administered mail survey that included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) and a co-morbidity questionnaire. We assessed the proportion of drivers versus non-drivers and patients who reported difficulty driving and who used vehicle adaptations. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 74% and 92.2% of the subjects were current drivers. Fifty percent of the current drivers reported a little difficulty, 6.8% reported quite a bit of difficulty, and 1.5% a great deal of difficulty driving. Major reasons given for why RA limited their driving were stiffness and pain. Frequent use of mobility aids (adjusted odds ratio, OR: 5.85), HAQ-DI > or = 1 (adjusted OR: 3.40), and older age (adjusted OR: 1.04) were significant predictors of an individual with RA discontinuing driving. Higher levels of disability (HAQ-DI) were associated with a greater number of problems reported with driving and with curtailment of driving. A multivariate logistic regression determined that having a HAQ-DI > or = 1 (adjusted OR: 4.3) and difficulties sitting in the vehicle (adjusted OR: 2.9) were associated with RA limiting driving. CONCLUSION: Over 50% of respondents reported some degree of difficulty driving due to their RA. Scores on HAQ-DI > or = 1 were associated with difficulty driving. Further validation of our findings needs to be performed.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Automobile Driving , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Pain Res Manag ; 8(3): 157-63, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14657983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain is an important public health problem in Canada. International estimates of general population pain prevalence range from 2% to 46%. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the potentially misleading use of overall prevalence estimates in the pain literature and to use two Canadian population-based surveys to assess the impact of sampling and measurement on prevalence. METHODS: Two of the secondary data sets used were the 1996/97 National Population and Health Survey (NPHS) and the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). This paper is based on the assessment of chronic pain in the NPHS, and the assessment of short term pain using the Medical Outcomes Trust's 36-item health survey and the Health Utilities Index, both collected by CaMos. Data are presented as frequencies and percentages overall and stratified by age and sex. CaMos prevalence estimates were age- and sex-standardized to the NPHS population. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of pain was 39% for one-week pain, 66% for four-week pain and 15% for chronic pain. Women were more likely to report pain than men and the prevalence of pain increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: This study yields useful information about the self-reported responses to a variety of questions assessing pain in the general population. Responses to the different questions likely represent different categories of pain, such as short term versus chronic pain, which in turn may have different epidemiological risk factors and profiles. Longitudinal studies of the epidemiology, predictors and natural history of chronic pain are urgently needed in the Canadian population.


Subject(s)
Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Pain/epidemiology , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Participation/psychology , Prospective Studies , Selection Bias
16.
Clin Ther ; 24(8): 1225-91, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12240779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians believe that higher doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are more effective than lower doses for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) but are associated with higher rates of adverse events (AEs). However, there is a lack of consensus on dose-effect relationships with the NSAIDs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to investigate evidence for the relationship between NSAID dose, efficacy, and the occurrence of AEs from clinical trials of RA and OA of the hip and knee. METHODS: Relevant English-language publications were identified through a search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and REFLINE using the terms aceclofenac, diclofenac, etodolac, ibuprofen, isoxicam, lornoxicam, meloxicam, nabumetone, naproxen, piroxicam, tenidap, tenoxicam, arthritis, OA (hip and knee), RA, rheumatic disorders, and musculoskeletal disorders for the period January 1970 to December 1997 (this review was conducted in 1998). Bibliographies of retrieved publications were reviewed for other potentially relevant articles. Selected publications were evaluated for quality (likelihood of bias) based on 4 factors (randomization procedure; completeness of patient and treatment information; standardization and completeness of outcome data; and reporting of attrition data). RESULTS: This review included 99 publications concerning clinical trials conducted in 24 countries and enrolling 28,239 patients. The majority of reports were published in the 1990s, particularly in the latter half of that decade. The average quality of the publications improved over time, with a significant increase in mean quality score from 5.43 in the 1970s to 9.21 during the last half of the 1990s (P < 0.05). Only 8 reports directly compared high and low doses of the same drug in relation to efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Data on the relationship of NSAID dose to efficacy and the incidence of AEs were limited. There is a need for clinical trials directly addressing dose-effect relationships of NSAIDs, as well as reviews of more current literature and reports in languages other than English.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL