Alemtuzumab induces severe orbitopathy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

CONTEXT: Treatment with Alemtuzumab (ALZ) in patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with the development of ALZ-induced Graves' disease (GD-ALZ). Some cases may develop associated Graves´ Orbitopathy (GO-ALZ), with possible visual compromise. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the main clinical and biochemical characteristics of GD-ALZ, as well as the clinical course of a case series of GO-ALZ METHODS: This study is a retrospective observational study, carried out in a reference hospital for the care of patients with RRMS in Spain. Cases treated with ALZ in the period 2014-2022 were included. GO-ALZ cases were identified among those with clinical symptoms compatible with thyroid eye disease after initiating ALZ treatment. RESULTS: A total of 135 cases, with a mean follow-up of 69.6 months after the first ALZ cycle, were included. The incidence of GD-ALZ was 32.6% (44/135), with a predominance of women (77.3%) and mean age of 41.9 years. The presence of first-degree relatives with hypothyroidism was identified as risk factor for the development of GD-ALZ (adjusted P-value: 0.02). GO-ALZ was diagnosed in 6 cases (incidence: 13.6%), of which 3 had severe clinical forms of GO, requiring anti-IL-6 treatment. A favorable response was reported in all of them, with a significant decrease in disease activity and improvement in proptosis. CONCLUSIONS: We report one of the largest cohorts of GD-ALZ and GO-ALZ cases. The diagnosis of these entities should be taken into account in patients treated with Alemtuzumab, given the risk of developing severe clinical forms. In moderate-severe forms of GO-ALZ, drugs with anti-IL-6 activity are a safe and effective option.

Ultrasonography in rheumatology: time to learn from patient views.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study was to assess the perceived quality and grade of satisfaction expressed by patients with chronic arthropathies regarding the use of musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasonography by rheumatologists as an integrated clinical care tool. METHODS: All Spanish rheumatology departments with MSK ultrasonography incorporated in their healthcare services were invited to participate in the study. A Spanish-language survey was offered to fill out anonymously to all consecutive patients with chronic arthropathies under follow-up in the rheumatology outpatient clinics who attended their centre for a period of 3 months. The survey consisted of three sections. The first section contained patients' demographics, disease data, frequency of performing rheumatological ultrasound and information about who performed their ultrasound assessments. The second section consisted of 14 questions about patient's experience and opinion on different aspects of the management, performance and perceived usefulness of performing ultrasound, to be answered on a Likert scale 1-5. The third section of the survey was addressed to the rheumatologist ultrasonographers. RESULTS: Nine hundred and four patients from 16 university hospital rheumatology departments completed the survey. All questions reached an overall favourable response ≥ 80%. Patients who reported usual ultrasound examinations in their rheumatology care and those in which it was their attending rheumatologist who performed the ultrasound assessments responded more favourably. CONCLUSION: Our encouraging patient-centred results may be useful in facilitating the implementation of rheumatological ultrasound in rheumatology care worldwide. Key Points • This is the largest multicentre survey carried out in patients with chronic joint diseases designed to assess their experience and perceived benefits with the use of ultrasonography performed by rheumatologists in daily practice. • Musculoskeletal ultrasound incorporated into rheumatology care was very well accepted and valued by most patients. • The patients perceived that ultrasonography helps not only their rheumatologist but also themselves to better understand their condition. • The patients believed that ultrasonography helps them accept and comply with the proposed treatment.

Coexistencia de anticuerpos anti-histidil-tRNA-sintetasa y anti-partícula de reconocimiento de la señal en un paciente con polimiositis / Coexistence of anti-Jo1 and anti-signal recognition particle antibodies in a polymyositis patient

Las miopatías inflamatorias idiopáticas son un grupo heterogéneo de miopatías potencialmente tratables. Se clasifican en 4 subtipos: dermatomiositis, polimiositis, miositis autoinmune necrosante y miositis por cuerpos de inclusión, en función de las características clínicas e histológicas. Los anticuerpos asociados a miositis y los autoanticuerpos específicos de miositis se encuentran frecuentemente en pacientes con miopatías inflamatorias, siendo útiles en el diagnóstico y clasificación. El anticuerpo anti-histidil tRNA sintetasa es el más prevalente y el más específico para polimiositis. El anticuerpo de partícula de reconocimiento de señal es también un autoanticuerpo especıfico para polimiositis, pero más infrecuente, y raramente se encuentra en pacientes que presentan otros autoanticuerpos específicos para miositis. En este trabajo se presenta un paciente con polimiositis en el que coexisten los 2 autoanticuerpos en el suero, lo que se considera una situación clínica extremadamente rara. Aquí analizamos la evolución clínica y hallazgos para examinar el efecto de la coexistencia y la posible interacción sobre el pronóstico

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of potentially treatable myopathies. They are classified, on the basis of clinical and histopathological features, into four subtypes: dermatomyositis, polymyositis, necrotizing autoimmune myositis and inclusion-body myositis. Myositis-associated antibodies and myositis-specific autoantibodies are frequently found in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and are useful in the diagnosis and classification. Anti-histidyl transfer RNA synthetase antibody is the most widely prevalent and is highly specific for polymyositis. Signal recognition particle antibody is also a specific autoantibody for polymyositis, but it is infrequent and rarely found in patients having other myositis-specific autoantibodies. We present a man with polymyositis who had both antibodies in serum, which is considered an extremely rare clinical situation. Here we analyze the clinical course and findings, and examine the effect of the coexistence and possible interaction on prognosis

Coexistence of anti-Jo1 and anti-signal recognition particle antibodies in a polymyositis patient. / Coexistencia de anticuerpos anti-histidil-tRNA-sintetasa y anti-partícula de reconocimiento de la señal en un paciente con polimiositis.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of potentially treatable myopathies. They are classified, on the basis of clinical and histopathological features, into four subtypes: dermatomyositis, polymyositis, necrotizing autoimmune myositis and inclusion-body myositis. Myositis-associated antibodies and myositis-specific autoantibodies are frequently found in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and are useful in the diagnosis and classification. Anti-histidyl transfer RNA synthetase antibody is the most widely prevalent and is highly specific for polymyositis. Signal recognition particle antibody is also a specific autoantibody for polymyositis, but it is infrequent and rarely found in patients having other myositis-specific autoantibodies. We present a man with polymyositis who had both antibodies in serum, which is considered an extremely rare clinical situation. Here we analyze the clinical course and findings, and examine the effect of the coexistence and possible interaction on prognosis.