ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We assessed three cochlear implant (CI) suppliers: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear Limited, and MED-EL, for implant revision requiring reoperation after CI placement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of integrated-health-system database between 2010 and 2021. Separate models were created for pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) cohorts. PATIENTS: Pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) patients undergoing cochlear implantation within our integrated healthcare system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Revision after CI placement. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk and adjust for confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. RESULTS: A total of 2,347 patients underwent a primary CI placement, and Cochlear Limited was most implanted (51.5%), followed by Advanced Bionics (35.2%) and MED-EL (13.3%). In the pediatric cohort, the 7-year crude revision rate was 10.9% for Advanced Bionics and 4.8% for Cochlear Limited, whereas MED-EL had insufficient cases. In adults, the rates were 9.1%, 4.5%, and 3.3% for Advanced Bionics, MED-EL, and Cochlear Limited, respectively. After 2 years of postoperative follow-up, Advanced Bionics had a significantly higher revision risk (HR = 8.25, 95% CI = 2.91-23.46); MED-EL had no difference (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.46-9.25). CONCLUSION: We found an increased revision risk after 2 years of follow-up for adults with Advanced Bionics CI devices. Although we found no statistical difference between manufacturers in the pediatric cohort, after 2 years of follow-up, there were increasing trends in the revision probability for Advanced Bionics. Further research may determine whether patients are better suited for some CI devices.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Reoperation , Humans , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Child , Adult , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implantation/trends , Adolescent , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Aged , Infant , Cohort StudiesSubject(s)
Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Neck Injuries/complications , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology , Trachea/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Child, Preschool , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/pathology , Mediastinal Emphysema/surgery , Subcutaneous Emphysema/pathology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This pilot study evaluated the role of cartilage-derived morphogenic proteins (CDMPs) as promoters of cartilage growth and differentiation and as a possible alternative to autologous cartilage grafts in laryngotracheal reconstruction. METHODS: In phase 1, 6 New Zealand rabbits underwent subperichondrial injection of CDMP-1, CDMP-2, or CDMP-3 in the right thyroid ala and normal saline solution in the left thyroid ala as controls. In phase 2, 14 rabbits underwent anterior cricoid split and interposition of a fibrillar collagen sponge saturated with normal saline solution, CDMP-2, or CDMP-3. RESULTS: In both phases, saline solution failed to induce new cartilage or bone growth. Small foci of cartilage and/or bone formation were observed within the thyroid subperichondria of those rabbits injected with CDMP-2 or CDMP-3. In phase 2, a few small foci of new cartilage and/or bone formation were observed at the edges of the cricoid split with CDMP-2 and CDMP-3. CONCLUSIONS: A different carrier of CDMP, a change in dosage, or a combination of CDMPs might yield more significant neochondrification. The role of CDMPs as promoters of cartilage and differentiation could not be disqualified in this study and should be further investigated.
