ABSTRACT
The evolutionary conserved molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) plays an indispensable role in tumorigenesis by stabilizing client oncoproteins. Although the functionality of HSP90 is tightly regulated, cancer cells exhibit a unique dependence on this chaperone, leading to its overexpression, which has been associated with poor prognosis in certain malignancies. While various strategies targeting heat shock proteins (HSPs) involved in carcinogenesis have been explored, only inhibition of HSP90 has consistently and effectively resulted in proteasomal degradation of its client proteins. To date, a total of 22 HSP90 inhibitors (HSP90i) have been tested in 186 cancer clinical trials, as reported by clinicaltrials.gov. Among these trials, 60 % have been completed, 10 % are currently active, and 30 % have been suspended, terminated, or withdrawn. HSP90 inhibitors (HSP90i) have been used as single agents or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of various cancer types in clinical trials. Notably, improved clinical outcomes have been observed when HSP90i are used in combination therapies, as they exhibit a synergistic antitumor effect. However, as single agents, HSP90i have shown limited clinical activity due to drug-related toxicity or therapy resistance. Recently, active trials conducted in Japan evaluating TAS-116 (pimitespib) have demonstrated promising results with low toxicity as monotherapy and in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. Exploratory biomarker analyses performed in various trials have demonstrated target engagement that suggests the potential for identifying patient populations that may respond favorably to the therapy. In this review, we discuss the advances made in the past 5 years regarding HSP90i and their implications in anticancer therapeutics. Our focus lies in evaluating drug efficacy, prognosis forecast, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and clinical outcomes reported in published trials. Through this comprehensive review, we aim to shed light on the progress and potential of HSP90i as promising therapeutic agents in cancer treatment.
ABSTRACT
Background: LMB-100 is a mesothelin (MSLN)-targeting recombinant immunotoxin (iTox) carrying a Pseudomonas exotoxin A payload that has shown promise against solid tumors, however, efficacy is limited by the development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Tofacitinib is an oral Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that prevented ADA formation against iTox in preclinical studies. Methods: A phase 1 trial testing LMB-100 and tofacitinib in patients with MSLN-expressing cancers (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, n=13; cholangiocarcinoma, n=1; appendiceal carcinoma, n=1; cystadenocarcinoma, n=1) was performed to assess safety and to determine if tofacitinib impacted ADA formation. Participants were treated for up to 3 cycles with LMB-100 as a 30-minute infusion on days 4, 6, and 8 at two dose levels (100 and 140 µg/kg) while oral tofacitinib was administered for the first 10 days of the cycle (10 mg BID). Peripheral blood was collected for analysis of ADA levels, serum cytokines and circulating immune subsets. Results: The study was closed early due to occurrence of drug-induced pericarditis in 2 patients. Pericarditis with the combination was not reproducible in a transgenic murine model containing human MSLN. Two of 4 patients receiving all 3 cycles of treatment maintained effective LMB-100 levels, an unusual occurrence. Sustained increases in systemic IL-10 and TNF-α were seen, a phenomenon not observed in prior LMB-100 studies. A decrease in activated T cell subsets and an increase in circulating immunosuppressive myeloid populations occurred. No radiologic decreases in tumor volume were observed. Discussion: Further testing of tofacitinib to prevent ADA formation is recommended in applicable non-malignant disease settings. Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04034238.
ABSTRACT
The multi-cohort phase 2 trial NCT02203513 was designed to evaluate the clinical activity of the CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i) prexasertib in patients with breast or ovarian cancer. Here we report the activity of CHK1i in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) with measurable and biopsiable disease (cohort 5), or without biopsiable disease (cohort 6). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes were safety and progression-free survival (PFS). 49 heavily pretreated patients were enrolled (24 in cohort 5, 25 in cohort 6). Among the 39 RECISTv1.1-evaluable patients, ORR was 33.3% in cohort 5 and 28.6% in cohort 6. Primary endpoint was not evaluable due to early stop of the trial. The median PFS was 4 months in cohort 5 and 6 months in cohort 6. Toxicity was manageable. Translational research was an exploratory endpoint. Potential biomarkers were investigated using pre-treatment fresh biopsies and serial blood samples. Transcriptomic analysis revealed high levels of DNA replication-related genes (POLA1, POLE, GINS3) associated with lack of clinical benefit [defined post-hoc as PFS < 6 months]. Subsequent preclinical experiments demonstrated significant cytotoxicity of POLA1 silencing in combination with CHK1i in platinum-resistant HGSOC cell line models. Therefore, POLA1 expression may be predictive for CHK1i resistance, and the concurrent POLA1 inhibition may improve the efficacy of CHK1i monotherapy in this hard-to-treat population, deserving further investigation.
Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein , Ovarian Neoplasms , Pyrazines , Female , Humans , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneABSTRACT
Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a chaperone with vital roles in regulating proteostasis, long recognized for its function in protein folding and maturation. A view is emerging that identifies HSP90 not as one protein that is structurally and functionally homogeneous but, rather, as a protein that is shaped by its environment. In this Review, we discuss evidence of multiple structural forms of HSP90 in health and disease, including homo-oligomers and hetero-oligomers, also termed epichaperomes, and examine the impact of stress, post-translational modifications and co-chaperones on their formation. We describe how these variations influence context-dependent functions of HSP90 as well as its interaction with other chaperones, co-chaperones and proteins, and how this structural complexity of HSP90 impacts and is impacted by its interaction with small molecule modulators. We close by discussing recent developments regarding the use of HSP90 inhibitors in cancer and how our new appreciation of the structural and functional heterogeneity of HSP90 invites a re-evaluation of how we discover and implement HSP90 therapeutics for disease treatment.
Subject(s)
HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins , Molecular Chaperones , HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Molecular Chaperones/metabolism , Protein Folding , Proteostasis , HomeostasisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: ONC201 is a small molecule that can cause nonapoptotic cell death through loss of mitochondrial function. Results from the phase I/II trials of ONC201 in patients with refractory solid tumors demonstrated tumor responses and prolonged stable disease in some patients. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of ONC201 at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with recurrent or refractory metastatic breast or endometrial cancer. Fresh tissue biopsies and blood were collected at baseline and at cycle 2 day 2 for correlative studies. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled; 10 patients with endometrial cancer, 7 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The overall response rate was 0%, and the clinical benefit rate, defined by complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD), was 27% (n = 3/11). All patients experienced an adverse event (AE), which was primarily low grade. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 4 patients; no grade 4 AEs occurred. Tumor biopsies did not show that ONC201 consistently induced mitochondrial damage or alterations in tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or the TRAIL death receptors. ONC201 treatment caused alterations in peripheral immune cell subsets. CONCLUSION: ONC201 monotherapy did not induce objective responses in recurrent or refractory metastatic breast or endometrial cancer at the RP2D dose of 625 mg weekly but had an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03394027).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Endometrial Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in Japanese patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced/recurrent breast cancer and to explore potential biomarkers. METHODS: This phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03291886) was conducted at 28 Japanese sites (September 2017-July 2020; interim analysis cutoff: April 2019). Patients with progression/relapse following non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors were randomized 1:1 to entinostat (5 mg/week) or placebo, plus exemestane (25 mg/day). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. Exploratory biomarker outcomes included lysine acetylation, immune cell profiles, estrogen receptor 1 mutations and plasma chemokines. RESULTS: Of 133 randomized patients, 131 (65 entinostat, 66 placebo) who received study drug were analyzed. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 5.8 (3.2-7.8) months for entinostat and 3.3 (3.1-5.8) months for placebo (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.75 [0.50 - 1.14]; P = 0.189). Median overall survival was not reached in either group. Entinostat tended to prolong progression-free survival in patients aged ≥65 years, not endocrine resistant, or with estrogen receptor 1 Y537S mutation. Candidate biomarkers of efficacy (progression-free survival) included lysine acetylation in CD3+ cells, plasma interferon gamma-induced protein 10, dendritic cell CD86 expression, and CD4+ cell expression of human leukocyte antigen-DR and inducible T-cell co-stimulator. Safety was similar to non-Japanese populations; however, seven entinostat-treated patients (10.8%) had reversible lung injury. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients, the safety of entinostat plus exemestane was acceptable and progression-free survival was prolonged, although not significantly. Exploratory analyses identified potential biomarkers, including lysine acetylation, of efficacy.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Estrogen Receptor alpha , Lysine/therapeutic use , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
LMB-100 is a novel immune-conjugate (immunotoxin) that targets mesothelin. A phase 1/2 clinical trial was conducted (NCT02810418) with primary objectives assessing the safety and efficacy of LMB-100 ± nab-paclitaxel. Participant blood samples were analyzed for changes in serum cytokines and circulating immune cell subsets associated with response or toxicity. On Arm A, participants (n = 20) received standard 30-minute LMB-100 infusion with nab-paclitaxel. Although clinical efficacy was observed, the combination caused intolerable capillary leak syndrome (CLS), a major toxicity of unclear etiology that affects many immunotoxin drugs. Participants developing CLS experienced rapid elevations in IFNγ and IL-8 compared to those without significant CLS, along with midcycle increases in Ki-67- CD4 T cells that were CD38, HLA-DR, or TIM3 positive. Additionally, a strong increase in activated CD4 and CD8 T cells and a concurrent decrease in Tregs were seen in the single Arm A patient achieving a partial response. In Arm B, administration of single agent LMB-100 to participants (n = 20) as a long infusion given over 24-48 h was investigated based on pre-clinical data that this format could reduce CLS. An optimal dose and schedule of long infusion LMB-100 were identified, but no clinical efficacy was observed even in patients receiving LMB-100 in combination with nab-paclitaxel. Despite this, both Arm A and B participants experienced increases in specific subsets of proliferating CD4 and CD8 T cells following Cycle 1 treatment. In summary, LMB-100 treatment causes systemic immune activation. Inflammatory and immune changes that accompany drug associated CLS were characterized for the first time.
Subject(s)
Immunoconjugates , Immunotoxins , Humans , Immunotoxins/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , AlbuminsABSTRACT
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a very rare and highly aggressive variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, accounting for 0.5-4% of all pancreatic cancer cases in the USA. Current data indicate that epigenetic changes and MYC overexpression lead to squamous transdifferentiation of pancreatic tumor cells and development of ASCP. Minnelide™, an oral anti-super-enhancer drug that inhibits MYC expression in preclinical models of ASCP, has demonstrated safety in a phase I study. We describe the design for a phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of Minnelide in patients with advanced refractory ASCP.
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a rare and highly aggressive variant of pancreatic cancer, with limited treatment options. Changes in activation of DNA elements called super-enhancers drive the growth of ASCP. Minnelide™ is an oral drug that blocks the super-enhancer network and is safe to give to patients with advanced cancer. This trial is designed to determine whether Minnelide can shrink tumors in patients with ASCP who have already received at least one previous treatment for their cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04896073 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenosquamous , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/genetics , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Humans , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) of various types are released or shed from all cells. EVs carry proteins and contain additional protein and nucleic acid cargo that relates to their biogenesis and cell of origin. EV cargo in liquid biopsies is of widespread interest owing to its ability to provide a retrospective snapshot of cell state at the time of EV release. For the purposes of EV cargo analysis and repertoire profiling, multiplex assays are an essential tool in multiparametric analyte studies but are still being developed for high-parameter EV protein detection. Although bead-based EV multiplex analyses offer EV profiling capabilities with conventional flow cytometers, the utilization of EV multiplex assays has been limited by the lack of software analysis tools for such assays. To facilitate robust EV repertoire studies, we developed multiplex analysis post-acquisition analysis (MPAPASS) open-source software for stitched multiplex analysis, EV database-compatible reporting, and visualization of EV repertoires.
Subject(s)
Extracellular Vesicles , Retrospective Studies , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Flow Cytometry/methods , SoftwareABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) that progressed on checkpoint inhibition (CPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase I expansion cohort of patients with mUC who received prior CPI was treated with cabozantinib 40 mg/day and nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary goal was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v.1.1. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Twenty-nine out of 30 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Median follow-up was 22.2 months. Most patients (86.7%) received prior chemotherapy and all patients received prior CPI (median seven cycles). ORR was 16.0%, with one complete response and three partial responses (PR). Among 4 responders, 2 were primary refractory, 1 had a PR, and 1 had stable disease on prior CPI. Median DoR was 33.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.7-33.5], median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.1-5.5), and median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.8-19.5). CaboNivo decreased immunosuppressive subsets such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and increased potential antitumor immune subsets such as nonclassical monocytes and effector T cells. A lower percentage of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs, lower CTLA-4 and TIM-3 expression on Tregs, and higher effector CD4+ T cells at baseline were associated with better PFS and/or OS. CONCLUSIONS: CaboNivo was clinically active, well tolerated, and favorably modulated peripheral blood immune subsets in patients with mUC refractory to CPI.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Anilides , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Nivolumab , Pyridines , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: High-risk smoldering myeloma has a 5-year risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma of approximately 75%. Treatment with lenalidomide decreases the risk of progression; however, novel triplet regimens are superior, and earlier disease may be more treatment sensitive. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) with lenalidomide maintenance therapy as early intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma and to determine the rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial, responses were evaluated at every cycle during KRd treatment and every 3 cycles subsequently. Bone marrow biopsies and imaging were performed by cycle 8 and then annually. The study enrolled patients from May 29, 2012, to July 23, 2020, at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, a highly specialized tertiary cancer center. Patient key eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of high-risk smoldering myeloma based on the Mayo Clinic, Spanish, and/or Rajkumar, Mateos, and Landgren criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received eight 4-week cycles of intravenous carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 (first 2 doses, 20 mg/m2), dexamethasone (20 mg, cycles 1-4; 10 mg, cycles 5-8 twice weekly), and lenalidomide 25 mg (days 1-21) followed by twenty-four 28-day cycles of maintenance lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21). Stem cell harvest and storage were optional. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the MRD-negative CR rate. Key secondary outcomes included duration of MRD-negative CR and progression to multiple myeloma. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 40-79 years]; 30 men [55.6%]; and 2 Asian [3.7%], 15 Black [27.8%], 1 Hispanic [1.9%], and 36 White [66.7%] patients) were enrolled, with a median potential follow-up time of 31.9 months (range, 6.7-102.9 months). The MRD-negative CR rate was 70.4% (95% CI, 56.4%-82.0%), with a median sustained duration of 5.5 years (95% CI, 3.7 years to not estimable). The 8-year probability of being free from progression to multiple myeloma was 91.2% (95% CI, 67.4%-97.9%), and no deaths occurred. Nonhematologic grade 3 adverse events occurred in 21 patients (38.9%) and included thromboembolism, rash, and lung infection, with no grade 4 events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that treatment of high-risk smoldering myeloma with novel triplet regimens, such as KRd and lenalidomide maintenance therapy, may alter the natural history of smoldering myeloma by significantly delaying development of end-organ disease. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this favorable benefit-to-risk profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01572480.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Smoldering Multiple Myeloma , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Dexamethasone , Female , Humans , Lenalidomide , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , OligopeptidesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Despite advances in immunotherapies, the prognosis for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative, newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia/acute biphenotypic leukemia (ALL/ABL) remains poor. The benzamide derivative entinostat inhibits histone deacetylase and induces histone hyperacetylation. The purine nucleoside analogue clofarabine is FDA-approved for R/R ALL in children 1-21 years of age. Low doses of clofarabine have been reported to induce DNA hypomethylation. We conducted a phase 1 study of low dose clofarabine with escalating doses of entinostat in adults with ND or R/R ALL/ABL. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Adults ≥60 years with ND ALL/ABL or ≥21 years with R/R ALL/ABL received repeated cycles every 3 weeks of entinostat (4 mg, 6 mg or 8 mg orally days 1 and 8) and clofarabine (10 mg/m2/day IV for 5 days, days 3-7) (Arm A). Adults aged 40-59 years with ND ALL/ABL or age ≥21 years in first relapse received entinostat and clofarabine prior to traditional chemotherapy on day 11 (Arm B). Changes in DNA damage, global protein lysine acetylation, myeloid-derived suppressor cells and monocytes were measured in PBMCs before and during therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated at three entinostat dose levels with the maximum administered dose being entinostat 8 mg. The regimen was well tolerated with infectious and metabolic derangements more common in the older population versus the younger cohort. There was no severe hyperglycemia and no peripheral neuropathy in this small study. There were 2 deaths (1 sepsis, 1 intracranial bleed). Overall response rate was 32 %; it was 50 % for ND ALL/ABL. Entinostat increased global protein acetylation and inhibited immunosuppressive monocyte subpopulations, while clofarabine induced DNA damage in all cell subsets examined. CONCLUSION: Entinostat plus clofarabine appears to be tolerable and active in older adults with ND ALL/ABL, but less active in R/R patients. Further evaluation of this regimen in ND ALL/ABL appears warranted.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cell Lineage , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Philadelphia Chromosome , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Benzamides/administration & dosage , Clofarabine/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/pathology , Prognosis , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Salvage Therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although most malignancies express cancer-testis antigens (CTA), immune responses to these proteins are limited in thoracic oncology patients. This trial was undertaken to examine if a cancer cell lysate vaccine could induce immunity to CTA, and to ascertain if metronomic cyclophosphamide and celecoxib enhances vaccine-induced immune responses. METHODS: Eleven patients with primary thoracic malignancies and 10 patients with extrathoracic neoplasms metastatic to the chest rendered NED by conventional therapies were randomized to receive H1299 lung cancer cell lysates (10 mg protein/vaccine) with Iscomatrix™ adjuvant via deep intradermal injection q 4 weeks ×6 with or without daily oral metronomic cyclophosphamide/celecoxib. The primary endpoint was serologic response to purified CTA assessed 1 month after the 6th vaccination. Secondary endpoints included assessment of the effects of cyclophosphamide and celecoxib on frequency and magnitude of vaccine-induced immune responses to CTA. Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of the effects of the vaccine regimens on peripheral immune subsets. Standard of care imaging studies were obtained at baseline and 1 month after the 3rd and 6th vaccinations. RESULTS: All patients exhibited local and systemic inflammatory responses lasting 72-96 hours following vaccinations. There were no dose limiting treatment related toxicities. Fourteen patients (67%) completed all six vaccinations. Eight of 14 patients (57%) exhibited serologic responses to NY-ESO-1. One patient developed antibodies to GAGE7; several patients exhibited reactivity to XAGE and MAGE-C2. Vaccine therapy decreased the percent of Tregs (P=0.0068), PD-1 expression on Tregs (P=0.0027), PD-L1 expression on CD14+ monocytes (P=0.0089), PD-L1 expression on classical monocytes (P=0.016), and PD-L1 expression on intermediate monocytes (P=0.0031). Cyclophosphamide/celecoxib did not appear to increase immune responses or enhance vaccine-induced alterations in peripheral immune subsets. CONCLUSIONS: H1299 lysate vaccines with Iscomatrix™ induce immune responses to CTA and modulate peripheral immune subsets in a manner that may enhance antitumor immunity in patients with thoracic malignancies.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical problem that may be overcome with the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors such as entinostat. The ENCORE301 phase II study reported improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of entinostat to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane in advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: E2112 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that enrolled men or women with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease progressed after nonsteroidal AI. Participants were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg by mouth once daily and entinostat (EE) or placebo (EP) 5 mg by mouth once weekly. Primary end points were PFS by central review and OS. Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate, and lysine acetylation change in peripheral blood mononuclear cells between baseline and cycle 1 day 15. RESULTS: Six hundred eight patients were randomly assigned during March 2014-October 2018. Median age was 63 years (range 29-91), 60% had visceral disease, and 84% had progressed after nonsteroidal AI in metastatic setting. Previous treatments included chemotherapy (60%), fulvestrant (30%), and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (35%). Most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the EE arm included neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (14%), anemia (8%), leukopenia (6%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Median PFS was 3.3 months (EE) versus 3.1 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.13; P = .30). Median OS was 23.4 months (EE) versus 21.7 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21; P = .94). Objective response rate was 5.8% (EE) and 5.6% (EP). Pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed target inhibition in entinostat-treated patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not improve survival in AI-resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Androstadienes/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Aromatase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Benzamides/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Adenocarcinoma/chemistry , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Androstadienes/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Benzamides/adverse effects , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms, Male/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms, Male/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms, Male/mortality , Breast Neoplasms, Male/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Pyridines/adverse effects , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , South Africa , Time Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) benefits only a small subset of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), yet the mechanisms driving benefit are poorly understood. To identify predictors of clinical benefit to ICB, we performed immunogenomic profiling of tumor samples from patients with relapsed SCLC. Tumors of patients who derive clinical benefit from ICB exhibit cytotoxic T-cell infiltration, high expression of antigen processing and presentation machinery (APM) genes, and low neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation. However, elevated Notch signaling, which positively correlates with low NE differentiation, most significantly predicts clinical benefit to ICB. Activation of Notch signaling in a NE human SCLC cell line induces a low NE phenotype, marked by increased expression of APM genes, demonstrating a mechanistic link between Notch activation, low NE differentiation and increased intrinsic tumor immunity. Our findings suggest Notch signaling as a determinant of response to ICB in SCLC.
Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Receptor, Notch1/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Receptor, Notch1/metabolism , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/genetics , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
Small cell neuroendocrine cancers (SCNCs) are recalcitrant cancers arising from diverse primary sites that lack effective treatments. Using chemical genetic screens, we identified inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and rad3 related (ATR), the primary activator of the replication stress response, and topoisomerase I (TOP1), nuclear enzyme that suppresses genomic instability, as synergistically cytotoxic in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In a proof-of-concept study, we combined M6620 (berzosertib), first-in-class ATR inhibitor, and TOP1 inhibitor topotecan in patients with relapsed SCNCs. Objective response rate among patients with SCLC was 36% (9/25), achieving the primary efficacy endpoint. Durable tumor regressions were observed in patients with platinum-resistant SCNCs, typically fatal within weeks of recurrence. SCNCs with high neuroendocrine differentiation, characterized by enhanced replication stress, were more likely to respond. These findings highlight replication stress as a potentially transformative vulnerability of SCNCs, paving the way for rational patient selection in these cancers, now treated as a single disease.
Subject(s)
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/metabolism , Isoxazoles/pharmacology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Pyrazines/pharmacology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/genetics , DNA Replication/drug effects , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/genetics , Genomic Instability/genetics , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive lung tumor, characterized by a rapid doubling time and the development of widespread metastases, for which immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved to overcome T cell anergy. In light of its dismal prognosis, and lack of curative options, new therapies for extensive-disease SCLC are desperately needed. METHODS: RRx-001 is a small molecule Myc inhibitor and down-regulates CD47 expression on tumor cells. We evaluated the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) pre and post RRx-001 treatment in a phase 2 clinical trial, called QUADRUPLE THREAT, where patients with previously treated SCLC received RRx-001 in combination with a platinum doublet. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02489903. Fourteen patients with SCLC were analyzed to investigate the association between clinical outcome and PD-L1 expression on CTCs pre and post RRx-001. The correlation between the binary clinical outcome (clinical benefit vs. progressive disease) and the change of PD-L1 expression on CTCs after RRx-001 was analyzed using a logistic regression adjusting for baseline PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: The logistic model McFadden goodness of fit score was 0.477. The logistic model analyzing the association between decreased PD-L1 expression on CTCs after RRx-001 and response to reintroduced platinum doublet had an approximate 92.8% accuracy in its prediction of clinical benefit. The estimated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) displayed a ROC area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PD-L1 expression on CTCs decreased after RRx-001 was significantly correlated with response to reintroduced platinum-based doublet therapy. Monitoring PD-L1 expression on CTCs during RRx-001 treatment may serve as a biomarker to predict response to RRx-001-based cancer therapy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Entinostat is an oral small molecule inhibitor of class I histone deacetylases (HDAC), which has not previously been evaluated in pediatrics. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of entinostat in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors including central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. METHODS: A rolling six dose escalation design evaluated two dose levels. Entinostat oral tablet formulation was administered once per week, four doses per 28-day cycle. PK and PD studies were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible patients' median (range) age was 14 years (6-20). Six subjects were treated at 3 mg/m2 dose level and 15 were treated in 4 mg/m2 dose level. The study included patients with CNS tumors (n = 12), sarcomas (n = 6), or other solid tumors (n = 3). Eight patients were not fully evaluable for toxicity due to progression of disease prior to receiving the required percentage of protocol therapy. No cycle one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at either dose level. A three-fold higher area under the curve (AUC) was achieved in our cohort compared to adults using a similar dosing schedule. The PD studies showed increase in acetylated lysine in peripheral blood leukocytes at both doses. CONCLUSIONS: Entinostat was well tolerated with no DLT observed. All patients experienced progression within the first two cycles, except one patient with ependymoma with stable disease. Based on PK and PD, the R2PD in pediatric patients with solid tumors is 4 mg/m2 orally administered once weekly.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Benzamides/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Pyridines/adverse effects , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib combined with docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase 1/2 multicentre study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with daily prednisone 10 mg) was combined with escalating doses of daily cabozantinib (20, 40 and 60 mg). Based on the results of the phase 1 study, the investigation was expanded into a randomized study of docetaxel with prednisone (hereafter 'docetaxel/prednisone') plus the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cabozantinib compared with docetaxel/prednisone alone. RESULTS: A total of 44 men with mCRPC were enrolled in this phase 1/2 trial. An MTD of 40 mg cabozantinib plus docetaxel/prednisone was determined. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenic fever and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and there was one death attributable to a thromboembolic event. In addition, grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression, hypophosphataemia and neuropathy were seen in three or more patients. In the phase 1 study, the median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) time were 13.6 and 16.3 months, respectively. In the phase 2 study, which was terminated early because of poor accrual, the median TTP and OS favoured the combination (n = 13) compared to docetaxel/prednisone alone (n = 12; 21.0 vs 6.6 months; P = 0.035 and 23.8 vs 15.6 months; P = 0.072, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite the limited number of patients in this study, preliminary data suggest that cabozantinib can be safely added to docetaxel/prednisone with possible enhanced efficacy.
Subject(s)
Anilides/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anilides/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Docetaxel/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Pyridines/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: In a Phase II study RRx-001 was combined with Etoposide platinum (EP) in previously platinum treated SCLC. We correlated expression of the M2 marker, CD206, on HLA-DRlow/- monocytes, a phenotype that correlates with a poor prognosis, with response to RRx-001. Research design and methods: Patients received 4 mg RRx-001 once weekly until progression followed by the start of EP (etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1-3 of a 21-day cycle and either cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1 or carboplatin AUC 5-6 IV on day 1). Treatment continued until progression or intolerable toxicity. Peripheral blood was collected in Cell Preparation Tubes with sodium citrate from 14 patients for exploratory studies during screening and after therapy on Days 1, 8, and 15. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from blood by centrifugation and multiparameter flow cytometric analysis was performed. Results: CD206 expression on HLA-DRlow/- monocytes was associated with response to chemotherapy and overall survival. Conclusion: During treatment with RRx-001, reduced expression of the protumorigenic M2 marker CD206 on peripheral monocytes positively correlated with increased response and survival.