Revisión sistemática de los métodos predictores de la funcionalidad del trasplante renal / Systematic review of kidney transplantation functional predictors

Contexto: El trasplante renal de donantes con criterios expandidos ha aumentado el pool de riñones a costa de un riesgo superior de disfunción del injerto a corto y/o largo plazo. La cuestión principal reside en determinar qué riñones ofrecerán una función y supervivencia aceptables comparado con el riesgo que supone la cirugía y la posterior inmunosupresión. Objetivo: El objetivo de nuestro artículo es revisar la evidencia actual sobre las herramientas para predecir la funcionalidad del trasplante renal de donantes de cadáver con criterios expandidos y determinar la validez para su uso en la práctica habitual. Adquisición de evidencia: Hemos realizado una revisión sistemática de la literatura según los criterios PRISMA, a través de Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), utilizando las palabras clave, aisladas o conjuntamente: cadaveric renal transplantation; kidney graft function appraisal; graft function predictors. Se seleccionaron series prospectivas y retrospectivas, así como artículos de revisión. Un total de 375 artículos fueron analizados, de los cuales 39 fueron finalmente seleccionados para revisión. Síntesis de evidencia: Entre los predictores de la funcionalidad se encuentran: los índices de riesgo del donante; el cálculo del peso funcional renal o la valoración de la masa nefrónica; la medición de las resistencias vasculares durante la perfusión en hipotermia; la medición de biomarcadores en la orina del donante y en el líquido de perfusión; la medición de parámetros funcionales y de reperfusión en normotermia y la medición de los parámetros morfológicos, micro y macroscópicos, del órgano diana. En este artículo presentamos un resumen explicativo de cada uno de estos parámetros, así como su evidencia más reciente al respeto. Discusión: Ningún parámetro de los revisados fue capaz de predecir por sí mismo, con fiabilidad, la función renal y la supervivencia del trasplante. Existe un importante vacío en cuanto a la valoración macroscópica del trasplante renal. Conclusiones: Es necesario continuar desarrollando los predictores de la funcionalidad renal para definir con precisión la distribución de cada uno de los riñones de los donantes que disponemos en la actualidad

Context: Kidney transplantation from donors with expanded criteria has increased the pool of kidneys at the cost of a higher risk of short and long-term graft dysfunction. The main issue lies in determining which kidneys will offer acceptable function and survival compared with the risk represented by surgery and subsequent immunosuppression. Objective: The objective of our article is to review the current evidence on the tools for predicting the functionality of kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors with expanded criteria and determining the validity for their use in standard practice. Acquisition of evidence: We conducted a systematic literature review according to the PRISM criteria, through Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and using the keywords (in isolation or in conjunction) "cadaveric renal transplantation; kidney graft function appraisal, graft function predictors". We selected prospective and retrospective series and review articles. A total of 375 articles were analysed, 39 of which were ultimately selected for review. Summary of the evidence: The predictors of functionality include the following: The donor risk indices; the calculation of the renal functional weight or the assessment of the nephronic mass; the measurement of vascular resistances during perfusion in hypothermia; the measurement of the donor's biomarkers in urine and in the perfusion liquid; the measurement of functional and reperfusion parameters in normothermia; and the measurement of morphological parameters (microscopic and macroscopic) of the target organ. In this article, we present an explanatory summary of each of these parameters, as well as their most recent evidence on this issue. Discussion: None of the reviewed parameters in isolation could reliably predict renal function and graft survival. There is a significant void in terms of the macroscopic assessment of kidney transplantation. Conclusions: We need to continue developing predictors of renal functionality to accurately define the distribution of each currently available donor kidney

Systematic review of kidney transplantation functional predictors. / Revisión sistemática de los métodos predictores de la funcionalidad del trasplante renal.

CONTEXT: Kidney transplantation from donors with expanded criteria has increased the pool of kidneys at the cost of a higher risk of short and long-term graft dysfunction. The main issue lies in determining which kidneys will offer acceptable function and survival compared with the risk represented by surgery and subsequent immunosuppression. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our article is to review the current evidence on the tools for predicting the functionality of kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors with expanded criteria and determining the validity for their use in standard practice. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: We conducted a systematic literature review according to the PRISM criteria, through Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and using the keywords (in isolation or in conjunction) "cadaveric renal transplantation; kidney graft function appraisal, graft function predictors". We selected prospective and retrospective series and review articles. A total of 375 articles were analysed, 39 of which were ultimately selected for review. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: The predictors of functionality include the following: The donor risk indices; the calculation of the renal functional weight or the assessment of the nephronic mass; the measurement of vascular resistances during perfusion in hypothermia; the measurement of the donor's biomarkers in urine and in the perfusion liquid; the measurement of functional and reperfusion parameters in normothermia; and the measurement of morphological parameters (microscopic and macroscopic) of the target organ. In this article, we present an explanatory summary of each of these parameters, as well as their most recent evidence on this issue. DISCUSSION: None of the reviewed parameters in isolation could reliably predict renal function and graft survival. There is a significant void in terms of the macroscopic assessment of kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We need to continue developing predictors of renal functionality to accurately define the distribution of each currently available donor kidney.

Extensive emphysematous pyelonephritis in a renal allograft: case report and review of literature.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is an acute, severe necrotizing infection of the renal parenchyma and perirenal tissue, which results in the presence of gas within the renal parenchyma, collecting system, or perinephric tissue. EPN of renal allograft is rare, with only 23 cases reported in Western literature. Here, we report a patient treated successfully with surgery. We also review the literature, focusing on old and new suggested classification systems for EPN.

Bone mass behavior after 1 year of different treatment strategies in prostate cancer patients subjected to androgen deprivation therapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mass changes after 1 year of four different types of pharmacological intervention. Ninety-seven prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy, and severe osteopenia or osteoporosis were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided in four groups. Group 1: 28 patients treated with denosumab, Group 2: 24 patients treated with alendronate, Group 3: 24 patients with no antiresorptive treatment and Group 4: 21 patients previously treated with alendronate and switched to denosumab. Dual X-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and after 1 year. Bone mass changes at the L2-L4 lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were evaluated. No differences were found at baseline. After 1 year, men receiving denosumab or alendronate (Group 1 and 2) showed a significant bone mass increase at the lumbar spine (+2.4 and +5.0 %, respectively), while no significant changes were observed in Group 3 and 4. At the femoral neck, Group 1 and 2 patients showed a significant bone mass increase (+3.7 and +3.6 %, respectively), while no significant changes were observed in Group 3 and 4. At the total hip, we observed a significant bone mass increase in Group 1 (+2.9 %) and a significant bone mass loss in Group 3 patients (-1.9 %). No significant changes were observed in Group 2 and 4. Denosumab increased significantly bone mass in all three dual X-ray absorptiometry standard sites, while alendronate did not at total hip. No benefit was observed in men previously treated with alendronate who switched to denosumab treatment.

Cistectomía radical laparoscopica en los tumores vesicales clínicamente localizados. (T2) / Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in clinically localized (T2) bladder tumors

Objetivo: La cistectomía radical laparoscópica se ha desarrollado a partir de la expansión de la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica. Esta técnica permite un abordaje poco invasivo para el tratamiento de los tumores vesicales infiltrantes de la capa muscular con disminución del sangrado y una más rápida recuperación postoperatoria. Métodos: Entre septiembre de 2004 y enero de 2007 se han realizado 54 cistectomías radicales por vía laparoscópica, 48 en estadio T2 y de estas últimas 43 (90%) eran varones y 5 (10%) mujeres. La edad media fue de 64 años (27-88a). La linfadenectomía se practicó por acceso laparoscópico en todos los casos, obteniendo una media de 13 ganglios (4-24). La derivación urinaria se realizó por la incisión de extracción del espécimen en todos los casos menos uno que se realizó completamente intracorpóreo, siendo ureteroileostomía cutánea tipo Bricker en 30 casos (62%), neovejiga ortotópica tipo Padovana en 17 casos (35%) y ureterostomía cutánea en un caso (2%). Resultados: El tiempo quirúrgico medio de todo el procedimiento fue de 287 minutos (180-480), 270 minutos para los casos con derivación tipo Bricker y de 316 para los casos con una neovejiga. El índice de transfusión fue del 25%. El tiempo medio de íleo paralítico fue de 5 días (2-10d) con un tiempo medio de ingreso para los pacientes con Bricker de 13 días (6-34) y de 16 días (8-30) para las neovejigas. El control oncológico, con un seguimiento medio de 10,8 meses (0,4-30m), presenta una supervivencia cáncer específica del 90% con un tiempo medio de supervivencia estimado de 28 meses (IC 95% 26-30). La supervivencia media global ha sido del 79% con un tiempo de supervivencia de 26 meses (IC 95% 23-29). Conclusiones: La cistectomía radical laparoscópica es una técnica factible que ofrece ventajas. Permite una exéresis con un menor sangrado y un postoperatorio más llevadero. Estudios aleatorizados deberían demostrar estas ventajas para confirmar si puede llegar a ser la técnica de elección. La realización de la derivación urinaria por la laparotomía, obligada para la extracción de la pieza quirúrgica, optimiza los resultados de la derivación y el tiempo quirúrgico total sin reducir los beneficios de la exéresis laparoscópica (AU)

Objectives: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy has been developed after the expansion of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. This technique makes possible a minimally invasive approach to muscle-invasive bladder cancer with less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery. Methods: From September 2004 to January 2007, 54 laparoscopic radical cystectomies were performed, 48 of them in stage T2, from which 43 (90%) were male and 5 (10%) female patients. Mean age was 64 years (27-88). Lymphadenectomy was carried out by laparoscopic approach in all cases, with a mean of 13 nodes obtained (4-24). Urinary diversion was done through the incision needed to extract the specimen in all cases but one that was completed completely intracorporeally; constructing a Bricker-type ureteroileostomy in 30 (62%) cases, orthotopic neobladder (Vesica Ileale Padovana) in 17 cases (35%), and cutaneous ureterostomy in 1 case (2%). Results: Mean surgical time for the whole procedure was 287 minutes (180-480), 270 minutes for Bricker-type derivation cases and 316 minutes for neobladder cases. Blood transfusion rate was 25%. Mean ileal paralysis was 5 days (2-10) with a mean hospital stay of 13 days (6-34) for Bricker cases and 16 days (8-30) for neobladder cases. Oncological control, after a mean follow-up of 10,8 months (0,4-30), showed a cancer-specific survival of 90% with a mean survival time of 28 months (95% CI 26-30). Global mean survival was 79% with a mean survival of 26 months (95% CI 23-29). Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a feasible technique that offers some advantages. It allows excision with less blood loss and an easier postoperative period. Randomized studies should demonstrate these advantages to confirm this approach as the technique of choice. Urinary diversion performed through the laparotomy incision, necessary to extract the specimen, optimizes derivation results and whole surgical time without reducing the beneficial effects of the laparoscopic exeresis (AU)

Angiomiolipomas renales: presentación, tratamiento y resultado de 20 casos / Renal angiomyolipoma: presentation, treatment and results of 20 cases

Introducción: Los angiomiolipomas renales son tumores benignos. Ocasionalmente la ruptura espontánea de los mismos puede poner en peligro la vida de los pacientes. Tanto el tratamiento quirúrgico como la embolización arterial selectiva son tratamientos válidos para dichas lesiones. Objetivos: Analizar los casos de angiomiolipomas renales tratados en nuestro centro, la presentación clínica y el tratamiento indicados en cada uno. Material y método: Se revisan de forma retrospectiva 20 pacientes con angiomiolipomas renales tratados durante el período comprendido entre marzo de 1996 y marzo de 2006. Se describen las características de dichos tumores, el tratamiento recibido y los resultados obtenidos. Resultados: Los pacientes afectados de esclerosis tuberosa (20%) presentaban tumores múltiples y bilaterales, aunque de tamaño similar a los del resto de pacientes. El diagnóstico de síndrome de esclerosis tuberosa fue el único factor asociado a la ruptura espontánea de las lesiones. Cuatro de los 9 pacientes embolizados de urgencia presentaron resangrado (44,4%) y 4 del total de los 16 casos embolizados (25%) sufrieron el síndrome post-embolización, sin hallar ningún factor predictor para ninguna de las dos situaciones. Un 58,4% de los tumores embolizados presentaron reducciones del tamaño inferiores a un tercio de linicial, caracterizándose éstos por ser múltiples, bilaterales y de mayor tamaño que el resto. No se hallaron diferencias significativas en los niveles de creatinina plasmática antes y después de cada tratamiento. Conclusiones: Los angiomiolipomas renales parecen comportarse de forma más agresiva en los pacientes con síndrome de esclerosis tuberosa. No hemos hallado factores predictores de resangrado ni del síndrome post-embolización. Tanto la cirugía como la embolización arterial no parecen comprometer la función renal de los pacientes tratados (AU)

Introduction: Renal angiomyolipoma is a benign tumour, but its spontaneous rupture may become threatening for patient’s live. Both surgery and selective arterial embolization are accepted treatments for this lesion. Objectives: Analyze renal angyolipoma treated in our center, their clinical outcome and treatment purposed in each case. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyse 20 cases of patients with renal angiomyolipoma treated in our centre from March 1996 to March 2006. We describe tumour characteristics, treatment followed and results obtained. Results: Patients suffering from tuberous sclerosis (20%) showed multiple bilateral tumours, with size similar to the rest of patients. Diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis was the only factor attached to spontaneous rupture of those lesions. Four of 9 emergency embolized patients (44.4%) required from second treatment because of recurrent haemorrhage, and 4 of the 16 embolization episodes (25%) presented post-embolization syndrome, both with no predicting factors attached. Reduction of less than one third of the inicial diameter was observed in 58.4% of embolized tumours, which used to be multiple, bilateral and of size larger to the rest. No significative differences were observed in plasmatic creatinine after and before treatments. Conclusions: Renal angiomyolipoma may behave in an aggressive way in patients with tuberous sclerosis. No predicting factors of recurrent haemorrhage or post-embolization syndrome were observed. Both surgery and arterial embolization have proved not to compromise renal function in treated patients (AU)

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: learning curve with a mentor training program]. / Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica: la curva de aprendizaje con tutor.

INTRODUCTION: We describe and evaluate the results of our mentor training program for laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy (LRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 2004 through December 2005, we have performed 105 (LRP). Three groups have been analysed: Group 1: The mentor as the first surgeon with the trainee acting as the assistant. Group 2: The trainee as the first surgeon with the mentor acting as the assistant. Group 3: The trainee as the first surgeon with another trainee/resident as the assistant. We have evaluated operative, postoperative data and surgical/oncological control. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in mean operative time in Groups 2 and 3 (200'-198'), but there was a difference from Group 1 (148,4') (p<0,05) we have observed a progressive operative time decrease only in Group 1. Blood loss, surgical-oncological control, pathological stage and hospital stay have been similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Skills for LRP can be effectively and safely taught by the presence of an experienced mentor. Waiting for long term results according to potency and continence, it was not associated to higher patient risk, neither to a worse surgical/oncologic outcome. We consider that this program is reproducible and allows a shorter learning curve.

[Comparison between open and laparoscopic approach in radical prostatectomy]. / Prostatectomia radical laparoscópica versus abierta.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the differences between laparoscopic (LRP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2005 180 Radical prostatectomies (RP) were performed, 105 laparoscopical and 75 by an open approach. Different urologists have acted as first surgeon; 51% of them, fully experienced ones in OPR, and 56% in LRP. Differences in operative time, estimated blood loss (difference of pre and post operative hematocrite), and duration of hospitalization were compared. Additionally, we have also analysed surgical and oncologic control of the specimen defined by the following variables: Malignant margins (MM) (positive margin in a pT3 specimen), and benign/malign surgical incision (BSI/MSI). RESULTS: Groups were similar concerning age, clinical stage and Gleason score, and there are only differences in PSA. Mean operative time was significantly higher in LRP (172 minutes) versus ORP (145 minutes) (p < 0.001). Difference of pre and post operative hematocrite was also higher in the open group (10.7 vs 9.2) (p = 0.03), together with hospital stay, which was one day longer in the ORP group (p = 0.001). ORP group had a higher rate of benign surgical incisions (48.7% vs 26.7%) (p = 0.001). Regarding oncologic results, LRP presented a 5.4% of positive margins, which compared significantly with a 16.9% rate in the open group (p = 0.023). However, no differences concerning malignant surgical incisions were observed. CONCLUSION: With no differences in clinical and pathological stage, LRP offers a significant reduction of surgical aggressiveness on the specimen, together with a better MM control. We also observe a clear decrease in blood loss and hospital stay. Therefore, we conclude that LRP in our environment is a valid approach of surgical prostate cancer treatment in spite of a longer operative time (27 minutes) and a steep learning curve.

Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica: la curva de aprendizaje con tutor / Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: learning curve with a mentor training program

Objetivos: Exponer con detalle el sistema de aprendizaje de la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica (PRL) con tutor llevado a cabo en nuestro centro así como los resultados. Material y métodos: Se realiza el análisis de variables intraquirúrgicas, postoperatorias y del control quirúrgico y oncológico de la pieza, de 105 PRL (marzo 2004-diciembre 2005) según los siguientes grupos: Grupo 1: tutor como primer cirujano y alumno como asistente. Grupo 2 alumno como primer cirujano y el tutor como ayudante. Grupo 3: alumno como primer cirujano y otro alumno/residente como ayudante. Resultados: No se han observado diferencias significativas en cuanto la media de tiempo quirúrgico (TQ) entre el grupo 2 y 3 (188’-170’, p=0,09). Ésta ha sido menor en el Grupo 1 (150’, p<0,05), disminuyendo con el tiempo. La pérdida sanguínea, el control quirúrgico-oncológico, el estadio patológico y el tiempo de estancia hospitalaria han sido similares en los tres grupos. Conclusiones: La presencia de un laparoscopista experto como tutor permite aprender la PRL de manera segura y efectiva. En espera de los resultados funcionales y oncológicos a largo plazo, este sistema de aprendizaje no se asocia ni con un mayor riesgo para el paciente ni con un peor control quirúrgico/oncológico. Consideramos que este método es fácilmente reproducible y permite un acortamiento de la curva de aprendizaje

Material and Methods: From March 2004 through December 2005, we have performed 105 (LRP). Three groups have been analysed: Group 1: The mentor as the first surgeon with the trainee acting as the assistant. Group 2: The trainee as the first surgeon with the mentor acting as the assistant. Group 3: The trainee as the first surgeon with another trainee/resident as the assistant. We have evaluated operative, postoperative data and surgical/oncological control. Results: There was no statistical difference in mean operative time in Groups 2 and 3 (200’-198’), but there was a difference from Group 1 (148,4’) (p<0,05) we have observed a progressive operative time decrease only in Group 1. Blood loss, surgical-oncological control, pathological stage and hospital stay have been similar in the three groups. Conclusions: Skills for LRP can be effectively and safely taught by the presence of an experienced mentor. Waiting for long term results according to potency and continence, it was not associated to higher patient risk, neither to a worse surgical/oncologic outcome. We consider that this program is reproducible and allows a shorter learning curve

Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica versus abierta / Comparison between open and laparoscopic approach in radical prostatectomy

Objetivos. Analizar las diferencias entre la prostatectomía radical abierta (PRA) y la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica (PRL). Material y métodos. Se evalúan 180 cirugías prostáticas radicales realizadas en el 2004 y 2005, de las cuales 105 (58%) fueron laparoscópicas (PRL) y 75 (42%) por vía abierta. Más de la mitad de las intervenciones se realizaron por cirujanos expertos: 51% en las PRL y 56% en las PRA. Se compararon las variables: tiempo quirúrgico, sangrado intraoperatorio (diferencia entre hematocrito prequirúrgico y postquirúrgico) y los días de ingreso. El control oncológico y quirúrgico se evaluaron mediante los parámetros: margen maligno (MM) (margen positivo en un pT3) e incisión quirúrgica benigna (IQB) y maligna (IQM). Resultados. Los dos grupos son comparables respecto a la edad, estadio clínico, Gleason de la biopsia y volumen, sólo difiriendo en el valor de PSA. La media del tiempo quirúrgico fue significativamente mayor en la PRL (172 minutos) versus la PRA (145 minutos). La diferencia del hematocrito fue mayor en la PRA (10,7 puntos) respecto a la PRL (9,2 puntos) (p=0,03), así como los días de ingreso, representando un día más en la PRA (p=0,001). Un 26,7% de las PRL han presentado IQB, frente a un 48,7 % en las PRA (p=0,001). Desde el punto de vista oncológico se han observado un 5,4% de MM en las PRL versus un 16,9% en las PRA. (p=0,023). No obstante, no se han observado diferencias respecto a las IQM. Conclusión. En la PRL, a igualdad de estadio clínico y patológico, se observa un mejor control de los márgenes junto con una menor afectación quirúrgica de la pieza. También existe una menor pérdida sanguínea así como una reducción de los días de ingreso. Por tanto, se puede concluir que la PRL es, en nuestro entorno, una técnica válida para el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata organoconfinado, a pesar de un mayor tiempo quirúrgico (27 minutos) y de la dificultad de su aprendizaje

Introduction. To evaluate the differences between laparoscopic (LRP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Material and Methods. From 2004 to 2005 180 Radical prostatectomies (RP) were performed, 105 laparoscopical and 75 by an open approach. Different urologists have acted as first surgeon; 51% of them, fully experienced ones in OPR, and 56% in LRP. Differences in operative time, estimated blood loss (difference of pre and post operative hematocrite), and duration of hospitalization were compared. Additionally, we have also analysed surgical and oncologic control of the specimen defined by the following variables: Malignant margins (MM) (positive margin in a pT3 specimen), and benign/malign surgical incision (BSI/MSI). Results. Groups were similar concerning age, clinical stage and Gleason score, and there are only differences in PSA. Mean operative time was significantly higher in LRP (172 minutes) versus ORP (145 minutes) (p<0.001). Difference of pre and post operative hematocrite was also higher in the open group (10.7 vs 9,2) (p=0.03), together with hospital stay, which was one day longer in the ORP group (p=0.001). ORP group had a higher rate of benign surgical incisions (48.7% vs 26.7%) (p=0.001). Regarding oncologic results, LRP presented a 5.4 % of positive margins, which compared significantly with a 16.9% rate in the open group (p=0.023). However, no differences concerning malignant surgical incisions were observed. Conclusion. With no differences in clinical and pathological stage, LRP offers a significant reduction of surgical aggressiveness on the specimen, together with a better MM control. We also observe a clear decrease in blood loss and hospital stay. Therefore, we conclude that LRP in our environment is a valid approach of surgical prostate cancer treatment in spite of a longer operative time (27 minutes) and a steep learning curve

[Current status of radical laparoscopic prostatectomy]. / Estado actual de la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica.

Laparoscopic surgery can be said to have come of age when it was first indicated for cancer conditions. Advances in this field are largely due to the French school, which has made it a standard practise in prostate cancer. It complies with the principles required for cancer as well as conventional surgery, but it remains to be verified whether its long-term results, both from tumoral and functional perspectives, are not only similar to those of classical surgery, but even better. In fact, increasing numbers of clinical groups are incorporating this technique in their daily work.

Estado actual de la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica / Current status of radical laparoscopic prostatectomy

La cirugía laparoscópica puede considerarse que ha alcanzado la mayoría de edad al indicarse en la patología oncológica, y debe su desarrollo a las escuelas francesas que sistematizaron su empleo en el cáncer prostático. Cumple los principios que ha de seguir la cirugía oncológica, al igual que la cirugía convencional, pero queda aún por demostrar que los resultados a largo plazo, tanto desde el punto de vista tumoral como el funcional sean mejores que la cirugía clásica. Cada vez son más los grupos que están incorporando estas técnicas a su quehacer diario

Laparoscopic surgery can be said to have come of age when it was first indicated for cancer conditions. Advances in this field are largely due to the French school, which has made it a standard practise in prostate cancer. It complies with the principles required for cancer as well as conventional surgery, but it remains to be verified whether its long-term results, both from tumoral and functional perspectives, are not only similar to those of classical surgery, but even better. In fact, increasing numbers of clinical groups are incorporating this technique in their daily work

[Renal hydatidic cyst simulating hypernephroma]. / Quiste hidatídico renal simulando hipernefroma.

OBJECTIVE: To present a new case of hydatid cyst of the kidney with a difficult radiographic diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe the clinical, diagnosis and treatment of a complex renal mass and its histological confirmation after surgery. Review of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: kidney's hydatidose is an unusual placement of this pathology. It is important to take care in the differential diagnosis in the context of complexes renal masses. There are some diagnosis procedures which can help us to establish it. Surgery is the treatment of choice in the majority of the cases.

Quiste hidatídico renal simulando hipernefroma / Renal hydatidic cyst simulating hypernephroma

Objetivo: Presentar un nuevo caso de quiste hidatídico renal de diagnóstico iconográfico complejo. Material Y Métodos: Se describe la clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento de una masa renal compleja y posterior confirmación histológica tras la exéresis de la misma. Revisión de la literatura. Conclusiones: la hidatidosis renal es una localización infrecuente de esta patología. Es importante tenerla en cuenta a la hora del diagnóstico diferencial en el contexto de masas renales complejas. Existen procedimientos diagnósticos que nos pueden ayudar a confirmarla ante su sospecha. La cirugía es el tratamiento de elección en la mayoría de los casos (AU)

Objective: To present a new case of hydatid cyst of the kidney with a difficult radiographic diagnosis. Material And Methods: We describe the clinical, diagnosis and treatment of a complex renal mass and its histological confirmation after surgery. Review of the literature. Conclusions: kidney´s hydatidose is an unusual placement of this pathology. It is important to takecare in the differential diagnosis in the context of complexes renal masses. There are some diagnosis procedures which can help us to establish it. Surgery is the treatment of choice in the majority of the cases (AU)

[Von Hippel-Lindau disease: atypical presentation]. / Enfermedad de von Hippel-Lindau: una presentación atípica.

OBJECTIVE: To describe an atypical presentation of von Hippel-Lindau disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present the clinical, diagnostic and treatment of the urological signs of this disease, which has overcoat a neurological management, in a young man with familiar history of it. CONCLUSIONS: The basic knowledge of the von Hippel-Lindau disease is important for the urologist because the urological signs of it, are common and they make up one of the most important causes of morbility and mortality.

[Inflammatory pseudotumor of the urinary bladder]. / Pseudotumor inflamatorio vesical.

OBJECTIVE: To present a new case of inflammatory pseudotumor of the urinary bladder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe the clinical, diagnostic and treatment of a new case of inflammatory pseudotumor of the urinary bladder in a 22 years old man without urological history. CONCLUSIONS: The inflammatory pseudotumor of the bladder is a rare benign lesion of unknown etiology. The most important histopathological differential diagnosis to consider is the rabdomyosarcoma. The immunohistochemistry study is basic in the diagnostic, characterization and differentiation of both pathologies. His benign development force us to a conservative management always it is possible.

Enfermedad de Von Hippel-Lindau: una presentación atípica / Von Hippel-Lindau disease: an atypical presentation

OBJETIVO: Describir una presentación atípica de la enfermedad de von Hippel-Lindau. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Presentamos la clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento de las manifestaciones urológicas de esta enfermedad, de índole mayormente neurológica, en un varón joven con antecedentes familiares de la misma. CONCLUSIONES: Es importante para el urólogo el conocimiento básico de la enfermedad de von Hippel-Lindau porque las manifestaciones genitourinarias de ella son frecuentes, y constituyen una de las causas predominantes de morbi-mortalidad (AU)

Pseudotumor inflamatorio vesical / Inflammatory pseudotumor of the urinary bladder

OBJETIVO: Presentar un nuevo caso de pseudotumor inflamatorio vesical. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se describe la clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento de un caso de pseudotumor inflamatorio de localización vesical en un varón de 22 años sin antecedentes urológicos de interés. CONCLUSIONES: El pseudotumor inflamatorio es una lesión benigna poco frecuente y de etiología desconocida. El principal diagnóstico diferencial morfológico es el rabdomiosarcoma vesical. El estudio inmunohistoquímico es fundamental en el diagnóstico, caracterización y diferenciación de ambas patologías. Su carácter benigno obliga a un tratamiento conservador siempre que sea posible (AU)

[Our experience with the implant of single component integrated prostheses (Hydroflex-Dynaflex)]. / Nuestra experiencia en el implante de prótesis integradas de un solo componente (Hydroflex--Dynaflex).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To present our experience with Hydroflex and Dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between october 1988 and december 2000 a total of 63 men underwent implantation of 8 Hydroflex and 55 Dynaflex penile prosthesis. The follow-up period ranged from 12 and 127 months (mean 54.5). RESULTS: A total of 124 cylinders were implanted (in 2 cases only 1 cylinder was implanted). During implantation 3 corpora cavernosun ruptures were present, but implantation was possible in 2. Specific complication rates after implantation were as follow: early infection, 3 patients (4.7%); late infection, 1 patient (1.6%); pain that needed readmission 2 cases (3.2%); mechanical device failure, 7 cylinders in 6 men (mean time 83.5 months). 7 men (11.1%) needed prolonged teaching time to operate the prosthesis. Only 6 men (9.5%) wer dissatisfied with the prosthesis. It was possible to change only 1 cylinder when needed. CONCLUSIONS: Self-contained inflatable prosthesis brings good results on long time use. The mechanical malfunction rate is low and it is possible to change only one cylinder if needed. An important number of patients need intensive and prolonged teaching time to obtain a successful result.