Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Acta Clin Croat ; 61(Suppl 2): 78-83, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36824646

ABSTRACT

Hip and knee replacement surgery are a common and effective procedure for the relief of pain and loss of function. The number of procedures is increasing and great interest is given how to improve outcome following hip and knee replacement surgery. Last two decades have been characterized by many innovations in hip and knee replacement surgery including minimally invasive technique but also by improvements in anesthetic technique and blood management. The patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery are commonly elderly and have cos-existing organ dysfunctions. These procedures are characterized by great perioperative disturbances including cardiovascular complications, high incidence of thromboembolic complications, possible significant perioperative blood loss, possible bone cement effect and high level of postoperative pain. Anesthetic assessment of patients include preoperative preparations, intraoperative and postoperative care. In this article, all problems of perioperative blood management are discussed. The recent data of advantages of blood management for every patient are outlined. Blood management include preoperative preparation, use of autologous blood in perioperative period and administration of drugs for minimizing intraoperative blood loss. The final result of improvements in blood management is reducing in blood loss and need for allogeneic blood and significant reduction in perioperative morbidity.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Blood Transfusion
2.
Acta Clin Croat ; 58(Suppl 1): 108-113, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31741568

ABSTRACT

Anterior section of the hip joint capsule is innervated by femoral nerve and obturator nerve, and posterior section is innervated by the nerve to quadratus femoris muscle and occasionally by the superior gluteal (posterolateral region) and sciatic nerve (posterosuperior region). One of the regional anesthesia options for hip surgery is the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) that affects nerves important for hip innervation and sensory innervation of the thigh - femoral, obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. FICB can be easily performed and is often a good solution for management of hip fractures in emergency departments. Its use reduces morphine pre-operative requirement for patients with femoral neck fractures and can also be indicated for hip arthroplasty, hip arthroscopy and burn management of the region. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a block of the posterior abdominal wall performed exclusively under ultrasound guidance, with still unclarified mechanism of action. When considering hip surgery and postoperative management, the anterior QLB has shown to reduce lengthy hospital stay and opioid use, it improves perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing hip and proximal femoral surgery compared to standard intravenous analgesia regimen, provides early and rapid pain relief and allows early ambulation, thus preventing deep vein thrombosis and thromboembolic complications etc. However, some nerve branches responsible for innervation of the hip joint are not affected by QLB, which has to be taken into consideration. QLB has shown potential for use in hip surgery and perioperative pain management, but still needs to be validated as a reliable treatment approach.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles , Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Fascia , Hip Joint/surgery , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hip Joint/innervation , Humans , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/etiology
3.
Acta Clin Croat ; 55(3): 414-421, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29045105

ABSTRACT

Fondaparinux has been shown to be as effective as low molecular weight heparin in orthopedic surgery, with no cases of heparin induced thrombocytopenia proven until today. The main goal of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to define whether thromboprophylaxis in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) influences clinical parameters in the same manner in patients receiving fondaparinux as in those receiving nadroparin during the first 7 postoperative days. Sixty patients with primary knee osteoarthritis underwent unilateral TKA performed by the same surgeon and were randomized into two groups of 30 patients receiving either fondaparinux or nadroparin thromboprophylaxis. Patients were compared according to the duration of operation, perioperative blood loss, laboratory results and clinical evaluation of the edema during the early postoperative period. No differences were found between the groups in the mean duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss, and most of laboratory results. The level of urea was significantly lower in the nadroparin group on the first and second postoperative day. No cases of heparin induced thrombocytopenia, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were noted during the study. Study results showed both fondaparinux and nadroparin to have the same influence on clinical parameters during the first 7 postoperative days in patients undergoing TKA.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Nadroparin/administration & dosage , Polysaccharides/administration & dosage , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Fondaparinux , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies
4.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 134(5): 631-6, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24676651

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Metamizole use has been limited because of its risk of agranulocytosis. However, more recent literature seems to support its safety. This prospective, randomised, double-blind study was conducted to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous metamizole or intravenous paracetamol in combination with morphine PCA during the first 24 h following total hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ten consecutive patients were selected for study. The two study groups were (A) metamizole, (B) paracetamol. Postoperative pain therapy was provided by Morphine PCA pump. In the first treatment group (A group), all patients received intravenous metamizole 1.5 g every 8 h during the first 24 postoperative hours. In the second treatment group (B group), all patients received intravenous paracetamol 1 g every 8 h during the first 24 postoperative hours. Postoperative pain intensity was measured 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 22 h after the end of surgery by a VAS. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in VAS pain values favoring metamizole were reported at 6-h (p = 0.038), 8-h (p = 0.036), 14-h (p = 0.011), 18-h (p < 0.001) and 22-h (p = 0.025) post-baseline. Mean cumulative pain values were 17.9 for metamizole and 30.6 for paracetamol. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have also shown excellent efficacy of paracetamol and metamizole combined with opioids, but metamizole proved to be a better analgesic than paracetamol. It is also necessary to mention the financial aspect considering that intravenous paracetamol is about ten times more expensive than an equivalent analgesic doses of intravenous metamizole.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Dipyrone/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Aged , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies
5.
Int Orthop ; 38(2): 341-6, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24305788

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: During total knee arthroplasty (TKA) blood loss can be significant and in spite of all techniques for reducing blood loss there is still a significant possibility for blood transfusions. For blood loss management during TKA, pre-operative autologous blood donation (PABD) is still a standard of care. In this prospective randomised study we have evaluated the efficacy of PABD in patients undergoing TKA to answer the question whether there is any need for autologous blood donations during TKA and, if yes, for which group of patients. METHODS: Patients were randomised to three groups. In group 1 patients did not donate autologous blood, in group 2 patients donated 1 dose 72 hours prior to TKA and in group 3 patients donated autologous blood 14 days prior to TKA. In all patients haemoglobin, haematocrit, thrombocyte and reticulocyte values, iron concentrations (Fe, unsaturated iron binding capacity, total iron binding capacity), activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and intra-operative and post-operative blood loss were measured and compared. RESULTS: With PABD there was no reduction in allogeneic blood transfusions and a large number of taken doses of autologous blood was discarded, which significantly increased the cost of treatment for these patients. For patients undergoing TKA, PABD can provoke iatrogenic anaemia and thereby increase the likelihood of the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study showed that PABD in non-anaemic patients is not justified and is not economically feasible.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Blood Donors , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Preoperative Care/methods , Aged , Anemia/epidemiology , Blood Transfusion, Autologous/economics , Blood Transfusion, Autologous/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/economics , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Lijec Vjesn ; 136(9-10): 291-5, 2014.
Article in Croatian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25632774

ABSTRACT

The aim is to show our experience in anesthesia of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) who have undergone orthopedic surgical procedures. This is a retrospective analysis of OI patients treated at our Department from 1980 to 2012. We analyzed demographics, comorbidities, preoperative characteristics, anesthesia types, anesthetics and intraoperative and postoperative complications. In the given period, 26 OI patients were treated, using 103 surgeries, and 103 anesthesia procedures. Most procedures, a total of 68, were used in children aged 0-10 years. According to the diagnosis, OI type III was mostly encountered. The rating of the American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status was II in most cases, a total of 99. General anesthesia was used in 89 cases, and regional anesthesia in 14. Fourteen intraoperative complications were seen, mostly difficult intubation, and six postoperative cardiovascular instability cases. With careful preparation, and knowledge of pitfalls, anesthesia in these patients should be a safe procedure.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Orthopedic Procedures , Osteogenesis Imperfecta , Postoperative Complications , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthetics/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Croatia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/epidemiology , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Acta Med Croatica ; 66(1): 23-7, 2012 Mar.
Article in Croatian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23088082

ABSTRACT

Postoperative delirium or acute confusional state is common after major surgery. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the current knowledge of the risk factors and the importance of anesthetic technique in postoperative delirium. The risk factors for postoperative delirium include patient characteristics such as advanced age, poor preoperative functional state, depression, and abnormal serum levels of sodium, potassium, glucose and albumin. The type of surgery is also important, so delirium is common after high operative stress procedures. Perioperative risk factors also include blood loss, postoperative hematocrit, hypotension and hypoxemia, pain and polypharmacy. Anesthetic technique is a potentially modifiable risk factor. Although administration of many drugs can be avoided or limited with regional anesthetic techniques and reduction in the prevalence of postoperative delirium has been analyzed in many studies, the results are inconsistent. Literature data were analyzed to determine whether type of anesthesia determines the incidence of postoperative delirium. According to PubMed, there are several studies comparing postoperative delirium after regional or general anesthesia. Many of these studies showed a trend toward increased postoperative delirium with general anesthesia, but the difference was not significant. On interpreting these results, it should be taken in consideration that many of these studies were retrospective and nonrandomized with a small number of participants, so further large, multicenter, randomized trials are needed to make any firm conclusion on the influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative delirium. Although the pathophysiology of delirium is not fully understood, it appears that multiple metabolic and neurochemical insults disrupt neuronal functioning in susceptible patients. Prevention and optimal treatment consist of minimizing or correcting these metabolic and other insults. Early detection of coexisting postoperative medical problems, pain, infections, or other complications is crucial. Regional anesthetic techniques have many potential advantages such as reduced stress response and good postoperative analgesia, but further investigations are needed to confirm these observations.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction/adverse effects , Delirium/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Humans
8.
Med Glas (Zenica) ; 9(1): 143-51, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22634929

ABSTRACT

Hip replacement surgery is a common and effective procedure for the relief of pain and loss of function. The number of procedures is increasing and great interest is shown for the manner of outcome improvement following hip replacement surgery. Last decade (2001-2010) is declared as the Bone and Joint Decade and has been characterized by many innovations in hip replacement surgery including minimally invasive technique but also by improvements in anesthetic technique. However there is no consensus about most appropriate anesthetic and analgesic techniques to use. Total hip replacement is procedure characterized by great perioperative disturbances including cardiovascular complications, high incidence of thromboembolic complications, possible significant perioperative blood loss, possible bone cement effect and high level of postoperative pain. Anesthetic assessment of patients include preoperative preparations, intraoperative and postoperative care. Most important factors determining outcome of patients include preoperative assessment and planning in order to minimize potential anesthetic problems, optimize co-morbidity and provide the most appropriate anesthetic for the patient. In this article all problems of preoperative assessment are discussed. The recent data of advantages of regional anesthetic technique are outlined. All the problems of intraoperative course and how to avoid them are presented. The possible techniques of postoperative pain therapy are also presented. The importance of thromboprophylaxis is outlined and recent guidelines for thromboprophylaxis are given including recommendations for new antithrombotic drugs. Our recommendation is to always prepare a patient for this procedure, analyse preoperative status, choose optimal anesthetic technique, provide thromboprophylaxis and multimodal pain therapy according to accepted guidelines.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesia, Conduction , Bone Cements/adverse effects , Cementation , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Preoperative Care , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
9.
Int Orthop ; 36(4): 703-9, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21964703

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of two different dosing regimens of human recombinant erythropoietin (rHu-EPO) for preoperative autologous blood collection in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Prospective randomised trials in which erythropoietin 15,000 IU was administered intravenously twice a week or 30,000 IU once a week (total 90,000 IU) combined with ferrous II sulphate (Ferro-Gradumet 2) orally and compared with Ferro-Gradumet 2 alone. RESULTS: Although different dosing regimens of rHu-EPO administration during preoperative autologous blood donation have similar effects on the collection of two units of autologous blood, preoperative haemoglobin level and perioperative allogenic blood transfusion, a once weekly dose regimen of rHu-EPO was more convenient (although not statistically significantly) for patients. CONCLUSION: We recommend the more practical and comfortable but yet highly effective therapeutic regimen with a single weekly intravenous administration of rHu-EPO for patients scheduled for THA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Blood Transfusion, Autologous/methods , Erythropoietin/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Preoperative Care , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Ferrous Compounds/administration & dosage , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/metabolism , Recombinant Proteins
10.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 39(2): 76-9, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20396680

ABSTRACT

Autotransfusion is widely used after total hip arthroplasty (THA), but there are concerns about damage of red blood cells (RBCs) collected after surgery. In this study, we wanted to determine the damage and survival of RBCs salvaged after cemented THA and after uncemented THA and to compare the results. In this prospective study of 60 patients-30 who underwent cemented THA and 30 who underwent uncemented THA-postoperative autotransfusion systems (BIODREN; B.E.R.C.O., Modena, Italy) were used. Levels of potassium and free hemoglobin in the postoperative blood samples were analyzed. Before transfusion, salvaged RBCs were labeled with radioactive chromium-51, and their survival was measured. In blood salvaged after cemented THA, medium potassium level was 4.1 mmol/L (range, 3.2-5.6 mmol/L), and mean free hemoglobin level was 327 mg% (range, 120-410 mg%). In blood salvaged after uncemented THA, mean potassium level was 4.2 mmol/L (range, 3.1-5.5 mmol/L), and mean free hemoglobin level was 296 mg% (range, 130-402 mg%). In the cemented group, RBC survival was 73% at 48 hours after transfusion (range, 61%-79%), and mean time from 100% activity to 50% activity was 21 days (range, 14.2-28.2 days). In the uncemented group, RBC survival was 75% at 48 hours after transfusion (range, 68%-82%), and mean time from 100% to 50% activity of radio-labeled RBCs was 22 days (range, 16.2-29.4 days). There were no statistically significant differences in potassium levels, free hemoglobin levels, or RBC survival between the cemented and uncemented groups. Blood salvaged after surgery was not significantly damaged. Our study results confirmed that washing blood collected after surgery is not necessary. Not washing this blood is safe and decreases allogeneic transfusion in orthopedic procedures.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Bone Cements/adverse effects , Erythrocyte Aging/drug effects , Hemolysis/drug effects , Polymethacrylic Acids/adverse effects , Blood Cell Count , Blood Loss, Surgical , Cementation , Chromium Radioisotopes , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hemolysis/physiology , Humans , Prospective Studies
11.
Coll Antropol ; 32(1): 153-60, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18494201

ABSTRACT

Several methods have been found to be successful in reducing the need for allogeneic transfusion among the patients undergoing total hip replacement. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyse the quality and evaluate the effect of postoperative autotransfusion on the need for allogeneic transfusion following total hip replacement. The prospective study was performed in two groups of patients undergoing total hip replacement. Before the operative procedure all patients in both groups predonated two doses of autologous blood. In GROUP 1. the system for postoperative collection and transfusion of shed blood was used. In GROUP 2. the patients underwent total hip replacement without blood salvage system. Standard suction collection sets were used postoperatively. In this group shed blood was not transfused to the patients. The samples of preoperative donated autologus blood, allogeneic blood and postoperative collected autologous blood were analysed for number of red cells, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, white blood cells, values of potassium, sodium, free hemoglobin and acid base status. The postoperatively blood salvage significantly reduced the use of allogeneic transfusion among patients managed with total hip replacement (allogeneic transfusion received 12% patients in Group 1 and 80% patients in Group 2; p<0.001). The values of red blood cells are significantly lower in postoperative collected autotransfusion blood compared with preoperative collected autologous blood and allogeneic blood (p<0.001). The values of potassium and acid base status were in normal range in postoperatively collected autotransfusion blood. These values in preoperatively collected autologous blood and allogeneic blood were out of normal range; (p<0.001). In addition to reducing the risk of complications that are associated with allogeneic transfusion, postoperative blood salvage may offer benefits including reducing the need for allogeneic blood. Our study confirmed that postoperative collection and transfusion of drainaged blood is simple and safe method that significantly reduce the need for allogeneic transfusion in patients underwent total hip replacement. The blood collected and transfused postoperatively has lower values of red blood cells and normal values of potassium and acid base balance. The transfusion of this blood caused no complications in our patients.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Blood Cell Count , Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Aged , Blood Transfusion , Female , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Male , Potassium/blood , Sodium/blood
12.
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat ; 16(1): 8-12, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18358102

ABSTRACT

Brachial plexus block using axillary approach is a simple and safe method of regional anesthesia often used for elbow, forearm and hand surgery. Different techniques can be used to achieve brachial plexus block. On using perivascular approach to brachial plexus, we neither searched for paresthesia nor used nerve stimulator to identify the correct needle position within the neurovascular sheet. Axillary artery was palpated and a mixture of local anesthetic agents was injected into the neurovascular sheet above and below axillary artery at the site of strongest artery pulsation. The local anesthetic solution comprised equal volumes of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% without adrenaline, in a total volume of 30-40 mL, depending on body mass. This technique is used in more than 150 patients per year at our department. In the present study, 158 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery under brachial plexus block were retrospectively assessed. Successful anesthesia was achieved in 135 (85.0%) patients using brachial plexus block alone, 19 (12.5%) patients required additional medication, two patients required supplementation with intravenous regional anesthesia, and another two patients required general anesthesia. The incidence of successful blocks, latency time of onset, local and systemic complications or allergic skin reactions were investigated. There were no significant complications attributed to the anesthetic technique.


Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus , Nerve Block/methods , Upper Extremity/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Axilla/blood supply , Axilla/innervation , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
13.
Lijec Vjesn ; 129(6-7): 186-90, 2007.
Article in Croatian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18018708

ABSTRACT

Preoperative donation of blood for autologous transfusion has become a routine practice for patients who are scheduled to have an ortopaedic procedure. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative autologous donation on reduction of allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. Data of 289 patients who had had a revision total hip arthroplasty during sixty-six-month period were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and thirty-eight patients donated 1 or two units of autologous blood (47.8%), and 151 patients (52.2%) did not. Preoperative autologous blood reduced allogeneic blood transfusion in patients who had a revision of femoral component only or revision of acetabular component only. Two predonated autologous units and basic hemoglobin level >150 g/L reduced allogeneic blood transfusion in patients who had revision of acetabular and femoral component. All patients who had revision of acetabular and femoral component and had basic hemoglobin level <120 g/L, required additional allogeneic blood transfusion despite predonation blood.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Transfusion , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation
14.
Scand J Urol Nephrol ; 39(4): 334-6, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16118110

ABSTRACT

An exceedingly rare case of a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta and prostate cancer is reported. The patient underwent radical prostatectomy, which had to be stopped due to the extremely narrow space for surgical manipulation. The clinical, diagnostic and operative peculiarities of the case are presented and the relevant literature reviewed.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/complications , Pelvis/abnormalities , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Abnormalities/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL