A novel peanut allergy immunotherapy: Plant-based enveloped Ara h 2 Bioparticles activate dendritic cells and polarize T cell responses to Th1.

Introduction: As the only market-authorized allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for peanut allergy is accompanied by a high risk of side effects and mainly induces robust desensitization without sustained efficacy, novel treatment options are required. Peanut-specific plant-derived eBioparticles (eBPs) surface expressing Ara h 2 at high density have been shown to be very hypoallergenic. Here, we assessed the dendritic cell (DC)-activating and T cell polarization capacity of these peanut-specific eBPs. Methods: Route and kinetics of eBP uptake were studied by (imaging) flow cytometry using monocyte-derived DCs incubated with fluorescently-labelled Ara h 2 eBPs or natural Ara h 2 (nAra h 2) in the presence or absence of inhibitors that block pathways involved in macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and/or receptor-mediated uptake. DC activation was monitored by flow cytometry (maturation marker expression) and ELISA (cytokine production). T cell polarization was assessed by co-culturing DCs exposed to Ara h 2 eBPs or nAra h 2 with naïve CD4+ T cells, followed by flow cytometry assessment of intracellular IFNγ+ (Th1) and IL-13+ (Th2), and CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). The suppressive activity of Tregs was tested using a suppressor assay. Results: Ara h 2 eBPs were taken up by DCs through actin-dependent pathways. They activated DCs demonstrated by an induced expression of CD83 and CD86, and production of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-10. eBP-treated DCs polarized naïve CD4+ T cells towards Th1 cells, while reducing Th2 cell development. Furthermore, eBP-treated DCs induced reduced the frequency of Foxp3+ Tregs but did not significantly affect T cell IL-10 production or T cells with suppressive capacity. In contrast, DC activation and Th1 cell polarization were not observed for nAra h 2. Conclusion: Ara h 2 eBPs activate DCs that subsequently promote Th1 cell polarization and reduce Th2 cell polarization. These characteristics mark Ara h 2 eBPs as a promising novel candidate for peanut AIT.

Design, production and immunomodulatory potency of a novel allergen bioparticle.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment with evidence for sustained efficacy. However, it is poorly developed compared to symptomatic drugs. The main reasons come from treatment duration implying monthly injections during 3 to 5 years or daily sublingual use, and the risk of allergic side-effects. To become a more attractive alternative to lifelong symptomatic drug use, improvements to AIT are needed. Among the most promising new immunotherapy strategies is the use of bioparticles for the presentation of target antigen to the immune system as they can elicit strong T cell and B cell immune responses. Virus-like particles (VLPs) are a specific class of bioparticles in which the structural and immunogenic constituents are from viral origin. However, VLPs are ill-suited for use in AIT as their antigenicity is linked to structure. Recently, synthetic biology has been used to produce artificial modular bioparticles, in which supramolecular assemblies are made of elements from heterogeneous biological sources promoting the design and use of in vivo-assembling enveloped bioparticles for viral and non-viral antigens presentation. We have used a coiled-coil hybrid assembly for the design of an enveloped bioparticle (eBP) that present trimers of the Der p 2 allergen at its surface, This bioparticle was produced as recombinant and in vivo assembled eBPs in plant. This allergen biotherapeutic was used to demonstrate i) the capacity of plants to produce synthetic supramolecular allergen bioparticles, and ii) the immunomodulatory potential of naturally-assembled allergen bioparticles. Our results show that allergens exposed on eBPs induced a very strong IgG response consisting predominantly of IgG2a in favor of the TH1 response. Finally, our results demonstrate that rDer p 2 present on the surface of BPs show a very limited potential to stimulate the basophil degranulation of patient allergic to this allergen which is predictive of a high safety potential.

Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The sublingual mucosa has been used for many years to apply allergenic extracts for the purpose of specific immunotherapy (IT). Although sublingual IT (SLIT) is both safe and efficacious, the density of antigen-presenting cells is higher in other regions of the oral cavity and vestibule, which make them a potentially desirable target for IT. OBJECTIVE: To present the concept of oral mucosal IT (OMIT) and to provide pilot data for this extended application of SLIT. METHODS: An open-label, 12-month, prospective study was undertaken as a preliminary step before a full-scale clinical investigation. Twenty-four individuals with allergic rhinitis received IT by applying allergenic extracts daily to either the oral vestibule plus oral cavity mucosa by using a glycerin-based toothpaste or to the sublingual mucosa by using 50% glycerin liquid drops. Adverse events, adherence rates, total combined scores, rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire scores, changes in skin reactivity, and changes in serum antibody levels were measured for each participant. RESULTS: No severe adverse events occurred in either group. The adherence rate was 80% for the OMIT group and 62% for the SLIT group (p = 0.61). Decreased total combined scores were demonstrated for both the OMIT group (15.6%) and the SLIT group (22.3%), although this decrease did not reach statistical significance in either group. Both groups achieved a meaningful clinical improvement of at least 0.5 points on rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire. A statistically significant rise in specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) was seen in both groups over the first 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: OMIT and SLIT demonstrated similar safety profiles and adherence rates. Measurements of clinical efficacy improved for both groups, but only changes in IgG4 achieved statistical significance. These pilot data provide enough evidence to proceed with a full-scale investigation to explore the role of OMIT in the long-term management of allergic rhinitis.

Dosing of sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: evidence-based review with recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Since the mid 1980s, the clinical use of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has dramatically increased. However, 1 of the primary barriers to providing SLIT is lack of a published dosing recommendations. The purpose of this work is to provide a range of effective SLIT dosing based upon a rigorous review of the existing evidence base. An appendix with SLIT dosing recommendations is also included. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the past 25 years of the medical literature using PubMed was performed for specific antigens. Inclusion criteria for articles included: randomized, placebo-controlled studies of SLIT, studies with clinical allergic rhinitis outcomes, and dosing units available to determine the micrograms per month of major allergen administered. The extracted data was used to compile a range of effective SLIT dosing for individual antigens. RESULTS: Seventy-five articles met the inclusion criteria, providing a range of effective dosing for some allergens. There was commonly a wide range in doses for particular antigens between the individual studies. For some antigens, there was significant overlap in dosage amount between studies showing efficacy and lack of efficacy. Clinical trials meeting inclusion criteria are not available for many allergens. CONCLUSION: This study provided a comprehensive review of the published sublingual dosing ranges for specific antigens. The review provided a range of effective sublingual doses for some allergens, whereas for other allergens there was insufficient published data to determine specific doses. Recommendations for SLIT dosing were produced based on the data revealed in the review and expert opinion.