Induced overexpression of OCT4A in human embryonic stem cells increases cloning efficiency.

Our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying human embryonic stem cell (hESC) self-renewal and differentiation is incomplete. The level of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4), a critical regulator of pluripotency, is precisely controlled in mouse embryonic stem cells. However, studies of human OCT4 are often confounded by the presence of three isoforms and six expressed pseudogenes, which has complicated the interpretation of results. Using an inducible lentiviral overexpression and knockdown system to manipulate OCT4A above or below physiological levels, we specifically examine the functional role of the OCT4A isoform in hESC. (We also designed and generated a comparable series of vectors, which were not functional, for the overexpression and knockdown of OCT4B.) We show that specific knockdown of OCT4A results in hESC differentiation, as indicated by morphology changes, cell surface antigen expression, and upregulation of ectodermal genes. In contrast, inducible overexpression of OCT4A in hESC leads to a transient instability of the hESC phenotype, as indicated by changes in morphology, cell surface antigen expression, and transcriptional profile, that returns to baseline within 5 days. Interestingly, sustained expression of OCT4A past 5 days enhances hESC cloning efficiency, suggesting that higher levels of OCT4A can support self-renewal. Overall, our results indicate that high levels of OCT4A increase hESC cloning efficiency and do not induce differentiation (whereas OCT4B expression cannot be induced in hESC), highlighting the importance of isoform-specific studies in a stable and inducible expression system for human OCT4. Additionally, we demonstrate the utility of an efficient method for conditional gene expression in hESC.

Molecular characterization of the human NANOG protein.

NANOG is a key transcriptional regulator of pluripotent stem cell (PSC) self-renewal. NANOG occupies promoters that are active and others that are repressed during self-renewal; however, the mechanisms by which NANOG regulates transcriptional repression and activation are unknown. We hypothesized that individual protein domains of NANOG control its interactions with both the promoters and its coregulators. We performed a detailed characterization of the functional domains in the human (h) NANOG protein, using a panel of deletion-mutant and point-mutant constructs. We determined that six amino acids in the homeodomain ((136)YKQVKT(141)) are sufficient for the nuclear localization of hNANOG. We also determined that the tryptophan-rich region (W) of hNANOG contains a CRM1-independent signal for nuclear export, suggesting a possible cellular shuttling behavior that has not been reported for hNANOG. We also show that at least four tryptophans are required for nuclear export. We also determined that similar to murine (m) NANOG, the W region of hNANOG contains a homodimerization domain. Finally, in vitro transactivation analyses identified distinct regions that enhance or diminish activity at gene promoters that are active during self-renewal. Specifically, the N-terminal region interferes with transcription and removal of this region that produced a "super-active" hNANOG with enhanced transcriptional activity. We also confirmed that the transcriptional activator in hNANOG is contained in the C-terminal region, similar to murine NANOG. In summary, this study has characterized the structure and function of hNANOG protein leading to an increased understanding of the mechanism by which hNANOG regulates both transcriptional activation and repression during PSC self-renewal.

Detection of chromosomal instability in paired breast surgery and ductal lavage specimens by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.

PURPOSE: Ductal lavage is a new modality for collecting exfoliated breast cells with the goal of detecting early neoplasia. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the correlation between cancer-associated abnormalities in breast lesions and exfoliated breast cells collected by ductal lavage. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed histopathologic, cytologic, and molecular cytogenetic analyses on 39 paired cases of surgically excised breast lesions and ductal lavage specimens collected immediately before surgery. RESULTS: Abnormal cytology was detected in 7 of 15 (47%) of the evaluable lavages collected from malignant cases, versus 4 of 19 (21%) of the evaluable lavages harvested from benign cases for a sensitivity and specificity of 47 and 79%, respectively. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of all evaluable lavages revealed numeric changes on chromosomes 1, 8, 11, and/or 17 in 10 of 14 (71%) specimens from malignant cases versus 2 of 18 (11%) from benign cases for a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that cytologic and genetic abnormalities associated with breast cancer progression can be detected in ductal lavage cells collected from women with in situ and invasive breast cancer and suggests that fluorescence in situ hybridization may have superior sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional cytology.

Immunocytochemical analysis of breast cells obtained by ductal lavage.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal breast fluids containing exfoliated mammary epithelial cells can be harvested from the breast by ductal lavage to screen for disease-associated cytologic abnormalities. In addition to epithelial cells, breast fluids contain large numbers of mammary foam cells, and the tissue of origin of these foam cells has been the subject of controversy for many years. Immunocytochemical, morphologic, and molecular studies variously have supported a mammary epithelial origin versus a histiocytic origin for this cell type. In the current study, the authors performed immunocytochemical analysis with epithelial specific and macrophage specific antibodies to characterize and quantify breast cells obtained by ductal lavage. METHODS: Breast fluids were harvested from 19 individual breast ducts in 15 female patients by ductal lavage. Cells from each specimen were processed for immunocytochemical staining using the AE1/AE3 multicytokeratin and CD68 (clone KP1) monoclonal antibodies. Cells were classified as mammary epithelial cells or mammary foam cells on the basis of morphologic criteria, and the cells were counted and evaluated for immunoreactivity with epithelial specific and macrophage specific antibodies. RESULTS: The CD68 macrophage specific antibody stained all ductal lavage cells that exhibited foam cell morphology. The AE1/AE3 multicytokeratin antibody demonstrated strong, positive staining of cells that exhibited epithelial morphology but failed to demonstrate significant staining of mammary foam cells. The lavage specimens contained a range of 3040-278,850 epithelial cells and 2230-90,480 foam cells. The median numbers of epithelial cells and foam cells per lavage sample were 15,680 and 29,200, respectively. The ratio of epithelial cells to foam cells varied among specimens ranging from 3.4 to 0.09 (median, 0.8). Seven of 19 lavage specimens contained more epithelial cells than foam cells, whereas 12 samples contained a greater proportion of foam cells. CONCLUSIONS: Immunocytochemical analysis using the AE1/AE3 multicytokeratin and CD68 antibodies supports a histiocytic origin for the majority of mammary foam cells harvested from the ductal system of the human breast by ductal lavage. Although mammary foam cells constitute a significant proportion of the cellular population obtained by ductal lavage, thousands of epithelial cells also are harvested.