Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-central Thoracic Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultracentral thoracic tumors at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with ultracentral lung tumors or nodes, defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus, treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All SBRT plans were generated with the goal of creating homogenous dose distributions. The primary endpoint was incidence of SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicity, defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V5.0). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and identify predictors of severe toxicity and LF, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients receiving 162 ultracentral courses of SBRT were included. The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%), with doses ranging from 30 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range, 48-115 Gy). The incidence of severe toxicity was 9.4% at 3 years. The most common severe toxicity was pneumonitis (n = 4). There was 1 possible treatment-related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of severe toxicity included increased PTV size, decreased PTV V95%, lung V5 Gy, and lung V20 Gy. The incidence of LF was 14% at 3 years. Predictors of LF included younger age and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. The median PFS was 8.8 months, while the median overall survival was 44.0 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest case series of ultracentral thoracic SBRT to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT was associated with relatively low rates of severe toxicity and LF. Predictors of toxicity should be interpreted in the context of the heterogeneity in toxicities observed.

Unanticipated Radiation Replanning for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with unanticipated radiation therapy (RT) replanning in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and Materials: Patients from a single institution with newly diagnosed stage III NSCLC treated with radical RT from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. The frequency and reasons for replanning were determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with replanning. Results: Of 144 patients included in this study, 11% (n = 16) required replanning after the start of RT. The reason for replanning in these 16 patients was changes in the target detected by cone beam computed tomography (shift in 10 patients, shrinkage in 5 patients, and growth in 1 patient). Larger planning target volume (primary and nodal) was statistically predictive of replanning (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4; P = .02). The actuarial median overall survival was 33.3 months (95% CI, 10.3-43.9) for the 16 patients who were replanned and 36.3 months (95% CI, 27.4-66.5) for the remaining 128 patients (P = .96). The median time to local recurrence was 25.0 months (95% CI, 10.3-41.3) for those patients who underwent replanning, which was similar to those patients who did not undergo replanning (19.5 months; 95% CI, 11.8-23.2; P = .28). Conclusions: In this study, 11% of patients treated with radical RT for NSCLC required replanning due to changes in the target detected by cone beam computed tomography. A larger planning target volume predicts a higher likelihood of requiring adaptive RT. Overall survival and local control were similar between patients who were replanned compared with those who were not replanned.

Optimizing surface mould brachytherapy for treatment of nasal basal cell carcinoma using customized applicators.

PURPOSE: Surface mould brachytherapy (SMBT) is ideal in treating superficial skin cancer over the curved surface of the nasal ala. We describe the process of initiating and optimizing SMBT treatment at our institution including clinical workflow, generation of three dimensional (3D) printed custom applicators, and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Planning CT scans were used to acquire images for delineating target volumes. The applicator was designed with customized catheter positioning (3-5mm from target) to cover target volume while sparing dose to organs at risk (OAR) such as adjacent skin and nasal mucosa. Applicators were 3D printed, with transparent resin to aid visualization of underlying skin. Dosimetric parameters evaluated included CTV D90, CTV D0.1cc, and D2cc to OARs. Clinical outcomes assessed were local control, acute and late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 [CTCAEv5.0]), and cosmesis (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG]). RESULTS: Ten patients were treated with SMBT with a median followup of 17.8 months. Dose prescription was 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions. Mean CTV D90 was 38.5 Gy (range 34.7-40.6), mean CTV D0.1cc 49.2 Gy (range 45.6-53.5), which was <140% of the prescription dose in all patients. Treatment was well tolerated, with acceptable Grade 2 acute, Grade 0-1 late skin toxicity, and good-excellent cosmesis for all patients. Two patients experienced local failure, and both underwent surgical salvage. CONCLUSIONS: SMBT was successfully planned and delivered for superficial nasal BCC using 3D printed custom applicators. Excellent target coverage was achieved while minimizing dose to OAR. Toxicity and cosmesis rates were good-excellent.

Detection of solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules with lung MRI: performance of UTE, T1 gradient-echo, and single-shot T2 fast spin echo.

BACKGROUND: Although MRI is a radiation-free imaging modality, it has historically been limited in lung imaging due to inherent technical restrictions. The aim of this study is to explore the performance of lung MRI in detecting solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules using T1 gradient-echo (GRE) (VIBE, Volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination), ultrashort time echo (UTE) and T2 Fast Spin Echo (HASTE, Half fourier Single-shot Turbo spin-Echo). METHODS: Patients underwent a lung MRI in a 3 T scanner as part of a prospective research project. A baseline Chest CT was obtained as part of their standard of care. Nodules were identified and measured on the baseline CT and categorized according to their density (solid and subsolid) and size (> 4 mm/ ≤ 4 mm). Nodules seen on the baseline CT were classified as present or absent on the different MRI sequences by two thoracic radiologists independently. Interobserver agreement was determined using the simple Kappa coefficient. Paired differences were compared using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests. The McNemar test was used to evaluate paired differences in nodule detection between MRI sequences. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were prospectively enrolled. One hundred forty-nine nodules (100 solid/49 subsolid) with mean size 10.8 mm (SD = 9.4) were included in the analysis. There was substantial interobserver agreement (k = 0.7, p = 0.05). Detection for all nodules, solid and subsolid nodules was respectively; UTE: 71.8%/71.0%/73.5%; VIBE: 61.6%/65%/55.1%; HASTE 72.4%/72.2%/72.7%. Detection rate was higher for nodules > 4 mm in all groups: UTE 90.2%/93.4%/85.4%, VIBE 78.4%/88.5%/63.4%, HASTE 89.4%/93.8%/83.8%. Detection of lesions ≤4 mm was low for all sequences. UTE and HASTE performed significantly better than VIBE for detection of all nodules and subsolid nodules (diff = 18.4 and 17.6%, p = < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). There was no significant difference between UTE and HASTE. There were no significant differences amongst MRI sequences for solid nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Lung MRI shows adequate performance for the detection of solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules larger than 4 mm and can serve as a promising radiation-free alternative to CT.

Toxicity and Efficacy of Multitarget Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: With the increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary and metastatic cancer, use of multitarget thoracic (MTT) SBRT is rising. Given the limited safety and efficacy data, we report the experience of this strategy from a large academic center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2012 and 2021, patients who received SBRT for ≥2 thoracic targets separated by ≤1 year were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was clinically significant radiation pneumonitis (CSRP) requiring steroids, oxygen, or intubation. Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), initiation or change of systemic therapy (ICST), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of CSRP, LF, and ICST. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to look for clinical and dosimetric predictive factors of CSRP and LF. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients (481 lesions) were treated with MTT SBRT with a median follow-up of 19.7 months. Indications for SBRT were oligometastases (n = 70; 36.8%), oligoprogression (n = 62; 32.6%), curative intent in patients with primary lung cancer (n = 37; 19.5%), and control of dominant areas of metastatic progression (n = 21; 11.0%). The number of irradiated tumors ranged from 2 to 7 and the majority of SBRT courses were delivered simultaneously (88.2%). Overall, 14 patients (7.4%) had CSRP, with 5 cases requiring oxygen. The cumulative incidence of CSRP at 6 and 12 months was 5.3% and 7.6%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of LF at 2 years was 10.5%. The cumulative incidence of ICST at 2 years was 41.1%. Median progression-free survival was 11.8 months and median overall survival was 51.3 months. On multivariable analysis, a higher lung V35Gy (hazard ratio, 2.59; P = .02) was a statistically significant predictor of CSRP and colorectal histology predicted for higher LF (hazard ratio, 2.12; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In one of the largest institutional series of MTT SBRT, rates of CSRP and LF were low. Optimizing plans to lower the lung V35Gy may decrease the risk of CSRP.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Node Metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to metastatic mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (MHL) is challenging owing to the proximity of centrally located organs-at-risk. As limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of SBRT for MHL, a retrospective review of clinical outcomes was conducted from a large academic center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients received SBRT to MHL between 2014 to 2019 for the following indications: oligometastases, oligoprogression, or local control of a dominant area of progression. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0). The cumulative incidence function evaluated local failure (LF) and starting or changing systemic therapy (SCST). Kaplan-Meier methodology estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (84 metastases) were included. Median follow-up was 20 months. Primary cancer sites included kidney (53.8%), lung (13.4%), breast (7.7%), and other (25.1%). Indications for SBRT were oligoprogression (n = 35; 67.3%), oligometastases (n = 10; 19.2%), or local failure of a dominant area of progression (n = 7; 13.5%). The majority (n = 31; 59.6%) received SBRT to a single lymph node metastasis. Median SBRT dose was 35 Gy (range, 30-50 Gy) with a median biologically effective dose of 59.5 Gy (range, 48-100 Gy). All treatments were in 5 fractions. Seven grade ≥3 toxicities were experienced by 6 patients (11.5%) and were mostly transient (5/7; 71%). There was a single (1.9%) grade 5 toxicity (radiation pneumonitis). The cumulative incidence of LF was 9.0% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of SCST was 33.2% and 57.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval, 2.8-7.3) and median OS was 31.7 months (95% confidence interval, 23.8-87.5). CONCLUSIONS: In one of the largest single institutional series of SBRT for MHL, moderate rates of grade ≥3 toxicity were observed, although the majority were transient. This treatment resulted in low LF rates and potentially delayed SCST for many patients.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for malignant mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) safety and efficacy for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (MHL) is not yet established, given its potential for toxicity due to the proximity to esophagus and proximal bronchial tree (PBT). This review summarized current reported outcomes of MHL SABR. METHODS: This systematic review, based on the PRISMA guidelines, was performed using MEDLINE® (PubMed®), EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 2018. Studies reporting outcomes from SABR specifically for MHL from all primary malignancies were included. Non- English studies, guidelines, reviews, non-peer reviewed correspondences were excluded. Only the most recent publication and/or largest cohort from a single institution would be included for analysis. RESULTS: From the 222 studies identified, 4 retrospective studies totaling 196 patients were included in the analysis. One study included a small number of patients receiving non-ablative doses of stereotactic radiotherapy (RT). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common primary (65%), followed by breast (8%). Median follow-up ranged between 12 and 32 months. Reported dose and fractionation ranged from 21 to 60 Gy in 3-11 fractions, with median BED10 ranged from 46-106 Gy10. Three studies reported local control (LC) rates: study 1, 97% (1-year) and 77% (5-year); study 4, 88% (2-year); and study 2, 69% (6-month) and 66% (16-month). Pooled grade 3-5 toxicity rate according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 was 6% (n=11). Pooled SABR-related mortality (grade 5 toxicity) rate was 2% (n=4). Three SABR-related deaths from esophageal fistulae (2 to trachea, 1 to mediastinum) were reported, with all 3 having prior RT to the subcarinal nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggested SABR for MHL to be feasible and effective, though there is a potential for serious toxicity especially in the re-irradiation scenario. Multi-institutional and/or prospective studies will help determine the therapeutic benefit of SABR in this high-risk treatment scenario.

External beam radiation dose escalation for high grade glioma.

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 8, 2016. High grade glioma (HGG) is a rapidly growing brain tumour in the supporting cells of the nervous system, with several subtypes such as glioblastoma (grade IV astrocytoma), anaplastic (grade III) astrocytoma and anaplastic (grade III) oligodendroglioma. Studies have investigated the best strategy to give radiation to people with HGG. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy involves giving a daily radiation dose (called a fraction) of 180 cGy to 200 cGy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy uses higher daily doses, which reduces the overall number of fractions and treatment time. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy which uses a lower daily dose with a greater number of fractions and multiple fractions per day to deliver a total dose at least equivalent to external beam daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the same time frame. The aim is to reduce the potential for late toxicity. Accelerated radiotherapy (dose escalation) refers to the delivery of multiple fractions per day using daily doses of radiation consistent with external beam daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy doses. The aim is to reduce the overall treatment time; typically, two or three fractions per day may be delivered with a six to eight hour gap between fractions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of postoperative external beam radiation dose escalation in adults with HGG. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid to August 2019 for relevant randomised phase III trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included adults with a pathological diagnosis of HGG randomised to the following external beam radiation regimens: daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy; hypofractionated radiotherapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy; hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy or accelerated radiotherapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcomes were overall survival and adverse effects. The secondary outcomes were progression free survival and quality of life. We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Since the last version of this review, we identified no new relevant trials for inclusion. We included 11 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 2062 participants and 1537 in the relevant arms for this review. There was an overall survival benefit for people with HGG receiving postoperative radiotherapy compared to the participants receiving postoperative supportive care. For the four pooled RCTs (397 participants), the overall hazard ratio (HR) for survival was 2.01 favouring postoperative radiotherapy (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58 to 2.55; P < 0.00001; moderate-certainty evidence). Although these trials may not have completely reported adverse effects, they did not note any significant toxicity attributable to radiation. Progression free survival and quality of life could not be pooled due to lack of data. Overall survival was similar between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy in five trials (943 participants), where the HR was 0.95 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.17; P = 0.63; very low-certainty evidence. The trials reported that hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy were well tolerated with mild acute adverse effects. These trials only reported one participant in the hypofractionated arm developing symptomatic radiation necrosis that required surgery. Progression free survival and quality of life could not be pooled due to the lack of data. Overall survival was similar between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy in the subset of two trials (293 participants) which included participants aged 60 years and older with glioblastoma. For this category, the HR was 1.16 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.46; P = 0.21; high-certainty evidence). There were two trials which compared hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiation and one trial which compared accelerated radiotherapy versus conventional radiation. However, the results could not be pooled. The conventionally fractionated radiotherapy regimens were 4500 cGy to 6000 cGy given in 180 cGy to 200 cGy daily fractions, over five to six weeks. All trials generally included participants with World Health Organization (WHO) performance status from 0 to 2 and Karnofsky performance status of 50 and higher. The risk of selection bias was generally low among these RCTs. The number of participants lost to follow-up for the outcome of overall survival was low. Attrition, performance, detection and reporting bias for the outcome of overall survival was low. There was unclear attrition, performance, detection and reporting bias relating to the outcomes of adverse effects, progression free survival and quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative conventional daily radiotherapy probably improves survival for adults with good performance status and HGG compared to no postoperative radiotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has similar efficacy for survival compared to conventional radiotherapy, particularly for individuals aged 60 years and older with glioblastoma. There are insufficient data regarding hyperfractionation versus conventionally fractionated radiation (without chemotherapy) and for accelerated radiation versus conventionally fractionated radiation (without chemotherapy). There are HGG subsets who have poor prognosis even with treatment (e.g. glioblastoma histology, older age and poor performance status). These HGG individuals with poor prognosis have generally been excluded from randomised trials based on poor performance status. No randomised trial has compared comfort measures or best supportive care with an active intervention using radiotherapy or chemotherapy in these people with poor prognosis. Since the last version of this review, we found no new relevant studies. The search identified three new trials, but all were excluded as none had a conventionally fractionated radiotherapy arm.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment modality for selected patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objectives of this systematic review were to explore the benefits and risks of SBRT for extracranial oligometastatic NSCLC. The MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases were searched for relevant articles from January 1, 2000 to July 23, 2019. Fully published phase III or phase II trials of any sample size were included. Retrospective series published in manuscript form with at least 50 patients were also included. Four prospective phase II randomized trials (total, 188 participants), 4 prospective non-randomized studies (total, 140 participants), and eleven retrospective studies (total, 1288 participants) were included in this systematic review. A variety of dose fractionation schemes were used. The median overall survival (OS) ranged from 13.5 to 55 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 4.4 to 14.7 months. Quality of life outcomes were reported in 2 studies. None of the studies reported symptom control outcomes. There are no fully completed phase III randomized trials that clarify the risks and benefits of SBRT for oligometastatic NSCLC. Higher PFS and OS with SBRT were reported in 4 phase II randomized studies. The results from mature phase III randomized data regarding whether SBRT for oligometastatic NSCLC benefits patients in terms of OS, PFS, quality of life, and symptom control are needed.

Multiple bone metastases: what the palliative care specialist should know about the potential, limitations and practical aspects of radiation therapy.

Bone metastases represent a significant health care problem in the cancer population. The most common symptom for bone metastases is pain. Bone metastases may also cause pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, cauda equina compression and serum calcium disorders. This review article summarizes the epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, role for radiation, and future directions as it pertains to bone metastases. Radiotherapy is an effective and standard modality for the treatment of painful complicated and uncomplicated bony metastases. Further strategies are needed to optimize pain relief, quality of life and survival in the bone metastases cancer population.

Radiation for below the knee skin cancers: a single institution experience.

Background: Historically, radiation to skin cancers for the lower legs has been avoided due to the perceived increased risk of radiation toxicity (poor wound healing, radiation necrosis). However, there is a paucity of published data regarding this perceived risk.Purpose: The objective was to review the risk of poor wound healing/radiation necrosis occurring post radiation and to determine rates of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and progressive disease after radiation therapyMaterials and methods: A retrospective review of patients treated with radiation for skin cancer below the knee was undertaken from January 1, 2013 to May 31, 2018.Results: A total of 25 patients with 39 below the knee skin sites were treated with radiation. Mean follow-up time was 19 months (range 3 months-7.2 years). Crude CR, PR and progression rates for the treated lesions were 65%, 19%, and 16% respectively. Four out of 23 (17%) patients developed Grade 3 skin toxicity. There were no grades 4 or 5 toxicities.Conclusions: For patients not eligible for surgery, radiation therapy is an option with a moderate chance of complete response (65%) and a 17% risk of poor wound healing/radiation necrosis.

Symptom correlates of dyspnea in advanced cancer patients using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

PURPOSE: Dyspnea is frequently experienced in advanced cancer patients and is associated with poor prognosis and functional decline. This study used the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to characterize the relationship between dyspnea and concurrent symptoms experienced by advanced cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective database was collected and analyzed to extract patient demographics and ESAS scores. Logistic regression analysis and generalized estimating equations (GEE) identified correlations of other ESAS symptoms in three categories: severity of dyspnea (none, mild, moderate, severe), moderate/severe dyspnea (ESAS ≥ 4), and presence of dyspnea (ESAS ≥ 1), at patients' first visit and over time, respectively. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed drowsiness (p = 0.001), and anxiety (p = 0.01) and appetite loss (p = 0.02) were associated with increased severity of dyspnea at first visit. Over time, tiredness (p = 0.02), drowsiness (p = 0.04), nausea (p = 0.02), and anxiety (p = 0.0006) were more likely to experience increased dyspnea severity. Tiredness (p = 0.0003), depression (p = 0.03), and appetite loss (p = 0.003) were significant for moderate/severe dyspnea at first visit. Over multiple visits, tiredness (p < 0.0001), anxiety (p = 0.0008), and appetite loss (p = 0.0008) had higher probabilities of moderate/severe dyspnea. For the presence of dyspnea at the first visit, anxiety (p = 0.03) and drowsiness (p = 0.002) were significantly correlated with an increased frequency of dyspnea. Over time, anxiety (p < 0.0001) and drowsiness (p < 0.0001) remained significant with the addition of nausea (p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: The highly interactive relationship between dyspnea and other common cancer symptoms necessitates the development of comprehensive symptom assessments and utilization of multimodal management approaches that consider concurrent symptoms for improved identification and treatment of dyspnea.

A review of the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program in patients with advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy over two decades.

INTRODUCTION: The Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) is an outpatient radiotherapy clinic for palliative cancer patients where consultation, planning, and radiation treatment can take place in 1 day, allowing for rapid access to care. The objective of this study was to compare the patient population and overall survival of patients seen in the RRRP from 2014 to 2017 to that of patients seen in 1999. METHOD: Patient characteristics including sex, primary cancer site, sites of metastases, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were recorded at each clinic visit. Date of death (DOD) was retrieved from the Patient Care System (PCS) and Excelicare. To show overall survival from the first clinic visit, a Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve was generated in all patients from 2014 to 2017. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-six patients were included in the final analysis. Most patients were male (n = 347) with a primary cancer site of the lung (n = 165) and metastases to the bone (n = 475). Actuarial median overall survival was 15.3 months. In 1999, 395 patients were analyzed, in which a primary of the lung (n = 143) and metastases to the bone (n = 277) were the most prevalent. An additional 72 patients in this population had brain metastases. The actuarial median survival of the 1999 population was 4.5 months. CONCLUSION: The changing patient population in the RRRP has resulted in visible changes in survival. This may reflect differences in the proportion of patients with specific primaries and sites of metastases, as well as improvements in the availability of palliative radiation over the last two decades.

Re-analysis of symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients attending a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often present with several concurrent symptoms. There is evidence to suggest that related symptoms can cluster together in stable groups. The present study sought to identify symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic. METHODS: Principal component analysis (PCA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were used to identify symptom clusters among the 9 ESAS items using ESAS scores from each patient's first visit. RESULTS: PCA identified three symptom clusters (cluster 1: depression, anxiety; cluster 2: nausea, dyspnea, loss of appetite; cluster 3: pain, well-being, tiredness, drowsiness). EFA identified two clusters (cluster 1: tiredness, drowsiness, loss of appetite, well-being, pain, nausea, dyspnea; cluster 2: depression, anxiety). HCA identified three symptom clusters (cluster 1: depression, anxiety, pain, well-being; cluster 2: tiredness, drowsiness, dyspnea; cluster 3: nausea, loss of appetite). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom clusters were identified using three analytical methods. The following items were always in the same cluster: depression and anxiety; nausea and appetite loss; well-being and pain; tiredness and drowsiness. Further research in symptom clusters is necessary to advance our understanding of the complex symptom interactions in advanced cancer patients and to determine the most clinically relevant symptom clusters.

Are we better a decade later in the accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists?

BACKGROUND: Clinician predicted survival (CPS) plays a crucial role in palliative care, informing physicians of appropriate treatment best suited to the patient. The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of CPS of cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy. Secondary objectives included an analysis of factors predictive of accurate CPS, comparisons of the accuracy of survival predictions over subsequent clinic visits, and comparisons to the previous study in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) in 2005. METHODS: CPS was provided by one of four radiation oncologists from August 2014 to March 2017. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), primary cancer site, and sites of metastases were recorded. Date of death was retrieved from the Patient Care System (PCS) and Excelicare. Mean difference between actual survival (AS) and CPS was used to determine the accuracy of survival predictions. RESULTS: One-hundred seventy-two patients were included in the final analysis. Survival was largely overestimated (n=135, 78.5%), with CPS being overestimated by 19.0 weeks on average. KPS (P=0.2), primary cancer site (P=0.08), and various sites of metastases were not significantly related to CPS accuracy. Gender was significantly related to CPS accuracy after multivariable analysis (P=0.04), but was no longer significant after excluding prostate and breast cancer patients in multivariable analysis (P=0.2). The mean difference between AS and CPS did not significantly change over subsequent visits (P=0.5) and CPS accuracy decreased significantly compared to the previous RRRP study (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The survival estimates provided by radiation oncologists are inaccurately overestimated. Further research should aim to increase the accuracy of CPS in order to improve patient outcomes.

Evaluation of the 3-day recall period for the Functional Life Index-Emesis (FLIE).

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting are commonly experienced by cancer patients, and can be assessed by the Functional Life Index-Emesis (FLIE) instrument which employs a three-day recall period. However, it is unknown whether patients' responses to the FLIE better correlate with the average or the worst symptom severity of the recall period, or the severity of an individual day. METHODS: Patients receiving emetogenic radiotherapy for painful bone metastases who were enrolled in one of three trials for anti-emetic medications (ondansetron, aprepitant/granisetron, or palonosetron) completed the FLIE at baseline, and days 3, 5, 7, or 10 during treatment and follow-up. The concordance correlation coefficient (rc) was calculated between FLIE overall nausea and vomiting and daily nausea, vomiting, and quality of life (QoL) using the average responses of the 3-day recall period and with each of the three days' responses. RESULTS: Responses from eighty-nine patients who experienced nausea or vomiting were analysed. The highest concordance for FLIE nausea was with the 3-day average [during treatment: rc =0.698, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.495, 0.829; follow-up: rc =0.821, 95% CI: 0.711, 0.892]. FLIE vomiting had the highest concordance with worst day vomiting (during treatment, rc =0.310, 95% CI: 0.194, 0.417) or two day-prior vomiting (follow-up, rc =0.902, 95% CI: 0.832, 0.944). FLIE nausea and vomiting had inconsistent concordances with daily assessments of QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to the FLIE questionnaire are most representative of average nausea severity. Larger cohorts to validate these findings are warranted to address the lack of power in this present study and to confirm the wording and justification of a three-day recall period for the FLIE.