The Relationship Between Professionalism and Leadership: Parent-Child or Sibling?

Professionalism has been the foundation of physical therapy's contract with society, with the American Physical Therapy Association's (APTA) Core Values and Code of Ethics serving as its building blocks. Professional formation has focused on professionalism and has been taught in a manner that is more implicit than explicit in doctor of physical therapy (DPT) curricula. As a domain of competence, professionalism alone has not been broad enough to meet societal needs. In reaching our centennial year, many have reflected on what competencies are needed to move forward. The need for leadership competencies is not new and has been espoused by our leaders over the past 100 years. Some advocate for the adoption of leadership as a unique domain of competence, separate from the domain of professionalism, whereas others propose that either professionalism or leadership is one domain of competence that subsumes the other. The purpose of this Perspective is twofold: to compare and contrast the concepts of professionalism and leadership, and to make recommendations regarding what constitutes domains of competence within the professional formation of physical therapists. This Perspective offers recommendations addressing professional formation and the adoption of leadership and professionalism as 2 distinct domains of competence and discusses educational and clinical implications of the recommendations. This Perspective asserts that these recommendations must be adopted to move the profession forward into the next century so that physical therapists are recognized as adding value to the health care system and the evolving needs of society.

Self-Leadership Is Critical for All Physical Therapists.

Evidence that supports the explicit need to develop leadership skills at all levels of clinical practice is prevalent,1-8 yet intentional development of "self-leadership" within health care, and particularly within physical therapy, remains slow, fragmented, and inconsistent. Delineation and standardization of the definition of leadership, and the approach to developing leadership skills in individuals practicing within health care continues to be debated, producing several key dilemmas. Moreover, there is a lingering misperception that developing leadership capacity is reserved for physical therapists who assume positional or formal roles as "leaders" within communities, health care organizations, practices, or teams. This misperception focuses leadership development on "leading others" rather than "leading self." Similarly, challenges exist between balancing the leadership development needs of the leader as a positional role and the act of "leading" as physical therapists practice and engage within all levels of care and within different communities-as individuals and within teams. This tension further complicates when and how best to prepare physical therapists to meet this essential skill set in clinical practice. The purpose of this perspective is to describe nonpositional self-leadership and its importance to physical therapy practice, to propose common or contemporary leadership-related terminology, and to suggest a framework for leadership development. Through accomplishing these purposes, readers may be encouraged to change and adopt recommendations.

The Second Physical Therapy Summit on Global Health: developing an action plan to promote health in daily practice and reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases.

Based on indicators that emerged from The First Physical Therapy Summit on Global Health (2007), the Second Summit (2011) identified themes to inform a global physical therapy action plan to integrate health promotion into practice across the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT) regions. Working questions were: (1) how well is health promotion implemented within physical therapy practice; and (2) how might this be improved across five target audiences (i.e. physical therapist practitioners, educators, researchers, professional body representatives, and government liaisons/consultants). In structured facilitated sessions, Summit representatives (n = 32) discussed: (1) within WCPT regions, what is working and the challenges; and (2) across WCPT regions, what are potential directions using World Café(TM) methodology. Commonalities outweighed differences with respect to strategies to advance health-focused physical therapy as a clinical competency across regions and within target audiences. Participants agreed that health-focused practice is a professional priority, and a strategic action plan was needed to develop it as a clinical competency. The action plan and recommendations largely paralleled the principles and objectives of the World Health Organization's non-communicable diseases action plan. A third Summit planned for 2015 will provide a mechanism for follow-up to evaluate progress in integrating health-focused physical therapy within the profession.