The Safety of Volar to Dorsal Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Bennett Fracture-Dislocation - A Cadaveric Study.

Background: Bennett fractures are traditionally fixed with percutaneous K-wires from dorsal to volar, or with a volar to dorsal screw via a volar open approach. While volar to dorsal screw fixation is biomechanically advantageous, an open approach requires extensive soft tissue dissection, thus increasing morbidity. This study aims to investigate the practicality and safety of Bennett fracture fixation using a percutaneous, volar to dorsal screw, particularly with regard to the median nerve and its motor branch during wire and screw insertion. Methods: Fifteen fresh frozen forearm and hand specimens were obtained from the University of Auckland human cadaver laboratory. A guidewire is placed under image intensifier from volar to dorsal with the thumb held in traction, abduction and pronation. The wire is passed through the skin volarly under image intensifier, then the median nerve is dissected from the carpal tunnel and the motor branch of the median nerve (MBMN) is dissected from its origin to where it supplies the thenar musculature. The distance between the K-wire to the MBMN is measured. Results: In 14 of 15 specimens, the wire was superficial and radial to the carpal tunnel. The mean distance to the origin of the MBMN is 6.2 mm (95% CI 4.1-8.3) with the closest specimen 1 mm away. The mean closest distance the wire gets to any part of the MBMN is 3.7 mm (95% CI 1.6-5.8); in two specimens, the wire was through the MBMN. Conclusions: Wire placement, although done under image intensifier, is subject to significant variation in exiting location. While research has shown the thenar portal in arthroscopic thumb surgery is safe, our guidewire needs to exit further ulnar to capture the Bennett fracture fragment, placing the MBMN at risk. This cadaveric study has demonstrated the proposed technique is unsafe for use.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with concomitant spondylolysis: choice of fusion levels and evaluation of the outcomes obtained leaving the lytic level not instrumented.

PURPOSE: 7% of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients also present with a pars defect. To date, there are no available data on the results of fusion ending proximal to a spondylolysis in the setting of AIS. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in this patient cohort, to investigate if maintaining the lytic segment unfused represents a safe option. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients who received PSF for AIS, presented with a spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis and had a min. 2-year follow-up. Demographic data, instrumented levels, and preoperative radiographic data were collected. Mechanical complications, coronal or sagittal parameters, amount of slippage, and pain levels were evaluated. RESULTS: Data from 22 patients were available (age 14.4 ± 2.5 years), 18 Lenke 1-2 and 4 Lenke 3-6. 5 patients (24%) had an isthmic spondylolisthesis, all Meyerding I. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the instrumented curves was 58 ± 13°. For 18 patients, the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was the last touched vertebra (LTV); for 2, LIV was distal to the LTV; for 2, LIV was one level proximal to the LTV. The number of segments between the LIV and the lytic vertebra ranged from 1 to 6. At the last follow-up, no complications were observed. The residual curve below the instrumentation measured 8.5 ± 6.4°, the lordosis below the instrumented levels was 51.4 ± 13°. The magnitude of the isthmic spondylolisthesis remained constant for all included patients. Three patients reported minimal occasional low back pain. CONCLUSION: The LTV can be safely used as LIV when performing PSF for the management of AIS in patients with L5 spondylolysis.

Risk factors for distal construct failure in posterior spinal instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate risk factors for distal construct failure (DCF) in posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We hypothesise increased inferior angulation of the pedicle screw in the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) predisposes to failure and aim to find the critical angle that predisposes to failure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent PSIF for AIS at our institution from 2010 to 2020. On lateral radiographs, the angle between the superior endplate of the LIV was measured against its pedicle screw trajectory. Data on demographics, Cobb angle, Lenke classification, instrumentation density, rod protrusion from the most inferior screw, implants and reasons for revision were collected. RESULTS: Of 256 patients, 9 patients had DCF with 3 further failures post-revision, giving 12 cases to analyse. The DCF rate was 4.6%. The mean trajectory angle of DCF patients compared to non-DCF was 13.3° (95% CI 9.2° to 17.4°) vs. 7.6° (7.0° to 8.2°), p = 0.0002. The critical angle is less than 11° (p = 0.0076), OR 5.15. Lenke 5 and C curves, lower preoperative Cobb angle, titanium only rod constructs and one surgeon had higher failure rates. 9.6% of rods protruding less than 3 mm from its distal screw disengaged. CONCLUSION: Increased inferior trajectory of the LIV screw increases the rate of DCF; inferior trajectory greater than 11° predisposes to failure. Rod protrusion less than 3 mm from the distal screw increases rate of disengagement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.