Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 37(5): 1703-1711, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traditional cranial molding is an ancient practice prevalent in Ghana. In this work, we aimed at assessing mothers'/caregivers' perspective and their knowledge on potential harm of cranial molding on neonates. METHODS: Two hundred and one (201) nursing mothers with babies aged 1-12 months were sampled in a cross-sectional study using questionnaires. We assessed the mothers'/caregivers' reasons for cranial molding, their perceived benefits of this practice, and their knowledge about the potential harm this practice pose to babies. RESULTS: Sixty four percent (64%) of mothers confirmed they practice cranial molding on their babies either on their own or through the assistance of a caretaker. However, 72% of all mothers/caregivers did not know this practice has the potential to harm the baby in any way. Mothers'/caregivers' reasons for this practice included the following: to achieve a more "beautiful" head shape, hasten the healing of the fontanelle, and limit head growth. There was a significant association between the mothers'/caregivers' level of education and the practice of cranial molding (p value < 0.05). However, there was no association between head symmetry and cranial molding (p value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Majority of mothers/caregivers were actively engaged in cranial molding on neonates but remain ignorant about the potential harm this practice could have on their babies. Mothers/caregivers therefore need to be educated about the potential harm posed by traditional cranial molding on neonates.


Subject(s)
Mothers , Skull , Brain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Ghana , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL