Determining patterns of vascular function and structure in wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of wild-type transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt) on functional and structural peripheral vascular measures is unknown. In the present study, we explored patterns of vascular dysfunction in patients with ATTRwt in comparison to diseases with similar cardiac phenotype. METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with ATTRwt (n = 32) were compared to: 1. Age-and sex-matched reference population without amyloidosis (n = 32), 2. Age-and sex-matched patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (n = 32), and 3. patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis (AL-HF, n = 23) or elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 16). All subjects underwent peripheral vascular assessment using carotid artery ultrasonography, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), measurement of arterial stiffness and aortic hemodynamics including heart rate-adjusted time of return of reflected waves (Tr/HR). RESULTS: After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery disease (core model), peripheral and aortic blood pressures (BP) were lower in patients with ATTRwt (p < 0.05) whereas other vascular markers were preserved compared to the reference non-amyloidosis group. ATTRwt was independently associated with lower BP and longer Tr/HR compared to AL. Compared to AL-HF, FMD was lower in ATTRwt (p = 0.033). ATTRwt patients had lower BP and higher Tr/HR than HFpEF (p < 0.05). By ROC analysis, Tr/HR discriminated ATTRwt vs. AL-HF (sensitivity 93%, specificity 75%) and HFpEF (sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%) and lower FMD increased the likelihood for ATTRwt at low Tr/HR values. CONCLUSION: ATTRwt patients present a distinct peripheral vascular fingerprint which is different from AL-HF or HFpEF, consisting of lower peripheral and aortic BP, prolonged Tr/HR and FMD at reference-population range.

Consolidation with a short course of daratumumab in patients with AL amyloidosis or light chain deposition disease.

Daratumumab has major and rapid activity in AL amyloidosis with favourable toxicity. We used as a consolidation a short course of daratumumab in 25 patients with AL amyloidosis or light chain deposition disease (LCDD), who had not achieved a haematologic complete response (hemCR) after standard therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD). We evaluated minimal residual disease (MRD) and changes in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment before and after consolidation using next generation flow cytometry (NGF). At the time of consolidation, 21 patients were in very good partial response (VGPR) and four in partial response (PR); all had detectable MRD. One month after consolidation completion, 8 patients (32%) achieved a hemCR, of whom 5 (20%) became also MRD negative. In the BM, we observed significant changes in B-cell precursors, naïve B-cells, T-cells, CD27+ NK & NKT cells, mast cells and erythroblasts. After a median follow-up of 25 months, none of the patients in hemCR has relapsed and all have achieved an organ response; a haematologic relapse occurred in 6/17 patients that did not achieve hemCR. In conclusion, consolidation with a short course of daratumumab can improve depth of response in patients with AL amyloidosis or LCDD and significantly affects BM environment.

Next generation flow cytometry for MRD detection in patients with AL amyloidosis.

The treatment of AL amyloidosis aims to eradicate the plasma cell clone and eliminate toxic free light chain production. Only in a minority of patients the plasma cell clone is completely eradicated; residual light chain production may still exist while clonal relapse may occur. We used sensitive next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in AL amyloidosis patients at complete haematologic response. MRD evaluation was feasible in 51 of 52 (98%) tested patients and at a median sensitivity of 2.3 × 10-6 MRD was undetectable in 23 (45%). An organ response occurred in 86% of MRDneg vs 77% in MRDpos; renal response in 15/17(88%) of MRDneg vs in 14/16(87.5%) of MRDpos and cardiac response in 10/10(100%) of MRDneg vs 11/15(73%) of MRDpos patients. After a median follow-up of 24 months post MRD testing, no MRDneg patient had a haematologic relapse vs 6/28(21%) MRDpos (p = .029). Pooling haematologic and organ progressions, 9 (32%) MRDpos patients had disease progression vs only 1 (4%) MRDneg patient (p = .026). In conclusion, MRD detection using NGF has profound clinical implications, so that AL patients with undetectable MRD have a very high probability of organ response and a very low probability of haematologic relapse.

Timing and impact of a deep response in the outcome of patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

A rapid and deep haematologic response is fundamental in order to improve outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis. We evaluated the impact of timing and depth of haematologic response at early time points (at 1 and 3 months from the start of therapy) in 227 consecutive previously untreated AL patients, who received bortezomib-based primary therapy. After 1 month of therapy, 30.5% had ≥VGPR, 28% PR and 36% no response (NR), with 11% having iFLC <20 mg/L and 15% dFLC <10 mg/L. Deep haematologic response at 1 month (either ≥VGPR or iFLC <20 mg/L or dFLC <10 mg/L), was associated with a high organ response rate. The survival of patients with ≥VGPR was significantly better than those with PR and NR at 1-month landmark (p < .001) but this benefit was mainly driven by those with iFLC <20 mg/L. The depth of haematologic response at 1 month was significant across all Mayo stages. At 3 months, 46% of the patients had not significantly improved the depth of their response but even patients that improved their response from an iFLC ≥20 mg/L at 1 month to iFLC <20 mg/L at 3 months still had inferior outcome to those with an early deep response. Thus, in patients with AL amyloidosis, a very rapid and deep response is crucial, especially for those at high risk, targeting very low FLC levels within the first month of therapy.

Primary treatment of light-chain amyloidosis with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone.

Bortezomib and dexamethasone with cyclophosphamide (CyBorD) or melphalan (BMDex) are commonly used primary treatments for light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, but limited data exist on bortezomib with immunomodulatory drug combinations. We report our experience with primary therapy with a bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) "light" regimen in 34 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis. The majority (79%) had cardiac involvement, 15% and 23% were Mayo stage 3A and 3B, respectively, and 54% had renal involvement. After the first VRD cycle, 71% of patients achieved a hematologic response (44% at least very good partial response [VGPR]). On intent to treat, 11 (32%) achieved a complete response (of whom 5 of 11 were minimal residual disease [MRD] negative at 10-5), 17 (50%) a VGPR, and 2 (7%) a partial response. The 12-month survival was 73%. Starting lenalidomide dose was 5 mg in 86% of patients. Hematologic toxicity was mild; nonhematologic toxicities included rash (grade 3/4 [16%]), infections (grade ≥3 [12%]), constipation (grade ≥3 [9%]), and peripheral neuropathy (grade 2 [20%]); 37.5% of patients required lenalidomide dose reduction, 27% discontinued lenalidomide, 38% required bortezomib dose reduction, and 12% discontinued bortezomib. We compared VRD to CyBorD in 68 patients matched for Mayo stage and baseline difference between involved minus uninvolved serum free light chain levels, and observed a trend for deeper response at 3 and 6 months with VRD. In conclusion, VRD can be an active regimen for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis able to induce very deep hematologic responses at the expense of increased toxicity.