ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bowel endometriosis impacts quality of life. Treatment requires complex surgical procedures with associated morbidity. Precision approach with robotic surgery leads to organ preservation. Bowel endometriosis requires a multidisciplinary management to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes of bowel endometriosis undergoing multidisciplinary planning and robotic surgery. METHODS: Consecutive cases of multidisciplinary robotic bowel endometriosis procedures (January 2021-December 2022) were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database in a national endometriosis accredited centre. Patients were managed through a multidisciplinary setting including gynaecologists, colorectal robotic surgeons, and other specialists. Dyschezia (menstrual and non-cyclical) and quality of life were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 months) through validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty-eight consecutive cases of robotic bowel endometriosis were included. Median age was 35.0 (30.2-42.0) years. Median body mass index was 24.0 (21.0-26.7) kg/m2. Procedures performed were 48 (70.6%) shavings, 11 (16.2%) deep shavings, 3 (4.4%) disc excisions, and 6 (8.8%) segmental resections. One (1.5%) patient required temporary stoma. Median operating time was 150 (120-180) min. There were no conversions/return to theatre postoperatively. Median endometriotic nodule size was 25.0 (15.5-40.0) mm. Two (2.9%) patients developed postoperative complications. Median length of postoperative stay was 2 (2-4) days. Median follow-up was 12 (7-17) months. One (1.5%) patient recurred. Median menstrual dyschezia score improved from 5.0 (2.0-8.0) to 1.0 (0.0-5.7). Median non-cyclical dyschezia significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 1.0 (0.0-5.7) to 0.0 (0.0-2.0). Median quality of life score improved from 52.5 (35.0-70.0) to 74.5 (60.0-80.0). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic multidisciplinary approach to bowel endometriosis provides good perioperative outcomes with improvement of dyschezia and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Female , Humans , Adult , Endometriosis/surgery , Quality of Life , ConstipationABSTRACT
Recent publication of an evidence-based clinical guideline by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG 2005) for invasive testing in pregnancy stimulated a review of our prenatal diagnosis counselling service. This coincided with a reduction in the hours worked by obstetric trainees and a need to streamline antenatal care. We arranged for a senior midwife (KE) with extensive experience in general midwifery and fetal medicine to undergo additional training in counselling for amniocentesis. She then took over the running of the counselling service supported by an in-house care pathway. She had open access to a consultant (RF) for advice. A review of the case notes of 60 consecutive women who attended for counselling showed that the midwife followed the guidelines extremely closely both in terms of process and quality of the documentation. A total of 58 of the women were counselled solely by the midwife-practitioner. Only two required additional counselling by the consultant. Of a subset of 27 women surveyed by telephone questionnaire, only two (7.4%) were surprised to have been counselled by a midwife; 25 (93%) said the counselling was excellent or good; 17 (63%) said they would prefer to see a midwife in any future pregnancy and only one woman said she would prefer to see a doctor.
Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Counseling , Midwifery , Nurse Practitioners , Adult , Clinical Competence , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Nurse-Patient Relations , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
A recent publication of an evidence-based clinical guideline for male and female sterilisation by the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (RCOG) created a stimulus for a review of our female sterilisation service. We arranged for a gynaecology nurse-practitioner (A.O.) with extensive experience in general gynaecology and contraception to undergo additional training in counselling female sterilisation. She then took over the daily running of the sterilisation clinic using a care pathway and pre-printed letters. She had open access to a consultant (R.F.) for advice. A review of 100 consecutive referrals showed that the nurse followed the guidelines extremely closely both in terms of referral to the medical team for advice and/or further counselling and quality of documentation. A total of 59% of the women attending the clinic were cared for by the nurse-practitioner alone. Only four had to see a consultant. All women questioned expressed very positive comments about the style and content of counselling and just one stated she preferred to see a doctor.
