Splenic artery transposition for hepatic arterial reconstruction in a locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: During pancreatic surgery for malignancies, hepatic revascularization is needed in case of en bloc resection with hepatic artery involvement. In these cases, the use of the splenic artery is described in the literature, including transposition and interposition techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the case of pancreatic cancer resection with involvement of the right hepatic artery, anomalous arising from the superior mesenteric artery, and hepatic revascularization with splenic artery reconstruction. A literature review to analyze the use of splenic artery in hepatic revascularization during pancreatic cancer surgery was performed. RESULTS: A 61-year-old man with a 55-mm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic head, in wide contact with the right hepatic artery, underwent total pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Right hepatic artery was resected, and the distal part of the splenic artery was transposed to the right hepatic artery with a termino-terminal anastomosis. Histopathological examination revealed R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic revascularization with splenic artery should be considered in patients suitable to extend resectability in pancreatic cancer surgery. A multidisciplinary approach and careful pre-operative planning are essential.

Management of mycotic aorto-iliac aneurysms: a 30-year monocentric experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the early and late outcomes of our 30-year experience with mycotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of all the patients with mycotic aneurysm, by analyzing prospectively collected data between September 1989 and October 2019 from the Unit of Vascular Surgery of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli - IRCCS in Rome, Italy. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with mycotic aneurysm were included. Twenty-two patients underwent surgery; one patient arrived at the emergency room with unstable clinical conditions and died before being treated. Fourteen cases (60.9%) were located at the infrarenal aorta, while three cases (13.0%) were pararenal aortic aneurysms. Six cases (26.1%) had an iliac arteries localization. Seventeen patients (77.3%) underwent open surgical repair aneurysmectomy with in situ reconstruction, while three cases (13.6%) underwent extra-anatomic revascularization. Three patients (13.6%) underwent the placement of an endoprosthesis, of whom two underwent hybrid procedures, and one EVAR. The latter underwent an early conversion to open repair due to a type I endoleak. The mean length of hospital stay was 35 ± 18.7 days. Five patients (22.7%) died in the immediate postoperative period. In the follow-up of 45.5 ± 41.3 months (range 2-156), we documented six deaths (35.3%), of whom two (11.8%) were aortic-related for a 34.8% overall aortic-related mortality. Eleven patients were alive, with an overall survival of 47.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Mycotic aneurysm is an extremely rare and varied pathology. Open surgical repair showed to be a safe approach because of a complete and aggressive debridement of local infected tissues, with an acceptable long-term mortality rate.

Open treatment of extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

AIM: Extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair is considered relatively safer to repair than other extents of TAAA in terms of both perioperative mortality and spinal cord ischemia. Our purpose is to report our experience and to perform a literature review regarding extent IV TAAA open repair in order to provide an updated benchmark for comparison with any other alternative strategy in this aortic segment. METHODS: From 1993 to 2015 we performed 736 open repairs for TAAA (177 extent I, 196 extent II, 141 extent III, 222 extent IV). In extent IV group there were 164 men (73.9%) and the mean age was 67.4±9.3 years (range 32-84). The aneurysm etiology was degenerative in 198 patients (95.6%). Twelve patients (5.4%) underwent emergent operation. Totally abdominal approach was used in 22.0% of the cases. Until 2006 left heart bypass (LHBP) and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) were almost never performed during extent IV repair. Since 2006 we changed our approach with a more aggressive use of LHBP (22.9%) and CSFD (43.4%) in 83 consecutive extent IV. Renal arteries perfusion was performed with 4 °C Ringer's solution until 2009 and with 4 °C Custodiol solution since September 2009 to date. Literature search was performed on several databases (PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials). Research was updated on March 1th 2015. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality in our overall group of TAAA and in the extents IV was 10.7% and 4.9%, respectively (P=0.01); spinal cord ischemia rate 11.4% and 2.7%, respectively (P=0.0001). In the extents IV treated between 2006 and 2015 we observed a further trend of outcomes improvement with a rate of perioperative mortality and spinal cord ischemia of 1.2%, and 2.4%, respectively. Database searches yielded a total of 767 articles. Excluding non-pertinent titles or abstracts, we retrieved in complete form and assessed 27 studies according to the selection criteria. Nine studies were further excluded because of our prespecified exclusion criteria. The final 18 manuscripts included a total of 2098 patients. In this group median mortality rate was 4.8% (interquartile range 3-6) and the mean incidence of spinal cord ischemia was 1.56±1.54%. CONCLUSION: Perioperative outcomes after extent IV TAAA open repair were significantly better compared to our overall TAAA series. A more aggressive use of CSFD, LHBP and renal perfusion with Custodiol solution allowed a further trend of outcomes improvement in our series of extent IV TAAA open repair. Literature analysis confirmed during extent IV open repair very satisfactory perioperative outcomes with rates of mortality and spinal cord ischemia dropped to under 5% and 2%, respectively.

Strategies to treat thoracic aortitis and infected aortic grafts.

Infectious thoracic aortitis is a rare disease, especially since the incidence of syphilis and tuberculosis has dropped in western countries. However, the risk to develop an infectious aortitis and subsequent mycotic aneurysm formation is still present, particularly in case of associated endocarditis, sepsis, and in immunosuppressive disorders. Moreover, the number of surgical and endovascular thoracic aortic repairs is continuously increasing, and infective graft complications are observed more frequently. Several etiopathogenetic factors may play a role in thoracic aortic and prosthetic infections, including hematogenous seeding, local bacterial translocation, and iatrogenous contamination. Also, fistulization of the esophagus or the bronchial tree is commonly associated with these diseases, and it represents a critical event requiring a multidisciplinary management. Knowledge on underlying micro-organisms, antibiotic efficacy, risk factors, and prevention strategies has a key role in the management of this spectrum of infectious diseases involving the thoracic aorta. When the diagnosis of a mycotic aneurysm or a prosthetic graft infection is established, treatment is demanding, often including a number of surgical options. Patients are usually severely compromised by sepsis, and in most cases they are considered unfit for surgery for general clinical conditions or local concerns. Thus, results of different therapeutic strategies for infectious diseases of the thoracic aorta are still burdened with very high morbidity and mortality. In this manuscript, we review the literature regarding the main issues related to thoracic infectious aortitis and aortic graft infections, and we report our personal series of patients surgically treated at our institution for these conditions from 1993 to 2014.

Clinical use of extra-large self-expanding stents.

The aim of this study is to describe our clinical experience with an extra-large self-expandable stent specifically designed to treat aortic lesions (E-XL, Jotec GmbH, Hechingen, Germany), now commercially available in Europe. The E-XL was used at our Institution in 14 patients (mean age, 56±12 years; 9 males) with the following indications: improve proximal fixation (4 cases), type I endoleak (2 cases), aortic dissection with static malperfusion (1 case) and dynamic malperfusion (7 cases). Early results have been shown to be safe and effective in different clinical settings, including in emergency cases. This peculiar aortic stent could be useful in the armamentarium of the endovascular surgeon.

Redo surgery in ascending aorta and aortic arch.

AIM: Reinterventions following previous ascending aorta and aortic arch repair are uncommon, but technically challenging and often burdened with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to present a single-center experience in the treatment of this complex pathology, using different surgical approaches. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2014, 17 patients (14 males, mean age 73±16 years) underwent ascending aorta and aortic arch redo surgery at our Department. A prospectively maintained database including thoracic aortic procedures was reviewed retrospectively to collect data on redo patients. RESULTS: In 13 cases the index procedure was an endovascular or hybrid procedure on the aortic arch performed at our Department, for an in-house reintervention rate of 6.9% (13/188). In 10 cases the cause of reintervention was stent-graft distal migration, treated by means of endovascular relining in all cases, associated with adjunctive supra-aortic trunks debranching via sternotomy in 6 cases. In 5 cases the cause of reintervention was retrograde ascending aortic dissection, in 1 case ascending aortic anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following supra-aortic trunk debranching, and in 1 case mediastinitis following implantation of an endovascular plug previously used to treat an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm. In these last 7 cases, all patients were treated by means of ascending and arch surgical replacement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP). No 30-day mortality was observed. Major perioperative morbidity included 1 paraplegia, 1 minor stroke, 1 bleeding requiring reintervention, and 3 cases of respiratory failure requiring prolonged intubation (2) or tracheostomy (1). CONCLUSION: In our experience, incidence of serious complications requiring reinterventions following ascending aorta or aortic arch repair is not negligible. Redo surgery in ascending aorta and aortic arch is feasible in high-volume and experienced centers, as it often requires hybrid repair via midline sternotomy, or surgical replacement under DHCA and ACP.

Open repair for aortic occlusive disease: indication, techniques, results, tips and tricks.

AIM: The aim of this article was to review indications, techniques, and outcomes of a series of open repair for aortic occlusive disease. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2013, 1071 patients (917 men, 154 women; mean age 62.6 years) underwent open repair for aortoiliac occlusive disease. According to TASC II classification, 123 patients (11.5%) had type B lesions, 343 (32%) type C, and 605 (56.5%) type D. Among type D lesions, 138 patients had Leriche's Syndrome with complete aortic occlusion. Nine hundred and eight aortobifemoral bypasses, 114 axillo-bifemoral bypasses, 42 aortic endarterectomies with patch aortoplasty, and 7 thoracobifemoral bypasses were performed. Associated endarterectomy of abdominal aorta was required in 191 patients (18.5%), of the femoral arteries in 297 (28.7%). RESULTS: Perioperatively mortality was 0.6%; perioperative morbidity included cardiac (3.4% of patients), respiratory (2.6%), as well as acute renal insufficiency (2.6%). There were 26 (2.5%) cases of intraoperative distal embolization, 9 (0.8%) of acute graft thrombosis and 9 (0.8%) of bleeding requiring surgical revision within the first 24 hours after surgery. Sixty-one groin complications were reported in 57 patients (5.3%). During a mean follow-up time of 74 months (range 1-264), calculated actuarial occlusion-free survival at 12, 24, and 36 months was 94.8%, 91.8% and 87.2%, respectively. The limb-salvage rate in patients with critical limb ischemia was 87.3%. There were 11 (1%) graft infections. CONCLUSION: Open repair is a ductile strategy and may be tailored according to the patient clinical condition and disease anatomy. Long-term patency is excellent with low perioperative mortality and reasonable morbidity rates.

The Bolton Treovance endograft: single center experience.

AIM: In the last two decades, results of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have significantly improved thanks to the evolution of stent-grafts and endovascular delivery systems. However, further development is still needed to reduce the incidence of complications and secondary reinterventions. We present our initial experience with the Treovance abdominal aortic stent-graft (Bolton Medical, Barcelona, Spain), a new-generation trimodular endovascular device, developed to increase flexibility, lower profile, improve deployment and sealing mechanisms. METHODS: We treated 8 patients with anatomically suitable non-ruptured AAA. RESULTS: Primary technical success was obtained in all patients, and no 30-day device-related complications nor deaths were reported. One patient experienced graft limb occlusion at 3 months, and underwent surgical conversion. At 1-year follow-up (completed in 6 patients), no device-related complications nor type I or III endoleak were observed. CONCLUSION: Initial personal experience with the Treovance abdominal stent-graft was satisfactory with regard to technical success and short-term clinical results. This new-generation endovascular device performed well even in angulated or heavily calcified anatomies.

On-label use of commercially-available abdominal endografts for para-anastomotic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze feasibility and outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with a strictly on-label use of abdominal aortic endografts (OnL-EVAR) to treat para-anastomotic aneurysms (PAAs) and pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair (OR). METHODS: The data of all consecutive patients treated between 1999 and 2012 for non-infected abdominal PAAs and PSAs at our center were prospectively collected. All cases fit for EVAR based on the instructions for use of a series of abdominal aortic endografts commercially available during the study period were scheduled for OnL-EVAR regardless of patients' surgical risk. Any patients unfit for OnL-EVAR underwent OR or other complex endovascular techniques. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three patients were collected; 78 underwent OR and 65 endovascular repair with different strategies. Coil embolization, hybrid, and chimney/periscope grafts techniques were limited to seven patients unfit both for OR and OnL-EVAR. Inclusion criteria for OnL-EVAR were reached in 58 patients for an overall OnL-EVAR feasibility of approximately 40% (21% for PAAs and 55% for PSAs). In particular, OnL-EVAR feasibility was 19% in case of involvement of proximal aortic anastomosis, 71% for distal aortic anastomosis, and 80% for iliac arteries. Overall, 25 aortouniiliac and 11 bifurcated implants were performed, single proximal aortic cuffs were used in 10 patients, and iliac extension in 12. Primary technical success was 98% without perioperative mortality. At a median follow-up of 67 months (range: 1-144 months), cumulative aneurysm-related mortality was 7%, endograft migration 7%, and reintervention was 17%. Life-table analysis showed actuarial survival and freedom from aneurysm-related death at 1, 3, and 5 years of 100%, 98%, and 95%, and of 100%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. Freedom from aortic reintervention or open conversion at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94%, 90%, and 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility of OnL-EVAR was limited for PAAs and PSAs, with a rate that was lower than 20% in case of involvement of proximal aortic anastomosis. Aortouniiliac configuration was the most commonly feasible implant and, despite strict on-label use of abdominal devices, the rate of late complications and reinterventions was high.

Open repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are classified as juxtarenal if their proximal extent is next to the origin of the renal arteries but does not involve them. An AAA is suprarenal if it extends above at least one renal artery and ends below the celiac axis. Juxtarenal AAAs need inter-renal or suprarenal clamping, with the aortic reconstruction usually made at the infrarenal level. Aneurysms requiring suprarenal clamping, often supraceliac, and the reconstruction (direct attachment or bypass) of at least one renal artery, are often defined as suprarenal AAAs. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is feasible in most of cases of infrarenal AAAs and has been shown to be as effective as open repair (OR) in reducing aneurysm-related mortality and perioperative mortality with shorter length of stay. However, the feasibility of standard EVAR with an on-label use of commercially available devices is limited in the juxtarenal aorta. In our series, approximately, 20% to 30% of patients with an AAA are considered not eligible for standard EVAR owing to their anatomy, and in the most of the cases are patients with juxtarenal AAAs. Fenestrated and branched endografts and newer "off the shelf" techniques (such as chimney, periscope, sandwich) have been recently described, all with the purpose of widening the therapeutic range of EVAR to the treatment of aneurysms with involvement of renal and visceral arteries. However, safety, efficacy, long-term results, and cost-effectiveness of these expensive techniques have still to be carefully assessed. For these reasons, the OR is currently still considered the gold standard for treatment of juxtarenal AAAs, reserving endovascular strategies mainly for high-risk patients having comorbidities or other contraindications for conventional repair. If compared to open repair of infrarenal AAAs, juxtarenal AAA OR is technically more complex and might require specific organ-protection strategies in order to minimize ischemia-reperfusion injury to kidneys and visceral organs. Because of the complexity of the surgical procedure and of the multiple clinical problems, an optimal operative strategy for the treatment of juxtarenal AAAs has not been established yet. The choice of the surgical access, clamping level, methods of organ protection and their impact on renal, respiratiry, cardiac and gastrointestinal morbidity are still debated issues.

Delayed open conversion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm: device-specific surgical approach.

OBJECTIVES: Despite several advances in endoluminal salvage for failed endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR), in our experience an increasing number of cases necessitate delayed open conversion (dOC). METHODS: EVAR patients requiring delayed (>30 days) conversion were prospectively collected in a computerized database including demographics, details of aortoiliac anatomy, procedural and clinical success, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2011, 54 patients were treated for aortic stent-graft explantation. Indications included 34 type I and III endoleaks, 13 type II endoleaks with aneurysm growth, 4 cases of material failures, and 3 stent-graft infections. All fit-for-surgery patients with type I/III endoleak underwent directly dOC. Different surgical approaches were used depending on the type of stent-graft. Overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%. Overall morbidity was 31% mainly due to acute renal failure (13 cases). Mean hospitalization was 6 days (range, 5-27 days). Overall survival at mean follow-up of 19 months was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the use of EVAR has increased dramatically, including in young patients regardless of their fitness for open repair. dOC after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm seems to be a lifesaving procedure with satisfactory initial and mid-term results.

Single-center experience with endovascular treatment of acute blunt thoracic aortic injuries.

AIM: Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) has been recently considered an appealing alternative to open treatment of traumatic aortic injuries. However, the use of this technique in emergency is often limited by hemodynamic instability, severe associated lesions and unavailability of adequate materials. Dedicated stent-grafts are not currently available. We report our results in treating blunt traumas of the thoracic aorta using three different commercially available stent-grafts. METHODS Between 2003 and 2010, 28 patients (22 males, mean age 38.9±12.1 years) underwent TEVAR for a traumatic aortic lesion. A total-body computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in all cases to establish the diagnosis of aortic rupture and evaluate associated injuries. After TEVAR, patients were followed-up with CTA of the chest before discharge from the hospital, at 6 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (54%) were hemodynamically unstable at presentation, and 20 patients (71%) presented severe associated lesions. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 36.2. Twenty-four patients were treated emergently, whereas four patients underwent prior clinical stabilization of severe associated injuries. Primary technical success rate was 100%. No patient required conversion to open thoracic surgical repair. No paraplegia or stroke was observed. Procedure-related complications included an external iliac artery lesion during introducer sheath removal. The left subclavian artery was intentionally covered in 7 cases (25%), and revascularized in two hemodynamically stable patients prior to stent-graft deployment. Two patients died perioperatively due to multiorgan failure, for a total in-hospital mortality of 7%. Twenty-four patients (92% of survivors) adhered to the follow-up protocol (mean 37.3±17.5 months), and they are all alive without instances of reintervention. CONCLUSION: In our experience, endovascular treatment of acute traumatic thoracic aortic injuries using different commercially available stent-grafts allows to obtain satisfactory short term results.

The best treatment of juxtarenal aortic occlusion is and will be open surgery.

Occlusion of the infrarenal aorta (IAO) represents from 3% to 8.5% of aortoiliac occlusive diseases, and is a variant of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) Type D lesions. Two different patterns of IAO can be identified: Distal and proximal, or iuxtarenal. The former typically spares the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery, and is associated with the classic Leriche clinical triad. The latter extends cephalad approaching the level of the renal arteries, and may also cause acute renal failure, intestinal infarction, and even paraplegia due to the proximal propagation of aortic thrombosis. Endovascular treatment for TASC Type C and D lesions as a whole provides impressive results in terms of periprocedural morbidity, secondary patency rates, and of course less invasivity in comparison to open surgery. However, when complete aortic occlusions, and particularly juxtarenal occlusion, are specifically addressed, the reported results are in fact sobering, both in terms of technical success rates, and perioperative complications. Surgery repair of juxtarenal aortic occlusion, namely aortic endarterectomy and bypass grafting, is a challenging procedure that requires almost invariably aortic cross-clamping above the level of the renal arteries, and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, it currently provides unmatched perioperative and long-term results, and should be regarded as the treatment of choice.

Diagnostic laparoscopy for early detection of acute mesenteric ischaemia in patients with aortic dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Recognition of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMesI) in patients with aortic dissection (AoD) may be a challenge and exploratory laparotomy is often performed. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our experience with the use of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) for the early detection of AMesI in patients with AoD, either undergoing medical treatment or after open/endovascular interventions. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2011, 202 consecutive AoDs were treated in our centre (71 acute type A AoD; 131 acute and chronic type B AoD). Among the 17 (8.4%) patients in which AMesI was suspected, nine (52.9%) were selected for DL. Three DLs were performed during medical treatment of patients with acute type B AoD, six after treatment of AoD (both surgical and endovascular). Three second-look DLs were also performed. Eight DLs were negative, three showed AMesI and the patients underwent successful emergent revascularisation. One DL was not conclusive and laparotomy was required. Among the eight patients not submitted to DL, one case of bowel infarction was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In our series DL was feasible and safe. The low invasiveness and repeatability were the main advantages. Although additional experience is mandatory, DL seems a promising technique for the detection of AMesI in patients with AoD.

Open repair for infrarenal AAA: technical aspects.

The aim of this study was to describe the technique and report our single center experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open surgical repair over the last 17 years. From 1993 to 2010, a total of 4347 open surgical procedures for repair of AAA were performed in our center. The details of 3857 (88.7%) patients undergoing infrarenal AAA open repair were analyzed; mean age at the time of surgery was 71.8 years ranging from 58 to 89 years. Among all repairs, 23.7% (914) were performed in women and 24.3% (937) in octogenarians; 3587 (93.0%) procedures were performed for degenerative aneurysms, 146 (3.8%) for inflammatory aneurysms, 100 (2.6%) for dissecting aneurysms, and 19 (0.5%) for other pattern of disease. In 162 cases (4.2%) surgery was performed for ruptured aneurysm. In most cases (N.=2596; 67.3%) infrarenal AAA open repair was performed by means of aorto-aortic bypass using a tube graft. A total of 1261 patients were treated using a bifurcated graft: 417 (33.1%) aorto-iliac bypasses, 530 (42.0%) aorto-femoral bypasses and 314 (24.9%) aorto-iliac-femoral bypasses were performed. In elective aorto-aortic bypass, mean aortic clamping time was 21.3+6.7 minutes. The average duration of the procedure was 126+84 minutes (range, 42-410 minutes). Mean intraoperative bleeding was 803.4+422.7 mL (range 250-3,100). Overall intraoperative mortality was 0.2%. Intraoperative mesenteric ischemia was observed in 3% of cases, all treated with inferior mesenteric artery reimplantation. The rate of intraoperative lower limbs ischemia was 2.2%. One intraoperative acute type A aortic dissection occurred. The overall 30-day mortality was 0.6%. Permanent renal function impairment occurred in 4.3% of cases. The rate of pulmonary complications was 9.8%. Other complications were myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, late ischemic colitis, late leg ischemia, wound infection, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Although endovascular techniques have emerged as a less invasive alternative to open repair, short- and long-term outcomes associated to the surgery of infrarenal AAAs remain satisfactory for a large range of patients.

Analysis of stroke after TEVAR involving the aortic arch.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the incidence of stroke after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch disease. METHODS: In the last decade, 393 patients received TEVAR at our Institution; in 143 cases the aortic arch was involved (32 zones '0', 35 zones '1' and 76 zone '2'). The left subclavian artery (LSA) was revascularised selectively in 75 cases; the proximal LSA was ligated or occluded with a plug in 55 cases before endograft (EG) deployment. RESULTS: Initial clinical success, perioperative mortality, spinal cord ischaemia and stroke in TEVAR patients with or without arch involvement were, respectively, 86.7% vs. 94.4%, 4.2% vs. 2.4%, 2.1% vs. 3.6% and 2.8% vs. 1.2%. The stroke rate was 9.4% (P < 0.02) in 'zone 0', 0% in 'zone 1' and 1.3% in 'zone 2' with scans showing severe atheroma and/or thrombus in all cases. Stroke was observed in patients with 2.6% or without 2.9% LSA revascularisation; however, it was never observed in patients in whom the LSA was occluded before EG deployment and in 4.5% of patients in whom it was patent at the time of EG deployment. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke after TEVAR is not infrequent especially when the arch is involved. Careful patient selection together with a strategy to reduce embolisation such as occlusion of supra-aortic trunks before EG deployment may play a beneficial role.

Aseptic polyurethane carotid patch rejection: complication, allergy or miraculous healing?

Carotid endarterectomy plays an important role in the prevention of ischemic stroke; patching could reduce the risk of intra- and postoperative complications and late restenosis among primary closure. Materials actually available for the patch tailoring are synthetic or biological: which is the best is still debated. We present the case of a polyurethane (PU) carotid patch rejection three years after its implant, with no evident arterial discontinuity and no sign of infection. Histopathological analysis on hematoxylin-eosin stained sections of the regenerated arterial wall tissue removed revealed plasma cell infiltration and clusters of foreign body giant cells. PU patch rejection has been seldom described in literature. This is an unusual late complication that should be considered at long-term follow-up evaluation of these patients.

Hybrid procedures for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and dissections.

The search for less invasive therapeutic approaches to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) brought endovascular procedures to establish themselves as alternatives to open surgery in high-risk patients. Aim of this study is to illustrate the hybrid - open and endovascular - treatment of dissecting and non-dissecting TAAAs, and to analyze short and midterm results at our Center. We analyzed 41 high-risk patients who underwent hybrid TAAA repair (dissecting TAAA in 17% of cases) with a variety of visceral rerouting configuration and of commercially available thoracic endografts. Thirty-one simultaneous (76%) and 10 staged procedures (24%) were performed with a four-vessel revascularization in 13 cases (32%), a three-vessel in 9 (22%) and a two-vessel in 19 (46%). No intraoperative deaths were observed in our series, with a technical success in endovascular TAAA repair of 100%. Two patients died in the intersurgical time. A perioperative mortality of 13% and a perioperative morbidity of 32% were recorded, including one case (2.4%) of permanent paraplegia. At a median follow-up of 23.3 months, we observed a visceral graft occlusion rate of 6%, three type II endoleak and one endograft migration. Six patients died for unrelated events. Typical complications of conventional TAAA open surgery have been not eliminated by hybrid repair and still significant mortality and morbidity have been reported. Dissecting etiology did not negatively affect the outcome of hybrid repair in our experience. Fate of visceral bypasses and incidence of endoleak and other endograft-related complications need to be carefully assessed. Hybrid TAAA repair should nowadays be limited as alternative to simple observation in patients unfit for the conventional open repair.