[Frequency and severity of sarcopenia in patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory musculoskeletal diseases : Results of a monocentric study in a tertiary care center]. / Häufigkeit und Schweregrad von Sarkopenie bei Patient*innen mit entzündlichen und nichtentzündlichen muskuloskeletalen Erkrankungen : Ergebnisse einer monozentrischen Studie in einem tertiären Zentrum.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia (SP) is defined as the pathological loss of muscle mass and function. This is a clinically relevant problem, especially in geriatric patients, because SP is associated with falls, frailty, loss of function, and increased mortality. People with inflammatory and degenerative rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMD) are also at risk for developing SP; however, there is little research on the prevalence of this health disorder in this patient group using currently available SP criteria. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and severity of SP in patients with RMD. METHODS: A total of 141 consecutive patients over 65 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthritis (SpA), vasculitis, and noninflammatory musculoskeletal diseases were recruited in a cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP 1 and 2) definitions of presarcopenia, SP, and severe SP were used to determine the prevalence. Lean mass as a parameter of muscle mass and bone density were measured by dual X­ray absorptiometry (DXA). Handgrip strength and the short physical performance battery (SPPB) were performed in a standardized manner. Furthermore, the frequency of falls and the presence of frailty were determined. Student's T-test and the χ2-test were used for statistics. RESULTS: Of the patients included 73% were female, the mean age was 73 years and 80% had an inflammatory RMD. According to EWGSOP 2, 58.9% of participants probable had SP due to low muscle function. When muscle mass was added for confirmation, the prevalence of SP was 10.6%, 5.6% of whom had severe SP. The prevalence was numerically but not statistically different between inflammatory (11.5%) and noninflammatory RMD (7.1%). The prevalence of SP was highest in patients with RA (9.5%) and vasculitis (24%), and lowest in SpA (4%). Both osteoporosis (40% vs. 18.5%) and falls (15% vs. 8.6%) occurred more frequently in patients with SP than those without SP. DISCUSSION: This study showed a relatively high prevalence of SP, especially in patients with RA and vasculitis. In patients at risk, measures to detect SP should routinely be performed in a standardized manner in the clinical practice. The high frequency of muscle function deficits in this study population supports the importance of measuring muscle mass in addition to bone density with DXA to confirm SP.

[How well are patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases protected against measles?] / Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of infections due to the autoimmune disease but also due to the immunosuppressive medication. Although vaccinations are known to be effective in the primary prophylaxis of infections, the vaccination rate in Germany is generally too low. Due to the recently increasing, sometimes epidemic-like occurrence of measles, the administration of live vaccine against measles has recently become required by law. OBJECTIVE: How many patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are currently sufficiently protected against measles? METHOD: Between December 2017 and October 2018 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases at the Ruhrgebiet Rheumatism Center were prospectively and consecutively included. Data on the disease and treatment at the level of substance classes, patient history of vaccination and infections were collated. All information on vaccinations were controlled in the vaccination certificate. Antibodies against measles were determined using ELISA. The threshold for sufficient protection against measles was set at 150 mIU/ml. RESULTS: Out of 975 patients 540 (55.4%) could present a vaccination certificate. In 201 patients with a certificate (37.2%) vaccination had been documented since birth. Overall, 45 out of 267 patients born after 1970 (16.9%) had sufficient protection against measles. The patient history of measles in childhood showed no differences between patients with and without protective measles IgG antibodies. Protective measles IgG antibodies were detected in 901 out of 928 patients with measurement of the measles IgG antibody level (97.1%). The different principles of action of the current immunosuppressive treatments had no influence on this. CONCLUSION: These data show that at least 2.9% of the patients did not have sufficient protection against measles. Interestingly, the majority of patients born after 1970 had protective antibodies despite the lack of vaccination against measles. The efforts in primary and also in the specialist medical care should be urgently strengthened in order to be able to guarantee an adequate infection prophylaxis in particularly endangered patients.

[Biosimilars and the nocebo effect]. / Biosimilars und der Nocebo-Effekt.

Biosimilars have been approved for use in Germany for many years and in the meantime also in rheumatology but only a few years ago. Biosimilars, which are biotechnologically manufactured products the same as reference biologicals, have actually now achieved a substantial proportion of the market in some regions but there are still doubters among patients and physicians who fear a loss of quality even if there is no evidence for this. A part of this problem can be explained by the nocebo effect but which furthermore also has a substantial medical importance. This effect is described and explained in this article. Psychosocial and context-related factors, such as the relationship between patient and physician, previous experience with treatment and treatment expectations can either improve or impair the efficacy of treatment interventions. These phenomena are commonly known as placebo and nocebo effects. As placebo and nocebo effects can influence the development of symptoms, the frequency of undesired events and the efficacy of treatment, it is decisive to know these effects and to develop strategies for prevention in order to optimize the treatment results. Although in recent years experimental studies have achieved substantial progress in the clarification of the psychosocial and neurobiological mechanisms of placebo effects, detailed mechanisms of nocebo effects are still widely unexplored. An improved understanding of these mechanisms promises the development of user-friendly strategies for the clinical care to improve treatment results and patient satisfaction.