Harmonization of Molecular Testing for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Emphasis on PD-L1.

Comprehensive molecular testing plays a critical role in the choice of treatment for non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC). The analysis of druggable alterations in EGFR, BRAF, MET, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1/2/3 genes is more or less standardized and can be achieved using a single diagnostic platform, e.g., next generation sequencing (NGS) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In contrast to above targets, PD-L1 testing requires the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC). There are multiple PD-L1 IHC assays, which utilize distinct antibodies and detection systems. These PD-L1 tests are tailored to distinct drugs, often rely on different thresholds and scoring guidelines, and are characterized by incomplete inter-laboratory and inter-observer reproducibility. Several studies evaluated the performance of PD-L1 RNA expression tests, as PCR-based RNA analysis is compatible with other NSCLC molecular testing platforms, can be performed in a semi-automated manner, and has a potential for proper standardization. These investigations revealed a correlation between PD-L1 protein and RNA expression; however, there were NSCLCs demonstrating decent amounts of PD-L1 transcript in the absence of PD-L1 IHC staining. Clinical studies are required to evaluate, which of the two PD-L1 testing approaches, i.e., RNA or protein expression measurement, has a better predictive value.

Distribution of EGFR Mutations in 10,607 Russian Patients with Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study was aimed to evaluate distribution of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in a large series of Russian lung cancer (LC) patients. METHODS: 10,607 LC samples were considered for EGFR analysis; EGFR status was successfully determined in 10,426 cases (98.3 %), indicating relatively low failure rate. RESULTS: EGFR mutations (ex19del and L858R) were detected in 1759/8716 (20.2 %) adenocarcinomas, 28/669 (4.2 %) squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 8/119 (6.7 %) large cell carcinomas. The occurrence of EGFR mutations in adenocarcinomas gradually increased with age, being attributed mainly to the increment of the L858R frequency in non-smokers (patients aged 18-30 years: 1/27 (3.7 %); 31-40 years: 5/98 (5.1 %); 41-50 years: 18/276 (6.5 %); 51-60 years: 102/944 (10.8 %); 61-70 years: 138/1011 (13.7 %); 71-80 years: 85/496 (17.1 %); 81-100 years: 5/27 (18.5 %); p < 0.0001). The EGFR mutation was detected in 804/2107 (38.2 %) non-smoking women versus 125/806 (15.5 %) non-smoking men (p < 0.0001), while the corresponding figures for smokers were 60/273 (22.0 %) versus 147/2214 (6.6 %) (p < 0.0001). The obtained gender-related data differ from the estimates obtained in Asian studies; they indicate that increased prevalence of EGFR mutations in white females may not be entirely attributed to the low prevalence of smoking, but is likely to be related to gender factors per se. CONCLUSION: Biological causes of distinct age- and gender-related distribution of EGFR mutations in LC deserve further investigation.

Hypercoagulability as a prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In experimental systems, interference with coagulation can affect tumor biology. We suggested that abnormal coagulation could be a negative predictor for response to immunotherapy and survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). METHODS: To address this issue, retrospective analysis of 289 previously untreated MRCC patients entering on institutional review board-approved clinical trials was conducted between 2003 and 2006. In addition, two groups of MRCC patients with (n = 28) or without (n = 28) hypercoagulability were compared in a case-control study. Baseline and treatment characteristics were well balanced. RESULTS: Hypercoagulability was present at treatment start in 40% of patients. Median baseline fibrinogen was 6.2 mg/dl. Serious disorders were found in 68% of patients. Abnormal coagulation was strongly associated with a number of metastatic sites (2 and more metastatic sites vs. 0-1 (P = .001). Patients with high extent of hypercoagulability had significantly higher number of metastatic sites (P = .02). On univariate analysis, patients with hypercoagulability had significantly shorter overall survival than patients with normal coagulation; median survivals of 8.9 and 16.3, respectively (P = .001).Short survival and low response rate also were significantly associated with hypercoagulability in a case-control study. Median survival was 8.2 months and 14.6 months, respectively (P = .0011). Disease control rate (overall response + stable disease) was significantly higher in patients with normal coagulation: 71.4 versus 42.9% (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Hypercoagulability disorders were found to be prognostic factor for response rate to systemic therapy and survival in patients with MRCC.