Executive summary of the Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias - 2023.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the main cause of death worldwide, and thus its prevention, early diagnosis and treatment is of paramount importance. Dyslipidemia represents a major ASCVD risk factor that should be adequately managed at different clinical settings. 2023 guidelines of the Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society focus on the assessment of ASCVD risk, laboratory evaluation of dyslipidemias, new and emerging lipid-lowering drugs, as well as diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders in women, the elderly and in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, stroke, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Statin intolerance is also discussed.

Evaluation of the usability of the digital platform navigator KardioUp for the journey of patients with chronic heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Digital health interventions constitute a promising supplementary approach for further improvement of the quality and experience of cardiovascular care in patients with heart failure (HF). However, concerns about privacy, security, and quality may arise additionally to lack of personal motivation and accessibility to digital resources. Therefore, the proposed system aims to implement innovative technological trends in HF monitoring by recording clinical, biological, and biometric parameters. METHODS: The availability and feasibility of the digital platform KardioUp was evaluated in a group of 25 patients with HF (mean age: 60 years) and 15 medical doctors (mean age 40 years) in two University Cardiology Clinics of the country. Connectivity of platform with the application and Android devices, use of alerts in clinical measurements, educational material provided, and total satisfaction by both patients and physicians were also evaluated. Patients with health barriers to understand the use of digital platforms or low eHealth ≤8 (digital unawareness) were excluded. RESULTS: All patients answered that the upload of measurements of blood pressure, blood glucose, and weight into the application were feasible. Patients mean eHealth score was 32,7. Additionally, the graphics of the application were friendly and educational material was also easily approached. Patients felt that this application can enable real patient-empowerment and self-management support. CONCLUSIONS: KardioUp was evaluated as a non-pharmacological intervention that could promote autonomous living of patients. Thus, possible alterations in daily activities and other parameters will be continuously evaluated providing metrics' monitoring on patients' performance, adherence to their treatment plan, avoidance of rehospitalizations, and overall health metrics.

Wearable blood pressure measurement devices and new approaches in hypertension management: the digital era.

Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is considered an integral component of the diagnostic algorithm and management of hypertension. In the era of digitalization, a great deal of wearable BP measuring devices has been developed. These digital blood pressure monitors allow frequent BP measurements with minimal annoyance to the patient while they do promise radical changes regarding the diagnostic accuracy, as the importance of making an accurate diagnosis of hypertension has become evident. By increasing the number of BP measurements in different conditions, these monitors allow accurate identification of different clinical phenotypes, such as masked hypertension and pathological BP variability, that seem to have a negative impact on cardiovascular prognosis. Frequent measurements of BP and the incorporation of new features in BP variability, both enable well-rounded interpretation of BP data in the context of real-life settings. This article is a review of all different technologies and wearable BP monitoring devices.

Beta thalassemia major: the invaluable role of electrocardiography and echocardiography.

The submitted manuscript is a "Letter to the Editor" with reference to the "Evaluation of electrocardiography, echocardiography and cardiac T2* for cardiac complications in beta thalassemia major" by Fadime Ersoy Dursun et al. (The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02421-x ).

Ivabradine and metoprolol in fixed dose combination: When, why and how to use it.

Heart rate is an important factor in coronary artery disease and its manifestations, and as such has been considered as a possible target for therapy. Although in epidemiological, and in less degree, in clinical studies derived indications of a possible pathogenetic role of heart rate in major cardiac diseases, clinical trials did not provided any strong evidence. However, even as a simple risk marker, remains important in the treatment of coronary artery disease and heart failure. Beta-blockers are the drugs most frequently used for heart rate control. However, recent studies constantly find insufficient effectiveness of beta-blockers in heart rate control and go further to question their efficacy on outcomes, making clear the need for an additional therapy. Ivabradine, a pure heart rate inhibitor, added to classic beta-blocker treatment represent the new therapeutic option in stable coronary disease and heart failure.

Mediterranean diet and prognosis of first-diagnosed Acute Coronary Syndrome patients according to heart failure phenotype: Hellenic Heart Failure Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nutrition in secondary prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is inadequately investigated. We sought to evaluate the role of Mediterranean diet in prognosis of first-diagnosed ACS patients, according to heart failure type. SUBJECTS/METHODS: in 2006-2009, 1000 consecutive patients hospitalized at First Cardiology Clinic of Athens with ACS diagnosis were enrolled in the study. In 2016, 10-year follow-up was performed (75% participation rate). Only n=690 (69%) first-diagnosed ACS patients were included. Adherence to Mediterranean diet was assessed through MedDietScore (range 0-55). Heart failure phenotypes were reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction (that is, HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively). RESULTS: Ranking from first to third MedDietScore tertile, fewer 1, 2 and 10-year fatal/non-fatal ACS events were observed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis highlighted a significantly inverse association between MedDietScore and long-term ACS prognosis in 1 year (odds ratio (OR)=0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.71, 1.00), P=0.05), 2 year (OR=0.91, 95% CI (0.82, 1.00), P=0.04) and 10 year (OR=0.93, 95% CI (0.85, 1.00), P=0.05) follow-up. Further analysis revealed that MedDietScore differentially affected patients' prognosis according to heart failure phenotype, with short-term impact in HFrEF and HFmrEF patients yet longer positive outcomes in HFpEF and C-reactive protein potentially mediated these relations. CONCLUSIONS: Mediterranean diet seemed to protect against recurrent cardiac episodes in coronary patients with major ACS complications. Results were more encouraging with regard to patients with preserved left ventricle function. Such findings may possess a cost-effective, supplementary-to-medical, treatment approach in this patient category where evidence concerning their management are inconclusive.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 23 August 2017; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2017.122.

Differential effects of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on target organ damage and sympathetic activation in non-obese essential hypertensive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the combination of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on blood pressure, target organ damage and sympathetic activation in patients with grade 2 essential hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 3 month, randomized, blinded-endpoint study in essential hypertensive patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Office and ambulatory blood pressure, arterial stiffness, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, renal arterial resistive index, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity were evaluated at baseline, after a 2 week run-in placebo period, at 1 month and at 3 months. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients were assigned to lercanidipine/enalapril (n = 19), enalapril/amlodipine (n = 18) and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril (n = 19). Each pharmacological combination tested was effective in reducing office blood pressure at 1 month and 3 months, and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure at 3 months. Renal arterial resistive index (RI) significantly improved at 1 month and 3 months compared with baseline in all groups. However in the lercanidipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril groups, RI was favorably reduced (0.53 ± 0.03 and 0.54 ± 0.04 respectively, p < 0.05) in comparison with the enalapril/amlodipine RI value (0.57 ± 0.03) at 3 months. Moreover, after 3 months of treatment, a significant decrease (by -5.47 bursts/min) (p < 0.05) in muscle sympathetic nerve activity was observed in the lercanidipine/enalapril group (50.79 ± 6.49) compared with baseline (56.26 ± 6.05), while no differences were detected in the amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence of the efficacy of the lercanidipine/enalapril combination in ameliorating hypertension-related target organ damage and in reducing sympathetic overdrive.

A literature review to evaluate the clinical and economic value of olmesartan for the treatment of hypertensive patients.

The objective of the present study was to systematically review the clinical and economic outcomes of olmesartan as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of hypertension. A literature search was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane library until December 2015, with no limit on publication date. Eligible studies were selected using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, limiting articles to those published in the English language. Background information of the study, participants' characteristics and study outcomes were collected. Meta-analysis of data was not performed. Fifty-five studies were included, of which fifty investigated the clinical efficacy of olmesartan and five the cost-effectiveness of olmesartan. In general results from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of olmesartan as monotherapy and as combination therapy demonstrated that olmesartan provided better antihypertensive blood pressure-lowering efficacy and was generally well tolerated compared with other antihypertensive agents. Results from economic evaluations indicated that olmesartan may be more cost-effective than other ARBs such as losartan, valsartan, irbesartan and candesartan, having the potential of decreasing the overall medical costs of care for patients with hypertension. Evidence from the present systematic review confirms the antihypertensive efficacy and good safety profile of olmesartan both as monotherapy and as combination therapy. Olmesartan was also found to be cost-effective compared with other ARBs, though this area has yet relatively poor evidence and needs to further be explored.

Is epistaxis associated with arterial hypertension? A systematic review of the literature.

Both epistaxis and hypertension are frequent problems in the adult population. The relationship between the level of arterial pressure and incidence of epistaxis in a patient with hypertension is a question that appears frequently in the clinical practice. A systematic review of the literature regarding the relation of arterial hypertension with epistaxis was performed through MEDLINE and EMBASE. All studies, whether examining the correlation of arterial pressure at presentation of a patient with nasal bleeding or the repercussion of episodes of epistaxis in hypertensive patients, were included in this review. Studies were evaluated independently by two reviewers according to a standard evaluation form. Overall, nine studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Five of them were single-group (patient) studies, while the remaining four included a control group. In eight studies, the patient group included patients with epistaxis, while one focused on hypertensive patients. Six out of nine studies agree that arterial pressure is higher at the time of epistaxis, as compared to the control group or to the general population. Seven out of nine studies conclude that there is cross-correlation between arterial pressure and the actual incident of epistaxis. The presence of high arterial blood pressure during the actual episode of nasal bleeding cannot establish a causative relationship with epistaxis, because of confounding stress and possible white coat phenomenon, but may lead to initial diagnosis of an already installed arterial hypertension.

Plasma levels of active extracellular matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in patients with essential hypertension before and after antihypertensive treatment.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that plasma concentrations of matrix metallo-proteinase-2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), two enzymes that share similar substrate specificity (collagen type IV and V), possibly related to vascular remodelling, are altered in essential hypertension. The second aim of the study was to assess whether chronic antihypertensive treatment with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine would normalize these alterations. To test this hypothesis, we measured plasma concentrations of active MMP-2 and MMP-9 in 42 patients with never-treated essential hypertension and in 25 normotensive control subjects. Measurements were repeated after 6 months of treatment with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine. Baseline values of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were decreased (P=0.01 and 0.002, respectively) in hypertensive patients compared with normotensives. Hypertensive patients with systemic vascular resistances <1440 dyn s/cm(5) exhibited higher values of MMP-2 (P=0.005) and MMP-9 (P=0.001) than hypertensive patients with systemic vascular resistances >1440 dyn s/cm(5). Treated patients attained a nonsignificant increase in MMP-2 plasma concentrations, but a significant increase in MMP-9 plasma concentrations (P=0.01) compared to respective values before treatment. In conclusion, these findings suggest that plasma concentrations of active MMP-2 and MMP-9, mainly related to vascular extracellular matrix metabolism, are depressed in patients with essential hypertension. A 6 month treatment with amlodipine can normalize MMP-9 but not MMP-2 plasma concentrations. The hypothesis that antihypertensive treatment may modulate collagen metabolism remains to be determined by further studies.