COVID-associated complications after reconstructive breast surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The COVID pandemic significantly influenced reconstructive breast surgery regimens. Many surgeries were cancelled or postponed. COVID entails not only respiratory, but also coagulative symptoms. It, therefore, potentially increases the risk of postoperative complications. The incidence of perioperative COVID infection and its influence on postoperative recovery after reconstructive breast surgery is still unknown. METHODS: This dual center retrospective cohort study included patients that underwent reconstructive breast surgery between March 2020 and July 2021. Post-mastectomy autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction (ABR; IBR), as well as post-lumpectomy oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction (PBR) were eligible. Patient data were extracted from electronic medical records. Data regarding COVID-19 infection was collected through a questionnaire. The primary outcome was complication rate. RESULTS: The ABR, IBR and PBR groups consisted of 113 (12 COVID-positive), 41 (2 COVID-positive) and 113 (10 COVID-positive) patients. In the ABR and PBR groups, postoperative complications occurred significantly more often in patients with perioperative COVID-infection. Especially impaired wound healing occurred significantly more often in the ABR and PBR breasts, but also at the donor site of ABR patients with perioperative COVID. CONCLUSION: Perioperative COVID-infection increases susceptibility to complicated wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery. A possible explanation lies in the dysregulation of haemostasis by the virus, and its direct effects on microvasculature. A hypercoagulable state results. We recommend to postpone elective breast surgery for 4-6 weeks after COVID-19 infection. Also, precautionary measures remain important to minimize the risk of perioperative COVID-19 infection.

The impact of using the internal mammary artery as a recipient vessel on medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion in autologous breast reconstruction: An observational study using indocyanine green.

BACKGROUND: The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the preferred recipient vessel for microvascular anastomosis in immediate autologous breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). Although the IMA accounts for approximately 60% of the blood supply to the breast, the exact contribution to the mastectomy skin flap perfusion is unclear. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the impact of using the IMA as a recipient vessel on medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion assessed with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). METHODS: This observational study included ten consecutive women who underwent immediate autologous breast reconstructions following SSM. Two intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) assessments were performed to assess tissue perfusion of the upper and lower part of the medial mastectomy skin flap: the first following the SSM and the second after clamping the IMA. During a 120-second angiography, three additional images were made after 60, 90, and 120 s. The ICG inflow time and mean, minimum, and maximum fluorescence intensities (FIs) were obtained. RESULTS: Four unilateral and six bilateral autologous breast reconstructions were included. There was no difference in tissue perfusion when comparing the inflow time (24.1 s vs. 23.0 s, P = 0.348), the mean FI (131.4 vs. 124.0, P = 0.126), minimum FI (28.6 vs. 33.4, P = 0.086), and maximum FI (253.1 vs. 247.6, P = 0.166) before and after clamping the IMA. CONCLUSION: According to this study, the use of the IMA as a recipient vessel does not reduce medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion in patients undergoing immediate autologous breast reconstructions following SSM.

The influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications of immediate DIEP flap breast reconstructions.

PURPOSE: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of complications of immediate deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2010 and June 2017. Patients were divided in two groups as breast reconstructions with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative flap re-explorations, recipient-site complications and donor-site complications. RESULTS: In total 432 immediate DIEP flap breast reconstructions in 326 patients were included. Forty-eight patients (n = 67 flaps) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to immediate breast reconstruction and 278 patients (n = 365 flaps) did not. No statistically significant differences for any major (4.5% vs. 10.4%; p = 0.175) or minor (16.4% vs. 24.7%; p = 0.191) recipient-site complication were observed. Donor-site complications were recorded in 9 (18.8%) and 62 (22.2%) patients, respectively (p = 0.587). There was no difference in need for flap re-exploration between groups (3.0% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.139). Correction for potential confounding variables did not result in significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated similar complication rates for patients with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to immediate breast reconstruction, indicating that it is safe to perform an immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation (p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results.

Complications following immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

PURPOSE: As more breast cancer patients opt for immediate breast reconstruction, the incidence of complications should be evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze the recipient-site complications and flap re-explorations of immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions. METHODS: For this multicenter retrospective cohort study, the medical records of all patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction in three hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2010 and June 2017 were reviewed. Patient demographics, risk factors, timing of reconstruction, recipient-site complications, and flap re-explorations were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 910 DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 397 immediate and n = 513 delayed reconstructions) in 737 patients were included. There were no significant differences in major complications or flap re-explorations between immediate and delayed reconstructions. The total flap failure rate was 1.5 and 2.5% in the immediate and delayed group, respectively. Significantly more hematomas (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.59-5.30; p = 0.001) and seromas (OR 3.60; 95% CI 1.14-11.4; p = 0.029) occurred in immediate reconstructions, whereas wound problems were more frequently observed in delayed reconstructions (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.27-3.11; p = 0.003). Correction for potential confounders still showed significant differences for hematoma and seroma, but no longer for wound problems (p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated similar incidences of major recipient-site complications and flap re-explorations between immediate and delayed DIEP flap breast reconstructions. However, hematoma and seroma occurred significantly more often in immediate reconstructions, while wound problems were more frequently observed in delayed reconstructions.

Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions and to assess the possible benefits of sensory nerve coaptation compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies regarding the sensory recovery of all types of innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions. RESULTS: The search yielded 334 hits, of which 32 studies concerning 1177 breast reconstructions were included. The amount of heterogeneity between the studies was high, which made the pooling of data difficult. The studies indicated that spontaneous reinnervation of autologous breast reconstructions occurred to a variable extent, depending on how and when it was measured. Despite these variable results, the sensory recovery of innervated flaps, however, was superior, started earlier and gradually improved over time with a higher chance of approaching normal values than non-innervated flaps. There is a lack of studies that assess the return of erogenous sensation and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The current evidence shows that nerve coaptation results in superior sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. This review illustrates that more standardised, high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to objectively evaluate the sensory recovery of the breast after autologous breast reconstructions.

Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the first choice for autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyse the recipient- and donor-site complications and compare them between unilateral and bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2014, 530 DIEP flap reconstructions were performed in 426 consecutive patients in three Dutch hospitals. Major and minor complications were categorised into recipient- and donor-site complications. Post-operative flap re-explorations were recorded. RESULTS: Of the total 530 DIEP flap reconstructions performed (322 unilateral, 104 bilateral), recipient-site complications were major in 9.8% and minor in 20.2%. The patients developed fat necrosis (unilateral 14.0% vs. bilateral 7.7%; OR 1.950; 95% CI 1.071-3.550; p = 0.027) and infection (unilateral 5.6% vs. bilateral 1.9%; OR 3.020; 95% CI 1.007-9.052; p = 0.039) at the recipient site significantly more frequently in the unilateral DIEP flap reconstructions. The donor-site complications were major in 0.9% and minor in 19.5% of the cases. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with complications (donor site: OR 1.137; 95% CI 1.075-1.201; p < 0.001, recipient site: OR 1.073; 95% CI 1.009-1.142; p = 0.026). Flap re-explorations were performed in 5.7% (n = 30) of the cases. Total flap loss occurred in 3.0% (n = 16) of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions can be performed with the same percentage of complications and re-explorations as unilateral reconstructions and even result in less fat necrosis and infection at the recipient site. Higher BMIs are significantly associated with recipient- and donor-site complications.

Single-stage breast reconstruction using Strattice™: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Strattice™, a porcine acellular dermal matrix, has emerged as a product to augment implant-based breast reconstruction. It aims to resolve problems related to poor tissue coverage of the implant. Presently, evidence justifying the use of Strattice in breast reconstruction is lacking. The objective of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes of a patient cohort that underwent single-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with the additional use of Strattice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent single-stage breast reconstruction with the use of Strattice. All cases of breast reconstruction after oncologic or prophylactic mastectomy between 2010 and 2014 in one of eight different centres in the Netherlands were included. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics and clinical outcome data were collected. The outcomes were presented using descriptive statistics, and the associations were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients who underwent either unilateral (60 patients) or bilateral (25 patients) (n = 110 breasts) single-stage breast reconstruction with the use of Strattice were identified. The indication for mastectomy was therapeutic in 69.1% (76) of cases and prophylactic in 30.9% (34) of cases. The reported minor complications included seroma (20.9%), skin necrosis (20.0%), wound dehiscence (11.8%), erythema/inflammation (14.5%) and infection (11.8%). In 22 breasts (22.7%), reoperation was necessary, with explantation of the implant in 11 breasts (11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the total complication rate was very high (78%). Although most complications were minor, reoperation was performed in 22.7%, with explantation of the implant in 11.8% of breasts. We suggest that patient selection, experience of the surgeon and handling of early complications are factors playing a crucial role in the success of the operation. The use of a Strattice sheet in single-stage implant-based breast reconstruction may be a promising technique, but more evidence from prospective, randomized studies is necessary to justify its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.