An Updated Review of the Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There has been remarkable progress in the treatment of HF over recent years with the establishment of guideline-directed medical therapies including: (1) Beta-blockers, (2) renal angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition (i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEi], aldosterone receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]); (3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and (4) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). However, there are challenges to the implementation of these medications in patients with concomitant CKD due to increased vulnerability to common side-effects (including worsening renal function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension), and most of the pivotal trials which provide evidence of the efficacy of these medications excluded patients with severe CKD. Patients with CKD and HF often have regular healthcare encounters with multiple professionals and can receive conflicting guidance regarding their medication. Thus, despite being at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events, patients who have both HF and CKD are more likely to be under-optimised on evidence-based therapies. This review is an updated summary of the evidence available for the management of HF (including reduced, mildly reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction) in patients with various stages of CKD. The review covers the evidence for recommended medications, devices such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), intravenous (IV) iron, and discusses how frailty affects the management of these patients. It also considers emerging evidence for the prevention of HF in the cohort of patients with CKD. It synthesises the available evidence regarding when to temporarily stop, continue or rechallenge medications in this cohort. Chronic HF in context of CKD remains a challenging scenario for clinicians to manage, which is usually complicated by frailty, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Treatment should be tailored to a patients individual needs and management in specialised cardio-renal clinics with a multi-disciplinary team approach has been recommended. This review offers a concise summary on this expansive topic.

Investigating the relationship between FRailty And Quality of LIfe in patients with heart faiLure and CKD (FRAIL study).

AIMS: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) are disproportionally affected by frailty, an independent predictor of morbidity. The prevalence of frailty and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in a unique population of patients with both CKD and HF (CKD-HF) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between frailty and QoL in patients with CKD-HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were identified from a tertiary care cardiorenal clinic. Eligible patients had CKD-HF with a stable estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.732. Data were collected from each participant at one point in time using surveys delivered by study personnel between 14 July 2022 and 31 March 2023. Frailty was defined as Modified Frailty Phenotype (MFP) score ≥3. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess QoL. Demographic data were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. Demographics and QoL were compared between frail and non-frail cohorts using Pearson's R and Student's t-test (two-tailed, alpha-priori = 0.05). One hundred five participants consented, and 103 completed the questionnaires in full. Amongst the 103 participants, 49.5% (n = 51) were frail. Frailty was related to sex (P = 0.021) and medication count (P = 0.007), however not to other clinical measures, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.437) and ejection fraction (P = 0.911). Frail patients reported poorer QoL across physical functioning (P < 0.001), general health (P < 0.001), bodily pain (P = 0.004), social functioning (P < 0.001), and energy levels (P < 0.001), however not emotional wellbeing (P = 0.058); 51.5% cited 'better quality of life' as their healthcare priority, over longer survival (23.3%) or avoiding hospital admissions (22.3%). This was consistent across frail and non-frail groups. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of CKD-HF patients are frail, regardless of disease severity, and more susceptible to significantly poorer QoL across physical and social domains. Improving QoL is the priority of patients across both frail and non-frail cohorts, further emphasizing the need for prompt recognition of frailty as well as possible intervention and prevention.

Indicated prevention interventions for anxiety in children and adolescents: a review and meta-analysis of school-based programs.

Anxiety disorders are among the most common youth mental health disorders. Early intervention can reduce elevated anxiety symptoms. School-based interventions exist but it is unclear how effective targeted approaches are for reducing symptoms of anxiety. This review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of school-based indicated interventions for symptomatic children and adolescents. The study was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42018087628]. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library for randomised-controlled trials comparing indicated programs for child and adolescent (5-18 years) anxiety to active or inactive control groups. Data were extracted from papers up to December 2019. The primary outcome was efficacy (mean change in anxiety symptom scores). Sub-group and sensitivity analyses explored intervention intensity and control type. We identified 20 studies with 2076 participants. Eighteen studies were suitable for meta-analysis. A small positive effect was found for indicated programs compared to controls on self-reported anxiety symptoms at post-test (g = - 0.28, CI = - 0.50, - 0.05, k = 18). This benefit was maintained at 6 (g = - 0.35, CI = - 0.58, - 0.13, k = 9) and 12 months (g = - 0.24, CI = - 0.48, 0.00, k = 4). Based on two studies, > 12 month effects were very small (g = - 0.01, CI = - 0.38, 0.36). No differences were found based on intervention intensity or control type. Risk of bias and variability between studies was high (I2 = 78%). Findings show that school-based indicated programs for child and adolescent anxiety can produce small beneficial effects, enduring for up to 12 months. Future studies should include long-term diagnostic assessments.