ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiovascular effects of a combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan (MVX) versus medetomidine (MED) alone administered intramuscularly (IM) and to determine whether heart rate (HR) can be used as a surrogate for cardiac output (CO) after the use of medetomidine with or without vatinoxan. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, blinded, experimental, crossover study. ANIMALS: A group of eight healthy Beagle dogs aged 4.6 (2.3-9.4) years and weighing 12.9 (9-14.7) kg, median (range). METHODS: Each dog was injected with 1 mg m-2 medetomidine with or without 20 mg m-2 vatinoxan IM with a washout period of 7 days. Cardiovascular data and arterial and mixed venous blood gas samples were collected at baseline, 5, 10, 15, 20, 35, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after treatment administration. CO was measured at all time points via thermodilution. Differences between treatments, period and sequence were evaluated with repeated measures analysis of covariance and the relationship between HR and CO was assessed with a repeated measures analysis of variance; p values < 0.05 were deemed significant. RESULTS: The CO was 47-96% lower after MED than after MVX (p < 0.0001). Increases in systemic, pulmonary arterial and right atrial pressures and oxygen extraction ratio were significantly higher after MED than after MVX (all p < 0.0001). HR was significantly lower after MED and the linear relationship to CO was significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Overall, MED affected the cardiovascular system more negatively than MVX, and the difference in cardiovascular function between the treatments can be considered clinically relevant. HR was linearly related to CO, and decreases in HR reflected cardiac performance for dogs sedated with medetomidine with or without vatinoxan.
Subject(s)
Heart , Medetomidine , Dogs , Animals , Cross-Over Studies , Medetomidine/pharmacology , ArteriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate effects of vatinoxan in dogs, when administered as intravenous (IV) premedication with medetomidine and butorphanol before anaesthesia for surgical castration. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 28 client-owned dogs. METHODS: Dogs were premedicated with medetomidine (0.125 mg m-2) and butorphanol (0.2 mg kg-1) (group MB; n = 14), or medetomidine (0.25 mg m-2), butorphanol (0.2 mg kg-1) and vatinoxan (5 mg m-2) (group MB-VATI; n = 14). Anaesthesia was induced 15 minutes later with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen (targeting 1.3%). Before surgical incision, lidocaine (2 mg kg-1) was injected intratesticularly. At the end of the procedure, meloxicam (0.2 mg kg-1) was administered IV. The level of sedation, the qualities of induction, intubation and recovery, and Glasgow Composite Pain Scale short form (GCPS-SF) were assessed. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane (Fe'Sevo) and carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2) were recorded. Blood samples were collected at 10 and 30 minutes after premedication for plasma medetomidine and butorphanol concentrations. RESULTS: At the beginning of surgery, HR was 61 ± 16 and 93 ± 23 beats minute-1 (p = 0.001), and MAP was 78 ± 7 and 56 ± 7 mmHg (p = 0.001) in MB and MB-VATI groups, respectively. No differences were detected in fR, Pe'CO2, Fe'Sevo, the level of sedation, the qualities of induction, intubation and recovery, or in GCPS-SF. Plasma medetomidine concentrations were higher in group MB-VATI than in MB at 10 minutes (p = 0.002) and 30 minutes (p = 0.0001). Plasma butorphanol concentrations were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In group MB, HR was significantly lower than in group MB-VATI. Hypotension detected in group MB-VATI during sevoflurane anaesthesia was clinically the most significant difference between groups.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Medetomidine , Dogs , Animals , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Butorphanol/pharmacology , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Carbon Dioxide/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Anesthesia/veterinary , Heart RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of intramuscular (IM) co-administration of the peripheral α2-adrenoceptor agonist vatinoxan (MK-467) with medetomidine and butorphanol prior to intravenous (IV) ketamine on the cardiopulmonary and anaesthetic effects in dogs, followed by atipamezole reversal. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, masked crossover study. ANIMALS: A total of eight purpose-bred Beagle dogs aged 3 years. METHODS: Each dog was instrumented and administered two treatments 2 weeks apart: medetomidine (20 µg kg-1) and butorphanol (100 µg kg-1) premedication with vatinoxan (500 µg kg-1; treatment MVB) or without vatinoxan (treatment MB) IM 20 minutes before IV ketamine (4 mg kg-1). Atipamezole (100 µg kg-1) was administered IM 60 minutes after ketamine. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial (MAP) and central venous (CVP) pressures and cardiac output (CO) were measured; cardiac (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVRI) indices were calculated before and 10 minutes after MVB or MB, and 10, 25, 40, 55, 70 and 100 minutes after ketamine. Data were analysed with repeated measures analysis of covariance models. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sedation, induction, intubation and recovery scores were assessed. RESULTS: At most time points, HR and CI were significantly higher, and SVRI and CVP significantly lower with MVB than with MB. With both treatments, SVRI and MAP decreased after ketamine, whereas HR and CI increased. MAP was significantly lower with MVB than with MB; mild hypotension (57-59 mmHg) was recorded in two dogs with MVB prior to atipamezole administration. Sedation, induction, intubation and recovery scores were not different between treatments, but intolerance to the endotracheal tube was observed earlier with MVB. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Haemodynamic performance was improved by vatinoxan co-administration with medetomidine-butorphanol, before and after ketamine administration. However, vatinoxan was associated with mild hypotension after ketamine with the dose used in this study. Vatinoxan shortened the duration of anaesthesia.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia/veterinary , Butorphanol/pharmacology , Heart Rate/drug effects , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Animals , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Butorphanol/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Dogs , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Male , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Quinolizines/administration & dosage , Vascular ResistanceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cardiovascular and sedation reversal effects of IM administration of atipamezole (AA) in dogs treated with medetomidine hydrochloride (MED) or MED and vatinoxan (MK-467). ANIMALS: 8 purpose-bred, 2-year-old Beagles. PROCEDURES: A randomized, blinded, crossover study was performed in which each dog received 2 IM treatments at a ≥ 2-week interval as follows: injection of MED (20 µg/kg) or MED mixed with 400 µg of vatinoxan/kg (MEDVAT) 30 minutes before AA (100 µg/kg). Sedation score, heart rate, mean arterial and central venous blood pressures, and cardiac output were recorded before and at various time points (up to 90 minutes) after AA. Cardiac and systemic vascular resistance indices were calculated. Venous blood samples were collected at intervals until 210 minutes after AA for drug concentration analysis. RESULTS: Heart rate following MED administration was lower, compared with findings after MEDVAT administration, prior to and at ≥ 10 minutes after AA. Mean arterial blood pressure was lower with MEDVAT than with MED at 5 minutes after AA, when its nadir was detected. Overall, cardiac index was higher and systemic vascular resistance index lower, indicating better cardiovascular function, in MEDVAT-atipamezole-treated dogs. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were lower and recoveries from sedation were faster and more complete after MEDVAT treatment with AA than after MED treatment with AA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Atipamezole failed to restore heart rate and cardiac index in medetomidine-sedated dogs, and relapses into sedation were observed. Coadministration of vatinoxan with MED helped to maintain hemodynamic function and hastened the recovery from sedation after AA in dogs.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Dogs , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Anesthesia/veterinary , Animals , Cardiac Output/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Male , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Medetomidine/antagonists & inhibitors , Quinolizines/antagonists & inhibitors , Random Allocation , Single-Blind MethodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We determined the possible effects of a peripherally acting α2-adrenoceptor antagonist, MK-467, on the absorption of intramuscularly (IM) coadministered medetomidine, butorphanol and midazolam. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, experimental, blinded crossover study. ANIMALS: Six healthy Beagle dogs. METHODS: Two IM treatments were administered: 1) medetomidine hydrochloride (20 µg kg-1) + butorphanol (100 µg kg-1) + midazolam (200 µg kg-1; MBM) and 2) MBM + MK-467 hydrochloride (500 µg kg-1; MBM-MK), mixed in a syringe. Heart rate was recorded at regular intervals. Sedation was assessed with visual analog scales (0-100 mm). Drug concentrations in plasma were analyzed with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with chiral separation of dex- and levomedetomidine. Maximum drug concentrations in plasma (Cmax) and time to Cmax (Tmax) were determined. Paired t-tests, with Bonferroni correction when appropriate, were used for comparisons between the treatments. RESULTS: Data from five dogs were analyzed. Heart rate was significantly higher from 20 to 90 minutes after MBM-MK. The Tmax values for midazolam and levomedetomidine (mean ± standard deviation) were approximately halved with coadministration of MK-467, from 23 ± 9 to 11 ± 6 minutes (p = 0.049) for midazolam and from 32 ± 15 to 18 ± 6 minutes for levomedetomidine (p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MK-467 accelerated the absorption of IM coadministered drugs. This is clinically relevant as it may hasten the onset of peak sedative effects.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Butorphanol/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Animals , Butorphanol/blood , Butorphanol/pharmacokinetics , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/veterinary , Cross-Over Studies , Deep Sedation/methods , Deep Sedation/veterinary , Dogs , Drug Combinations , Drug Interactions , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/blood , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacokinetics , Male , Medetomidine/blood , Medetomidine/pharmacokinetics , Midazolam/blood , Midazolam/pharmacokinetics , Quinolizines/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/veterinaryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine a dose of MK-467, a peripheral α2-adrenoceptor antagonist, which, when administered intravenously (IV) concomitantly with 25 µg kg-1 of dexmedetomidine, will prevent bradycardia without altering sedation in cats. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded, experimental, crossover study. ANIMALS: Eight healthy, adult, purpose-bred cats. METHODS: Cats were administered seven IV treatments were administered at least 2 weeks apart, consisting of dexmedetomidine 12.5 µg kg-1 (D12.5) and 25 µg kg-1 (D25), MK-467 300 µg kg-1 (M300), and D25 combined with 75, 150, 300 and 600 µg kg-1 of MK-467 (D25M 75, D25M150, D25M300 and D25M600, respectively). Heart rates (HR) were recorded via telemetry and sedation assessed with a simple descriptive score and a visual analogue scale prior to treatments and at intervals until 8 hours thereafter. RESULTS: Data from one cat were excluded because it developed renal failure. Heart rate decreased significantly from baseline after all treatments except M300 and D25M600. The lowest HR for each treatment with dexmedetomidine were 99 ± 21 (D25), 103 ± 22 (D12.5), 114 ± 10 (D25M75), 117 ± 17 (D25M150), 121 ± 12 (D25M300) and 139 ± 15 (D25M600) beats minute-1. Sedation increased with all treatments that included dexmedetomidine, whereas M300 did not induce any central effects. In comparison with D25, the combination of MK-467 with dexmedetomidine reduced the duration of detectable sedation. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MK-467 dose-dependently attenuated the bradycardia associated with dexmedetomidine, and shortened the sedative effect without altering its quality. MK-467 may be useful in attenuating reductions in HR in conscious cats administered dexmedetomidine.