Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 446, 2022 03 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35255881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Open online forums like Reddit provide an opportunity to quantitatively examine COVID-19 vaccine perceptions early in the vaccine timeline. We examine COVID-19 misinformation on Reddit following vaccine scientific announcements, in the initial phases of the vaccine timeline. METHODS: We collected all posts on Reddit (reddit.com) from January 1 2020 - December 14 2020 (n=266,840) that contained both COVID-19 and vaccine-related keywords. We used topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence within topics after the release of vaccine trial data. Social network analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between Reddit communities (subreddits) that shared COVID-19 vaccine posts, and the movement of posts between subreddits. RESULTS: There was an association between a Pfizer press release reporting 90% efficacy and increased discussion on vaccine misinformation. We observed an association between Johnson and Johnson temporarily halting its vaccine trials and reduced misinformation. We found that information skeptical of vaccination was first posted in a subreddit (r/Coronavirus) which favored accurate information and then reposted in subreddits associated with antivaccine beliefs and conspiracy theories (e.g. conspiracy, NoNewNormal). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings can inform the development of interventions where individuals determine the accuracy of vaccine information, and communications campaigns to improve COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, early in the vaccine timeline. Such efforts can increase individual- and population-level awareness of accurate and scientifically sound information regarding vaccines and thereby improve attitudes about vaccines, especially in the early phases of vaccine roll-out. Further research is needed to understand how social media can contribute to COVID-19 vaccination services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Social Media , Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Cornea ; 39(7): 898-901, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32301810

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report an unusual case of corneal whorl-like opacity patterns in a patient of primary localized conjunctival amyloidosis. METHODS: Case report and review of literature. RESULTS: A 35-year old man with a case of primary localized conjunctival amyloidosis presented with corneal whorl-like opacity patterns and underwent conjunctival and limbal biopsies. Histopathological evaluation showed dense deposition of amorphous, hyaline, eosinophilic material with week periodic acid-Schiff positivity and congophilia on congo red stain. There was birefringence under a polarized microscope. These findings were suggestive of amyloid deposition. tumor-associated calcium signal transducer-2 mutation was negative ruling out gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Systemic evaluation was negative for primary systemic amyloidosis. A diagnosis of primary localized conjunctival amyloidosis with corneal whorl-like opacity patterns was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: This is an unusual case report of primary localized conjunctival amyloidosis, presenting as corneal whorl-like opacity patterns. Primary localized conjunctival amyloidosis usually involves the fornix and then spreads to lids causing lid thickening, blepharoptosis, subconjunctival, or orbital mass. In our case, it probably started around limbus, involving palisades of Vogt and caused corneal whorl-like opacity patterns which were the presenting feature.


Subject(s)
Amyloidosis/diagnosis , Conjunctiva/pathology , Conjunctival Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Biopsy , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...