Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Complex Aortic Aneurysm Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID on total case load and peri-operative outcomes in patients undergoing open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular repair (ER) of complex aortic aneurysms (cAAs). METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of prospective data of patients managed with elective cAA ER or OSR from January 2018 to December 2021 was conducted. A comparative analysis on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the case volume and on the 30-day outcomes was assessed using time periods, before (2018-2019) and during the pandemic (2020-2021). RESULTS: During the 4-year study period, 255 patients with cAA were managed with ER and 576 with OSR. The pandemic did not reduce the cAA ER volume (p=0.12), but a statistically significant reduction in OSR case load was recorded (p=0.04). Following OSR, hospital length of stay (11.1 vs 10.3 days), and early mortality (6.94% vs 4.63%), were similar before and during the pandemic. In the ER cohort, baseline characteristics, early mortality (3.6% vs 4.1%, p=0.976), and morbidity (10% vs 14%, p=0.44), were comparable during the 2 periods. For ER cases, the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay both decreased significantly (8±8-6±7 days, p<0.001 and 2±4 vs 1±6 days p=0.01, respectively) during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Resource pressures drove modifications in clinical practice to reduce the length of hospitalization, without compromising the clinical outcomes, in patients undergoing ER of cAA. This modification was not effective in patients undergoing OSR that resulted in a significant decrease of this activity. CLINICAL IMPACT: The pandemic did not reduce complex endovascular repair (ER) volume (p=0.12) while a significant reduction in open surgical repair (OSR) case load was recorded (p=0.04). For the endovascular cohort, early mortality (p=0.976) and morbidity (p=0.44) remained stable, while the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay decreased (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively) during the pandemic.

A Review: Single and MultiBranch Devices for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies with Proximal Sealing in Ishimaru Zone 0.

Recently published experience has shown that endovascular management of the aortic arch, including sealing in the proximal zones, can be a viable option for patients considered unfit for conventional open repair. Endograft designs vary and include single or multibranch devices, with or without the addition of surgical debranching. Initial reports show that both techniques can be performed with high technical success and acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in high volume centers. Single branch devices, available off-the-shelf, may provide a treatment option for emergent presentations where patients cannot wait for the design and manufacture of a customized endograft. Double or triple branched endografts are now increasingly implanted in high-volume aortic centers. The purpose of this review is to describe the single and multibranched endovascular devices currently available for aortic arch repair, their associated published outcomes, and to discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages.

Predictors of percutaneous access-related complications in aortic endovascular procedures: 'real-world' insights and a comparison to open access.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR) is becoming increasingly popular due to fewer access-related complications, shorter procedural times and length of stay (LOS). Our aim was to explore factors associated with access-related complications and their impact on procedural time and LOS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive aorto-iliac endovascular procedures in a tertiary hub comprising 2 institutions and 18 consultant vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists between 2016-2017. Access-related complications were defined as: bleeding requiring cutdown or return to theatre, acute limb ischemia or common femoral artery (CFA) pseudoaneurysm requiring intervention and wound infection or dehiscence needing hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 511 patients, 354 (69%) had a percutaneous approach via 589 CFA access sites. In this percutaneous group, access-related complications occurred in 11% of sites (65/589); Their rate varied with procedure type ranging between 3.6% to 17.6%. The most common complication was bleeding due to closure device failure in 8.5% (50/589) of access sites. When uncomplicated, percutaneous interventions were faster compared to open surgical access (P<0.0001). Operation time and median LOS (3 vs. 2 days) were longer for elective standard EVAR patients experiencing access-related complications (P=0.033). In the percutaneous group, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between access-related complications and eGFR (odds ratio (OR) 0.984 [0.972-0.997], P=0.014), CFA depth (OR 1.026 [1.008-1.045], P=0.005), device used (Prostar vs. Proglide (OR 2.177 [1.236-3.832], P=0.007) and procedural type (complex vs. standard EVAR) (OR 2.017 [1.122-3.627], P=0.019). We developed a risk score which had reasonably good predictive power (C-statistic 0.716 [0.646-0.787], P<0.0001) for avoiding access complications. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological (low eGFR level), anatomical (increased CFA depth) and technical factors (choice of device and complex procedures) were identified as predictors of access-related complications in this large retrospective series. These are important for safe selection of patients that would benefit from percutaneous access.

"First in Man" Total Percutaneous Aortic Arch Repair With 3-Inner-branch Endografts: A Report of Two Cases.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Aneurysms of the arch are a complex clinical problem and a technical challenge. Currently, over 40% of patients are considered unfit for conventional open surgery, requiring a cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic circulatory arrest. In experienced hands and appropriate anatomic conditions, arch-branched graft technology has shown to be a safe and effective alternative to open conventional surgery to patients that historically have had no surgical options. OBJECTIVES: This report summarizes the first in man implant of a three-vessel arch branch stent graft using a total percutaneous approach without the need for exposure of the cervical arteries-a surgical step with inherent problems and risks. METHODS: This approach was performed in two consecutive patients, a 66-year-old woman with a chronic post type A dissection 60 mm diameter aneurysm of the aortic arch, and a 72-year-old man with a 70 mm saccular degenerative atheromatous aortic arch aneurysm. RESULTS: Technical success was obtained in both cases. The patients were extubated in the operating theatre. Neither suffered any pre- or postoperative neurological deficits. Both were discharged home after remarkably uneventful hospital stays. There were no access complications. Postoperative computerized tomography scans and ultra-sound confirmed patent supra-aortic branches and completely excluded aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Our new truly minimally invasive approach demonstrates that it is possible to manage one of the most challenging treatments of aortic pathologies without any surgical incision. Further, evaluation and experience are required to confirm these promising results.

Editor's Choice - A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography and Colour Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance Post Infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Financial Implications and Impact of Different International Surveillance Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: Use of colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance differs in internationally published guidelines. This study aimed firstly to compare CDUS detection of significant sac abnormalities with CTA. Secondly, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to compare financial estimates of the, predominantly CDUS based, local and Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) protocols, the risk stratified European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) protocol, and the CTA based National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) protocol. METHODS: Agreement between CDUS and CTA was assessed for detection of significant sac abnormalities. Surveillance protocols were extrapolated from published guidelines and applied to infrarenal EVAR patients active on local surveillance at a large, single centre. Surveillance intensity was dependent on presence of endoleak and subsequent risk of treatment failure in accordance with surveillance recommendations. Estimates for each surveillance protocol were inclusive of a range of published incidences of endoleak, contrast associated acute kidney injury (AKI), and excess hospital bed days, and estimated for a hypothetical five year surveillance period. RESULTS: The kappa coefficient between CDUS and CTA for detecting sac abnormalities was 0.68. Maximum five year surveillance cost estimates for the 289 active EVAR patients were £272 359 for SVS, £230 708 for ESVS, £643 802 for NICE, and £266 777 for local protocols, or £1 270, £1 076, £3 003, and £1 244 per patient. Differences in endoleak incidence accounted for a 1.1 to 1.4 fold increase in costs. AKI incidence accounted for a 3.3 to 6.2 fold increase in costs. CONCLUSION: A combined CTA and CDUS EVAR surveillance protocol, with CTA reserved for early seal assessment and confirmatory purposes, provides an economical approach without compromising detection of sac abnormalities. AKI, as opposed to direct imaging costs, accounted for the largest differences in surveillance cost estimates.

Endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch.

This article reviews endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch. Therapeutic strategies intended for this complex aortic condition are evolving rapidly to allow the treatment of various hostile aortic anatomy and frail patients. Principles, technical considerations, devices and outcomes of each technique are reviewed and summarized. Hybrid repair offer similar early mortality and stroke rates compared to open conventional surgery. Arch chimney and other parallel graft techniques present poor long term outcome, and should be limited to emergency situations where no other option is available. Fenestrated stent-grafting is subjected to many technical challenges in aortic arch due to difficulties in stent-graft orientation and fenestration positioning. In situ fenestration is an off-label technique that should only be used as an emergency bailout maneuver, considering that temporary coverage of supra aortic trunk vessel and its long-term durability raise concern. Finally, in experienced hands and appropriate anatomic conditions, arch branched graft technology has shown itself to be a safe and effective alternative to open conventional surgery. No randomized controlled trials have yet compared total endovascular aortic arch repair with hybrid techniques and open arch repair. The management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch is challenging, decision-making and interventions should continue to be performed in high-volume centers with a dedicated aortic team with an expertise in both open and endovascular repairs.

Streptococcus pneumoniae as a Cause of Mycotic and Infected Aneurysms in Patients without Respiratory Features: Challenging Diagnoses Aided by 16S PCR.

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae is considered a rare cause of mycotic aneurysms. The microbiological diagnosis of mycotic aneurysms can be difficult, and many patients have negative blood culture results. METHODS: We describe a series of four consecutive cases of mycotic aneurysms caused by S. pneumoniae with no respiratory features or extravascular septic foci. In two patients with negative blood culture results, 16S PCR was used for the diagnosis of S. pneumoniae infection. RESULTS: Four men with mycotic aneurysms affecting the aorta, axillary, and popliteal arteries caused by S. pneumoniae presented to our center between 2015 and 2016. All were treated with at least one month of intravenous antibiotics, followed by at least 4 weeks of oral antibiotics. Two were additionally managed using endovascular surgical techniques, and one underwent an open surgical repair. The fourth patient presented with bilateral popliteal aneurysms, one of which ruptured and was managed using surgical ligation and bypass, whereas the other side subsequently ruptured and was repaired endovascularly. Three of the four patients are currently off antibiotics and considered cured, while one died of an unrelated cause. CONCLUSIONS: S. pneumoniae should be considered a potential causative agent of mycotic aneurysms. Diagnosis can be confirmed using 16S PCR, especially in patients where peripheral blood cultures are uninformative.

Complex endovascular repair of postdissection arch and thoracoabdominal aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: We report our experience of the treatment of postdissection arch aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) by endovascular repair using fenestrated and branched endografts. METHODS: This study includes all patients presenting with chronic postdissection aneurysms >55 mm in diameter deemed unfit for open surgery and treated by complex endografting between October 2011 and April 2017. Where appropriate, staged management strategies including left subclavian artery revascularization, thoracic endografting, dissection flap fenestration, and tear enlargement were performed before the complex endovascular repair. Outcome data were collected prospectively, specifically including technical success, endoleaks, target vessel patency, aneurysm diameter, adverse events, reinterventions, and mortality. RESULTS: We treated 40 patients with a median age of 63 years (55-71 years). In total, 43 procedures were performed: 19 arch repairs using inner branch endografts (one to three branches) and 24 TAAA repairs using fenestrated or branched endografts. Three patients were treated using both arch and TAAA repair. The median time between initial presentation with acute dissection and the first complex aortic repair was 5 years (3.0-10.0 years). Staged procedures were performed in 33 of 40 patients (82.5%). The technical success rate was 93%, the median procedure length was 240 minutes (170-285 minutes), and the median dose-area product was 80 Gy · cm2 (54.3-138.4 Gy · cm2). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 2.3% (1/43) and 4.7% (2/43), respectively. The spinal cord ischemia rate was 7% and occurred only after TAAA repair. One stroke with partial recovery and one transient ischemic attack were observed (4.7%) after arch repair. Six early reinterventions (14%) were performed: three for access complications, two to treat acute hemorrhage, and one to treat a type II endoleak. Median follow-up was 25.5 months (11-42.25 months). The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 90% and 76.4%, respectively. Late reinterventions were required in eight patients, two in the arch group (to treat endoleaks at 3 and 33 months) and six in the TAAA group (2 iliac and 1 bifurcated endograft extensions, 2 additional renal stents, 1 inferior mesenteric artery embolization). Aneurysm diameter was stable (72%) or shrank (23%) during follow-up. Enlargement was shown in two patients with endoleaks. CONCLUSIONS: Complex endovascular repair of postdissection aneurysms is a safe procedure in patients deemed unfit for open surgery. Our experience suggests that close follow-up is mandatory as secondary procedures are frequently required to completely exclude the false lumen.

A Staged Hybrid Procedure to Manage Complex Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Aortic Arch Aneurysm.

We report the management of a patient who had an open-surgical repair following traumatic avulsion of the supra-aortic trunks (SAT) 30 years prior to presentation with a large arch aneurysm and poor cerebral collaterals. "Simple" thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) was not an option because it would have excluded the collateral circulation to the carotid and vertebral arteries. We devised a two-stage hybrid procedure to repair this challenging aneurysm.

Beliefs of students about growing older and perceptions of working in gerontology.

An ageing population that is increasing does not necessarily mean an increase in people who require health and social care. However, it is predicted that a wide range of such services is likely to be needed. This demand is set against a shortage of skilled healthcare professionals and a lack of interest in working with older people. There is a particular shortage of skilled gerontological workers in the developed world, made worse by a perceived lack of professional esteem, economic reward and poor working environments in the specialism. Most studies recommend education to enable individuals to develop accurate knowledge about the ageing process and interest in working with older people. There is a discrepancy in the literature as to whether health and social care workers hold positive or negative attitudes towards older people. As attitudes are strongly linked with perceptions of working with older people, this article presents a review of the literature and discussion on attitudes of health and social care students to ageing and perceptions of working with older people.

Successful endovascular correction of an endograft connected with the false lumen of a type B aortic dissection.

Thoracic endografting is widely used in the treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissections to redirect the entire aortic flow toward the true lumen by covering the proximal entry tear. This procedure is challenging because endovascular navigation, maintaining position in the true lumen, can be difficult as there are frequently numerous reentry tears. There is obvious potential for complications such as malpositioning of the distal part of the endograft within the false lumen. This error can promote true lumen collapse and/or aortic rupture. This report details the endovascular correction of such a complication.

Carotid endarterectomy: where do we stand at present?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The introduction of endovascular techniques and improvements in the medical management of atherosclerotic carotid lesions have led to changes in the modern management of stroke. The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest developments in surgical carotid intervention and highlight the current controversies. RECENT FINDINGS: The predominant controversies that dominate the correct surgical management of carotid atherosclerotic disease are: Notwithstanding the results of the Carotid Revascularisation Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial, does carotid artery stenting produce equivalent outcomes to surgical carotid endarterectomy? Should recent developments in best medical management of these lesions and changing socioeconomic factors restrict the indication for surgical intervention for asymptomatic lesions? What is the ideal time frame for carotid interventions in symptomatic patients? SUMMARY: There is insufficient current or historic evidence to resolve these controversies and further large randomized controlled trials are therefore required. The current knowledge limits are explored.

Off-the-shelf branched endograft for emergent aneurysm repair.

A 65-year-old man with a tender, 98-mm-diameter, pararenal aortic aneurysm was referred to our center. This patient was unfit for open repair and could not wait 8 weeks for a custom-made endograft to be manufactured. We describe the endovascular treatment of his aneurysm with a 4-branch endograft that had been constructed for another patient. He had an uneventful recovery. Postoperative CT scan confirmed patency of all visceral branches and exclusion of the aneurysm. Various branched and fenestrated endografts are or will soon be available "off-the-shelf" to treat ruptured or symptomatic pararenal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. We assess the pros and cons of this new generation of endografts designed to adapt to most aortic anatomies.

Importance of debriefing following critical incidents.

Working in emergency departments (EDs) is inherently stressful, and stress caused by events such as witnessed death, elder or child abuse, and aggression and violence can have profound effects on staff. One strategy that can be effective in helping staff deal with such events is critical incident stress debriefing but, as the literature suggests, this is poorly established in ED settings. This article reports the results of a study in three EDs in Ireland of nurses' and doctors' perceived needs for debriefing and makes recommendations to improve this area of practice.

Debate: whether fenestrated endografts should be limited to a small number of specialized centers.

Until fairly recently, experience with advanced endovascular technologies, including fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR), has been limited to a relatively small number of practitioners worldwide. Excellent outcomes have been achieved by these accomplished surgeons who, at least initially, have primarily used custom-made devices constructed by a single endograft manufacturer. Access to this technology has been limited by the skills necessary for such procedures and by the customization process with industry partners. However, several issues are changing rapidly with FEVAR. Increasing numbers of surgeons now have the necessary endovascular skills, and off-the-shelf endografts from several manufacturers have become, or are becoming, available. Also, the regulatory landscape is changing with device approval in the United States. Surgeons and patients alike are anticipating the widespread adoption of this advanced technology that will surely benefit increasing numbers of patients. Or will it? Will widespread adoption in a larger number of smaller-volume hospitals, by less experienced surgeons, result in poor patient outcomes, or will excellent results continue with more patients benefitting from these technologic advances? These are important questions to ask before such adoption and are the subject of this debate.

The current management of carotid atherosclerotic disease: who, when and how?

Ischaemic stroke represents a major health hazard in the western world, which has a severe impact on society and the health-care system. Roughly, 10% of all first ischaemic strokes can be attributed to significant atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries. Correct management of these lesions is essential in the prevention and treatment of carotid disease-related ischaemic events. The close relationship between diagnosis and medical and surgical management makes it necessary that all involved physicians and surgeons have profound knowledge of management strategies beyond their specific speciality. Continuous improvement in pharmacological therapy and operative techniques as well as frequently changing guidelines represent a constant challenge for the individual health-care professional. This review gives a thorough outline of the up-to-date evidence-based management of carotid artery disease and discusses its current controversies.