Logical memory, visual reproduction, and verbal paired associates are effective embedded validity indicators in patients with traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study was design to evaluate the potential of the recognition trials for the Logical Memory (LM), Visual Reproduction (VR), and Verbal Paired Associates (VPA) subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scales-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) to serve as embedded performance validity tests (PVTs). METHOD: The classification accuracy of the three WMS-IV subtests was computed against three different criterion PVTs in a sample of 103 adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESULTS: The optimal cutoffs (LM ≤ 20, VR ≤ 3, VPA ≤ 36) produced good combinations of sensitivity (.33-.87) and specificity (.92-.98). An age-corrected scaled score of ≤5 on either of the free recall trials on the VPA was specific (.91-.92) and relatively sensitive (.48-.57) to psychometrically defined invalid performance. A VR I ≤ 5 or VR II ≤ 4 had comparable specificity, but lower sensitivity (.25-.42). There was no difference in failure rate as a function of TBI severity. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to LM, VR, and VPA can also function as embedded PVTs. Failing validity cutoffs on these subtests signals an increased risk of non-credible presentation and is robust to genuine neurocognitive impairment. However, they should not be used in isolation to determine the validity of an overall neurocognitive profile.

A Study on the Correlations Between Comorbid Disease Conditions and Central and Peripheral Neurological Manifestations of COVID-19.

Background Medical comorbidities and neurological manifestations are commonly associated with COVID-19, though specific relationships remain unclear. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between medical comorbidities and neurological manifestations in patients with COVID-19. Methods We reviewed medical comorbidities and COVID-19-related central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) manifestations in 484 consecutive patients with COVID-19. Results Neurological manifestations were seen in 345 (71%) of 484 COVID-19 patients. CNS manifestations included headaches (22%), altered mental status (19%), dizziness (8%), gait imbalance (5%), strokes (four patients, <1%), and seizures (two patients, <1%). PNS manifestations included myalgia (31%), hypogeusia (8%), hyposmia (6%), critical illness myopathy (nine patients, 2%), visual disturbance (six patients, 1%), rhabdomyolysis (four patients, <1%), and nerve pain (one patient, <1%). There were 153 (32%) patients with CNS manifestations, 98 (20%) patients with PNS manifestations, and 94 (19%) patients with combined CNS and PNS manifestations. Comorbidities such as cardiac disease (22%), dementia (17%), hypertension (16%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 13%) were significantly associated with CNS manifestations. No comorbidities were associated with PNS manifestations. Conclusion Neurological manifestations were common in our sample of 484 COVID-19 patients, with headache and altered mental status being the most common CNS manifestations and myalgia being the most common PNS manifestation. Cardiac disease, dementia, hypertension, and COPD were more common in patients with CNS manifestations. Providers should be vigilant about the possible emergence of CNS manifestations in COVID-19 patients with these comorbid conditions.

Critical item (CR) analysis expands the classification accuracy of performance validity tests based on the forced choice paradigm-Replicating previously introduced CR cutoffs within the Word Choice Test.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to replicate previous research on critical item analysis within the Word Choice Test (WCT). METHOD: Archival data were collected from a mixed clinical sample of 119 consecutively referred adults (Mage = 51.7, Meducation = 14.7). The classification accuracy of the WCT was calculated against psychometrically defined criterion groups. RESULTS: Critical item analysis identified an additional 2%-5% of the sample that passed traditional cutoffs as noncredible. Passing critical items after failing traditional cutoffs was associated with weaker independent evidence of invalid performance, alerting the assessor to the elevated risk for false positives. Failing critical items in addition to failing select traditional cutoffs increased overall specificity. Non-White patients were 2.5 to 3.5 times more likely to Fail traditional WCT cutoffs, but select critical item cutoffs limited the risk to 1.5-2. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirmed the clinical utility of critical item analysis. Although the improvement in sensitivity was modest, critical items were effective at containing false positive errors in general, and especially in racially diverse patients. Critical item analysis appears to be a cost-effective and equitable method to improve an instrument's classification accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Delirium as a Presenting Symptom of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common neurologic manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in older adults who present to the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical characteristics associated with delirium as a presenting symptom of COVID-19 in older adults and develop a logistic regression to predict the likelihood of delirium. METHOD: We compared clinical characteristics in an age- and gender-matched sample of 68 delirious individuals with 68 nondelirious individuals (Mage = 78) who presented to the ED with COVID-19. RESULTS: The delirious group was more likely to have neurologic, psychiatric, and cardiovascular comorbidities; a prior history of delirium; and deliriogenic medications in their medication list. They were less likely to present with respiratory symptoms and more likely to present with sepsis, hypoxia, higher heart rate, and higher sodium. The delirious group had higher mortality (51%) than the nondelirious group (32%). Delirium developed within an average of 2 days of initial COVID-19 symptom onset, with symptom onset to ED within an average of 4 days and symptom onset to death within an average of 11 days. Logistic regression based on five delirium predictors correctly predicted 80% of those with delirium (75% sensitivity at 86% specificity). CONCLUSION: Our results are largely consistent with prior studies and suggest that delirium is a common, early occurring, and lethal manifestation of COVID-19 in older adults presenting to the ED, in most cases causing acute on chronic neurocognitive dysfunction strongly influenced by inflammatory and hypoxic-ischemic mechanisms.

The emotion word fluency test as an embedded performance validity indicator - Alone and in a multivariate validity composite.

OBJECTIVE: This project was designed to cross-validate existing performance validity cutoffs embedded within measures of verbal fluency (FAS and animals) and develop new ones for the Emotion Word Fluency Test (EWFT), a novel measure of category fluency. METHOD: The classification accuracy of the verbal fluency tests was examined in two samples (70 cognitively healthy university students and 52 clinical patients) against psychometrically defined criterion measures. RESULTS: A demographically adjusted T-score of ≤31 on the FAS was specific (.88-.97) to noncredible responding in both samples. Animals T ≤ 29 achieved high specificity (.90-.93) among students at .27-.38 sensitivity. A more conservative cutoff (T ≤ 27) was needed in the patient sample for a similar combination of sensitivity (.24-.45) and specificity (.87-.93). An EWFT raw score ≤5 was highly specific (.94-.97) but insensitive (.10-.18) to invalid performance. Failing multiple cutoffs improved specificity (.90-1.00) at variable sensitivity (.19-.45). CONCLUSIONS: Results help resolve the inconsistency in previous reports, and confirm the overall utility of existing verbal fluency tests as embedded validity indicators. Multivariate models of performance validity assessment are superior to single indicators. The clinical utility and limitations of the EWFT as a novel measure are discussed.

Altered mental status in 71 deaths due to COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of neurologic symptoms with a focus on altered mental status in a sample of deaths due to COVID-19. METHODS: We reviewed neurologic symptoms in 71 deaths due to COVID-19 at the first US hospital with reported cases, of which 66 (93%) had medical comorbidities, 47 (66%) came from assisted living facilities or nursing homes and 35 (49%) had baseline dementia. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (86%) demonstrated neurologic symptoms at hospital admission. Altered mental status was seen in 47 patients (66%) and represented the most common neurologic symptom. Seven patients (10%) were comatose at hospital admission and 5 (7%) presented with altered mental status without respiratory symptoms. Three patients had seizures and two had strokes. Hypertension (61%), cardiovascular disease (59%), and dementia (49%) were the most common comorbidities associated with death due to COVID-19 in our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic symptoms, particularly altered mental status, are very common in COVID-19 patients with high risk of mortality. In a small subset of patients, altered mental status is the defining feature of disease presentation. A mental status examination should be incorporated in the medical assessment of COVID-19.

Critical Item Analysis Enhances the Classification Accuracy of the Logical Memory Recognition Trial as a Performance Validity Indicator.

OBJECTIVE: : Replicate previous research on Logical Memory Recognition (LMRecog) and perform a critical item analysis. METHOD: : Performance validity was psychometrically operationalized in a mixed clinical sample of 213 adults. Classification of the LMRecog and nine critical items (CR-9) was computed. RESULTS: : LMRecog ≤20 produced a good combination of sensitivity (.30-.35) and specificity (.89-.90). CR-9 ≥5 and ≥6 had comparable classification accuracy. CR-9 ≥5 increased sensitivity by 4% over LMRecog ≤20; CR-9 ≥6 increased specificity by 6-8% over LMRecog ≤20; CR-9 ≥7 increased specificity by 8-15%. CONCLUSIONS: : Critical item analysis enhances the classification accuracy of the optimal LMRecog cutoff (≤20).

Predictors of survival in older adults hospitalized with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate clinical characteristics associated with mortality and predictors of survival in older adults hospitalized with COVID-19 with a focus on neurological comorbidities and presenting neurological manifestations. METHODS: We compared clinical characteristics in an age- and gender-matched sample of 75 deceased and 75 recovered patients (MAge = 78) hospitalized with COVID-19 and developed a logistic regression to predict likelihood of survival. RESULTS: Deceased patients were more like to have dementia, altered mental status (AMS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and balance difficulties; higher heart rate, respiratory rate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and absolute neutrophils; lower oxygen saturation and absolute lymphocytes; and shorter length of hospitalization. Logistic regression based on three mortality predictors (ARDS, AMS, and length of hospitalization) correctly predicted 87% of the outcome (89% sensitivity at 85% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Dementia and AMS were strong predictors of death in older adults hospitalized with COVID-19. Our findings add to the rapidly growing neurology of COVID-19 literature and underscore the importance of early recognition and the incorporation of a mental status examination into the medical assessment of COVID-19.

Self-rated executive dysfunction in adults with epilepsy and effects of a cognitive-behavioral intervention (HOBSCOTCH).

RATIONALE: Cognitive problems are common in adults with epilepsy and significantly affect their quality of life. HOBSCOTCH (HOme Based Self-management and COgnitive Training CHanges lives) was developed to teach problem-solving and compensatory memory strategies to these individuals. This study examined whether HOBSCOTCH is associated with improvement in specific aspects of subjective executive functions. METHODS: Fifty-one adults, age 18-65, with epilepsy and subjective cognitive concerns were randomized to receive HOBSCOTCH (n = 31) or a care-as-usual control sample (n = 20). Participants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult version (BRIEF-A), as well as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess depression. Rates of elevated (i.e., T ≥ 65, impaired) BRIEF-A scores at baseline, as well as pre-post score changes for the BRIEF-A clinical scales were evaluated. Significance was set at α = 0.05, one-tailed, given our directional hypothesis. RESULTS: At baseline, a considerable percentage of patients in the overall sample endorsed executive dysfunction on BRIEF-A scales: Inhibit = 28%, Shift = 51%, Emotional Control = 45%, Self-Monitor = 33%, Initiate = 35%, Working Memory = 88%, Plan/Organize = 45%, Task Monitor = 47%, Organization of Materials = 28%. Significant improvement was seen in mean T-scores for Inhibit, Shift, Initiate, and Working Memory in the treatment group, but only Working Memory improved in the control group. The control group endorsed worse task monitoring and organization of materials at baseline and follow-up. Change in depression was not observed for either group, and there was no association between changes in depression and BRIEF-A scores. CONCLUSIONS: A sizeable subset of adults with epilepsy reported experiencing executive dysfunction in their everyday lives, especially for working memory. HOBSCOTCH resulted in amelioration of subjective executive functioning independent of changes in mood.

Differentiating epilepsy from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using neuropsychological test data.

OBJECTIVE: Differentiating epileptic seizures (ES) from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) represents a challenging differential diagnosis with important treatment implications. This study was designed to explore the utility of neuropsychological test scores in differentiating ES from PNES. METHOD: Psychometric data from 72 patients with ES and 33 patients with PNES were compared on various tests of cognitive ability and performance validity. Individual measures that best discriminated the diagnoses were then entered as predictors in a logistic regression equation with group membership (ES vs. PNES) as the criterion. RESULTS: On most tests of cognitive ability, the PNES sample outperformed the ES sample (medium-large effect) and was less likely to fail the Reliable Digit Span. However, patients with PNES failed two embedded validity indicators at significantly higher rates (risk ratios (RR): 2.45-4.16). There were no group differences on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). A logistic regression equation based on seven neuropsychological tests correctly classified 85.1% of patients. The cutoff with perfect specificity was associated with 0.47 sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous research, the utility of psychometric methods of differential diagnosis is limited by the complex neurocognitive profiles associated with ES and PNES. Although individual measures might help differentiate ES from PNES, multivariate assessment models have superior discriminant power. The strongest psychometric evidence for PNES appears to be a consistent lack of impairment on tests sensitive to diffuse neurocognitive deficits such as processing speed, working memory, and verbal fluency. While video-electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring is the gold standard of differential diagnosis, psychometric testing has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in complex or unclear cases such as patients with nondiagnostic video-EEGs. Adopting a standardized, fixed neuropsychological battery at epilepsy centers would advance research on the differential diagnostic power of psychometric testing.

Patient safety considerations in the rehabilitation of the individual with cognitive impairment.

Deficits in cognitive functioning are associated with many safety concerns, including difficulties performing activities of daily living, medication errors, motor vehicle accidents, impaired awareness of deficits, decision-making capacity, falls, and travel away from home. Preventing adverse safety outcomes is particularly relevant in rehabilitation patients. Integration of information and recommendations stemming from allied disciplines, such as rehabilitation medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychology, is the most effective way to limit poor outcomes. Education and prevention counseling by health care professionals is an important approach in limiting adverse safety outcomes in patients with cognitive impairment.