[Cancer patients in the emergency department]. / Krebspatienten in der Notaufnahme.

A growing number of patients are living with cancer or have a history of cancer leading to increasing adverse effects of treatment or disease necessitating emergency department (ED) consultation. Long-term cancer survivors are at higher risk of comorbidities causing a substantial increase in health care resource utilization. The most frequent reasons for cancer-related ED visits are dyspnea, fever, pain, gastrointestinal or neurological symptoms leading to high hospital and intensive care unit admission rates. Acute respiratory failure in cancer patients necessitates timely diagnostic testing, whereby computed tomography is superior to chest X­ray. Delay in intensive care unit (ICU) admission or mechanical ventilation increases mortality. Febrile neutropenia is an emergency with urgent need for antibiotic treatment. Treatment of neutropenic and nonneutropenic patients with sepsis does not differ. Cardiovascular disease is now the second leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. Immunotherapy can lead to substantial and in some patients life-threatening complications that may not easily be recognized in the ED. Cancer-specific emergencies such as leukostasis, tumorlysis or hypercalcemia rarely present to ED and require interdisciplinary care. The constantly growing cancer population is likely to increase ED utilization. Knowledge about cancer treatment and disease-associated complications is crucial for emergency physicians. Palliative care education should secure appropriate end-of-life care avoiding futile interventions.

Thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusions in ICU patients: an international inception cohort study (PLOT-ICU).

PURPOSE: Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150 × 109/L) is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is likely associated with worse outcomes. In this study we present international contemporary data on thrombocytopenia in ICU patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult ICU patients in 52 ICUs across 10 countries. We assessed frequencies of thrombocytopenia, use of platelet transfusions and clinical outcomes including mortality. We evaluated pre-selected potential risk factors for the development of thrombocytopenia during ICU stay and associations between thrombocytopenia at ICU admission and 90-day mortality using pre-specified logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We analysed 1166 ICU patients; the median age was 63 years and 39.5% were female. Overall, 43.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 40.4-46.1) had thrombocytopenia; 23.4% (20-26) had thrombocytopenia at ICU admission, and 19.8% (17.6-22.2) developed thrombocytopenia during their ICU stay. Absence of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), non-cancer-related immune deficiency, liver failure, male sex, septic shock, and bleeding at ICU admission were associated with the development of thrombocytopenia during ICU stay. Among patients with thrombocytopenia, 22.6% received platelet transfusion(s), and 64.3% of in-ICU transfusions were prophylactic. Patients with thrombocytopenia had higher occurrences of bleeding and death, fewer days alive without the use of life-support, and fewer days alive and out of hospital. Thrombocytopenia at ICU admission was associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.7; 95% CI 1.19-2.42). CONCLUSION: Thrombocytopenia occurred in 43% of critically ill patients and was associated with worse outcomes including increased mortality. Platelet transfusions were given to 23% of patients with thrombocytopenia and most were prophylactic.

Impact of chronic graft-versus-host-disease on intensive care outcome in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients.

Chronic graft-vs-host-disease (cGvHD) is the most relevant long-term complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with major impact on non-relapse mortality, but data on intensive care unit (ICU) outcome are missing. In this retrospective, multicenter study we analyzed 174 adult HSCT recipients with cGvHD requiring intensive care treatment. Skin, pulmonary, liver, and intestinal involvement were present in 76.7%, 47.1%, 38.1% and 24.1%, respectively, and a total of 63.2% had severe cGvHD. Main reasons for ICU admission were respiratory failure (69.7%) and sepsis (34.3%). Hospital- and 3-year OS rates were 51.7% and 28.6%, respectively. Global severity of cGvHD did not impact short- and long-term survival. However, patients with severe liver cGvHD or the overlap subtype had a reduced hospital survival, while severe pulmonary cGvHD was associated with worse long-term survival. In multivariate analysis need for invasive ventilation (HR 1.08 (95% CI 1.02-1.14)) or hemodialysis (HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.14-2.62)) and <1 year since HSCT (HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.03-2.39)) were independently associated with a poorer survival. While the global severity of cGvHD does not per se affect patients' survival after intensive care treatment, pre-existing severe hepatic, intestinal or pulmonary cGvHD is associated with worse outcomes.

A bi-centric experience of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2 R) for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the main reason for ICU admission following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2 R) can be used as an adjunct to mechanical ventilation in patients with severe hypercapnia but has not been assessed in HSCT recipients. Retrospective analysis of all allogeneic HSCT recipients ≥18 years treated with ECCO2 R at two HSCT centers. 11 patients (m:f = 4:7, median age: 45 [IQR: 32-58] years) were analyzed. Acute leukemia was the underlying hematologic malignancy in all patients. The time from HSCT to ICU admission was 37 [8-79] months, and 9/11 (82%) suffered from chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with lung involvement. Pneumonia was the most frequent reason for ventilatory decompensation (n = 9). ECCO2 R was initiated for severe hypercapnia (Pa CO2 : 96 [84-115] mm Hg; pH: 7.13 [7.09-7.27]) despite aggressive mechanical ventilation (invasive, n = 9; non-invasive, n = 2). ECCO2 R effectively resolved blood gas disturbances in all patients, but only 2/11 (18%) could be weaned off ventilatory support, and one (9%) patient survived hospital discharge. Progressive respiratory and multiorgan dysfunction were the main reasons for treatment failure. ECCO2 R was technically feasible but resulted in a low survival rate in our cohort. A better understanding of the prognosis of ARF in patients with chronic GVHD and lung involvement is necessary before its use can be reconsidered in this setting.

Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease and Acute Chest Syndrome: a Single-Center Experience.

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) in adult patients with sickle cell disease represents a leading cause of death. It is characterized by a new density on chest X-ray accompanied by fever and/or respiratory symptoms. Currently, 49 adult patients with sickle cell disease are registered at our department. By now, 12 patients (24.5%) suffered from ACS and two patients showed multiple/recurrent (>2) episodes. Death in one patient was related to acute respiratory failure secondary to ACS. In three patients with ACS, invasive mechanical ventilation and subsequent veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) was mandatory. Veno-venous ECMO was applied within 24 hours upon arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU). All patients were treated aggressively for ACS including exchange transfusions [packed red blood cell (pRBC) units 5-16] maintaining a Hb S threshold of <30.0% in addition to broad-spectrum antibiotics, resulting in a successful outcome following decannulation from VV-ECMO (49 hours, 251 hours, 30 min., and 98 hours, respectively). Limited information is presently available on the use of VV-ECMO in adult patients with sickle cell disease in the context of acute respiratory failure secondary to ACS. The adequate timing of the decision to place ECMO in critically ill adults with sickle cell disease, incapable of being treated by conventional mechanical ventilation secondary to very severe vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), might further reduce mortality rates while treating the underlying condition.

Prognostic accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS criteria in hematological cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: With Sepsis-3, the increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) as a clinical score for the identification of patients with sepsis and quickSOFA (qSOFA) for the identification of patients at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit (ICU) were introduced in 2016. However, their validity has been questioned, and their applicability in different settings and subgroups, such as hematological cancer patients, remains unclear. We therefore assessed the validity of SOFA, qSOFA, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria regarding the diagnosis of sepsis and the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort of hematological cancer patients treated on ICU and non-ICU settings. METHODS: We retrospectively calculated SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA scores in our cohort and applied the definition of sepsis as "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection" as reference. Discriminatory capacity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Among 450 patients with hematological cancer (median age 58 years, 274 males [61%]), 180 (40%) had sepsis of which 101 (56%) were treated on ICU. For the diagnosis of sepsis, sensitivity was 86%, 64%, and 42% for SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA, respectively. However, the AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicated better discrimination for sepsis than SIRS (SOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64-0.73] p < 0.001; qSOFA, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62-0.71] p < 0.001; SIRS, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53-0.61] p < 0.001).In-hospital mortality was 40% and 14% in patients with and without sepsis, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding patients with sepsis, mortality was similar in patients with positive and negative SIRS scores (39% vs. 40% (p = 0.899), respectively). For patients with qSOFA ≥ 2, mortality was 49% compared to 33% for those with qSOFA < 2 (p = 0.056), and for SOFA 56% vs. 11% (p < 0.001), respectively. SOFA allowed significantly better discrimination for in-hospital mortality (AUROC 0.74 [95% CI, 0.69-0.79] p < 0.001) than qSOFA (AUROC 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.71] p < 0.001) or SIRS (AUROC 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44-0.54] p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in SOFA score of ≥ 2 had better prognostic accuracy for both diagnosis of sepsis and in-hospital mortality in this setting, and especially on ICU, we observed limited validity of SIRS criteria and qSOFA in identifying hematological patients with sepsis and at high risk of death.

Ileostomy for steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract.

Steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal tract associates with important morbidity and mortality. While high-dose steroids are the established first-line therapy in GVHD, no second-line therapy is generally accepted. In this analysis of 65 consecutive patients with severe, steroid-resistant, intestinal GVHD (92% stage 4), additional ileostomy surgery significantly reduced overall mortality (hazard ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.81; p = 0.003) compared to conventional GVHD therapy. Median overall survival was 16 months in the ileostomy cohort compared to 4 months in the conventional therapy cohort. In the ileostomy cohort, both infectious- and GVHD-associated mortality were reduced (40% versus 77%). Significantly declined fecal volumes (p = 0.001) after surgery provide evidence of intestinal adaptation following ileostomy. Correlative studies indicated ileostomy-induced immune-modulation with a > 50% decrease of activated T cells (p = 0.04) and an increase in regulatory T cells. The observed alterations of the patients' gut microbiota may also contribute to ileostomy's therapeutic effect. These data show that ileostomy induced significant clinical responses in patients with steroid-resistant GVHD along with a reduction of pro-inflammatory immune cells and changes of the intestinal microbiota. Ileostomy is a treatment option for steroid-resistant acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract that needs further validation in a prospective clinical trial.