The Role of Endoscopic and Surgical Treatment in Chronic Pancreatitis.

Chronic pancreatitis is a long-term illness leading to hospital admissions and readmission. This disease is often caused by heavy alcohol consumption and smoking. Patients with chronic pancreatitis suffer from acute or chronic pain episodes, recurrent pancreatitis, and complications, such as pseudocysts, biliary duct strictures, and pancreatic duct fistulas. Pancreatic duct strictures and stones may increase intraductal pressure and cause pain. Endoscopic therapy is aiming at decompressing the pressure and relieving the pain, most commonly with pancreatic duct stents and pancreatic duct stone retrieval. Early surgery is another option to treat the pain. In addition, endotherapy has been successful in treating complications related to chronic pancreatitis. The therapy should be individually chosen in a multidisciplinary meeting. Endoscopic therapy and surgery as treatment options for chronic pancreatitis are discussed in this review.

Effect And Predictive Value Of Routine Preoperative Laboratory Testing For Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several studies and guidelines are questioning routine preoperative laboratory tests in surgical and endoscopic procedures. Their effect in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not currently known. This study was carried out to evaluate the risk of adverse effects in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and their association with preoperative lab tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, prospective observational study on all 956 patients undergoing 1196 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies in the Endoscopy Unit of Helsinki University Central Hospital from 1 March 2012 to 28 February 2013. Routine preoperative laboratory test results (basic blood count, creatinine, potassium, sodium, international normalized ratio/thromboplastin time, and amylase), health status, medication, and demographic information of all patients were analyzed in relation to adverse effects related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and procedural sedation. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (43 cases, 3.6%) to have no association with abnormal routine preoperative laboratory tests. Respiratory depression caused by sedation (128 cases, 11%) was not associated with abnormal routine preoperative laboratory tests, and anemia was found to be a slightly protecting factor. Cardiovascular depression caused by sedation was associated with thrombocytopenia (odds ratio = 1.87, p = 0.025) and, in male patients, hyponatremia (odds ratio = 3.66, p < 0.001). Incidence of other adverse effects was too low for statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: Routine universal preoperative lab testing was not found to be successful in predicting adverse effects in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures. Laboratory testing should be done focusing on each patient's individual needs.

Preoperative biliary decompression preceding pancreaticoduodenectomy with plastic or self-expandable metallic stent.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The rainage (PBD) prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is controversial. If PBD is required, large bore self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are thought to maintain better drainage and have fewer postoperative complications than plastic stents. The confirming evidence is scarce. The aim of the study was to compare outcomes of surgery in patients who underwent PBD with SEMS or plastic stents deployed at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 366 patients having had PD during 2000-2009. Preceding endoscopic PBD was performed in 191 patients and nine had had percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTD). At the time of operation, 163 patients had a plastic stent and 28 had SEMS. Due to stent exchanges, 176 plastic stents and 29 SEMS were placed in all. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The stent failure rate was 7.4% for plastic stents and 3.4% for SEMS (p = 0.697). A bilirubin level under 50 µmol/L was reached by 80% of the patients with plastic stents and by 61% of the patients with SEMS (p = 0.058). A postoperative infection complication and/or a pancreatic fistula was found in 26% while using plastic stents and in 25% using SEMS (p = 1.000). In unstented patients with biliary obstruction, the bile juice was sterile significantly more often than in endoscopically stented patients (100% vs 1%, p < 0.001). When the stented and unstented patients were compared regarding postoperative infection complications, there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.365). Plastic stents did not differ from SEMS regarding the stent failure rate, bilirubin level decrease, amount of bacteria in the bile juice, or postoperative complications when used for PBD. The significantly higher price of SEMS suggests their use in selected cases only.

Risk factors for complications of ERCP in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiographic pancreatography (ERCP) is the most accurate technique for surveillance of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for complications of ERCP in patients with PSC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2007 - 2009 we performed 441 ERCPs in patients with PSC. The primary tools for ERCP were a guide wire and papillotomy knife to gain access into the biliary duct. If the primary cannulation failed, and the wire went only into the pancreatic duct, pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed. If necessary, a further oblique cut with a needle knife was done in order to expose the biliary duct. RESULTS: Primary cannulation was successful in 389 patients (88.2 %). Of these, 147 (37.8 %) had had biliary sphincterotomy performed previously. In the group with failed primary cannulation, access into the biliary duct was achieved after pancreatic sphincterotomy in 52 patients. In 11 of these, a further cut with a needle knife was performed. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was diagnosed in 31 patients (7.0 %). Factors predicting PEP were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.6, P = 0.015) and a guide wire in the pancreatic duct (OR 8.2, P < 0.01). Previous biliary sphincterotomy was a protective factor (OR 0.28, P = 0.02). The risk of PEP increased with the number of times the wire accidentally passed into the pancreatic duct (P < 0.001). Cholangitis developed in 6 patients (1.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PSC the incidence of ERCP complications remained relatively low. The complication risk increased with the complexity of cannulation. In a patient with PSC in whom follow-up ERCP is planned, biliary sphincterotomy should be considered, as it may protect against PEP.

Patient-controlled sedation for ERCP: a randomized double-blind comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Self-administration of a propofol and opioid mixture by patients (patient-controlled sedation, PCS) could offer a practical alternative for individual sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, what would be the most suitable sedative mixture for PCS is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare remifentanil and alfentanil in the PCS during ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing elective ERCP received PCS with propofol and opioid in three different regimens. The concentrations of opioids in the sedative mixture were 0.02 mg/mL in the remifentanil group (R) and 0.04 mg/mL and 0.08 mg/mL in the alfentanil 1 (A1) and alfentanil 2 (A2) groups, respectively. The infusion pump was adjusted to deliver a 1 mL single dose with zero lockout time. We considered PCS as successful if no procedure interruption due to sedation-related complications occurred or if additional propofol was not needed. The consumption of propofol was registered, and sedation levels and vital signs were monitored. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction with sedation were assessed using structured questionnaires. RESULTS: The consumption (SD) of propofol was 177 (105)mg in group R, 197 (88) mg in group A1 and 162 (70)mg in group A2. PCS was successful in 74 /81 (91 %) of sedations, without differences between the groups in terms of propofol consumption, sedation success rate, sedation levels, vital signs, postprocedural pain, and endoscopist and patient satisfaction. Respiratory depression and nausea were observed more frequently with remifentanil than with alfentanil (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCS is an acceptable method of sedation for ERCP. The combination of propofol and alfentanil should be recommended because a remifentanil - propofol mixture depresses spontaneous respiration more and produces nausea more frequently.

Effect of short-term treatment with regular or high doses of omeprazole on the detection of Helicobacter pylori in bleeding peptic ulcer patients.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether short-term regular or high-dose omeprazole has any influence on the colonization of Helicobacter pylori in the stomach. We therefore studied the effect of 3-day treatment of 2 different doses of omeprazole. METHODS: H. pylori-positive patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (n = 101) were randomized to receive either a regular dose (20 mg/day for 3 days) (n = 51) or a high dose of omeprazole (80 mg bolus + 8 mg/h infusion/day for 3 days) (n = 50). H. pylori status was assessed by histology and urease testing of gastric biopsies pre-entry and after 3-day therapy. RESULTS: With the high dose of omeprazole, tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori became negative significantly more often than with the regular dose (60% versus 27.5%, P=0.001 (any test), 67.6% versus 31.7%, P=0.003 (histology) and 82.2% versus 43.6%, P=0.001 (urease test)). CONCLUSION: Conversion of the H. pylori tests negative after 3-day treatment of omeprazole is dose-dependent. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection depends on the timing of biopsies in relation to the beginning of proton-pump inhibitor treatment. If samples to find H. pylori are not taken before the treatment, the presence of the bacteria may be overlooked.

Regular-dose versus high-dose omeprazole in peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that profound acid inhibition along with endoscopic therapy might prevent rebleeding and reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. The aim of the study was to test the possible equivalence of a high dose and the regular dose of omeprazole in peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study involving 142 patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding (Forrest classification I-II: spurting or oozing bleeding, non-bleeding visible vessel, clot and black base). One-hundred-and-two (71.8%) patients received endoscopic treatment (adrenaline injection and/or heater probe) in pre-entry. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the regular dose of omeprazole intravenously (20 mg once a day for 3 days, i.e. 60 mg/72 h) or a high dose of omeprazole (80 mg bolus + 8 mg/h for 3 days, i.e. 652 mg/72 h). Rebleeding, surgery and death were the outcome measures. RESULTS: Six (8.2%) of the 73 patients receiving the regular dose of omeprazole and 8 (11.6%) of the 69 patients receiving the high dose of omeprazole rebled (P = 0.002 for equivalence, equivalence limit 0.15). Three (4.1%) of the former patients and 5 (7.2%) of the latter group underwent surgery. Four (5.5%) patients in the regular-dose and 2 (2.9%) in the high-dose group died within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Under the defined tolerance limits, the regular dose of omeprazole is as successful as a high dose in preventing peptic ulcer rebleeding.

Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in Central Finland Province, Finland, and in Tartu County, Estonia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A comparative study of the epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH) was carried out in Central Finland province (CF), Finland, and in Tartu county (TC), Estonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients from CF and TC aged > or = 15 who were treated in the Central Hospital of Central Finland and in Tartu University Hospital for UGIH, entered the prospective study during 1 August 1992-31 July 1994. Altogether 298 patients (198 men, 100 women) were treated in CF and 270 patients (159 men, 104 women) in TC. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of UGIH was 68.3/100,000 adults per year in CF and 98.6 in TC. The incidence increased considerably with age: from 3.1 in those aged 20-29 to 314.1 in those > or = 80 in CF, and from 13.2 to 299.1 in TC, respectively. Incidence rates were twice as low in younger age groups in CF compared to TC, almost equalized in those > or = 60 and became even higher in those > or = 80. 63% of the patients (55% men, 79% women) in CF and 49% (35% men, 70% women) in TC were > or = 60. NSAID use before UGIH was equally common (46%) in both regions. Peptic ulcer accounted for over 50% of UGIH cases both in CF and TC. Mortality rate was 8.1% in CF and 9.9% in TC. The main epidemiological differences between the regions are the lower overall incidence of UGIH, due to the lower incidence of haemorrhage in the younger age groups, and the higher proportion of the elderly patients in CF compared to TC.