Changes in sleep profile on exposure to sodium chloride and artificially carbonated springs: a pilot study.

[Purpose] Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of bathing in a sodium chloride spring and an artificially carbonated spring on core body temperature and electroencephalograms, to assess whether the springs facilitate sleep. [Participants and Methods] This randomized, controlled, crossover study evaluated the effects of a sodium chloride spring, an artificially carbonated spring, a plain hot bath, and no bath on sleep. The subjective evaluations and recording of temperature were performed before/after bathing at 40 °C for 15 min at 22:00 h, before nocturnal sleep (0:00-7:00 h), and after the participants (n=8) woke up in the morning. [Results] Bathing significantly increased the core body temperature, with significant subsequent declines observed until bedtime. Participants in the sodium chloride spring group had the highest average core body temperature, while participants in the no-bath group had the lowest average core body temperature before bedtime (23:00-0:00 h). During bedtime (1:00-2:00 h), the participants in the no bath group had the highest average core body temperature, while participants in the artificially carbonated spring group had the lowest average core body temperature. The amount of delta power/min in the first sleep cycle significantly increased in the bathing groups, with the highest value during bedtime being recorded in the artificially carbonated spring group, followed by the sodium chloride spring, plain hot bath, and no-bath groups. These sleep changes were associated with significant declines in the elevated core body temperature. Increased heat dissipation and decreased core body temperature were observed in the artificially carbonated spring and sodium chloride spring groups, which increased the delta power during the first sleep cycle compared with that observed in the plain hot bath group, followed by the no-bath group. [Conclusion] An artificially carbonated spring would be the most appropriate given each circumstance because it did not cause fatigue, as observed with the sodium chloride spring.

Residual effects of low dose of suvorexant, zolpidem, and ramelteon in healthy elderly subjects: A randomized double-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: Current hypnotic agents have next-day residual effects. The new orexin antagonist, suvorexant, has little muscle relaxation effect on the physical and cognitive function in the following morning and daytime. In this study, the effects of suvorexant, zolpidem, ramelteon and placebo in elderly subjects were evaluated. METHODS: Six men and eight women aged 63-75 years received a single tablet and lights were then turned off. Subjects were instructed to sleep from 23:00-6:00 with an interruption from 4:00-4:30 for evaluations. Suvorexant 10 mg, zolpidem 5 mg, ramelteon 4 mg or placebo was administered single time in a randomized, double-blind and crossover design with a one-week drug holiday in between each drug. Measures of objective parameters and subjective ratings were obtained every 2 h from 4:00 to 16:00. RESULT: No subjects showed serious side effects from physical observations and vital sign checks before and after hypnotics were taken. During the first sleep period, the REM sleep time with suvorexant was especially longer than that with zolpidem. During the second sleep period, suvorexant had shorter sleep latency and longer stage2 sleep time than ramelteon and zolpidem, respectively. During the whole entire sleep, the REM sleep time with suvorexant was longer than zolpidem and placebo. For the body sway test with closed eye, the main effects of the medicines and zolpidem were significantly better than suvorexant and ramelteon. CONCLUSION: The changes of physical and cognitive functions in healthy elderly after taking hypnotics were not remarkable. Therefore, these three hypnotics maybe appropriate for the elderly people with insomnia for single-time low dose administration.

Residual effects of zolpidem, triazolam, rilmazafone and placebo in healthy elderly subjects: a randomized double-blind study.

With current hypnotic agents, next-day residual effects are a common problem. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the residual effects of the commercially available hypnotics - zolpidem, triazolam, and rilmazafone - on the physical and cognitive functions of healthy elderly people in the early morning and the day following drug administration. In this study, the next-day residual effects of zolpidem, triazolam, and rilmazafone, following bedtime dosing in elderly subjects, were evaluated. Women (n = 11) and men (n = 2) aged 60-70 years received a single dose (at 23:00) of one of these, zolpidem 5 mg, triazolam 0.125 mg, rilmazafone 1 mg and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Measures of objective parameters and psychomotor performances (Timed up and Go test, Functional Reach Test, body sway test, critical flicker fusion test, simple discrimination reaction test, short-term memory test) and subjective ratings were obtained at 04:00, 07:00, and the next time of the day. All hypnotics were generally well tolerated; there were no serious adverse side effects and no subjects discontinued the evaluations. Compared to placebo, zolpidem and rilmazafone had good results on the Functional Reach Test. Although subjective assessments tended to be poor in the early morning, rilmazafone significantly improved the body sway test in the other hypnotics. A single dose of zolpidem 5 mg and triazolam 0.125 mg did not have any next-day residual effects on healthy elderly subjects. Residual effects appeared to be related to the compound's half-life and the dose used. Rilmazafone 1 mg exhibited steadiness in static and dynamic balance and seemed to be more favorable for the elderly with early morning awakening.