Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Palliat Med ; 22(1): 62-70, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30004831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients' religious and spiritual values impact their goals and perception of illness, especially at the end of life (EOL). According to the Joint Commission, identifying spiritual beliefs may improve cultural competency and patient-centered care. However, clinicians may be uncomfortable discussing spirituality and unaware of basic religious teachings. OBJECTIVES: To assess clinician understanding and knowledge of key Christian, Jewish, and Islamic teachings around EOL care before and after a one-hour educational intervention through video podcast. DESIGN: After literature review and consultation with religious leaders, a pre- and post-test (10 questions per religion plus demographic questions) to assess knowledge of Christian, Jewish, and Islamic teachings and an educational video podcast were developed. The pretest was administered to healthcare providers, followed by a one-hour educational intervention through a video podcast. Next, a post-test was administered. SUBJECTS: Seventy-three healthcare providers participated in this study. MEASUREMENTS: Differences between pretest and post-test scores were analyzed employing paired t-test tests using SPSS software. RESULTS: The median score on the pretest was Christian: 6 [2-9], Jewish: 6 [4-10], and Islamic: 6 [2-8]. After the educational intervention, the median Christian, Jewish, and Islamic scores improved to 8 [4-10], 9 [6-10], and 10 [3-10], respectively (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the total pretest median score improved from 17 [10-24] to 27 [16-30]. CONCLUSIONS: A one-hour educational intervention through video podcast significantly improved understanding of Christian, Jewish, and Islamic teachings around EOL care. The video podcast enabled easy distribution of the educational session to multiple facilities and providers. Additional research is needed to determine the longitudinal outcomes and impact on patient outcomes of this intervention.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Education, Medical, Continuing , Health Personnel/psychology , Religion , Terminal Care , Audiovisual Aids , Awareness , Christianity , Health Personnel/education , Islam , Judaism , Palliative Care , Religion and Medicine , Review Literature as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 27(4): 446-453, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29382701

ABSTRACT

Background: Potential harms of screening mammography include false positive results, such as recall breast imaging or biopsies.Methods: We recruited women undergoing screening mammography at Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York. They completed a questionnaire on breast cancer risk factors and permitted access to their medical records. Breast cancer risk status was determined using the Gail model and a family history screener. High risk was defined as a 5-year invasive breast cancer risk of ≥1.67% or eligible for BRCA genetic testing. False positive results were defined as recall breast imaging (BIRADS score of 0, 3, 4, or 5) and/or biopsies that did not yield breast cancer.Results: From November 2014 to October 2015, 2,361 women were enrolled and 2,019 were evaluable, of whom 76% were Hispanic and 10% non-Hispanic white. Fewer Hispanic women met high-risk criteria for breast cancer than non-Hispanic whites (18.0% vs. 68.1%), but Hispanics more frequently engaged in annual screening (71.9% vs. 60.8%). Higher breast density (heterogeneously/extremely dense vs. mostly fat/scattered fibroglandular densities) and more frequent screening (annual vs. biennial) were significantly associated with false positive results [odds ratio (OR), 1.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-2.04 and OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.70-2.80, respectively].Conclusions: We observed that women who screened more frequently or had higher breast density were at greater risk for false positive results. In addition, Hispanic women were screening more frequently despite having a lower risk of breast cancer compared with whites.Impact: Our results highlight the need for risk-stratified screening to potentially minimize the harms of screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(4); 446-53. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Breast Density , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , False Positive Reactions , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mammography/economics , Mammography/methods , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , New York , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data
3.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2016: 411-420, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28269836

ABSTRACT

Chemoprevention with antiestrogens could decrease the incidence of invasive breast cancer but uptake has been low among high-risk women in the United States. We have designed a web-based patient-facing decision aid, called RealRisks, to inform high-risk women about the risks and benefits of chemoprevention and facilitate shared decision-making with their primary care provider. We conducted two rounds of usability testing to determine how subjects engaged with and understood the information in RealRisks. A total of 7 English-speaking and 4 Spanish-speaking subjects completed testing. Using surveys, think-aloud protocols, and subject recordings, we identified several themes relating to the usability of RealRisks, specifically in the content, ease of use, and navigability of the application. By conducting studies in two languages with a diverse multi-ethnic population, we were able to implement interface changes to make RealRisks accessible to users with varying health literacy and acculturation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Decision Making , Decision Support Techniques , Internet , Risk Assessment/methods , Female , Health Literacy , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , United States , User-Computer Interface
4.
ACS Nano ; 9(2): 2038-48, 2015 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25625504

ABSTRACT

Although copper-containing nanoparticles are used in commercial products such as fungicides and bactericides, we presently do not understand the environmental impact on other organisms that may be inadvertently exposed. In this study, we used the zebrafish embryo as a screening tool to study the potential impact of two nano Cu-based materials, CuPRO and Kocide, in comparison to nanosized and micron-sized Cu and CuO particles in their pristine form (0-10 ppm) as well as following their transformation in an experimental wastewater treatment system. This was accomplished by construction of a modeled domestic septic tank system from which effluents could be retrieved at different stages following particle introduction (10 ppm). The Cu speciation in the effluent was identified as nondissolvable inorganic Cu(H2PO2)2 and nondiffusible organic Cu by X-ray diffraction, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT), and Visual MINTEQ software. While the nanoscale materials, including the commercial particles, were clearly more potent (showing 50% hatching interference above 0.5 ppm) than the micron-scale particulates with no effect on hatching up to 10 ppm, the Cu released from the particles in the septic tank underwent transformation into nonbioavailable species that failed to interfere with the function of the zebrafish embryo hatching enzyme. Moreover, we demonstrate that the addition of humic acid, as an organic carbon component, could lead to a dose-dependent decrease in Cu toxicity in our high content zebrafish embryo screening assay. Thus, the use of zebrafish embryo screening, in combination with the effluents obtained from a modeled exposure environment, enables a bioassay approach to follow the change in the speciation and hazard potential of Cu particles instead of difficult-to-perform direct particle tracking.


Subject(s)
Copper/chemistry , Copper/toxicity , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Metal Nanoparticles/toxicity , Sewage , Waste Management/instrumentation , Zebrafish/embryology , Animals , Microspheres , Particle Size , Zebrafish/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL