Identificación de parámetros pronósticos relativos a la técnica quirúrgica en pacientes tratados mediante prostatectomía radical robótica / Identifying prognostic parameters related to surgical technique in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy

Introducción y objetivo Los factores más estudiados en pacientes tratados mediante prostatectomía radical robótica son antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y las características patológicas de la biopsia y la pieza de prostatectomía. Los factores asociados a la técnica quirúrgica han sido poco estudiados y con resultados controvertidos. El objetivo es identificar todos los factores posibles de la cirugía y su relación con la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (SLE) y de metástasis. Pacientes y métodos Estudio prospectivo aprobado por el Comité de Ética, en pacientes intervenidos de prostatectomía radical robótica desde enero del 2009 con seguimiento mínimo de cinco años. Analizamos como posibles factores pronósticos: el cirujano, el tiempo quirúrgico, la pérdida sanguínea, el acceso fascial, las técnicas de continencia, la preservación de la fascia, las bandeletas neurovasculares, el cuello vesical, la uretra, la curva de aprendizaje y las complicaciones quirúrgicas. Realizamos comparaciones univariables y emparejadas de supervivencia mediante la estimación de Kaplan-Meier y long-rank tests. El nivel de significancia para comparaciones múltiples se estableció con ajuste False Discovery Rate (p ajustada [padj]). Resultados Cohorte de 667 pacientes con mediana de seguimiento de 69 meses. En el análisis univariante, el cirujano (padj = 0,018), la conservación de ligamentos puboprostáticos (padj = 0,02), la preservación de fascia endopélvica (padj = 0,001) y realizar suspensión parauretral (padj < 0,001) son factores de mal pronóstico para la SLE. La preservación de la fascia también afecta negativamente a la supervivencia libre de metástasis (SLM) (padj = 0,04). Las cirugías previas abdominales, la próstata, el tiempo de intervención, el sangrado, el tipo de uretra residual, el lóbulo medio, el acceso fascial, la conservación de bandeletas o cuello vesical, no tienen significancia estadística (AU)

Introduction and objective The most frequently studied factors in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy are PSA and pathological features of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. Studies on the factors associated with the surgical technique are scarce and with controversial results. The objective is to identify all possible surgical factors and their relationship with disease-free and metastasis-free survival. Patients and Method Prospective study approved by the Ethics Committee, including patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy since January 2009 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surgeon, surgical time, blood loss, fascial access, continence techniques, preservation of the fascia, neurovascular bundles, bladder neck, urethra, learning curve and surgical complications, were analyzed as possible prognostic factors. We performed univariate and matched comparisons of survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation and long-rank tests. The significance level for multiple comparisons was established with False Discovery Rate-adjustment (adjusted p). Results Cohort of 667 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months. In univariate analysis, surgeon (adjp = 0.018), preservation of puboprostatic ligaments (adjp = 0.02), preservation of endopelvic fascia (adjp = 0.001) and performing periurethral suspension (adjp < 0.001) are poor prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Fascia preservation also negatively affects metastasis-free survival (adjp = 0.04). Previous abdominal surgeries, prostate, surgical time, blood loss, type of residual urethra, middle lobe, fascial access, fascia or bladder neck preservation, have no statistical significance. Conclusions The surgeon and specific aspects of the surgical technique are determining factors in disease-free survival. Preservation of the fascia is the only factor that negatively affects metastasis-free survival (AU)

Identifying prognostic parameters related to surgical technique in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The most frequently studied factors in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy are PSA and pathological features of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. Studies on the factors associated with the surgical technique are scarce and with controversial results. The objective is to identify all possible surgical factors and their relationship with disease-free and metastasis-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study approved by the Ethics Committee, including patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy since January 2009 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surgeon, surgical time, blood loss, fascial access, continence techniques, preservation of the fascia, neurovascular bundles, bladder neck, urethra, learning curve and surgical complications, were analyzed as possible prognostic factors. We performed univariate and matched comparisons of survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation and long-rank tests. The significance level for multiple comparisons was established with False Discovery Rate-adjustment (adjusted p). RESULTS: Cohort of 667 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months. In univariate analysis, surgeon (adjp=0.018), preservation of puboprostatic ligaments (adjp=0.02), preservation of endopelvic fascia (adjp=0.001) and performing periurethral suspension (adjp<0.001) are poor prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Fascia preservation also negatively affects metastasis-free survival (adjp=0.04). Previous abdominal surgeries, prostate, surgical time, blood loss, type of residual urethra, middle lobe, fascial access, fascia or bladder neck preservation, have no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon and specific aspects of the surgical technique are determining factors in disease-free survival. Preservation of the fascia is the only factor that negatively affects metastasis-free survival.

Ganglio centinela en la metástasis ganglionar por cáncer papilar de tiroides: validez diagnóstica y aplicación en la práctica clínica / Sentinel lymph node biopsy in papillary thyroid cancer: Accuracy and application in clinical practice

Introducción La biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela (BSGC) puede completar el estudio preoperatorio detectando adenopatías no visibles ecográficamente. De este modo, se puede estadificar a los pacientes y estratificar el riesgo de recidiva de forma más precisa y, por tanto, ayudar a definir el tipo de tratamiento tanto quirúrgico como con 131I que debemos realizar. El objetivo fue validar la BSGC para su utilización en el diagnóstico de la metástasis ganglionar por cáncer papilar de tiroides. Métodos Estudio observacional prospectivo de cohortes que incluye a 55 pacientes intervenidos por cáncer papilar de tiroides sin sospecha de afectación ganglionar clínica o radiológica, desde febrero de 2012 hasta febrero de 2015, con un seguimiento de entre 6 y 8 años. Se utilizó 99Tc con nanocoloide intratumoral y una sonda portátil de la gammacámara para la detección de los ganglios centinelas. Variables: edad, género, histológicas, analíticas y estadificación preoperatoria y postoperatoria. Se calculó la sensibilidad, la especificidad y los valores predictivos de la técnica. La validación se determinó calculando la detectabilidad y los falsos negativos de la prueba. Resultados En 53 de los 55 (96,36%) pacientes hubo detección del ganglio centinela. Los falsos negativos fueron 4 (7,5%) pacientes. Del resto, tras aplicar la BSGC, 24 (48,9%) se mantuvieron como N0, 14 (28,5%) pasaron a ser N1a y 11 (22,4%) se clasificaron como N1b. Las diferencias observadas en el estudio fueron significativas (p<0,05). La sensibilidad fue del 86,21%, la especificidad del 100%, el VPP del 100% y el VPN del 85,71%. La precisión diagnóstica fue del 92,45%. Conclusiones La BSGC es una técnica válida para su utilización en los pacientes afectos de cáncer papilar de tiroides, con una alta precisión diagnóstica (AU)

Introduction The presence of lymph nodes metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer modifies the type of surgical resection as well as the indication of the treatment with 131I in the postoperative period. This therapeutic approach is based on the results of the diagnostic tests, like the cervical ultrasonography. Currently other methods of diagnostic are tested as selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). It can complement to the ultrasound results. The aim was to validate the SLNB for use in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis by papillary thyroid cancer. Methods Observational prospective cohort study of 55 patients who underwent papillary thyroid cancer without suspicion of lymph node involvement clinical or radiological, since February 2012 through February 2015, with a follow-up between 6 and 8 years. It was used 99Tc with intratumoral nanocoloid and a portable tube of the gamma camera for the detection of the sentinel node. Variables: age, gender, histological, analytical and preoperative and postoperative staging. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of technique was calculated. The validation was determined by calculating the detectability and the false negative results of the test. Results In 53 of the 55 patients (96.36%) there was the sentinel node detection. The false negative were 4 patients (7.5%). Of the rest, after applying the SLNB, 24 (48.9%) were kept as N0, 14 (28.5%) became N1a and 11 (22.4%) were classified as N1b. The differences observed in the study were significant (P<.05). The sensitivity was 86.21%, the specificity of 100%, the PPV was 100% and the NPV of 85.71%. The diagnostic accuracy was 92.45%. Conclusions The SLNB is a valid technique for use in patients suffering from papillary thyroid cancer with a high diagnostic accuracy (AU)