Impact of neoadjuvant FLOT treatment of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer following surgical therapy.

Introduction: Therapeutic treatment for advanced-stage (T2-T4) gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent surgical intervention. Method: Neoadjuvant oncological treatment for GEJ and gastric cancer previously consisted of the intravenous administration of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (ECF) or epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) combination (Group 1). The new protocol (FLOT, F: 5-FU, L: leucovorin, O: oxaliplatin, T: docetaxel), included patients with resectable GEJ and gastric cancer who had a clinical stage cT2 or higher nodal positive cN+ disease (Group 2). Between 31 December 2008 and 31 October 2022, the effect of different oncological protocols in terms of surgical outcomes in cases of T2-T4 tumours were retrospectively evaluated. Results of randomly assigned patients from the earlier ECF/ECX protocol (n = 36) (Group 1) and the new FLOT protocol (n = 52) (Group 2) were compared. Effect of different neoadjuvant therapies on tumour regression, types of possible side effects, type of surgery, and oncological radicality of surgical procedures were analysed. Results: When comparing the two groups, we found that in case of the FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Group 2, n = 52), complete regression was achieved in 13.95% of patients, whereas in the case of ECF/ECX (Group 1, n = 36), complete regression occurred in only 9.10% of patients. Furthermore, in the FLOT group, the mean number of lymph nodes removed was slightly higher (24.69 vs. 20.13 in the ECF/ECX group). In terms of the safety resection margin (proximal), no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups. Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects. The occurrence of diarrhea was significantly higher in the FLOT group (p = 0.006). Leukopenia and nausea occurred more commonly with the old protocol (Group 1). The rate of neutropenia was lower following FLOT treatment (p = 0.294), with the lack of grade II and III cases. Anaemia occured at a significantly higher rate (p = 0.036) after the ECF/ECX protocol. Conclusions: As a result of the FLOT neoadjuvant oncological protocol for advanced gastro-esophageal junction and gastric cancer, the rate of complete tumour regression increased significantly. The rate of side effects was also appreciably lower following the FLOT protocol. These results strongly suggest a significant advantage of the FLOT neoadjuvant treatment used before surgery.

BC-Monitor: Towards a Routinely Accessible Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Tool for Real-Time Monitoring Breast Cancer Progression and Treatment Effectiveness.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly employed in the screening, follow-up, and monitoring of the continuously evolving tumor; however, most ctDNA assays validated for clinical use cannot maintain the right balance between sensitivity, coverage, sample requirements, time, and cost. Here, we report our BC-monitor, a simple, well-balanced ctDNA diagnostic approach using a gene panel significant in breast cancer and an optimized multiplex PCR-based NGS protocol capable of identifying allele variant frequencies below 1% in cell-free plasma DNA. We monitored a cohort of 45 breast cancer patients prospectively enrolled into our study receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy or palliative therapy for metastatic diseases. Their tumor mutation status was examined in the archived tumor samples and plasma samples collected before and continuously during therapy. Traceable mutations of the used 38-plex NGS assay were found in approximately two-thirds of the patients. Importantly, we detected new pathogenic variants in follow-up plasma samples that were not detected in the primary tumor and baseline plasma samples. We proved that the BC-monitor can pre-indicate disease progression four-six months earlier than conventional methods. Our study highlights the need for well-designed ctDNA monitoring during treatment and follow-up, integrated into a real-time treatment assessment, which could provide information on the active tumor DNA released into the blood.

Clinical benefit of fulvestrant monotherapy in the multimodal treatment of hormone receptor and HER2 positive advanced breast cancer: a case series.

Fulvestrant is a pure estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist approved for the treatment of metastatic ER positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. The clinical results of fulvestrant demonstrated encouraging activity in tumors in spite of HER2 positivity, but data about its use after progression on anti-HER2 agents are limited. Partial responses and durations of response of 12, 25, and 38 months in three cases with multiple metastases of ER positive and HER2 positive breast cancer were observed; all patients had been treated with 1-4 regimens of an anti-HER2 agent in combination with chemotherapy or an aromatase inhibitor before the initiation of fulvestrant. Fulvestrant is a valuable option with limited toxicity and durable response in metastatic HER2 and ER positive breast cancer after progression on anti-HER2 agents as well. Therapeutic benefit even in extensive skin metastases and (irradiated) brain metastases may be expected. Further investigations are warranted to establish where it fits into the multimodal management of ER and HER positive breast cancer.

Dose escalation can maximize therapeutic potential of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, based on limited evidence, increased sunitinib exposure is associated with better outcome. The survival and toxicity data of patients receiving individualized dose escalated sunitinib therapy as compared to standard management were analyzed in this study. METHODS: From July 2013, the data of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with slight progression but still a stable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria treated with an escalated dose of sunitinib (first level: 62.5 mg/day in 4/2 or 2 × 2/1 scheme, second level: 75 mg/day in 4/2 or 2 × 2/1 scheme) were collected prospectively. Regarding characteristics, outcome, and toxicity data, an explorative retrospective analysis of the register was carried out, comparing treatments after and before July 1, 2013 in the study (selected patients for escalated dose) and control (standard dose) groups, respectively. RESULTS: The study involved 103 patients receiving sunitinib therapy with a median overall and progression free survival of 25.36 ± 2.62 and 14.2 ± 3.22 months, respectively. Slight progression was detected in 48.5% of them. First and second-level dose escalation were indicated in 18.2% and 4.1% of patients, respectively. The dosing scheme was modified in 22.2%. The median progression free survival (39.7 ± 5.1 vs 14.2 ± 1.3 months (p = 0.037)) and the overall survival (57.5 ± 10.7 vs 27.9 ± 2.5 months (p = 0.044)) were significantly better in the study group (with dose escalation) than in the control group. Patients with nephrectomy and lower Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) scores showed more favorable outcomes. After dose escalation, the most common adverse events were worsening or development of fatigue, hypertension, stomatitis, and weight loss of over 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation of sunitinib dosing in selected patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, especially in case of slight progression, based on tolerable toxicity is safe and improves outcome. Dose escalation in 12.5 mg steps may be recommended for properly educated patients.

Cardiac Surveillance Findings During Adjuvant and Palliative Trastuzumab Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Trastuzumab therapy, the standard treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, is associated with possible cardiotoxicity. We set out to retrospectively analyze the cardiac follow-up data of patients with breast cancer receiving trastuzumab treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 47 and 31 patients receiving adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, respectively. Cardiovascular system assessments including echocardiography were regularly performed. RESULTS: A significant heart abnormality was detected in 44.7% of the operable and 41.9% of metastatic cases. In the adjuvant setting, left ventricular ejection fraction changes occurred mostly during treatment and less frequently after its completion (40.4% vs. 19.4%), while in the palliative setting, 35.5% and 40% in the first and the second year of therapy. An asymptomatic atrial septum aneurysm was detected in 8.5% and 13% of the patients in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity is mostly manifested in an asymptomatic decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction; hypertension, a high body mass index and left-sided irradiation are its predictors.

One-Year Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.

The evaluation of the effects of 1-year endocrine therapy (NET) was aimed at. A retrospective analysis of 42 cases with 46 stage II-III invasive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers was performed. One-year NET was planned with letrozole (n = 33, postmenopausal group), or with goserelin plus letrozole (n = 7) or with goserelin plus tamoxifen (n = 2) (premenopausal group). Surgery was performed in accordance with the initial stage and the response to therapy. With regard to the tumor remaining in the surgical specimen, risk groups were constructed: Group 1: stage 0, pathological complete regression (pCR); Group 2: stages IA-IIA; Group 3: stages ≥ IIB + cases with clinical progression. Due to local progression, NET was replaced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in three patients (four tumors). In two postmenopausal patients, letrozole was replaced by tamoxifen because of the insufficient treatment effect. In 19/42 cases, breast-conserving surgery was performed. Within Group 1, there was no cancer in four cases, while only DCIS remained in 2 (pCR: 13 %); Groups 2 and 3 comprised 25 and 15 cases, respectively. The likeliness of a good response (Groups 1 and 2 vs. Group 3) to NET was increased by 7 % for every 1 % increase of the expression of ER (OR = 1.070; 95 % CI: 1.007-1.138, p = 0.029). Progression-free survival differed according to treatment response (p = 0.001). The post-therapy Ki67 value of ≤ 15 % had only a marginal effect on survival. No other associations were detected between the tumor characteristics and the therapeutic response or survival. Long-duration NET is effective and safe in cases of hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

[Therapeutic significance of sunitinib-induced "off-target" side effects]. / Sunitinib indukálta "off-target" mellékhatások terápiás jelentõsége.

Sunitinib is a basic medicine in the therapy of metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma. Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of sunitinib in the everyday clinical practice taking the most common side effects and clinical features into consideration. Data of ninety-four patients with metastatic, clear cell renal carcinoma, receiving sunitinib therapy were analyzed retrospectively, regarding efficacy and toxicity. Factors potentially influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [age, nephrectomy, "off-target" side effects that are not connected to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)] were studied. Complete remission, partial remission and stable disease occurred in 8 (8.5%), 30 (31.9%) and 50 (53.1%) patients, respectively. Objective tumor response developed in 38 (40.4%) cases. Median PFS and OS were 18.3 (95% CI 14.45-22.14) and 27.9 (95% CI 20.95-34.85) months, respectively. PFS and OS were more favorable in case of hypothyreosis (pPFS=0.005, pOS=0.043), hand-foot syndrome (pPFS=0.006, pOS=0.008), grade ≥2 neutropenia (pPFS=0.003, pOS=0.008) and thrombocytopenia (pPFS=0.01, pOS=0.011). Effective therapy of manageable side effects (most of which have potential predictive effect) is important for favorable survival results. Maintenance of dose intensity is also essential in order to compare the daily routine with the efficacy and safety results of clinical trials.

[Experimental studies on microcirculatory inflammatory reactions of the urinary bladder]. / A húgyhólyag gyulladásos mikrokeringési reakcióinak kísérletes vizsgálata.

BACKGROUND: The vascular endothelium is a primary target of ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury of the urinary bladder. In case of interstitial cystitis (painful bladder syndrome) or in cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis, the injury is initiated at the epithelial/urothelial surface and propagates towards the interstitium, causing secondary involvement of the microvasculature. Hence the aim of our study was to assess and compare the microcirculatory aspects of the non-infectious forms of cystitis with that of IR-caused reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In male Sprague-Dawley rats, interstitial cystitis was induced by intravesical instillation of protamine sulphate (2 mg in 200 µl saline for 30 min; n = 6). In another group, cyclophosphamide (75 mg/kg, ip) was administered 24 hr prior to the experiments (n = 5). In the third group, urinary bladder ischemia was induced by 60-min occlusion of the vessels supplying the bladder (n = 5). The microcirculatory inflammatory reactions were investigated by fluorescence intravital microscopy 60 min after reperfusion and 24 hr after protamine sulphate instillation or cyclophosphamide administration, respectively. In the control group, the bladder was instilled with saline (n = 5). RESULTS: Rolling of leukocytes increased ~3-fold in the postcapillary vessels in the protamine sulphate-treated group and the increase in this parameter was ~5 and ~6.5-fold in cyclophosphamide and IR groups, respectively. The increase in leukocyte adherence reached similar, approx. 7-fold increase in each of the challenged groups. The red blood cell velocity in the capillaries decreased in the protamine sulphate and IR groups, while the velocity increased moderately in the cyclophosphamide-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that direct endothelial injury (caused by IR), as well as protamine sulphate and cyclophosphamide administrations induce inflammatory microcirculatory changes of the urinary bladder. These observations suggest a causative role for microcirculatory disturbances in the pathogenesis of interstitial cystitis and hemorrhagic cystitis as well.

Tumour topoisomerase II alpha protein expression and outcome after adjuvant dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

There is a need for the selection of those breast cancers where benefit may be attained from the addition of an anthracycline to the adjuvant chemotherapy. The expression of topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) protein in 3 cohorts of breast cancers treated with adjuvant dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy was determined retrospectively. The TOP2A status was analysed in relation with the other standard tumour features and the outcome. TOP2A IHC results were assessable in 106 patients: with a cut-off value of 15%, 48% of the tumours were classified as TOP2A-positive. The expression of TOP2A correlated with that of Ki67 (R = 0.532, p < 0.001) and a high grade (p = 0.04), but did not correlate with the proportion of ER- or PR-positive cells in the tumour. More tumors were TOP2A-negative among the ER- or PR-positive cancers than among the ER/PR-negative cancers (p = 0.021 and p = 0.002, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 64.5 months, 31 relapses (23.5%) and 23 deaths (17.4%) had occurred in 131 patients. The overall survival was longer in the TOP2A-positive cases than in the TOP2A-negative cases. The recurrence-free survival and the overall survival were significantly more favourable in the ER/PR-negative and TOP2A-positive tumours than in other subgroups. In a Cox proportional hazards model, the grade and TOP2A remained significant determinants in the ER/PR-negative subgroup. TOP2A positivity and grade 3 indicated a decrease in the risk of death with HR = 0.211 (95% CI: 0.042-1.05, p = 0.056) and HR = 0.216 (95% CI: 0.047-0.990, p = 0.048), respectively. A higher sensitivity to anthracycline-containing regimens is suggested in ER/PR-negative and TOP2A-positive cancers.

Efficacy and drawbacks of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is widely applied in locally advanced esophageal tumors to improve resectability and local tumor control. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the perioperative course of patients who underwent esophagectomy or esophagectomy following CRT. METHODOLOGY: Forty one patients were admitted with non-advanced disease (T1-2, N0), and primary resection was performed. Additional 21 patients received neoadjuvant CRT because of locally advanced, T2-4, N0-1 disease. To investigate predictive factors for responsiveness to CRT, we determined the p53, p21 and Ki67 oncogene expressions in the biopsy samples from the CRT patients. RESULTS: Following primary esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy, the postoperative course was in most cases uneventful. Anastomotic leaks developed in 3 of the 41 cases (7.3%), and postoperative death in 1 case (2.4%). In response to CRT, significant down-staging was observed in 11 of the 21 patients (58%); in these cases esophagectomy was performed. However, in this group the rates of anastomotic leak (2 patients) and postoperative death (2 patients) were higher than in the first group (18% each). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CRT is a good option for patients with locally advanced tumors, when primary R0 resection is hopeless. However, the rate and risk of postoperative complications are higher than after primary resection of non-advanced tumors.

Tumor topoisomerase II alpha status and response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Individualized chemotherapy for breast cancer improves the outcome. Anthracyclines target the enzyme topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A). We set out to perform a retrospective study of the presence of gene abnormalities and the expression of TOP2A in a cohort of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-three patients with 45 breast cancers were treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel-epirubicin with/without capecitabine chemotherapy. The TOP2A status of the cancers, determined retrospectively by fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, was analyzed in relation to the standard clinical and pathological data. RESULTS: Clinically and pathologically complete remission (pCR) was achieved in 15 (33.3%) and 9 (20%) cases, respectively. The TOP2A gene was amplified in 2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers (8%), and 32 (84.2%) overall exhibited TOP2A expression in >15% of the cells. The expression of TOP2A exhibited a strong correlation with the expression of Ki67 (R = 0.743, p < 0.001), and was negatively correlated with estrogen receptors (ER; R = 0.404, p = 0.012) and progesterone receptors (R = 0.430, p = 0.007). The expression of TOP2A was not related to the amplification of the TOP2A gene or the HER2 status of the tumor. The proportions of Ki67- and TOP2A-positive tumor cells were significantly reduced after chemotherapy (56.1 ± 23.6 vs. 19.0 ± 27.7%, p = 0.004, and 41.0 ± 27.9 vs. 12.7 ± 24.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). The development of pCR was related to a high grade (p = 0.054), ER negativity (p = 0.027) and high TOP2A expression (p = 0.037). The expression of TOP2A was an independent predictor of pCR (OR = 1.460, for every 10% increase, 95% CI: 1.016-2.096, p = 0.041). After a median follow-up time of 31.0 months, neither relapse-free survival nor overall survival was related to the tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: TOP2A expression is a marker of the tumor's proliferation rate and sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and does not depend on the amplification of its gene.

Long-term efficiency and toxicity of adjuvant dose-dense sequential adriamycin-Paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a protocol-specified analysis of the dose-dense adriamycin-paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide (ddATC) study. METHODS: Survival and late toxicity were analyzed in 55 patients enrolled to receive 4 x adriamycin 60 mg/m(2), 4 x paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), 4 x cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks, with cardioxane and filgrastim support. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze relapse-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed according to the presence of casting-type calcifications on the mammogram. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 78.5 (64.3-100.0) months, 29 (52.7%) patients were free of relapse (local, regional, distant or contralateral breast cancer), 34 (61.8%) patients were free of distant metastases, and 36 patients (65.5%) survived. The median times of RFS, DDFS and OS were not yet reached at 100.0 months. The median RFS, DDFS and OS times among breast cancer patients with tumors not associated with casting-type calcifications were >100.0 months, the corresponding parameters among patients with tumors accompanied by casting calcifications were 11.5 (p < 0.001), 11.5 (p < 0.001) and 29.6 months (p = 0.035), respectively. None of the patients developed myelodysplastic syndrome or leukemia. No cardiac failure occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that adjuvant sequential ddATC is an efficient and less toxic chemotherapy regimen in high-risk breast cancer. The presence of casting-type calcifications on the mammogram points to a special biologic nature with very poor prognosis.

[Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer]. / Neoadjuváns szisztémás terápia emlorákban.

Neoadjuvant (preoperative) systemic therapy is a good possibility for the treatment of symptomatic breast cancers of the locoregional stage. Chemotherapy or hormone therapy chosen according to the characteristics of the primary tumor, result in the regression of the tumor in the majority of the cases, favoring breast conserving surgery thereafter. The long-term effects of neoadjuvant systemic therapy are equivalent to that of adjuvant therapy, and the in vivo observed efficiency of the treatment reflects prognosis. Finally, systemic therapy introduced prior to surgery is not delayed by the possible adverse effects of the surgery. Detailed examination of the tumor and the patient is mandatory before starting systemic therapy. Besides breast imaging and histological examinations, staging is necessary. Pathological characterization of the tumor will enhance treatment choice based on the features of chemo- or hormone-sensitivity. For the treatment of chemosensitive tumors, taxane- and anthracycline-based polychemotherapy is the most efficacious. Data on neoadjuvant hormone therapy have been provided by studies on postmenopausal patients. Since the aromatase inhibitors are more efficient than tamoxifen, their use is the first option in this patient population. Among the molecular targeted agents, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy produces extending therapeutic response rate. Following the completion of the neoadjuvant systemic therapy, breast imaging is required once more before performing breast and lymph node surgery. Postoperative radiotherapy is generally needed. The use of a common language and professional guidelines by the members of the multidisciplinary breast team is a condition for neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Dose-dense sequential adriamycin-Paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy is well tolerated and safe in high-risk early breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with Adriamycin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide was evaluated. METHODS: Fifty-five high-risk breast cancer patients were enrolled. The following chemotherapy schedule was used: 4 x Adriamycin --> 4 x paclitaxel --> 4 x cyclophosphamide, q 2 weeks (Adriamycin, 60 mg/m2; paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2 over 3 h, and cyclophosphamide, 800 mg/m2). RESULTS: The dose intensity was 95.0, 99.8 and 97.4% of that planned for treatment with Adriamycin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide, respectively. During treatment with Adriamycin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide, 20, 12.7 and 25.5% of the patients, respectively, did not need filgrastim to maintain the dose density. The average number of filgrastim doses per cycle, when necessary, was 3.6. Neutropenia of grade 3-4 was found in 67.3, 13.5 and 10.0% of the patients after treatment with Adriamycin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide, respectively. A single case of febrile neutropenia was observed. Anemia occurred in 96.4% of the patients, and was significantly more frequent (p = 0.031) and more severe (p = 0.002) during paclitaxel treatment than in the other chemotherapy cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with Adriamycin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide is well tolerated and safe. Individual treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is needed to maintain the dose density in most patients, but some tolerate this regimen without it, probably due to differences in drug clearances.