Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 21(10): 1106-14, 2014 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25028285

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the vitamin D status of children aged 6-10years in the French general population for whom no guidelines have yet been defined due to insufficient data. METHOD: The study was conducted during two winters with very different sunshine levels: 5 March to 17 April 2012 and 8 January to 16 April 2013 in 20 then 22 centers. Three hundred children (60 children for each year of age) attending an ambulatory care unit or outpatient department for a reason unrelated to vitamin D status were included at the end of winter in 20 hospital centers (ten centers in the northern half of France above latitude 46-47°N/Lille: 50°N and ten centers in the southern half of France below latitude 46-47°N/Marseille: 43°N). Centralized 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and parathormone (PTH) assays were performed on leftover blood samples. The currently accepted normal range for 25(OH)D was used to define the following categories: ≤25nmol/L: severe vitamin D deficiency, 25nmol/L100nmol/L: high vitamin D status. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect the child's characteristics, use of a vitamin D supplement, and milk and dairy product intake. The cumulative number of hours of sunshine over the 90days prior to inclusion in each center was obtained from the Météo-France weather bureau. RESULTS: 25(OH)D assays were performed in 326 children; more than 95% of children received milk and dairy products and 38% had received a vitamin D supplement since starting the school year: 3.1% of children in the overall population presented severe vitamin D deficiency, 34.4% presented vitamin D deficiency, 53.1% had a sufficient vitamin D status, and 9.5% had a 25(OH)D concentration >100nmol/L with no impact on serum calcium and urinary calcium. Children living in the north of France generally had lower 25(OH)D levels than children living in the south of France. In the non-supplemented population (n=188), 5.3% of children presented severe vitamin D deficiency, 45.2% presented vitamin D deficiency and 48.4% had sufficient 25(OH)D levels. The percentage of children with severe vitamin D deficiency or vitamin D deficiency was twofold higher during the winter with poor sunshine compared to the sunnier winter with a less marked north/south difference. No case of severe vitamin D deficiency was observed in the supplemented population (n=119); 10-15% of children presented vitamin D deficiency and 22.7% had a 25(OH)D concentration >100nmol/L, while remaining within the acceptable range. Two cases of hypervitaminosis without hypercalcemia were identified: one after an unknown loading dose with a calcium/creatinine ratio in the normal range (0.8); for the second one, no additional information could be obtained. Vitamin D supplementation considerably reduced the north/south difference and the Winter1/Winter2 difference. A child not receiving a vitamin D supplement had a ninefold higher risk of vitamin D deficiency at the end of winter than a child receiving a vitamin D supplement (OR=8.8; 95%CI, 4.6-16.8). CONCLUSION: At least one-third of children aged 6-10years presented deficient 25(OH)D levels. None of the children receiving a vitamin D supplement presented severe vitamin D deficiency, only a small number of children presented vitamin D deficiency (n=16 (13.4%)), and no signs of overload were observed, while one half of non-supplemented children (n=95 (50.5%)) presented at least vitamin D deficiency at the end of winter. These results support the need for vitamin D supplementation during winter in children aged 6-10years.


Subject(s)
Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin D/blood , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Child , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Seasons , Sunlight , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamin D Deficiency/diagnosis , Vitamins/administration & dosage
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 19(12): 1293-302, 2012 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23146324

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess compliance with the current recommendations of prophylactic prescription of vitamin D via a multicentric cross-sectional epidemiological survey of 3240 children under 6 years of age. METHOD: Parent questionnaires and data from the health records of children presenting to the emergency departments of 25 teaching hospitals and hospital centers provided information on the children's characteristics, their prescriptions, and other vitamin D intake. Based on the currently applicable recommendations, intakes of 600-1,200 IU/day - 900-1500 IU/day for children with pigmented skin and/or premature and/or hypotrophic children - are considered adequate. RESULTS: In 1606 infants, 9.8% of the prescriptions were below and 23.7% were above the recommendations; in 1256 children between 18 months and 5 years of age, 53.4% of the prescriptions were below and 5.1% were above the recommendations. Children at risk, those from the southern half of France, and those between 18 months and 5 years of age were more likely to receive a prescription below the recommendations; their risk of receiving a prescription above the recommended guidelines was smaller. Of the children aged between 61 and 71 months, 85% had not received any prescription at all during the previous 12 months. These results were compared with the laboratory data collected from a subsample of children. There was a significant correlation between the adequacy of the prescription and the biological vitamin D status both for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) serological concentrations and for calciuria. CONCLUSIONS: Only 66.6% of the prescriptions in children between 0 and 18 months of age and 41.5% in children between 19 months and 5 years of age comply with the recommendations; 53.4% of the prescriptions in the latter age group are below the current recommendations.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Rickets/prevention & control , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Animals , Breast Feeding , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Milk , Multivariate Analysis , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Phys Rev Lett ; 105(14): 146104, 2010 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21230849

ABSTRACT

Thin SiO2 films were grown on a Ru(0001) single crystal and studied by photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy and scanning probe microscopy. The experimental results in combination with density functional theory calculations provide compelling evidence for the formation of crystalline, double-layer sheet silica weakly bound to a metal substrate.

4.
Arch Pediatr ; 6(9): 990-1000, 1999 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10519036

ABSTRACT

A decision-making table, using three questionnaires, is proposed to determine the vitamin D status in children and adolescents. The first questionnaire assesses the vitamin D endogenous synthesis, taking into account the sunlight exposure and the time interval out of the sun. The second questionnaire quantifies the vitamin D dietary intake within three levels: optimal, medium or low. In case of a medium dietary score, a third questionnaire evaluates the daily calcium intake, taking into account the fact that vitamin D metabolism is increased by a low calcium intake (under 400 mg/day). This decision-making table should enable the detection of children and adolescents at risk of vitamin D deficiency and requiring an adapted prophylaxis. Its accuracy will be assessed in prospective surveys.


Subject(s)
Decision Trees , Vitamin D Deficiency/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Nutritional Requirements , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamin D Deficiency/diagnosis , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiology
5.
Drugs ; 42 Suppl 4: 19-24, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1725150

ABSTRACT

In a noncomparative trial, 73 adults with acute sinusitis confirmed by x-ray received cefixime 400mg once daily for approximately 10 days. At the end of treatment, 60 patients (82%) were cured, 2 (2.7%) had improved and 7 (9.6%) had failed therapy; 4 patients were not evaluable. No relapses were observed at follow-up. Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Branhamella (Moraxella) catarrhalis were the main pretreatment pathogens, accounting for 65% of all bacterial isolates. Overall, 84% of pathogens were eradicated after treatment. Cefixime was well tolerated, moderate gastrointestinal disturbances being the most frequent adverse effects noted (3 of 4 patients with adverse effects). These results are comparable to those obtained with cefixime 400mg administered orally in 2 divided doses.


Subject(s)
Cefotaxime/analogs & derivatives , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Cefixime , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Drug Tolerance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
6.
Drugs ; 42 Suppl 4: 6-9, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1725153

ABSTRACT

The relative bioavailability of cefixime was studied in 24 healthy male volunteers, with each subject receiving a single 400mg dose of cefixime administered as an aqueous solution, a 400mg tablet and two 200mg tablets, in a randomised crossover sequence. Serum and urine samples were analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography. Peak cefixime levels were achieved 3 hours after administration of the solution vs 4 hours for the 2 tablet formulations; however, the extent of absorption was only slightly improved with the solution (by 14 and 7% compared with the 1 x 400 and 2 x 200mg tablets, respectively). The 400mg and 2 x 200mg tablets were found to be bioequivalent. The pharmacokinetic profile of the 400mg cefixime tablet (mean maximum plasma concentrations of 4.4 mg/L at 4 hours, area under the concentration-time curve of 34.4 mg/L.h, and apparent terminal elimination half-life of 3.7 hours) supports the clinical evaluation of a 400mg once-daily dosage regimen for cefixime.


Subject(s)
Cefotaxime/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Biological Availability , Cefixime , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Cefotaxime/pharmacokinetics , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Humans , Male , Solutions , Tablets
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL