ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether a cancer history increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo revascularization.MethodsâandâResults: Patients who were confirmed as type 1 acute MI (AMI) by coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who died in hospital or those not undergoing revascularization were excluded. Patients with a cancer history were compared with those without it. A cancer history was examined in the in-hospital cancer registry. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, recurrent type 1 MI, post-discharge coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke. Among 551 AMI patients, 55 had a cancer history (cancer group) and 496 did not (non-cancer group). Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the cancer group than in the non-cancer group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-2.82). Among the cancer group, patients who were diagnosed as AMI within 6 months after the cancer diagnosis had a higher risk of the composite endpoint than those who were diagnosed as AMI 6 months or later after the cancer diagnosis (adjusted HR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.55-19.07). CONCLUSIONS: A cancer history increased the risk of CV events after discharge among AMI patients after revascularization.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Neoplasms , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
A 60-year-old man with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was transported to our hospital by an emergency medical service. Ventricular fibrillation was finally terminated after the initiation of circulation support by percutaneous cardiopulmonary support device. Although acute myocardial infarction was suspected, emergency coronary angiography could not identify the culprit lesion of myocardial infarction while there were multiple intermediate stenotic lesions. Since re-elevation of troponin I was recorded on the 4th day after admission, coronary angiography was performed again, and diffuse severe stenosis in the right coronary artery and total occlusion in the left circumflex coronary artery that disappeared by the injection of isosorbide dinitrate was detected. Therefore, we reached the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction due to coronary vasospasm. It is very rare that emergency coronary angiogram reveals coronary vasospasm at the culprit lesion of myocardial infarction. The guideline recommends calcium channel antagonist and long-acting nitrates for vasospastic angina; however, it would be really difficult to make correct diagnosis of coronary vasospasm among the patients with acute myocardial infarction or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Repeated measurements of troponin and coronary angiography identified the cause of acute myocardial infarction as coronary vasospasm in the present case.