ABSTRACT
The epidemic phase of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) made the Worldwide health system struggle against a severe interstitial pneumonia requiring high-intensity care settings for respiratory failure. A rationalisation of resources and a specific treatment path were necessary. The study suggests a predictive model drawing on clinical data gathered by 119 consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted in Busto Arsizio hospital. We derived a score that identifies the risk of clinical evolution and in-hospital mortality clustering patients into four groups. The study outcomes have been compared across the derivation and validation samples. The prediction rule is based on eight simple patient characteristics that were independently associated with study outcomes. It is able to stratify COVID-19 patients into four severity classes, with in-hospital mortality rates of 0% in group 1, 6-12.5% in group 2, 7-20% in group 3 and 60-86% in group 4 across the derivation and validation sample. The prediction model derived in this study identifies COVID-19 patients with low risk of in-hospital mortality and ICU admission. The prediction model that the study presents identifies COVID-19 patients with low risk of in-hospital mortality and admission to ICU. Moreover, it establishes an intermediate portion of patients that should be treated accurately in order to avoid an unfavourable clinical evolution. A further validation of the model is important before its implementation as a decision-making tool to guide the initial management of patients.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision Rules , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Risk Assessment/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness IndexSubject(s)
Bone Marrow Diseases/pathology , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/complications , Piperazines/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Aged , Benzamides , Blast Crisis , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Male , Necrosis/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated out of hospital usually start warfarin with the recommended 5 mg loading dose and have their International Normalized Ratio (INR) test performed every 2-3 days. Thus, achievement of the therapeutic range may be more difficult than for inpatients, possibly resulting in extended duration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment. We retrospectively examined the charts of 55 DVT outpatients (mean age, 61.4 years; 30 males) to assess the actual duration of LMWH treatment and to identify predictors of a slow achievement of the INR range. Thirty patients (54.4%) reached the therapeutic INR range and stopped LMWH within 7 days, and 25 patients (45.6%) had to continue for an average of 10.5 days. The latter group was significantly younger than the former (57 and 65 years, respectively; P = 0.039). Patients younger than 60 years old had an odds ratio for an extended treatment of 4.92 (P = 0.0057). Algorithms with different loading doses of warfarin according to age should be proposed for outpatient treatment of DVT.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Age Factors , Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Excessive anticoagulation due to warfarin use is associated with hemorrhage. Subcutaneously administered vitamin K has not been evaluated for the treatment of warfarin-associated coagulopathy, yet it is widely used. OBJECTIVE: To show that oral vitamin K is more effective than subcutaneous vitamin K in the treatment of warfarin-associated coagulopathy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with an international normalized ratio (INR) between 4.5 and 10.0. INTERVENTION: Warfarin therapy was withheld, and 1 mg of vitamin K was given orally or subcutaneously. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the INR on the day after administration of vitamin K. Secondary outcome measures were hemorrhage and thrombosis during a 1-month follow-up period. RESULTS: 15 of 26 patients receiving oral vitamin K and 6 of 25 patients receiving subcutaneous vitamin K had therapeutic INRs on the day after study drug administration (P = 0.015; odds ratio, 4.32 [95% CI, 1.13 to 17.44]). CONCLUSION: Oral vitamin K lowers INR more rapidly than subcutaneous vitamin K in asymptomatic patients who have supratherapeutic INR values while receiving warfarin.
