Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e942728, 2024 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38247165

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Lateral condyle fracture of the humerus in children should be diagnosed and treated quickly to avoid the complications of malunion and varus deformity of the elbow. Worldwide, pediatric orthopedic departments experienced delays in patient diagnosis and treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. This retrospective study from a single center in Turkey aimed to compare outcomes from early treatment, elective treatment, and delayed treatment in 140 children with lateral condyle fracture of the humerus between 2013 and 2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the study, 140 patients with Milch type 2 fractures were included. Patients underwent fixation with K-wires or screws after open or closed reduction. Data collected included age, sex, trauma details, surgery timing, operating conditions, perioperative issues, and rehabilitation outcomes. Fracture union and complications were monitored through clinical examinations and X-rays. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). RESULTS There were 58 patients in the early group, 52 in the elective group, and 30 in the delayed group. Surgery durations varied among the groups (P=0.000). The early and delayed groups as well as the early and elective groups had significantly different incision sizes (P=0.000 for both). The early and delayed groups and the early and elective groups had significantly different MEPS scores (P=0.002 and P=0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients with late-presenting lateral condyle fractures, although complications increase, surgical treatment does not yield worse outcomes. Standardization of fracture management should be maintained during periods such as COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fabaceae , Fractures, Bone , Humans , Child , Retrospective Studies , Turkey , Pandemics , Treatment Delay , Humerus
2.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e942831, 2024 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38225811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Suicide attempts that involve jumping from a great height may not be fatal but can result in lumbosacral facture-dislocations. This retrospective study aimed to present the experience from a single center in Turkey of 21 patients with lumbosacral facture-dislocations, or suicidal jumper fractures, treated with lumbosacral fixation between 2015 and 2022. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 21 patients. The diagnosis was established through X-ray and computed tomography (CT) examinations. Neurological damage was assessed using the Gibbons score. Among the patients, 2 were classified as Roy-Camille type 1, 12 as Roy-Camille type 2, and 7 as Roy-Camille type 3. Morphologically, 8 patients had H-type fractures, 7 had T-type fractures, and 6 had U-type fractures. Bilateral spinopelvic fixation was performed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Majeed score. RESULTS The average Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 31.6±12.2. The mean duration of surgery was 123.6±44.9 minutes. According to the Majeed score, excellent results were observed in 8 individuals (40%), good results in 5 individuals (25%), fair results in 5 individuals (25%), and poor results in 2 individuals (10%). Out of 18 patients with neurological deficits, 14 showed improvement after surgery, while 4 continued to experience deficits. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study highlight the importance of obtaining a clear history of the cause of lumbosacral facture-dislocation, as attempted suicide by jumping from a height can cause specific types of injury to the lumbar spine and sacrum that require rapid diagnosis and management to reduce the incidence of permanent paraplegia.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Spinal Fractures , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Suicidal Ideation , Turkey , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Sacrum/surgery , Sacrum/injuries , Spinal Fractures/surgery
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 29: e942207, 2023 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927004

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Non-union of distal tibia fractures is a challenge in orthopedic surgery and can be due to open fractures, osteopenia, infection, or failure of surgical devices. This retrospective study aimed to describe 8 patients with non-union of distal tibial fractures treated with distal tibial nail and screw fixation. MATERIAL AND METHODS According to the Gustilo-Anderson classification, 3 patients had type 2 open fractures, 1 had a type 3 open fracture, 1 had a type 1 open fracture, and 3 had closed fractures. The Association of Osteosynthesis AO classified 4 patients as A2, 2 as B2, and 2 as C2. Seven patients received distal supporting bolt-locking-screw nails (DSBLS) and 1 received DSBLS nail and plate in their most recent operation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Olerud-Molander scores. RESULTS All 8 patients were male, with a mean age of 35.5±14.6 years. Six patients had atrophic non-union, 1 had hypertrophic non-union, and 1 had infected non-union. Union was achieved in all patients. The average union time was 25.1 (range, 12-60) months, and the follow-up duration was 3.6 (range, 2-6) years. The mean Olerud-Molander score was 92.5 (range 85-100), and the mean AOFAS score was 91.2 (range, 85-100). There was no evidence of rotational deformity or shortening. CONCLUSIONS Distal tibial non-unions benefit from nails with DSBLS system due to their excellent biomechanical properties. These nails facilitate union and allow patients to bear weight early in the postoperative period, enabling a quicker return to normal activities.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Open , Tibial Fractures , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Retrospective Studies , Fractures, Open/etiology , Tibia/surgery , Nails , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Bone Nails , Bone Plates , Treatment Outcome , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Fracture Healing
4.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc ; 56(5): 347-349, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36250883

ABSTRACT

Injuries from stingray fish are among the most common fish stings, and their frequency is increasing with the increase in global tourism. It most commonly causes injuries to the extremities and causes morbidity if not treated appropriately. Less commonly, life-threatening injuries can be observed due to injuries in the thorax and abdomen and damage to large vessels and vital organs. In addition to severe pain, tissue necrosis, and secondary infection after injury, systemic symptoms may occur. Since these injuries can occur in both fresh and salt water, it is possible to encounter such a case at any time. Flat spines are sharp, with backward barbs or serrations that make them difficult to extract once they penetrate tissue. After first aid, surgical extraction of the stingray spine with minimal damage is essential in addition to local and systemic treatments. In the literature, there are studies on envenomation and other systemic findings after stingray spine injuries, but few publications are available on the stingray spine extracted technique after injury. This case report presents a new and helpful technique for stingray spine extraction.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Skates, Fish , Animals , Necrosis , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL