Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 150(3): 527-535, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35748758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In addition to its intended purpose of perforator mapping, computed tomography angiography can also identify incidental findings that may require further evaluation. In this multi-institutional study, the authors evaluated the frequency of incidental findings and their significance and effects on treatment course and aimed to identify risk factors for detecting such findings. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent perforator mapping with computed tomography angiography was performed over a 5-year period from three academic institutions. Relevant sociodemographic and clinicopathologic information, computed tomography angiography reports, follow-up visits, and treatment outcomes were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between risk factors and incidental findings. RESULTS: From January of 2015 to July of 2020, a total of 656 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. Overall, 342 incidental findings were found, 76 of which required additional imaging or consultation. Ultimately, 10 patients (1.5 percent) had findings that altered reconstructive management, including five patients (0.8 percent) having severe disease that resulted in the cancellation of their reconstruction. Advanced age and immediate reconstruction timing were independent risk factors for incidental findings. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings are commonly identified on preoperative computed tomography angiography for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Suspicious findings should be investigated thoroughly because they can alter the reconstructive course. Understanding of high-risk groups for incidental findings can further advance patient education during initial consultation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Epigastric Arteries , Humans , Incidental Findings , Mammaplasty/methods , Retrospective Studies
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 146(2): 447-454, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740604

ABSTRACT

Plastic surgeons have the unique perspective of working with all types of patients and care teams from almost all specialties in surgery and medicine, which creates unique challenges in times of distress. As the initial epicenter of coronavirus disease 2019 cases in the United States, the University of Washington program was required to rapidly develop strategies to deal with the escalating crisis. All aspects of the program were affected, including the need to triage the urgency of plastic surgery care, safe staffing of plastic surgery teams, and the role of plastic surgery in the greater hospital community. In addition, as a residency training program, limiting the impact of resident education and maintaining a sense of community and connection among members of the program developed into important considerations. The authors hope that the narrative of their experience will provide insight into the decisions made in the University of Washington health care system but also remind others that they are not alone in dealing with the challenges of this pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Surgery, Plastic/education , Universities/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/standards , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/education , SARS-CoV-2 , Surgeons/education , Surgeons/organization & administration , Universities/standards , Washington , Workforce/organization & administration , Workforce/standards
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 27(4): 1094-7, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27285894

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The infraorbital nerve (ION) is at risk for iatrogenic injury during orbital floor repair. The authors aim to anatomically characterize the intraosseous course of the ION between the inferior orbital fissure and infraorbital foramen. METHODS: Ten cadaver heads (20 orbits) were dissected, with exposure of the orbital floor. The ION was identified from the infraorbital fissure to inferior orbital foramen. The presence and caliber of an osseous roof was noted. Distances measured were infraorbital foramen to infraorbital margin; length of the inferior orbital groove; length of the inferior orbital canal; length from the inferior orbital fissure to the infraorbital margin. RESULTS: Three variations of the osseous anatomy around the ION were identified. Four cadavers had no identifiable groove (Type 1, 40%) and the ION was completely roofed throughout its course. Five specimens exhibited a thin, transparent osseous roof over the nerve before forming the true canal, which we describe as a "pseudocanal" (Type 2, 50%). A true groove was seen in both orbits from a single cadaver (Type 3, 10%). Each cadaver had an ION course of the same type on both sides. Mean ±â€ŠSD intraorbital foramen to infraorbital margin distance was 7.1 ±â€Š1.4 mm. Distance from the infraorbital fissure to the infraorbital margin was 28.5 ±â€Š2.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The course of the infraorbital nerve can be described as Type 1 (true canal), Type 2 (pseudocanal), and Type 3 (groove and canal). The authors propose that this novel classification system will raise awareness of variations in orbital floor anatomy.


Subject(s)
Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Maxillary Nerve/anatomy & histology , Orbit/anatomy & histology , Adult , Cadaver , Humans , Male
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(7): 2357-66, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942453

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delayed wound healing or infection leads to premature tissue expander (TE) explantation after immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction. A large study with sufficient duration of follow-up focusing on the impact of chemotherapy (CT) on premature TE removal after immediate breast reconstruction is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing immediate TE reconstruction was conducted. Multivariate analyses identified factors contributing to premature removal of TEs including neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT, specific chemotherapeutic regimens, and other factors like cancer stage, body mass index, smoking, radiation, and age. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to study the timing of premature TE removal. RESULTS: Of 899 patients with TEs, 256 received no, 295 neoadjuvant, and 348 adjuvant CT. Premature removal occurred more frequently in the neoadjuvant (17.3 %) and adjuvant (19.9 %) cohorts than the no-CT (12.5 %) cohort (p = 0.056). Premature TE removal occurred earlier (p = 0.005) in patients who received no CT than those with adjuvant CT. Radiation in patients receiving neoadjuvant CT prolonged the mean time to premature removal (p = 0.003). In the absence of radiation, premature removal occurred significantly sooner with neoadjuvant than adjuvant CT (p = 0.035). DISCUSSION: Premature removal of a TE occurs more commonly in patients treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT and is most commonly observed 2-3 months after placement-well after the follow-up period recorded by the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. These findings can be used to aid preoperative counseling and guide the timing of follow-up for these patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Tissue Expansion Devices , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 67(7): 960-6, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24767693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Cook-Swartz Doppler has long been a trusted tool for close monitoring of blood flow after microvascular reconstruction; however, device implantation requires additional operating time. Synovis Life Technologies, Inc. received FDA approval in 2010 for the Flow Coupler, which combines an end-to-end anastomotic coupler with a removable 20 MHz Doppler, allowing both procedures to be performed simultaneously. However, its short history of widespread use necessitates further evaluation in the clinical setting. The authors studied the Synovis Flow Coupler in comparison to the more well-established Cook-Swartz Doppler for effectiveness and reliability in detection of vascular compromise. METHODS: The authors reviewed 220 free flap breast reconstructions in 150 patients over a three-year period in which either the Cook-Swartz Doppler or the Synovis Flow Coupler was implanted to monitor blood flow. Outcomes measured include false-positive or false-negative rates (FPR, FNR); rates of OR take-back and salvage; and flap survival. RESULTS: FPR was 1.0% for the Cook-Swartz Doppler and 1.9% for the Synovis Flow Coupler (p>0.05). FNR was 0.0% for both groups. Take-back rates were 10.1% for the Cook-Swartz, and 4.5% for Synovis (p>0.05). Flap failure rates were 1.8% and 0.9% for the Cook-Swartz and Synovis devices, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals no statistically significant differences in outcomes for free flap breast reconstruction where either the Cook-Swartz Doppler or the Synovis Flow Coupler was used to monitor blood flow to the perforator flap. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry/instrumentation , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Free Tissue Flaps/physiology , Graft Survival/physiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Perforator Flap/physiology , Postoperative Period , Prostheses and Implants , Regional Blood Flow , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...