ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is a common neurosurgical procedure, but the optimal entry site of the ventricular catheter is still under debate. In this study, the authors compare the parietal (Keen's) and frontal (Kocher's) entry sites in terms of the rate of revision surgery due to ventricular catheter misplacement, VPS dysfunction, and VPS infection. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the data on consecutive adults (age ≥ 18 years) who had undergone primary VPS insertion between 2010 and 2020 at two neurosurgical centers. One center regularly inserts the ventricular catheter frontally (frontal group); the other center, parietally (parietal group). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of ventricular catheter misplacement necessitating revision surgery. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), rate of revision surgery for VPS dysfunction and infection, as well as early (≤ 30 days) and late (> 30 days) mortality rates. Propensity score matching was performed based on baseline variables, such as normal pressure hydrocephalus, postinfectious hydrocephalus, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which were identified as predictors of ventricular catheter misplacement using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 539 consecutive patients, 301 (55.8%) were in the frontal group and 238 (44.2%) in the parietal group. Postoperative rates of revision surgery due to misplacement were comparable in the two catheter entry site groups (frontal 14 [4.7%] vs parietal 11 [4.6%], p = 0.987). Rates of revision surgery for VPS dysfunction (14 [4.7%] vs 10 [4.2%], respectively, p = 0.802) and infection (22 [7.3%] vs 10 [4.2%], p = 0.13) exhibited no significant differences. Favorable functional outcomes (mRS score ≤ 2; 164 [76.3%] vs 174 [79.5%], respectively, p = 0.058) and early mortality rates (5 [1.7%] vs 6 [2.5%], p = 0.483) were similar between the groups. After propensity score matching, the primary and secondary outcome measures remained comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The entry site of the ventricular catheter in VPS surgery does not seem to affect proximal revision rates. Further, revision rates due to VPS dysfunction, VPS infection, and morbidity were comparable as well.
ABSTRACT
Surgical treatment of acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) is still matter of debate, especially in the elderly. A retrospective study to compare two different surgical approaches, namely standard (SC, craniotomy size > 8 cm) and limited craniotomy (LC, craniotomy size < 8 cm), was conducted in elderly patients with traumatic aSDH to identify the role of craniotomy size in terms of clinical and radiological outcome. Sixty-four patients aged 75 or older with aSDH as sole lesion were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected pre- and postoperatively including clinical and radiological criteria. The primary outcome parameter was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome parameters were radiological. The mean age was 79.2 (± 3.1) years with no difference between groups and almost equal distribution of craniotomy size. Mortality rate was significantly higher in the SC group in comparison to the LC group (68.4% vs. 31.6%; p = 0.045). The preoperative HD (p = 0.08) and the MLS (p = 0.09) were significantly higher in the SC group, whereas postoperative radiological evaluation showed no significant difference in HD or MLS. A limited craniotomy is sufficient for adequate evacuation of an aSDH in the elderly achieving the same radiological and clinical outcome.
