Efficacy of surgical staple line reinforcement in Glissonean stapling: A single-center pilot study.

Vascular staplers are routinely used in laparoscopic liver resection, which has become a standard procedure in advanced medical facilities. Although previous reports have outlined the benefits of staple line reinforcement (SLR), its application in Glissonean pedicle transection during hepatic resection remains poorly studied. This study investigated surgical SLR as a tool to enhance staple line strength and improve perioperative hemostasis. Here, 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection using the Tri-StapleTM2.0 Reinforced Reload were included. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and outcomes were assessed. The results demonstrated successful outcomes with no complications related to bile leakage or injuries during staple insertion. Overall, our findings suggest that SLR can be safely utilized in Glissonean pedicle transection during laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies are required to comprehensively evaluate its benefits compared with conventional surgical staplers.

Management of Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy During Gastroenterological Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (GSATT).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of continuing preoperative aspirin monotherapy on surgical outcomes in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy (APT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The effectiveness of continuing preoperative aspirin monotherapy in patients undergoing APT in preventing thromboembolic consequences is mostly unknown. METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study on the Safety and Feasibility of Gastroenterological Surgery in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Therapy (GSATT study) conducted at 14 clinical centers enrolled and screened patients between October 2019 and December 2021. The participants (n=1,170) were assigned to the continued APT group, discontinued APT group, or non-APT group, and the surgical outcomes of each group were compared. Propensity score matching was performed between the continued and discontinued APT groups to investigate the effect of continuing preoperative aspirin therapy on thromboembolic complications. RESULTS: The rate of thromboembolic complications in the continued APT group was substantially lower than that in the non-APT or discontinued APT groups (0.5% vs. 2.6% vs. 2.9%; P=0.027). Multivariate investigation of the entire cohort revealed that discontinuation of APT (P<0.001) and chronic anticoagulant use (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative thromboembolism. The post-matching evaluation demonstrated that the rates of thromboembolic complications were significantly different between the continued and discontinued APT groups (0.6% vs. 3.3%; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: APT discontinuation following elective gastroenterological surgery increases the risk of thromboembolic consequences, whereas continuing preoperative aspirin greatly reduces this risk. The continuation of preoperative aspirin therapy in APT-received patients is considered one of the best alternatives for preventing thromboembolism during elective gastroenterological surgery.

The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection.

Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence.

Intracorporeal reinforcing sutures reduce anastomotic leakage in double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Introduction: In rectal surgery, double-stapled anastomosis is one of the most common techniques. However, the crossing of the staple line is considered a weakness of this method and could lead to anastomotic leakage (AL), which is one of the major complications of rectal cancer surgery. Aim: To investigate the usefulness of laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcement suturing for preventing AL in laparoscopic rectal surgery. Material and methods: A total of 153 patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic rectal resection with anastomosis using the double-stapling technique between January 2015 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcomes were recorded and retrospectively analysed. Patients who received intracorporeal reinforcing sutures (n = 72) were compared with those who did not receive the reinforcing sutures (n = 81). Results: AL was observed in 11 (7.2%) cases overall and in only 1 case in the group with intracorporeal reinforcing sutures. There were no associations between clinicopathological factors and the use of reinforcing sutures. Multivariate analysis revealed that a distance from the anal verge of less than 6.5 cm, diabetes mellitus, and the non-use of reinforcing sutures were independent risk factors for AL. Conclusions: Laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcing sutures reduced the incidence of AL. Therefore, laparoscopic reinforcing sutures for double-stapled anastomoses seem useful for the prevention of AL.

Indocyanine green plasma clearance rate and 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin single-photon emission computed tomography evaluated preoperative remnant liver.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative evaluation of future remnant liver reserves is important for safe hepatectomy. If the remnant is small, preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is useful. Liver volume analysis has been the primary method of preoperative evaluation, although functional examination may be more accurate. We have used the functional evaluation liver using the indocyanine green plasma clearance rate (KICG) and 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin single-photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-GSA SPECT) for safe hepatectomy. AIM: To analyze the safety of our institution's system for evaluating the remnant liver reserve. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 23 patients who underwent preoperative PVE. Two types of remnant liver KICG were defined as follows: Anatomical volume remnant KICG (a-rem-KICG), determined as the remnant liver anatomical volume rate × KICG; and functional volume remnant KICG (f-rem-KICG), determined as the remnant liver functional volume rate based on 99mTc-GSA SPECT × KICG. If either of the remnant liver KICGs were > 0.05, a hepatectomy was performed. Perioperative factors were analyzed. We defined the marginal group as patients with a-rem-KICG of < 0.05 and a f-rem-KICG of > 0.05 and compared the postoperative outcomes between the marginal and not marginal (both a-rem-KICG and f-rem-KICG > 0.05) groups. RESULTS: All 23 patients underwent planned hepatectomies. Right hepatectomy, right trisectionectomy and left trisectionectomy were in 16, 6 and 1 cases, respectively. The mean of blood loss and operative time were 576 mL and 474 min, respectively. The increased amount of f-rem-KICG was significantly larger than that of a-rem-KICG after PVE (0.034 vs 0.012, P = 0.0273). The not marginal and marginal groups had 17 (73.9%) and 6 (26.1%) patients, respectively. The complications of Clavian-Dindo classification grade II or higher and post-hepatectomy liver failure were observed in six (26.1%) and one (grade A, 4.3%) patient, respectively. The 90-d mortality was zero. The marginal group had no significant difference in postoperative outcomes (prothrombin time/international normalised ratio, total bilirubin, complication, post-hepatectomy liver failure, hospital stay, 90-d, and mortality) compared with the not-marginal group. CONCLUSION: Functional evaluation of the remnant liver enabled safe hepatectomy and may extend the indication for hepatectomy after PVE treatment.

Resection strategy for colorectal liver metastasis focusing on intrahepatic vessels and resection margins.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact of surgical margins and vessel preservation on the oncological outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS: In this retrospective study, resected CRLM (n = 242) from 116 patients were assigned to one of the following groups: Group A, apart from vessels (n = 201); Group B, hepatic vein contact (n = 27); or Group C, Glissonean pedicle contact (n = 25). We analyzed the local recurrence rates (LRR) in each group. RESULTS: The total LRR and that in Groups A, B, and C were 11.6%, 10.4%, 7.4%, and 20%, respectively. In group A, R1 resections were associated with a significantly higher LRR than R0 resections (27.6% vs 7.6%, respectively; P = 0.001); however, the margin widths were not related to the LRR. In group B, the LRR for hepatic vein preservation and resection did not differ. In group C, the Glissonean pedicle preservation group had a higher LRR than the Glissonean pedicle resection group (66.7% vs 5.3%, respectively; P = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate of the local recurrence group (25%) was significantly lower than that of the no recurrence group (84%, P < 0.001) and the intrahepatic recurrence group (60%, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: R0 resections for CRLM, apart from those involving vessels, can achieve local control. While preserving hepatic vein contact with CRLM is acceptable, the Glissonean pedicle should be resected because of the higher LRR.

Laparoscopic Colectomy for Splenic Flexure Cancer Approached from Four Directions.

Background: Standardized protocols for laparoscopic surgery of splenic flexure cancer (SFC) have not been established yet. We described a standardized laparoscopic procedure for SFCs and examined its safety and feasibility. Methods: Laparoscopic colectomy for SFC was performed as follows. The sigmoid colon was mobilized to the descending mesocolon through the medial approach. After confirming the base of the inferior mesenteric artery, the left colic artery was dissected and resected at the base. Further dissection was carried out between the mesentery of the colon and the renal fascia until it exceeded the upper pole of the left kidney and the splenic flexure. The next dissection reached the white line at the lateral side and the sigmoid-descending colon junction. After making an incision at the greater omentum and gastrocolic ligament from the center of the transverse colon to the splenic flexure, the transverse mesocolon base was dissected from the inside splenic flexure for complete mobilization. This was performed by approaching from four directions toward the splenic flexure. Intestinal resection and anastomosis are performed. Results: This procedure was performed in 70 patients with splenic flexure colon cancer (mean age 70 years). The mean operative time was 190 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 2.0 mL. No notable perioperative or postoperative complications were noted. Conclusions: Safe mobilization of the splenic flexure can be achieved by approaching from four directions, and standardization of left colectomy can facilitate complete mesenteric excision.

Hepatic anisakiasis mimicking metastatic liver tumour.

INTRODUCTION: Anisakiasis is a parasitic disease caused by anisakid nematode larvae, which are found in raw or undercooked fish. It occurs more frequently in the digestive tract, but has also been reported outside the gastrointestinal tract. This report details a case of rare hepatic anisakiasis that was initially diagnosed as metastatic rectal cancer. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 60-year-old male underwent radical resection for stage III rectal cancer followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for six months. Seven months after surgery, a new, 10 mm diameter area of low density was seen in segment 4/8 margin of the liver on enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. Metastatic liver tumour from rectal cancer was suspected. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy was performed. The diagnosis was revised to hepatic anisakiasis when pathological examination revealed anisakis simplex larvae in the necrotic tissue. DISCUSSION: Anisakiasis outside of the gastrointestinal tract is a rare finding, but may be seen more frequently with the recent increase in the consumption of raw fish around the world. Hepatic anisakiasis may mimic tumours in the liver. Clinicians should consider dietary inquiry and further evaluation in patients with liver margin tumours less than 20 mm in size that are not positively malignant, as hepatic anisakiasis may be a possible diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We report a rare case of hepatic anisakiasis which initially presented as suspected metastatic cancer. Hepatic anisakiasis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of low density liver tumours less than 20 mm, where the patient's diet includes raw fish.

Significance of Proper Graft Selection in Adult Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients with Preoperative Deteriorated Condition.

BACKGROUND The outcome of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is poor for recipients with severely deteriorated preoperative condition. This study therefore evaluated the proper graft selection according to the recipients' preoperative condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS We evaluated the clinical outcomes in 66 patients who underwent adult LDLT from October 2003 to June 2016 in our institution, excluding fulminant liver failure and ABO-incompatible cases. Preoperative risk factors included MELD score >20, preoperative hospitalization for over 2 weeks or intensive care unit admission and bacterial infection within 1 month before LDLT. Patients were classified into those with 0-1 risk factors (Group LR, n=44) and those with 2-3 risk factors (Group HR, n=22). RESULTS The overall survival (OS) rate after LDLT was significantly lower in Group HR than in Group LR (1-year: HR 83.9% vs. LR 93%, 3-year: HR 70.8% vs. LR 90.5%, 5-year: HR 62% vs. LR 87.6%; p=0.029). In Group LR, OS rates did not differ significantly by graft type or donor age. In Group HR, OS rates at 1 (93.8% vs. 66.7%), 3 (85.2% vs. 50%), and 5 (75.8% vs. 25%) years were significantly higher using right (n=16) vs. left (n=6) lobe grafts (p=0.046). CONCLUSIONS Proper graft selection is very important to improve the outcome of LDLT recipients in deteriorated preoperative condition. LDLT using right-lobe grafts may be recommended for high-risk severely deteriorated patients.

Clinical factors that affect the outcomes after anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the superiority of anatomical resection (AR) over non-anatomical resection (NR) is still controversial. In this study, we assessed the potential benefits of AR for HCC. METHODS: We enrolled 173 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy in our hospital from August 2003 to May 2013 and compared the outcomes for the AR group (n = 125) with those for the NR group (n = 48). RESULTS: The median observational period was 790 days. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 92.1 and 85.8 %, respectively; the 1- and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 78.2 and 63.0 %, respectively. The AR and NR groups did not significantly differ in the OS or DFS. However, the 2-year DFS was significantly better for the AR group than the NR group among HCV patients (68.2 vs. 32.2 %; P = 0.004) and patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) within the normal range (<20 ng/ml; 76.7 vs. 60.9 %; P = 0.031), total bilirubin <0.8 mg/dl (70.8 vs. 47.0 %; P = 0.034), and tumors 2-5 cm in diameter (82.0 vs. 62.5 %; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: If a patient is HCV-negative, has low AFP, low total bilirubin, or a tumor diameter of 2-5 cm, AR is recommended.

Axillobifemoral Bypass for Aortitis Syndrome in a Living-Donor Liver Transplant Patient.

A 64-year-old female patient with aortitis syndrome presented with progressive intermittent claudication for 6 months. Her medical history was notable for living-donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis 4-years prior and chronic immunosuppressive therapy. Evaluation included normal laboratory examination, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography which demonstrated severely calcified descending aorta with high-grade stenosis below the diaphragm. The patient was treated by axillobifemoral bypass using an 8-mm ringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft under general anesthesia. Medical management included decreased preoperative doses of immunosuppressants and predonisolone, which were resumed after the operation, and chronic anticoagulation. There were no postoperative complications.

The preventive surgical site infection bundle in patients with colorectal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications that occur after colorectal surgery. Surgery for colorectal perforation carries an especially high risk of incisional SSI because fecal ascites contaminates the incision intraoperatively, and in patients who underwent stoma creation, the incision is located near the infective origin and is subject to infection postoperatively. Although effectiveness of the preventive SSI bundle of elective colorectal surgery has been reported, no study has focused exclusively on emergency surgery for colorectal perforation. METHODS: Patients with colorectal perforation who underwent emergency surgery and stoma creation from 2010 to 2015 at our center were consecutively enrolled in the study. In March 2013, we developed the preventive incisional SSI bundle for patients with colorectal perforation undergoing stoma creation. The effectiveness of the bundle in these patients was determined and the rates of incisional SSI between before and after March 2013 were compared. RESULTS: We enrolled 108 patients with colorectal perforation who underwent emergency operation during the study period. Thirteen patients were excluded because they died within 30 days after surgery, and 23 patients without stoma were excluded; thus, 72 patients were analyzed. There were 47 patients in the pre-implementation group and 25 patients in the post-implementation group. The rate of incisional SSI was significantly lower after implementation of preventive incisional SSI bundle (43% vs. 20%, p = 0.049). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter after implementation of the bundle (27 vs. 18 days respectively; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The preventive incisional SSI bundle was effective in preventing incisional SSI in patients with colorectal perforation undergoing emergency surgery with stoma creation.

Prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal perforation based on routinely available parameters: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Even after surgery and intensive postoperative management, the mortality rate associated with colorectal perforation is high. Identification of mortality markers using routinely available preoperative parameters is important. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with colorectal perforation who underwent operations from January 2010 to January 2015. We divided them into a mortality and survivor group and compared clinical characteristics between the two groups. Additionally, we compared the mortality rate between different etiologies: malignant versus benign and diverticular versus nondiverticular. We used the χ (2) and Mann-Whitney U tests and a logistic regression model to identify factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: We enrolled 108 patients, and 52 (48 %) were male. The mean age at surgery was 71 ± 13 years. The postoperative mortality rate was 12 % (13 patients). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a high patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.020-1.181) and low preoperative systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.953-0.999) were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with colorectal perforation. In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference between the malignant and benign group (11.8 % vs. 23.9 %, respectively; p = 0.970), while the diverticular group had a significantly lower mortality rate than the nondiverticular group (2.6 % vs. 17.1 %, respectively; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients and patients with low preoperative blood pressure had a high risk of mortality associated with colorectal perforation. For such patients, operations and postoperative management should be performed carefully.

Comparison between anatomical subsegmentectomy and nonanatomical partial resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located within a single subsegment: a single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within a single subsegment, the superiority of anatomical subsegmentectomy over non-anatomical partial resection is still controversial. In this study, we assessed the potential benefit of subsegmentectomy. METHODOLOGY: We selected 44 patients with a single HCC lesion within one subsegment who had undergone anatomical subsegmentectomy or non-anatomical partial resection from among 173 patients who underwent hepatectomy in our hospital from August 2003 to May 2013. We compared the results following anatomical subsegmentectomy (Group A; n = 16) and non-anatomical partial resection (Group N; n = 28). RESULTS: One- and two-year survival rates were 92.5% and 89.3%, respectively; 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 88.9% and 69.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or RFS between the groups. However, among HBV-positive patients, RFS was significantly better for Group A than Group N (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: For HBV-positive HCC within a single subsegment, we recommend subsegmentectomy.

Long-term survival after resection of pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.

AIM: To retrospectively analyze factors affecting the long-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2011, 195 patients underwent pancreatic resection in our hospital. The prognostic factors after pancreatic resection were analyzed in all 195 patients. After excluding the censored cases within an observational period, the clinicopathological characteristics of 20 patients who survived ≥ 5 (n = 20) and < 5 (n = 76) years were compared. For this comparison, we analyzed the patients who underwent surgery before June 2008 and were observed for more than 5 years. For statistical analyses, the log-rank test was used to compare the cumulative survival rates, and the χ (2) and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the two groups. The Cox-Hazard model was used for a multivariate analysis, and P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. A multivariate analysis was conducted on the factors that were significant in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: The median survival for all patients was 27.1 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 34.5%. The median observational period was 595 d. With the univariate analysis, the UICC stage was significantly associated with survival time, and the CA19-9 ≤ 200 U/mL, DUPAN-2 ≤ 180 U/mL, tumor size ≤ 20 mm, R0 resection, absence of lymph node metastasis, absence of extrapancreatic neural invasion, and absence of portal invasion were favorable prognostic factors. The multivariate analysis showed that tumor size ≤ 20 mm (HR = 0.40; 95%CI: 0.17-0.83, P = 0.012) and negative surgical margins (R0 resection) (HR = 0.48; 95%CI: 0.30-0.77, P = 0.003) were independent favorable prognostic factors. Among the 96 patients, 20 patients survived for 5 years or more, and 76 patients died within 5 years after operation. Comparison of the 20 5-year survivors with the 76 non-survivors showed that lower concentrations of DUPAN-2 (79.5 vs 312.5 U/mL, P = 0.032), tumor size ≤ 20 mm (35% vs 8%, P = 0.008), R0 resection (95% vs 61%, P = 0.004), and absence of lymph node metastases (60% vs 18%, P = 0.036) were significantly associated with the 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: Negative surgical margins and a tumor size ≤ 20 mm were independent favorable prognostic factors. Histologically curative resection and early tumor detection are important factors in achieving long-term survival.

[A case of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the transverse colon].

A 7 1-year-old man presented to our hospital with constipation and abdominal pain. Computed tomography of the abdomen and colonoscopy revealed advanced cancer of the transverse colon. The biopsy specimen indicated a highly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent extended right hemicolectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Pathological examination showed a neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) with concurrent adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon and regional lymph node metastases of the NEC and adenocarcinoma. The histopathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) in accordance with the 2010 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System. Liver and lung metastases were identified 8 months after the surgery. We administered chemotherapy including 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) plus bevacizumab, with limited therapeutic effect, as the disease progressed despite treatment. The patient chose best supportive care 13 months after the surgery. Several studies have reported that most patients with adenoendocrine cell carcinoma, including MANEC, experience relapse within 1 year after surgery, and few patients remain disease-free for long periods after surgery. The optimal strategy for the management of MANEC is variable owing to its rarity; only 2 cases of MANEC in the colon, including the present case, have been reported in Japan. It is thus important to gather more evidence on this disease and its management.

Surgical text for orthotopic liver transplantation model with small-for-size graft in the pig: key techniques and pitfalls.

BACKGROUND: Challenges with small-for-size grafts are a critical issue in the liver transplantation field, and a reliable and reproducible animal model is required. METHOD: We performed 50 orthotopic liver transplantations in pigs with a 30% graft, and retrospectively investigated the learning curves. We modified our surgical procedures according to our experience. Here, we describe our current procedures in detail with retrospective evaluation of our experience. The artery to the right lateral lobe crosses the portal vein trunk. A 30% graft is taken using the right lateral lobe attached to a sufficient length of aorta. Hepatic venous plasty is undertaken on the back table to attach a venous patch to the anterior wall of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava, which has no extrahepatic margin. To minimize hypoperfusion to the digestive tract, an aorta-to-aorta anastomosis is performed in a side-to-end fashion in a minimal surgical field before suprahepatic inferior vena cava and portal vein reconstruction. A temporary transjugular portosystemic shunt is also inserted before suprahepatic inferior vena cava reconstruction. The recipient suprahepatic inferior vena cava is clamped at the intramediastinal level, including the margins of the diaphragm in the clamp. RESULTS: Although survival rate during first forty cases were under 0.2, a reasonable survival rate of 0.6 had been achieved after the experiences of forty cases. CONCLUSION: Precedent arterial reconstruction using an aorta-to-aorta anastomosis minimizes congestive damage and shortens operative time. Hepatic venous reconstruction should be completed without any outflow block, by using venous plasty and adequate clamping.

Successful living donor liver transplantation for severe hepatic GVHD histologically resembling autoimmune hepatitis after bone marrow transplantation from the same sibling donor.

A 30-year-old woman developed severe liver dysfunction 1 year after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HLA-identical sibling donor for B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) during the tapering of cyclosporin A. The histologic picture resembled autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), although neither autoantibody nor hypergammaglobulinemia was detected. She entered hepatic coma, and underwent living donor liver transplantation from the same donor on day 421 after BMT. She is well 18 months after the procedure, showing normal liver function and hematopoiesis. AIH-like hepatic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has not been documented. This patient is the second case of living donor liver transplantation for hepatic GVHD from the same donor.

The impact of meticulous management for hepatic artery thrombosis on long-term outcome after pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

To analyze the risk factors in the development of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and assess the impact of our perioperative management for HAT on the long-term outcome after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), we reviewed 382 patients under 12 yr of age who underwent 403 LDLT from January 1996 to December 2005. One- and 10-yr patient survival rates were 78% and 78% in the patients with HAT (27 patients; 6.7%), and 84% and 76% in the patients without HAT, respectively (p = n.s.). Univariate analysis showed gender (female), body weight (lower), and graft-to-recipient weight ratio (higher) were significant risk factors in the patients with HAT (p < 0.05). Patients with Doppler ultrasound signal loss of the hepatic artery (HA) accompanied by an increase of liver enzymes underwent thrombectomy and reanastomosis (S-group, n = 13), and patients with a weak HA signal underwent anticoagulant therapy (M-group, n = 13). One patient underwent re-LDLT. One- and five-yr patient survival rates were 83% and 83% in the S-group, and 77% and 77% in the M-group (p = n.s.). The incidence of biliary complications in the S-group (58%) was significantly higher than that of the M-group (15%). For a successful long-term outcome, the early detection of HAT and prompt medical and surgical intervention are crucial to minimize the insult of HAT.