Sex differences in the use of mechanical ventilation in a neurointensive care population: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In the general intensive care unit (ICU) women receive invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) less frequently than men. We investigated whether sex differences in the use of IMV also exist in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU), where patients are intubated not only due to respiratory failure but also due to neurological impairment. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study included adults admitted to the NCCU of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2018 and August 2021 with neurological or neurosurgical main diagnosis. We collected data on demographics, intubation, re-intubation, tracheotomy, and duration of IMV or other forms of respiratory support from the Swiss ICU registry or the medical records. A descriptive statistics was performed. Baseline and outcome characteristics were compared by sex in the whole population and in subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 963 patients were included. No differences between sexes in the use and duration of IMV, frequency of emergency or planned intubations, tracheostomy were found. The duration of oxygen support was longer in women (men 2 [2, 4] vs. women 3 [1, 6] days, p = 0.018), who were more often admitted due to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). No difference could be found after correction for age, diagnosis of admission and severity of disease. CONCLUSION: In this NCCU population and differently from the general ICU population, we found no difference by sex in the frequency and duration of IMV, intubation, reintubation, tracheotomy and non-invasive ventilation support. These results suggest that the differences in provision of care by sex reported in the general ICU population may be diagnosis-dependent. The difference in duration of oxygen supplementation observed in our population can be explained by the higher prevalence of SAH in women, where we aim for higher oxygenation targets due to the specific risk of vasospasm.

Limitation of life sustaining measures in neurocritical care: sex, timing, and advance directive.

BACKGROUND: The limitation of life sustaining treatments (LLST) causes ethical dilemmas even in patients faced with poor prognosis, which applies to many patients admitted to a Neurocritical Care Unit (NCCU). The effects of social and cultural aspects on LLST in an NCCU population remain poorly studied. METHODS: All NCCU patients between 01.2018 and 08.2021 were included. Medical records were reviewed for: demographics, diagnosis, severity of disease, and outcome. Advance directives (AD) and LLST discussions were reviewed evaluating timing, degree, and reason for LLST. Social/cultural factors (nationality, language spoken, religion, marital status, relationship to/sex of legal representative) were noted. Associations between these factors and the patients' sex, LLST timing, and presence of AD were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 2975 patients, 12% of men and 10.5% of women underwent LLST (p = 0.30). Women, compared to men, more commonly received withdrawal instead of withholding of life sustaining treatments (57.5 vs. 45.1%, p = 0.028) despite comparable disease severity. Women receiving LLST were older (73 ± 11.7 vs. 69 ± 14.9 years, p = 0.005) and often without a partner (43.8 vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001) compared to men. AD were associated with female sex and early LLST, but not with an increased in-hospital mortality (57.1 vs. 75.2% of patients with and without AD respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving LLST, the presence of an AD was associated with an increase of early LLST, but not with an increased in-hospital mortality. This supports the notion that the presence of an AD is primarily an expression of the patients' will but does not per se predestine the patient for an unfavorable outcome.

Complement inhibition for the treatment of COVID-19 triggered thrombotic microangiopathy with cardiac failure: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been increasingly recognized as a multisystem disease. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can infect literally any cell type that expresses its target receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. However, COVID-19-associated organ dysfunction is not only mediated by direct viral effects but also by the interaction between the host's immune response, endotheliopathy, and microvascular coagulopathy. It has been proposed that the activation of the complement system plays a central role in the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19 and the associated endotheliopathy. CASE SUMMARY: A 76-year-old male patient with indeterminate cardiogenic shock in the setting of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was admitted to our intensive care unit. Coronary angiography did not reveal a plausible explanation for his symptoms. The patient developed renal failure, neurological symptoms, severe thrombocytopenia, and a Coombs-negative haemolytic anaemia with schistocytes. All together the clinical picture was highly suggestive of a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with microvascular cardiac involvement. Conventional therapeutic strategies including high-dose steroids and seven sessions of therapeutic plasma exchange were all unsuccessful. Interestingly, complement inhibition with Eculizumab as rescue approach led to a rapid clinical and laboratory improvement and the patients were discharged with normalized organ functions at Day 36. CONCLUSION: The aetiology of cardiogenic shock observed in this patient cannot simply be explained by his focal and chronic coronary findings. Although viral myocarditis was not formally excluded, both the clinical features of TMA and the rapid resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms after pharmacological complement inhibition suggest a SARS-CoV-2-driven microangiopathic origin of heart failure.