Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 24(2): 100024, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The overdiagnosis of penicillin allergy and misclassification of non-truly allergic reactions is a growing public health problem, associated with the overuse of broad-spectrum and restricted antimicrobials. We aimed to evaluate the impact of penicillin allergy status on antimicrobial prescribing. METHODS: A retrospective study of inpatients with a documented penicillin allergy receiving antimicrobials was conducted from 1 April to 1 July 2021. Antimicrobial prescribing and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with an active penicillin allergy label and those whose label was removed following antimicrobial stewardship team review. Antimicrobials were classified in two categories: i) 'Access' (recommended), ii) 'Watch and Reserve' (restricted) according to WHO AWaRe classification, a tool to guide appropriate antibiotic use. RESULTS: 437 patients with a documented penicillin allergy receiving antimicrobials were included. 353 patients with an active penicillin allergy label, more frequently received antimicrobials from the 'Watch and Reserve list' (283;80% vs 30;37%; p<0.001). In contrast, 84 patients who were de-labelled received more often antimicrobials from the 'Access list' (53;63% vs 64;18%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin allergy reviews and de-labelling strategies may reduce the use of restricted antimicrobials under the 'Watch and Reserve list'. This practice should be encouraged and reinforced in all hospitals.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Hypersensitivity , Penicillins , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Penicillins/adverse effects , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20172017 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28903972

ABSTRACT

We present a 65-year-old diabetic patient with a complex liver abscess and bacteraemia from Lactobacillus paracasei The abscess resulted in a prolonged hospital stay due to ongoing sepsis despite ultrasound-guided drainage and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Furthermore, the patient developed several secondary complications including a right-sided pleural effusion, an inferior vena cava thrombus and septic lung emboli. The abscess was eventually managed successfully with a prolonged course of antibiotics and multiple ultrasound-guided drainage procedures.To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of probiotic consumption, confirmed by strain identification, as the likely source of a liver abscess. Probiotic products have been widely used for many years and are advocated to the general public for their health benefits with no warning of side effects. Lactobacilli are one group of bacteria commonly used in these products. Although rare, complications have been reported. Susceptible patients, such as those who are immunocompromised, should be advised against excessive consumption.


Subject(s)
Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Lactobacillus/pathogenicity , Liver Abscess/microbiology , Probiotics/adverse effects , Sepsis/microbiology , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Colony Count, Microbial , Drainage , Female , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Lactobacillus/classification , Lactobacillus/immunology , Lactobacillus/isolation & purification , Lethargy , Linezolid/therapeutic use , Liver Abscess/etiology , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pleural Effusion/microbiology , Sepsis/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thrombosis/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...