Comparison of physician-staffed helicopter with ground-based emergency medical services for trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have discussed whether physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) provide temporal and geographical benefits for patients in remote locations compared to ground emergency medical services (GEMS). Our study seeks to clarify the significance of HEMS for patients with severe trauma by comparing the mortality of patients transported directly from crash scenes by HEMS or GEMS, taking geographical factors into account. METHODS: Using medical records from a single center, collected from January 2014 to December 2018, we retrospectively identified 1674 trauma patients. Using propensity score analysis, we selected adult patients with an injury severity score ≥16, divided them into groups depending on their transport to the hospital by HEMS or GEMS, and compared their mortality within 24 h of hospitalization. For propensity score-matched groups, we analyzed distance and time. RESULTS: Of the 317 eligible patients, 202 were transported by HEMS. In the propensity score matching analysis, there was no significant difference in mortality between the HEMS and GEMS groups: 8.7% vs. 5.8%, odds ratio (OR), 1.547 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.530-4.514). The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW): 11% vs. 7.8%, OR, 1.080 (95% CI, 0.640-1.823); stabilized IPTW: 11% vs. 7.8%, OR, 1.080 (95% CI, 0.502-2.324); and truncated IPTW: 10% vs. 6.4%, OR, 1.143 (95% CI, 0.654-1.997). The distance from the crash scene to the hospital was farther in the HEMS group, and it took a longer period of time to arrive at the hospital (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HEMS may provide equal treatment opportunities and minimize trauma deaths for patients transported from a greater distance to an emergency medical center compared to GEMS for patients transported from nearby regions.

Influenza A with hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome in an adult: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome (HSES) is a type of acute encephalopathy mainly seen in infants. It is a syndrome encompassing an onset of high fever, disturbance of consciousness, convulsion, and shock that rapidly progresses to watery diarrhea and liver and renal dysfunctions. It is extremely rare in adults, and the number of reports is limited worldwide. We report the case of an adult patient with HSES, which occurred after influenza A infection. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old man visited his family doctor 2 days after he noticed fever and was diagnosed with influenza A using an influenza rapid diagnosis kit; he underwent treatment on an outpatient basis. He was immediately hospitalized after developing fever, abdominal pain, malaise, and shock 16 hours after the commencement of the treatment. Abrupt acute brain swelling was noted 24 hours after hospitalization. DIAGNOSES: The antibody titer to influenza A (H3N2) was 1:40. Computed tomography obtained 24 hours after treatment initiation confirmed acute cerebral edema and cerebral herniation. Electroencephalogram at that time showed a flat line. INTERVENTIONS: For the treatment of influenza A, laninamivir 150 mg was started immediately after the diagnosis by the family doctor, and 600 mg dose was given daily after hospitalization (or since 24 hours after the treatment initiation). For the management of shock, dobutamine 3 µg/kg/min and noradrenaline up to 0.2 µg/kg/min were used together with bolus infusion. OUTCOMES: The patient was declared brain dead on his 6th hospital day and he died on his 27th hospital day. CONCLUSION: Drastic courses such as that in our case with HSES can follow influenza infections even in adults.

Leakage sign for acute subdural hematoma in clinical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a serious traumatic disease, and predictive methods for hematoma growth are necessary to decide whether emergent operation is necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of "leakage" using computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with ASDH and to identify its prognostic value. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with ASDH were examined using CTA (mean age 64.1 ± 20.6 years; 24 men) by analyzing two serial scans (CTA phase and delayed phase). We defined a positive leakage sign as a > 10% increase in Hounsfield units (HU) in the region of interest. Hematoma expansion was determined using plain CT after 24 h in patients who did not undergo emergent surgery. RESULTS: Of the 67 patients, conservative therapy was administered to 35 patients; of these patients, 9 showed hematoma expansion, and 8 of these 9 patients (88.9%) showed positive leakage signs. The sensitivity and specificity of leakage signs to hematoma expansion in the no-surgery group were 88.8% and 76.1%, respectively. All positive leakage signs were found within 4.5 h of injury; patients showing negative leakage signs showed a decreased tendency towards hematoma 24 h after injury. Patients presenting with positive leakage signs had poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the leakage sign is a sensitive predictor of hematoma expansion and poor outcomes in ASDH. If the hematoma is small but leakage sign-positive, strict observation is necessary and aggressive surgery may improve outcomes.

Predictive Value of Leakage Signs for Pure Brain Contusional Hematoma Expansion.

Hematoma expansion is an important consideration in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). No precise methods are available, however, for predicting the expansion of TBI-related hematoma. We aimed to establish a more sensitive predictor for contusional hematoma expansion based on the presence of leakage signs on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Thirty-three patients with pure contusion were included in the analysis (age: 64.1 ± 20.6 years; 24 men and 7 women). We compared Hounsfield unit (HU) values within set regions of interest (diameter, 10 mm) between serial CTA phase and delayed-phase CT images (5 min after CTA phase). Positive leakage signs were defined as >10% increases in HU value. Hematoma expansion was determined using plain CT at 24 h in patients who did not undergo emergent surgery. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores measured at admission and 24 h after admission were also compared. Leakage signs predicted hematoma expansion with high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (92.8%). Patients with positive leakage signs had significant decreases in GCS scores 24 h after the scan (GCS change: positive group, -0.92 ± 0.59; negative group, 1.14 ± 0.82). Positive leakage signs were clearly associated with surgical hematoma removal. Five patients without hematoma who had positive leakage signs at admission exhibited significant expansion of hematomas 24 h later. Our results indicate that leakage signs had high sensitivity in the prediction of contusional hematoma expansion and were significantly associated with delayed neurological deterioration and the necessity of surgical removal.

Early-phase changes of extravascular lung water index as a prognostic indicator in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND: The features of early-phase acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are leakage of fluid into the extravascular space and impairment of its reabsorption, resulting in extravascular lung water (EVLW) accumulation. The current study aimed to identify how the initial EVLW values and their change were associated with mortality. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the PiCCO Pulmonary Edema Study, a multicenter prospective cohort study that included 23 institutions. Single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution-derived EVLW index (EVLWi) and conventional prognostic factors were prospectively collected over 48 h after enrollment. Associations between 28-day mortality and each variable including initial (on day 0), mean, maximum, and Δ (subtracting day 2 from day 0) EVLWi were evaluated. RESULTS: We evaluated 192 ARDS patients (median age, 69 years (quartile, 24 years); Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on admission, 10 (5); all-cause 28-day mortality, 31%). Although no significant differences were found in initial, mean, or maximum EVLWi, Δ-EVLWi was significantly higher (i.e., more reduction in EVLWi) in survivors than in non-survivors (3.0 vs. -0.3 mL/kg, p = 0.006). Age, maximum, and Δ-SOFA scores and Δ-EVLW were the independent predictors for survival according to the Cox proportional hazard model. Patients with Δ-EVLWi > 2.8 had a significantly higher incidence of survival than those with Δ-EVLWi ≤ 2.8 (log-rank test, χ (2) = 7.08, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in EVLWi during the first 48 h of ARDS may be associated with 28-day survival. Serial EVLWi measurements may be useful for understanding the pathophysiologic conditions in ARDS patients. A large multination confirmative trial is required.

Effect of a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor on mortality and ventilator-free days in patients with increased extravascular lung water: a post hoc analysis of the PiCCO Pulmonary Edema Study.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil elastase plays an important role in the development and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although the selective elastase inhibitor, sivelestat, is widely used in Japan for treating ARDS patients, its effectiveness remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of sivelestat in ARDS patients with evidence of increased extravascular lung water by re-analyzing a large multicenter study database. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the PiCCO Pulmonary Edema Study was conducted. This multicenter prospective cohort study included 23 institutions in Japan. Adult mechanically ventilated ARDS patients with an extravascular lung water index of >10 mL/kg were included and propensity score analyses were performed. The endpoints were 28-day mortality and ventilator-free days (VFDs). RESULTS: Patients were categorized into sivelestat (n = 87) and control (n = 77) groups, from which 329 inverse probability-weighted group patients (162 vs. 167) were generated. The overall 28-day mortality was 31.1% (51/164). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the study groups (sivelestat vs. control; unmatched: 29.9% vs. 32.5%; difference, -2.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI), -16.8 to 14.2; inverse probability-weighted: 24.7% vs. 29.5%, difference, -4.8%, 95% CI, -14.4 to 9.6). Although administration of sivelestat did not alter the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) in the unmatched (9.6 vs. 9.7 days; difference, 0.1, 95% CI, -3.0 to 3.1), the inverse probability-weighted analysis identified significantly more VFDs in the sivelestat group than in the control group (10.7 vs. 8.4 days, difference, -2.3, 95% CI, -4.4 to -0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Although sivelestat did not significantly affect 28-day mortality, this treatment may have the potential to increase VFDs in ARDS patients with increased extravascular lung water. Prospective randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the results of the current study.