Peritoneal Dialysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic Is an Effective Treatment in Developing Countries: A Report from Mexico.

INTRODUCTION: During the height of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, some renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities were insufficient, forcing medical centers to diversify the RRT modalities offered. In this study, we reported the outcomes of chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and acute PD in critically ill patients during COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care medical center in Mexico. METHODS: This descriptive, longitudinal, observational, retrospective study included 47 adult patients with atypical pneumonia in a tertiary care medical center in Mexico during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Chronic PD patients and PD incident patients due to acute kidney injury (AKI) were included. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were studied (29 chronic PD patients and 18 incident PD patients due to AKI); median age was 59 (48-68) years; 63.8% were men. The ultrafiltrate volume per day was 815 (596.1-1,193.2) mL. Overall mortality was 61.7%, 55.2% in chronic PD patients, and 72.2% in PD incident patients due to AKI. A higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the need for mechanical ventilation at admission, and the requirement for vasopressors were predictors for mortality (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In low- and lower-middle-income countries, PD was a valid alternative for RRT during the COVID-19 pandemic. In AKI patients, PD can correct hyperkalemia, acidosis, uremia, and volume overload; however, there was higher mortality in PD incident patients due to AKI. The main risk factors for mortality were a high SOFA score at admission, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and the requirement for vasopressors.

[COVID-19 in transplant recipients: Multicentric report of Mexican experience]. / COVID-19 en receptores de trasplante: reporte multicéntrico de la experiencia mexicana.

Background: Solid Organ Transplant recipients (SOTR) appear to be at particular high risk for critical COVID-19 due to immunosuppressive drugs and comorbidities. We report the first description of clinical course and short-term outcomes of kidney and liver transplant recipients with confirmed COVID-19 in Mexico. The objective of this paper was evaluate the clinical course of transplant patients with COVID-19 infection. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated SOTR (kidney and liver) over 18 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 from tertiary care centers in Mexico. Results: Data from 45 kidney transplant recipients were recorded. Median (IQR) age was 43 (IQR 25-70) years. Admission to hospital was required in 37 (75.5 %) patients, of which 8 (16.3%) were hospitalized at Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage was documented in 33 (67%) patients. The time of hospitalization was 8 (IQR 6-12) days. Six patients died (12.2%). Additionally, data from 10 liver transplant recipients were included. During their evolution, 5 / 10 required hospital admission and there were no deaths in this group. Conclusions: Transplant recipients show a higher fatality rate and complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection; more studies are needed to identify prognostic factors and effective anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapies.

Antecedentes: Los receptores de trasplante de órgano sólido (RTOS) parecen estar en un riesgo particularmente alto de cuadros severos de infección por coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) debido al uso crónico de medicamentos inmunosupresores y sus comorbilidades. Reportamos la primera descripción del curso clínico y desenlaces a corto plazo de los receptores de trasplante con enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) confirmada en México. El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar el curso clínico de estos pacientes. Material y métodos: Evaluamos de manera retrospectiva los RTOS (riñón e hígado) mayores de 18 años de edad, con diagnóstico confirmado de infección por SARS-CoV-2 provenientes de cinco centros de tercer nivel en México. Resultados: Se incluyeron 45 receptores de trasplante renal con una edad de 43 (intervalo intercuartílico [IQR]: 25-70) años. El ingreso hospitalario se requirió en 37 (75.5%) pacientes, de los cuales ocho (16.3%) fueron hospitalizados en la unidad de terapia intensiva. Se documentó lesión renal aguda en 33 (67%) pacientes. El tiempo de hospitalización fue de 8 (IQR: 6-12) días. Seis pacientes fallecieron (12.2%). Adicionalmente, 10 receptores de trasplante hepático fueron incluidos. Durante su evolución, 5 / 10 requirieron ingreso hospitalario; no se presentaron fallecimientos en este grupo de pacientes. Conclusiones: Los receptores de trasplante mostraron una alta tasa de mortalidad y complicaciones por la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Son necesarios más estudios para identificar los factores pronósticos y modalidades de tratamiento eficaces.

Kidney biopsy during pregnancy: a difficult decision. A case series reporting on 20 patients from Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Kidney biopsy is a routine procedure in the diagnosis of kidney disease, but during pregnancy it carries potential adverse effects for both mother and child, aside from the challenges of obtaining adequate tissue samples. Nevertheless, a precise diagnosis is necessary when specific and potentially toxic treatments are to be used during pregnancy. The present report presents our experience with regard to the usefulness and safety of kidney biopsies during pregnancy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical indications, complications, histopathological diagnoses, and treatment of patients who had kidney biopsies done at a single academic center during gestation weeks 11-30 between January 2015 and January 2019. RESULTS: Kidney biopsies were carried out in 20 pregnant patients with nephrotic proteinuria. Biopsy was adequate in all patients. The histological diagnoses included focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (collapsing, tip and perihiliar varieties), membranous lupus nephropathy, diabetic nephropathy, and IgA nephropathy. Treatment was associated with reduction of proteinuria in 17 patients and reduction of serum creatinine in 9 out of 11 patients who had serum creatinine ≥ 1 mg/dl at the time of biopsy. There was one major bleeding complication that required transfusion of one unit of blood. There was a high incidence of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and low birth weight despite appropriate kidney disease therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney biopsy may be done during pregnancy when therapeutic decisions depend on a precise pathologic diagnosis.

Association between kidney biopsy findings in CKD patients with diabetes and renal replacement therapy initiation, a perspective from a low-middle income country.

Kidney disease in diabetes mellitus is usually explained by diabetic kidney disease, but other superimposed etiologies occur frequently. The distinction between diabetic kidney disease and non-diabetic kidney disease can only be made by performing kidney biopsy. Our objective was to evaluate the association of diabetic kidney disease, non-diabetic kidney disease, or both with renal replacement therapy initiation. This is a retrospective cohort that included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for whom a kidney biopsy was indicated. Subjects were followed-up for 5 years, until renal replacement therapy initiation or were lost to follow up. One hundred and forty-one patients were included, 53 (39%) had diabetic kidney disease, 13 (9%) had non-diabetic kidney disease and 75 (54%) had both. Ninety-four percent of the cohort initiated renal replacement therapy during the 5-year follow-up. Higher degree of fibrosis was associated with a trend towards higher risk of requiring renal replacement therapy. In addition, the combined diabetic kidney disease + non-diabetic kidney disease group was associated with higher need of renal replacement therapy initiation when compared to the diabetic kidney disease group.

Renal Resistive Index as a Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury and Mortality in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with COVID-19 can be caused by multiple mechanisms. Renal resistive index (RRI) is a noninvasive instrument to evaluate kidney hemodynamics, and it is obtained by analysis of intrarenal arterial waves using Doppler ultrasound. This study aimed to determine the role of RRI in predicting AKI and adverse outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 65 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to the critical care unit from April 1, 2020, to June 20, 2020. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Cardiac, pulmonary, and kidney ultrasonographic evaluations were performed in a protocolized way. RESULTS: In this cohort, 65 patients were included, mean age was 53.4 years, 79% were male, and 35% were diabetic. Thirty-four percent of patients developed AKI, 12% required RRT, and 35% died. Of the patients who developed AKI, 68% had RRI ≥ 0.7. Also, 75% of the patients who required RRT had RRI ≥ 0.7. In the adjusted Cox model, the RRI ≥ 0.7 was associated with higher mortality (HR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.19-6.82, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Critical care ultrasonography is a noninvasive, reproducible, and accurate bedside method that has proven its usefulness. An elevated RRI may have a role in predicting AKI, RRT initiation, and mortality in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Dose of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: A Bona Fide Quality Indicator.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) constitutes an important aspect of acute management during critical illness. Continuous RRT (CRRT) is frequently utilized in intensive care unit settings, particularly in patients with severe AKI, fluid overload, and hemodynamic instability. The main goal of CRRT is to timely optimize solute control, acid-base, and volume status. Total effluent dose of CRRT is a deliverable that depends on multiple factors and therefore should be systematically monitored (prescribed vs. delivered) and iteratively adjusted in a sustainable mode. In this manuscript, we review current evidence of CRRT dosing and provide recommendations for its implementation as a quality indicator of CRRT delivery.

[Nutrition and peritoneal dialysis: Fundaments and practical aspects for dietary prescription]. / Nutrición y diálisis peritoneal: fundamentos y aspectos prácticos para la prescripción dietética.

The number of patients with advanced / end-stage chronic kidney disease (ESRD) with some modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) has been on the rise significantly. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) represents 11% of the world dialysis population. Different options for RRT have been associated with a greater risk of developing complications, such infections, metabolic alterations and nutritional complications, specifically a higher incidence of protein-energy wasting (PEW), ranging from 32 to 49% in PD patients. Peritoneal transporter type plays an important role in the development of nutritional complications, where the high transporter compared to the slow or low transporter has been associated with a higher nutritional risk by increasing the risk of volume overload, hypertension, and inflammation; as well as greater loss of proteins in the dialysate due to the greater number of replacements that characterize its prescription. Nutrition specialists needs to consider diverse aspects to achieve an individualized nutritional approach based on the characteristics of the patient, where knowing peritoneal transporter type is essential. The aim of this study is to review the evidence available to date regarding nutritional therapy in patients with peritoneal dialysis, as well as to analyze some basic aspects of dialysis therapy.

El número de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada/terminal (ERCT) con alguna modalidad de terapia de reemplazo renal (TRR) ha ido en ascenso. A nivel mundial, la diálisis peritoneal (DP) representa el 11% del total de pacientes con TRR. Las diferentes opciones de TRR se han asociado con un mayor riesgo para desarrollar complicaciones infecciosas, metabólicas y nutricionales, reportándose cifras alarmantes de desgaste proteico energético (DPE) que oscilan entre 32-49% en pacientes en DP. El tipo de transportador peritoneal juega un rol importante en el desarrollo de complicaciones nutricionales, donde el transportador alto, en comparación con el lento o bajo, se ha asociado con un mayor riesgo nutricional al incrementar el riesgo de sobrecarga de volumen, hipertensión e inflamación; así como mayor pérdida de proteínas en el dializado por el mayor número de recambios que caracteriza su prescripción. Por tal motivo, el profesional de la nutrición debe considerar diversos aspectos para lograr un abordaje nutricional individualizado a partir de las características del paciente, en el que conocer el tipo de transportador peritoneal es fundamental. El objetivo del presente trabajo es realizar una revisión de la evidencia disponible hasta la fecha respecto a la terapia nutricional del paciente con diálisis peritoneal, así como analizar algunos aspectos básicos de la terapia dialítica.

Peritoneal Dialysis Is an Option for Acute Kidney Injury Management in Patients with COVID-19.

In December 2019, cases of acute respiratory illness of unknown origin were reported in Wuhan, China. The disease is caused by "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2". After identifying severe lung damage, injury to other organs, such as the kidney, has been identified. Peritoneal dialysis is a renal replacement therapy (RRT) and is at least as effective as other extracorporeal therapy options, with significant cost-effective advantages. However, this strategy is rarely used for the management of acute kidney injury in severe lung disease. In this review, we explore PD as an RRT strategy that may be a key instrument in countries and hospitals with limited access to all RRTs.