Papillary fibroelastoma of the aortic valve: a rare cause of stroke.

We report a case of a 59-year-old woman with recurrent cerebrovascular insults caused by a papillary fibroelastoma of the aortic valve. Primary cardiac tumors are rare. Papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) is the most common valvular tumor and the second cardiac benign tumor after myxoma. The clinical presentation of PFE varies from asymptomatic to severe embolic complications. The tumor was surgically removed to avoid new embolic events.

Phase II study of cetrorelix, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to study the anticancer activity of cetrorelix, a decapeptide with LHRH receptor antagonist properties in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. About 80% of primary ovarian cancers and cell lines bear LHRH receptors. Cetrorelix has anticancer activity in in vitro and in vivo ovarian cancer models. METHODS: Eligible patients with ovarian or mullerian carcinoma resistant to platinum chemotherapy received cetrorelix 10 mg subcutaneously every day. Eligibility criteria included age > or = 18, PS < or = 2, measurable disease, chemistries and blood counts in normal range, no estrogen replacement for at least 2 weeks, and no known allergic reactions to extrinsic peptide. In patients volunteering for a biopsy, tissue was taken to perform a LHRH receptor assay. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated. Median age was 58 years. Median performance status was 0. Median number of prior chemotherapies was 3. Three patients had partial remissions lasting 9, 16, and 17 weeks. Toxicities effects included grade 4 anaphylactoid reaction (one patient) controlled by cortisol and cimetidine, grade 2 histamine reaction (two patients), grade 2 arthralgia (one patient) 20% cholesterol increase (two patients, who did not require specific treatment), minor hot flushes, headache, and local skin reaction at the injection site. Six of seven samples were LHRH receptor positive for mRNA and/or ligand assay. Two responding patients were LHRH receptor positive. The patient who had no receptor did not respond. CONCLUSION: Cetrorelix has activity against ovarian cancer in this refractory population, and has minimal toxicity, except for potential anaphylactoid reactions. Activity may be mediated through the LHRH receptor.

Antitumor effects of the cytotoxic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog AN-152 on human endometrial and ovarian cancers xenografted into nude mice.

OBJECTIVE: Most human endometrial and ovarian cancers express receptors for luteinizing hormone- releasing hormone. These receptors can be used for targeted chemotherapy with cytotoxic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs such as AN-152, in which doxorubicin is linked to [D-Lys(6)]luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. STUDY DESIGN: The antitumor effects of doxorubicin and AN-152 were assessed in vivo in human luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-positive HEC-1B endometrial cancers and NIH:OVCAR-3 ovarian cancers and in the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-negative SK-OV-3 ovarian line. Nude mice bearing these tumors subcutaneously were injected intravenously with saline solution (control), AN-152, or doxorubicin at equimolar doses. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor expression in tumors and specimens of human reproductive (n = 5) and nonreproductive (n = 15) normal tissues and in hematopoietic stem cells were analyzed with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and radioligand binding assay. RESULTS: The tumor volumes of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-positive HEC-1B and NIH:OVCAR-3 cancers were reduced significantly (P <.001) 1 week after treatment with AN-152 at 700 nmol/20 g or at 300 nmol/20 g. No toxic side effects were observed. Treatment with doxorubicin arrested tumor growth but did not reduce tumor volume. Doxorubicin at 700 nmol/20 g caused a high mortality rate and at 300 nmol/20 g (8.7 mg/kg) caused a loss of body weight, but no deaths occurred. The growth of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-negative SK-OV-3 cancers was not affected by AN-152. Normal human nonreproductive tissues, hematopoietic stem cells, and vaginal tissue did not express luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors, but luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors were found in the ovary, fallopian tube, cervix, endometrium, and myometrium. CONCLUSION: Targeted chemotherapeutic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog AN-152 is more effective and less toxic than cytotoxic radical doxorubicin on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-positive tumors. AN-152 could be considered for targeted chemotherapy in patients with ovarian or endometrial cancers.

Expression of receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in human ovarian and endometrial cancers: frequency, autoregulation, and correlation with direct antiproliferative activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues.

OBJECTIVE: Several recent reports have demonstrated the expression of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors by human ovarian and endometrial cancers. Controversy persists on the relevance of this finding, in particular whether these receptors mediate direct antiproliferative effects of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. We correlated the expression of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors by well-characterized ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines with the ability of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues to reduce their proliferation and studied the autoregulation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor expression by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist triptorelin and antagonist cetrorelix. The expression of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors was assessed in a series of specimens from primary ovarian and endometrial cancers. STUDY DESIGN: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor expression was assessed by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and radioligand binding assay. Antiproliferative effects were ascertained by proliferation assays in the absence or presence of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. RESULTS: Ovarian (4/6 cell lines) and endometrial (5/6 cell lines) cancer cell lines expressed luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors. The proliferation of these luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-positive cell lines was dose- and time-dependently reduced by agonistic and antagonistic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor density was reduced to 80% of controls (control, 100 %; P <.001) by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. Seventy percent of primary ovarian cancers and 83% of primary endometrial cancers expressed luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors that are expressed by human ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines mediate direct antiproliferative effects of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. Because most respective primary cancers expressed luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors, these receptors might be used for novel antiproliferative therapeutic approaches and should be further evaluated.