Globus sensation: pharyngoesophageal function, psychometric and psychiatric findings, and follow-up in 88 patients.

BACKGROUND: The globus sensation has been widely regarded as psychogenic, but organic disorders were found to be etiologically significant. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the structural, functional, psychological, and psychiatric factors possibly eliciting the globus sensation and influencing its course. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients, 67 women and 21 men (aged 22-71 years), referred to 2 tertiary care centers underwent history taking, otolaryngological examination, pharyngoesophageal videofluoroscopy and manometry, psychosocial evaluation, psychometric tests, psychiatric interview, and when indicated, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal bolus transport, gastroesophageal reflux, and gastric emptying studies. According to revealed disorders, therapy was initiated, and the outcome was studied. RESULTS: Only 15 patients had normal pharyngoesophageal function; of these 15, 6 had chronic tonsillitis or pharyngitis, 3 had thyroid adenomata, 4 had cervical spondylosis, and 1 each had dry oropharyngeal mucosa and chronic bronchitis. Of the other 73 patients, 2 had pharyngeal dysfunction, 24 had achalasia, 1 had diffuse esophageal spasms, 3 had "nutcracker esophagus," 30 had nonspecific esophageal motor disorders, and 13 had gastroesophageal reflux. Psychometry revealed no more anxiety and depression than in general medical outpatients. Of 58 patients interviewed, 37 met criteria for psychiatric disorders. Psychometric scores and psychiatric characteristics were unrelated to the sensation's course. Therapy was recommended, but only 26 patients were treated accordingly; 22 received nonspecific treatment. Follow-up 3 to 59 months later revealed that the sensation had vanished in 13 patients who had received specific treatment, 5 who had received nonspecific treatment, and 6 who had received no treatment; it was alleviated in 10 who had received specific treatment, 13 who had received nonspecific treatment, and 9 who had received no treatment; and it was unchanged in 3 who had received specific treatment, 5 who had received nonspecific treatment, and 23 patients who had received no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngoesophageal disorders may be sensed only vaguely, inducing the globus sensation. Psychological and psychiatric characteristics could be relevant to the discomfort experienced but are unlikely to be etiologically significant.

Effects of the prodrug loperamide oxide, loperamide, and placebo on jejunal motor activity.

This crossover, double-blind study investigated the effects of single oral doses of the prodrug loperamide oxide, which is reduced gradually to loperamide in the intestine, and loperamide on jejunal motor activity in 12 fasting healthy men. Five minutes after a phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC), 2 mg loperamide oxide, 4 mg loperamide oxide, 4 mg loperamide, or placebo were administered. Thereafter, motor activity 10-30 cm abroad the ligament of Treitz was recorded with five catheter orifices at 3-cm intervals over 4 hr. Number of contractions and area under curve increased significantly with 4 mg loperamide and 4 mg loperamide oxide, the increases with loperamide oxide occurring more gradually. Placebo and 2 mg loperamide oxide had no discernible effects. With both 4 mg loperamide and 4 mg loperamide oxide, phase I of the MMC was slightly prolonged and phase II and the time from drug administration to the onset of the first phase III slightly shortened. The percentage of aborally propagated contractions in phase II increased with all active treatments, whereas the occurrence of phases III was not altered.

High incidence of esophageal motor disorders in consecutive patients with globus sensation.

Thirty consecutive patients with globus sensation who were referred to a psychosomatic clinic prospectively underwent otolaryngological, videokinematographic, and manometric examinations of pharynx and esophagus to evaluate whether morphological abnormalities or motility disorders underlay their symptom. When indicated by findings, 24-hour pH-metry, scintigraphy of bolus transport, and esophagogastroscopy were performed. Seven patients were shown to have achalasia, 10 had "hypochalasia" (lower esophageal sphincter relaxation less than 75% with esophageal contraction abnormalities but no complete distal aperistalsis), and 1 had diffuse esophageal spasms; 2 patients had also hyperplastic lingual tonsils, 1 had tonsillitis, and 1 had a cervical spondylophyte. Nutcracker esophagus and nonspecific contraction abnormalities were found in 7 patients, and gastroesophageal reflux with esophagitis and a low lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure was found in 1; only 3 patients had normal esophageal motility. None had volunteered dysphagic symptoms at primary evaluation. Psychometric investigations in consenting patients showed no higher mean scores for state and trait anxiety, depression, hysteria, and hypochondriasis than in general medical outpatients. Esophageal motor disorders may, before giving rise to dysphagia, be sensed more vaguely and induce the globus sensation. However, only disappearance of the sensation after treatment allows inferring an etiological significance of such a disorder.