Effects of opioid-reduced anesthesia during scoliosis surgery in children: a prospective observational study.

Aims: Opioid-reduced anesthesia (ORA) was suggested to decrease morphine consumption after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery and incidence of chronic pain. Materials & methods: A prospective analysis using the ORA in AIS surgery was performed. Two cohorts were compared: a control group (opioid-based anesthesia) and the ORA group. The main outcome was morphine consumption at day 1. Results: 33 patients operated for AIS using ORA were compared with 36 with opioid-based anesthesia. Morphine consumption was decreased in the ORA group (1.1 mg.kg-1 [0.2-2] vs 0.8 mg.kg-1 [0.3-2]; p = 0.02) at day 1. Persistent neuropathic pain at 1 year was decreased in the ORA group (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The ORA protocol is efficient to reduce postoperative morphine consumption in AIS surgery and preventing neuropathic pain.

Correction to: Efficacy of the Game Ready® cooling device on postoperative analgesia after scoliosis surgery in children.

Unfortunately, one co-author name was incorrectly published in the original publication. The complete correct name of the co-author is given below.

Efficacy of the Game Ready® cooling device on postoperative analgesia after scoliosis surgery in children.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the opioid-sparing effect of a cooling brace after surgical correction of idiopathic surgery in children. METHODS: We compared two consecutive cohorts of patients before and after introducing this technique in our institution. Management of patients was standardized. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the morphine consumption during the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption at day 3, pain intensity (at days 1 and 3), the mobilization in the standing position and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: This study included 23 and 22 patients in the control and the cooling cohorts. Cooling brace was associated with a significant decrease in morphine consumption at day 1 (1.7 [0.9, 3.3] versus 1.2 [0.5, 3.2] mg kg-1, P = 0.02) and day 3 (2.5 [0.5, 6.7] versus 1.2 [0.9, 2.5] mg kg-1, P = 0.003), and a reduction in duration of hospitalization (4 [3, 6] versus 3 [3, 4] days, P = 0.004). However, no difference was found on the pain intensity or the percentage of patient mobilized in the standing position. Number of level fused and intraoperative opioid consumption were also different between the two cohorts. However, multivariate analysis found only the use of the cooling brace as significantly associated with opioid consumption at day 1. CONCLUSION: The use of this cooling brace allows decreasing the opioid use after surgical correction of idiopathic surgery in children. The current results strongly suggest an interest of this technique in the postoperative management of patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Accuracy of the sleep-related breathing disorder scale to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea in children: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy of the Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder (SRBD) Scale in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in children. PATIENTS/METHODS: A literature search of studies comparing SRBD to polysomnography for the diagnosis of OSAS in children was performed. Risks of biases were quantified using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Analyses determined the summary receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (SROC), the pooled sensitivity (Se), the specificity (Sp), and the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-). Results were graded and are expressed as means [95% confidence interval]. Post-test probabilities were computed for various populations. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included; and two were considered to have high risk of bias. The SROC was 0.73 [CI: 0.63; 0.82]. The combined Se, Sp, LR+ and LR- were: 0.72 [CI: 0.68; 0.77], 0.59 [CI: 0.56; 0.63], 1.74 [CI: 1.32; 2.30], 0.53 [CI: 0.39; 0.71], respectively. Sub-group analyses displayed similar results in comparison to overall results. GRADE evidence for the overall analysis was low to moderate. Finally, pre-test to post-test probabilities were estimated to be: 3.5%-1%, 50%-30% and 75%-30%, for the general population, the obese patients and the patients assigned for surgical treatment of OSAS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis indicates that the SRBD scale has acceptable accuracy in detecting patients with OSAS. It may be useful when evaluating patients with suspected OSAS before surgery. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO database (CRD42018088216).

Description of typical personality factors and events that lead to anxiety at induction of anesthesia in French children.

BACKGROUND: Preventive strategies are available to reduce preoperative anxiety in children, the ideal time for implementing such strategies remains poorly determined. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine psychological factors and events involved in the development of preoperative anxiety in children. METHODS: This study consisted of prospective evaluations of anxiety trait and state during the preoperative period. Attendance at a preanesthetic consultation is obligatory for all patients undergoing surgery in France. Anxiety trait and state assessments were quantified in mothers and children before and after the preanesthetic consultation using visual analog and faces numerical scales. Preoperative anxiety in children was assessed immediately before induction of anesthesia using an analog scale. Other data recorded included demographic and medical data and type of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Overall 111 consecutive patients were included. The following factors emerged leading to anxiety state at induction of anesthesia: maternal anxiety state before the preanesthetic consultation, a feeling of not being reassured by the anesthesiologist, maternal anxiety state after the consultation, and anxiety trait in the child. Logistic regression found this combination of factors (OR = 4 [1.4 -12]) and inpatient stay (OR = 3 [1.4-7]), predicting anxiety with an accuracy of 69%. CONCLUSION: The present study identified a combination of psychological factors and events associated with the development of anxiety at induction of anesthesia in children. Parental anxiety impacts upon children and occurs before the preanesthetic consultation. This result may assist clinicians to prescribe personalized preventive strategies against anxiety.

Peri-operative respiratory adverse events in children with upper respiratory tract infections allowed to proceed with anaesthesia: A French national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Peri-operative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) in paediatric patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) remain inadequately explored in patients allowed to proceed to anaesthesia and surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and risk factors of PRAE in children with URTI allowed to proceed to anaesthesia. DESIGN: Multicentre cohort study performed over 6 months in France. SETTING: Sixteen centres with dedicated paediatric anaesthetists. PATIENTS: Eligible patients were aged from 0 to 18 years with URTI symptoms on admission or a history of such over the preceding 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study was to determine predictors of PRAE. Secondary outcomes were: predictors of peri-operative arterial desaturation and of the decision to proceed with anaesthesia and surgery in children with URTI. RESULTS: Overall, 621 children were included and 489 (78.7%) anaesthetised. Of those anaesthetised, 165 (33.5%) and 97 (19.8%) experienced PRAE and arterial desaturation, respectively. Factors predictive of PRAE included patient age, tracheal intubation and the absence of midazolam premedication. Factors predictive of peri-operative arterial desaturation included patient age, anaesthetist experience, endoscopic procedures and the presence of other PRAE. Factors predicting proceeding to anaesthesia in the context of URTI included anaesthetist experience, emergency procedures and the absence of severe URTI symptoms. CONCLUSION: The risk of PRAE in patients anaesthetised in the presence of URTI was similar to previous publications - close to 30%. In the light of our findings, first, current rescheduling indications should be questioned, and second, further medical and organisational strategies should be investigated to reduce PRAE in children with URTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the European Networks of Centers for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (EUPAS16436).