Population pharmacokinetics and CD20 binding dynamics for mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. The approved step-up dose regimen of 1/2/60/30 mg IV is designed to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and maximize efficacy in early cycles. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed from 439 patients with relapsed/refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving Mosun IV monotherapy, including fixed dosing (0.05-2.8 mg IV every 3 weeks (q3w)) and Cycle 1 step-up dosing groups (0.4/1/2.8-1/2/60/30 mg IV q3w). Prior to Mosun treatment, ~50% of patients had residual levels of anti-CD20 drugs (e.g., rituximab or obinutuzumab) from prior treatment. CD20 receptor binding dynamics and rituximab/obinutuzumab PK were incorporated into the model to calculate the Mosun CD20 receptor occupancy percentage (RO%) over time. A two-compartment model with time-dependent clearance (CL) best described the data. The typical patient had an initial CL of 1.08 L/day, transitioning to a steady-state CL of 0.584 L/day. Statistically relevant covariates on PK parameters included body weight, albumin, sex, tumor burden, and baseline anti-CD20 drug concentration; no covariate was found to have a clinically relevant impact on exposure at the approved dose. Mosun CD20 RO% was highly variable, attributed to the large variability in residual baseline anti-CD20 drug concentration (median = 10 µg/mL). The 60 mg loading doses increased Mosun CD20 RO% in Cycle 1, providing efficacious exposures in the presence of the competing anti-CD20 drugs. PopPK model simulations, investigating Mosun dose delays, informed treatment resumption protocols to ensure CRS mitigation.

Early Decision Making in a Randomized Phase II Trial of Atezolizumab in Biliary Tract Cancer Using a Tumor Growth Inhibition-Survival Modeling Framework.

We assess the longitudinal tumor growth inhibition (TGI) metrics and overall survival (OS) predictions applied to patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) enrolled in IMbrave151 a multicenter randomized phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine. Tumor growth rate (KG) was estimated for patients in IMbrave151. A pre-existing TGI-OS model for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in IMbrave150 was modified to include available IMbrave151 study covariates and KG estimates and used to simulate IMbrave151 study outcomes. At the interim progression-free survival (PFS) analysis (98 patients, 27 weeks follow-up), clear separation in tumor dynamic profiles with a faster shrinkage rate and slower KG (0.0103 vs. 0.0117 week-1 ; tumor doubling time 67 vs. 59 weeks; KG geometric mean ratio of 0.84) favoring the bevacizumab containing arm was observed. At the first interim analysis for PFS, the simulated OS hazard ratio (HR) 95% prediction interval (PI) of 0.74 (95% PI: 0.58-0.94) offered an early prediction of treatment benefit later confirmed at the final analysis, observed HR of 0.76 based on 159 treated patients and 34 weeks of follow-up. This is the first prospective application of a TGI-OS modeling framework supporting gating of a phase III trial. The findings demonstrate the utility for longitudinal TGI and KG geometric mean ratio as relevant end points in oncology studies to support go/no-go decision making and facilitate interpretation of the IMbrave151 results to support future development efforts for novel therapeutics for patients with advanced BTC.

Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analysis of Venetoclax + Obinutuzumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Phase 1b Study and Phase 3 CLL14 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response parameters of the 400 mg once-daily venetoclax dose regimen in combination with obinutuzumab, which was approved for the first-line (1L) treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on data from the phase 3 CLL14 study and the phase 1b dose-finding GP28331 study. METHODS: Parameter estimates and uncertainty, which were estimated by a previously developed population PK (popPK) model, were used as informative priors for this analysis. They were re-estimated, and then used to evaluate additional covariate effects, describe venetoclax PK when administered with obinutuzumab, and provide empirical Bayes estimates of PK parameters and exposure. Exposure-progression-free survival (PFS) and exposure-safety relationships were assessed using data from CLL14, with steady-state nominal venetoclax exposure (CmeanSS,nominal) as the predictor variable. Exposure-safety analyses were conducted using logistic regression for selected treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Dose intensities were summarized by tertiles of CmeanSS,nominal. RESULTS: PK data from 274 patients (CLL14, n = 194; GP28331, n = 80) were included. The final model provided good fit of the observed data. Obinutuzumab co-administration, history of prior treatments, and disease severity at baseline had no appreciable influence on venetoclax steady-state exposure. No significant correlations were observed between venetoclax exposure and PFS, or between venetoclax exposure and the probability of treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, grade ≥ 3 infections, and SAEs. Median dose intensities for venetoclax and obinutuzumab remained similar across venetoclax exposure tertiles. CONCLUSION: PopPK and exposure-efficacy, exposure-safety, and exposure-tolerability analyses support the 400 mg once-daily venetoclax dose plus obinutuzumab for 1L treatment in patients with CLL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT02242942 and NCT02339181.

Extension of the Alternative Intravenous Dosing Regimens of Atezolizumab into Combination Settings through Modeling and Simulation.

Atezolizumab is approved as an intravenous (IV) infusion for use as a single agent and in combination with other therapies in a number of indications. The objectives of this publication are to characterize atezolizumab pharmacokinetics (PK) across indications with the available clinical data from one phase I and eight phase III studies, to determine the exposure-response (ER) relationships in combination settings across a variety of tumor types, and to provide the clinical safety to support the extension of the 840 mg q2w, 1200 mg q3w, and 1680 mg q4w IV dosing regimens across various indications in combination settings. Across all clinical studies, atezolizumab PK remained in the dose-linear range and were similar across tumor types when used in combination therapy or as a monotherapy. In the combination studies, efficacy was independent of the exposures tested and there was no significant increase in adverse events with increasing atezolizumab exposure (flat ER). The safety profile of atezolizumab in the individual combination studies was generally consistent with the established safety profile of atezolizumab, the combination partners, and the disease under study. The similar atezolizumab PK across monotherapy and combination therapy settings as well as the flat ER in new tumor types and combination therapies support the use of the 3 interchangeable atezolizumab dosing regimens in the combination setting. Atezolizumab is now approved with 3 interchangeable IV dosing regimens of 840 mg q2w, 1200 mg q3w, and 1680 mg q4w for single-agent and combination therapy use in the USA and EU.

Phase I and scintigraphy studies to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and lung deposition of inhaled GDC-0214 in healthy volunteers.

Several inflammatory cytokines that promote inflammation and pathogenesis in asthma signal through the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) pathway. This phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple ascending doses up to 15 mg twice daily for 14 days of a JAK1 inhibitor, GDC-0214, in healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 66). Doses were administered with a dry powder, capsule-based inhaler. An accompanying open-label gamma scintigraphy study in HVs examined the lung deposition of a single dose of inhaled Technetium-99m (99m Tc)-radiolabeled GDC-0214. GDC-0214 plasma concentrations were linear and approximately dose-proportional after both single and multiple doses. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at 15-30 min after dosing. The mean apparent elimination half-life ranged from 32 to 56 h across all single and multiple dose cohorts. After single and multiple doses, all adverse events were mild or moderate, and none led to treatment withdrawal. There was no clear evidence of systemic toxicity due to JAK1 inhibition, and systemic exposure was low, with plasma concentrations at least 15-fold less than the plasma protein binding-corrected IC50 of JAK1 at the highest dose. Scintigraphy showed that approximately 50% of the emitted dose of radiolabeled GDC-0214 was deposited in the lungs and was distributed well to the peripheral airways. 99m Tc-radiolabeled GDC-0214 (1 mg) exhibited a mean plasma Cmax similar to that observed in phase I at the same dose level. Overall, inhaled GDC-0214 exhibited pharmacokinetic properties favorable for inhaled administration.

Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1).

Baseline patient characteristics and prognostic factors are important considerations in oncology when evaluating the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Here, we assessed the impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on the PK of the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody). We evaluated data from ≈ 4500 patients from 12 clinical trials across different tumor types, treatment settings, and dosing regimens. In our dataset, ~ 30% of patients (range, 13-54%) developed treatment-emergent ADA, and in vitro neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were seen in ~ 50% of ADA-positive (+) patients. Pooled time course data showed a trend toward lower atezolizumab exposure in ADA+ patients, which was more pronounced in ADA+/NAb+ patients. However, the atezolizumab concentration distributions overlapped, and drug concentrations exceeded 6 µg/ml, the target concentration required for receptor saturation, in greater than 95% of patients. Patients had sufficient exposure regardless of ADA status. The dose selected to allow for dosing over effects from ADA resulted in a flat exposure-response relationship. Analysis of study results by ADA titer showed that exposure and overall survival were not affected in a clinically meaningful way. High tumor burden, low albumin, and high CRP at baseline showed the greatest association with ADA development but not with subsequent NAb development. These imbalanced factors at baseline can confound analysis of ADA impact. ADA increases atezolizumab clearance minimally (9%), and its impact on exposure based on the totality of the clinical pharmacology assessment does not appear to be clinically meaningful.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships of Astegolimab in Patients With Severe Asthma.

Astegolimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody that binds to the ST2 receptor and blocks the interleukin-33 signaling. It was evaluated in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma in the phase 2b study (Zenyatta) at doses of 70, 210, and 490 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. This work aimed to characterize astegolimab pharmacokinetics, identify influential covariates contributing to its interindividual variability, and make a descriptive assessment of the exposure-response relationships. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data from 368 patients in the Zenyatta study. Predicted average steady-state concentration was used in the subsequent exposure-response analyses, which evaluated efficacy (asthma exacerbation rate) and biomarker end points including forced expiratory volume in 1 second, fraction exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, and soluble ST2. A 2-compartment disposition model with first-order elimination and first-order absorption best described the astegolimab pharmacokinetics. The relative bioavailability for the 70-mg dose was 15.3% lower. Baseline body weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and eosinophils were statistically correlated with pharmacokinetic parameters, but only body weight had a clinically meaningful influence on the steady-state exposure (ratios exceeding 0.8-1.25). The exposure-response of efficacy and biomarkers were generally flat with a weak trend in favor of the highest dose/exposure. This study characterized astegolimab pharmacokinetics in patients with asthma and showed typical pharmacokinetic behavior as a monoclonal antibody-based drug. The exposure-response analyses suggested the highest dose tested in the Zenyatta study (490 mg every 4 weeks) performed close to the maximum effect, and no additional response may be expected above it.

Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pharmacokinetic and Safety Assessments Based on Hepatic Impairment Status and Geographic Region.

INTRODUCTION: Phase 1b GO30140 and phase 3 IMbrave150 studies evaluated first-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety by hepatic impairment status and geographic region. METHODS: Patients received atezolizumab 1,200 mg + bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Drug concentrations were evaluated by descriptive statistics and population PK. PK and adverse event frequencies were evaluated by hepatic impairment status and region. RESULTS: 323 IMbrave150 patients and 162 GO30140 patients were PK evaluable. Compared with IMbrave150 patients who had normal hepatic function per the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria (n = 123), patients with mild impairment (n = 171) had a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 0.92 for cycle 1 atezolizumab area under the concentration-time curve (AUC); patients with moderate impairment (n = 27) had a GMR of 0.88. Patients in Asia ([n = 162] vs. outside [n = 161]) had a GMR of 1.25 for cycle 1 atezolizumab AUC. Compared with GO30140 patients who had normal hepatic function (NCI-ODWG [n = 61]), patients with mild impairment (n = 92) had a GMR of 0.97 for cycle 1 peak bevacizumab concentrations; those with moderate impairment (n = 9) had a GMR of 0.94. Patients in Asia (n = 111) versus outside Asia (n = 51) had a GMR of 0.94 for cycle 1 peak bevacizumab concentration. PK results were generally comparable when evaluated based on additional hepatic functional definitions (Child-Pugh or albumin/bilirubin criteria) or study enrollment in Japan. No associations between atezolizumab PK and HCC etiology were seen. Adverse event frequencies were similar across evaluated groups. CONCLUSIONS: IMbrave150 and GO30140 patients with unresectable HCC had varying baseline hepatic impairment and high enrollment from Asia. PK data demonstrated considerable exposure overlap across groups. Treatment was tolerable across groups. No need for dose adjustment based on mild or moderate hepatic impairment or region is recommended based on this analysis.

Pharmacokinetics and exposure-efficacy relationships of omalizumab in patients with nasal polyps.

The anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, omalizumab (Xolair), is approved in the United States for the treatment of allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, and has recently been studied for the treatment of nasal polyposis following completion of the two replicate phase 3 studies (POLYP 1 and POLYP 2). The dosing of omalizumab used in the phase 3 studies is based on a combination of patients' pre-treatment IgE level and body weight, similar to the approach used in allergic asthma. The objectives of the current analyses were to evaluate whether the pharmacokinetics (PK) of omalizumab and its pharmacodynamic (PD) effect on free and total IgE level in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) are consistent with those in allergic asthma via population PK/PD modeling and simulation, and to graphically explore exposure-response relationships and free IgE-response relationships in CRSwNP. Omalizumab PK and PD effect of total and free IgE in CRSwNP are generally consistent with those in asthma. Observed post-treatment free IgE suppressions were generally within the target range of the baseline IgE- and body weight-based omalizumab dosing table, with 74.2% and 93.0% of patients achieving a serum free IgE level below 25 ng/mL and 50 ng/mL, respectively at Week 24. Exposure-response analyses indicated that there was no clear correlation between omalizumab or free IgE concentration and key efficacy endpoints within the POLYP studies. Overall, these results indicate that the body weight and IgE-based dosing regimen of omalizumab was appropriate for use in CRSwNP patients.

Population repeated time-to-event analysis of exacerbations in asthma patients: A novel approach for predicting asthma exacerbations based on biomarkers, spirometry, and diaries/questionnaires.

Identification of covariates, including biomarkers, spirometry, and diaries/questionnaires, that predict asthma exacerbations would allow better clinical predictions, shorter phase II trials and inform decisions on phase III design, and/or initiation (go/no-go). The objective of this work was to characterize asthma-exacerbation hazard as a function of baseline and time-varying covariates. A repeated time-to-event (RTTE) model for exacerbations was developed using data from a 52-week phase IIb trial, including 502 patients with asthma randomized to placebo or 70 mg, 210 mg, or 490 mg astegolimab every 4 weeks. Covariate analysis was performed for 20 baseline covariates using the full random effects modeling approach, followed by time-varying covariate analysis of nine covariates using the stepwise covariate model (SCM) building procedure. Following the SCM, an astegolimab treatment effect was explored. Diary-based symptom score (difference in objective function value [dOFV] of -83.7) and rescue medication use (dOFV = -33.5), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (dOFV = -14.9) were identified as significant time-varying covariates. Of note, time-varying covariates become more useful with more frequent measurements, which should favor the daily diary scores over others. The most influential baseline covariates were exacerbation history and diary-based symptom score (i.e., symptom score was important as both time-varying and baseline covariate). A (nonsignificant) astegolimab treatment effect was included in the final model because the limited data set did not allow concluding the remaining effect size as irrelevant. Without time-varying covariates, the treatment effect was statistically significant (p < 0.01). This work demonstrated the utility of a population RTTE approach to characterize exacerbation hazard in patients with severe asthma.

Prediction of overall survival in patients across solid tumors following atezolizumab treatments: A tumor growth inhibition-overall survival modeling framework.

The objectives of the study were to use tumor size data from 10 phase II/III atezolizumab studies across five solid tumor types to estimate tumor growth inhibition (TGI) metrics and assess the impact of TGI metrics and baseline prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) for each tumor type. TGI metrics were estimated from biexponential models and posttreatment longitudinal data of 6699 patients. TGI-OS full models were built using parametric survival regression by including all significant baseline covariates from the Cox univariate analysis followed by a backward elimination step. The model performance was evaluated for each trial by 1000 simulations of the OS distributions and hazard ratios (HR) of the atezolizumab-containing arms versus the respective controls. The tumor growth rate estimate was the most significant predictor of OS across all tumor types. Several baseline prognostic factors, such as inflammatory status (C-reactive protein, albumin, and/or neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), tumor burden (sum of longest diameters, number of metastatic sites, and/or presence of liver metastases), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and lactate dehydrogenase were also highly significant across multiple studies in the final multivariate models. TGI-OS models adequately described the OS distribution. The model-predicted HRs indicated good model performance across the 10 studies, with observed HRs within the 95% prediction intervals for all study arms versus controls. Multivariate TGI-OS models developed for different solid tumor types were able to predict treatment effect with various atezolizumab monotherapy or combination regimens and could be used to support design and analysis of future studies.

Pan-cancer population pharmacokinetics and exposure-safety and -efficacy analyses of atezolizumab in patients with high tumor mutational burden.

We retrospectively investigated the pharmacokinetics and exposure-efficacy/safety relationships of single-agent atezolizumab based on tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB) status (high vs low [≥16 vs <16 mutations/megabase]) in a pan-tumor population from seven clinical trials. Data sources included the OAK, POPLAR, BIRCH, FIR, IMvigor210, IMvigor211, and PCD4989g studies; 986 of 2894 treated patients (34%) had TMB data. Exposure metrics were obtained using a prior two-compartment intravenous-infusion population-pharmacokinetics model, merged with prognostic, biomarker, efficacy, and safety variables. Baseline demographic/clinical characteristics and prognostic factors were well balanced between patients with high (n = 175) and low (n = 811) tTMB. Exposure was similar in the high- and low-tTMB subgroups, with no difference seen in the evaluable vs total treated populations. The objective response rate (ORR) was 29.7% vs 13.4%, complete response rate was 6.9% vs 3.2%, and median duration of response (95% CI) was 29.0 (18.6-NE) months vs 15.9 (12.5-20.5) months for patients with high-tTMB vs low-tTMB tumors, respectively. A flat exposure-efficacy relationship was seen for ORR in patients with high-tTMB based on the cycle 1 minimum atezolizumab concentration and area under the serum concentration time curve (AUC). A nonsignificant exposure-safety profile was seen for grade 3/4 adverse events and adverse events of special interest based on the AUC of atezolizumab in the high-tTMB population. tTMB is an additional predictive biological factor affecting response to atezolizumab, and quantitative investigations of atezolizumab exposure and relationships of exposure with safety and efficacy support the use of a 1200-mg, every 3-week regimen in a tumor-agnostic high-tTMB population.

Pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) as a single agent or in combination with pertuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with recurrent or locally advanced metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The phase III MARIANNE study investigated single-agent trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and combination T-DM1 plus pertuzumab as the first-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Pharmacokinetic properties of T-DM1 and pertuzumab in these patients and the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were assessed. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic samples of T-DM1-related analytes (T-DM1 conjugate, total trastuzumab, DM1) and pertuzumab were analyzed. Observed pharmacokinetic data were summarized for all analytes. Historical population pharmacokinetic models for T-DM1 conjugate and pertuzumab in HER2-positive MBC were used to derive empirical Bayes estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: In MARIANNE (N = 375), mean ± standard deviation population pharmacokinetic model-predicted Cycle 1 Cmax for T-DM1 conjugate was 74.4 ± 10.1 µg/mL, Cycle 1 Ctrough was 1.34 ± 0.802 µg/mL, and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity after first dose (AUCinf) was 338 ± 69.5 µg*day/mL. These values were similar to other T-DM1 studies. Pharmacokinetics of T-DM1 conjugate and other analytes (total trastuzumab, DM1) were similar with or without pertuzumab. In the pertuzumab plus T-DM1 arm, mean model-predicted Cycle 1 pertuzumab Cmax, Ctrough, and AUCinf were 276 ± 50.0 µg/mL, 64.8 ± 17.9 µg/mL, and 4470 ± 1360 µg*day/mL, respectively. These values were similar to other pertuzumab studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis of T-DM1 conjugate and pertuzumab, pharmacokinetics are similar across different lines of treatment and stages of disease including previously untreated MBC patients, and no DDIs were identified for combined use of T-DM1 and pertuzumab.

Exposure-response analyses of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane.

PURPOSE: In the phase III EMILIA study, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus capecitabine plus lapatinib (control) in previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer. Using EMILIA data, we evaluated the T-DM1 exposure-response relationship. METHODS: Exposure-response relationships were examined with four exposure metrics [model-predicted and observed minimum concentration (C min) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to day 21 of T-DM1 at cycle 1] and multiple efficacy (OS, PFS, objective response rate) and safety (grade ≥ 3 adverse events, grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, grade ≥ 3 hepatotoxicity) endpoints. RESULTS: An apparent exposure-response trend was observed between model-predicted exposure metrics and efficacy; trends for observed exposure metrics were shallower and often not significant. Although median OS and PFS were numerically longer in patients with higher versus lower model-predicted cycle 1 C min, OS and PFS hazard ratios for T-DM1-treated patients in the lowest exposure quartile (Q1) versus control were < 1 after adjusting for baseline risk factors (e.g., ECOG status, tumor burden, measurable disease, and number of disease sites). No meaningful exposure-response relationship was observed for any safety endpoints. CONCLUSION: Exposure-response relationships for efficacy were inconsistent across exposure metrics; model-predicted cycle 1 C min showed the strongest exposure-response trend. The Q1 subgroup based on model-predicted cycle 1 C min had numerically similar or better OS and PFS versus control following covariate adjustment. The approved T-DM1 dose (3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) has a positive benefit-risk ratio versus control, even for the T-DM1 Q1 subgroup.

Model-based clinical pharmacology profiling and exposure-response relationships of the efficacy and biomarker of lebrikizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Lebrikizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to interleukin-13 and has been evaluated as a treatment for moderate-to-severe asthma. Objectives of this work were to characterize lebrikizumab pharmacokinetics (PK), identify influential covariates, and graphically explore exposure-response relationships in moderate-to-severe asthmatics. Pooled PK data from 11 studies were used in the population PK model development. Full covariate modeling was used to evaluate the impact of pre-specified covariates. Response data (exacerbation rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], and fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]) were obtained from moderate-to-severe asthmatics (n = 2148) who received placebo, lebrikizumab 37.5 mg or 125 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in two replicate phase 3 studies. Graphical exposure-response analyses were stratified by numerous covariates, including biomarker subgroups defined by serum periostin level and blood eosinophil count at baseline. Lebrikizumab PK was described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. Population typical values were estimated as 0.156 L/day for clearance (CL), 4.10 L for central volume (Vc), and 0.239 day-1 for absorption rate (ka), 85.6% for bioavailability (inter-subject variability: CL, 33.3%; Vc, 36.3%; ka, 40.8%). The estimated mean terminal half-life was 25.7 days. Body weight was the most influential covariate. Generally, the exposure-response analyses of FEV1 and FeNO showed increased response at higher exposure quartiles, while flat or unclear exposure-response relationships were observed in exacerbation rate. Lebrikizumab PK is as expected for a typical immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody. Results from the exposure-response analyses suggested that, compared to 125 mg Q4W, the 37.5 mg Q4W dose did not achieve the maximum responses for FEV1 and FeNO, although it appeared to maximize the effect on exacerbation reduction. This suggests that the antibody levels needed to improve these outcomes may not be the same. In addition, the role of IL-13 in airflow obstruction/airway inflammation and asthma exacerbations might be different and targeting multiple pathways may be required to treat this heterogeneous disease and provide clinically meaningful benefits to asthma patients.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of trastuzumab emtansine in advanced breast cancer previously treated with ≥2 HER2-targeted regimens.

AIMS: We conducted population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure-response analyses for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), to assess the need for T-DM1 dose optimization in patients with low exposure by using TH3RESA [A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Comparison With Treatment of Physician's Choice in Patients With human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive Breast Cancer Who Have Received at Least Two Prior Regimens of HER2-directed Therapy] study data (NCT01419197). The randomized phase III TH3RESA study investigated T-DM1 vs. treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. METHODS: We compared a historical T-DM1 PopPK model with T-DM1 pharmacokinetics in TH3RESA and performed exposure-response analyses using model-predicted cycle 1 maximum concentration (Cmax ), cycle 1 minimum concentration (Cmin ) and area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUCss ). Kaplan-Meier analyses [overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)] and logistic regression [overall response rate (ORR), safety] were stratified by T-DM1 exposure metrics. Survival hazard ratios (HRs) in the lowest exposure quartile (Q1) of cycle 1 Cmin were compared with matched TPC-treated patients. RESULTS: T-DM1 concentrations in TH3RESA were described well by the historical PopPK model. Patients with higher cycle 1 Cmin and AUCss exhibited numerically longer median OS and PFS and higher ORR than patients with lower exposure. Exposure-response relationships were less evident for cycle 1 Cmax . No relationship between exposure and safety was identified. HRs for the comparison of T-DM1-treated patients in the Q1 subgroup with matched TPC-treated patients were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63, 1.47] for OS and 0.92 (95% CI 0.64, 1.32) for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure-response relationships for efficacy were inconsistent across exposure metrics. HRs for survival in patients in the lowest T-DM1 exposure quartile vs. matched TPC-treated patients suggest that, compared with TCP, the approved T-DM1 dose is unlikely to be detrimental to patients with low exposure.

Incidence and risk of intestinal and extra-intestinal complications in Medicaid patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 5-year population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Intestinal and extra-intestinal complications are associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but their exact incidence is not well known. In order to improve our understanding of their incidence and impact, we assessed the complications associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) in a population-based study in Medicaid patients. METHODS: We utilized a retrospective cohort design and identified cases of UC and CD using Medi-Cal, the Medicaid program for the State of California. The disease cohort was age- and gender-matched to four controls each and the intestinal and extra-intestinal complications of CD and UC (analyzed separately) were studied over a period of 5 years following the initial diagnosis. RESULTS: For UC, the total number of intestinal complications, per 100 cases, was 92 observed compared to 21 expected; the total number of extra-intestinal complications was 42 observed compared to 30 expected. For CD, the number of intestinal complications was 81 observed compared to 20 expected and for extra-intestinal complications, 37 observed compared to 26 expected (all p < 0.001). For both UC and CD, bleeding was the most frequently seen intestinal complication, while the most common extra-intestinal complication was osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: IBD is associated with several intestinal and extra-intestinal complications of variable incidence and risk. Success of therapeutic regimens should be measured by decreases in incidence, risks, and costs of these complications, in addition to the usual impact on disease activity.

Epidemiology of alcohol-related liver and pancreatic disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of acute alcoholic pancreatitis (AP), chronic alcoholic pancreatitis (CP), acute alcoholic hepatitis (AH), and chronic alcoholic hepatitis with cirrhosis (CH) alone or in combination is not well described. To better understand alcohol-related liver and pancreas effects on and associations with different ethnic groups and sexes, we analyzed the trends of AP, CP, AH, CH, AP plus AH, and CP plus CH in the United States. METHODS: We examined discharge records from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest representative sample of US hospitals. Hospital discharges, case-fatality, and sex and race contributions were calculated from patients with discharge diagnoses of AP, CP, AH, CH, AP plus AH, or CP plus CH between 1988 and 2004. RESULTS: The distribution of overall hospital discharges per 100 000 persons between 1988 and 2004 was as follows: AP, 49.2; CP, 8.1; AH, 4.5; and CH, 13.7. Overall hospital discharges per 100 000 persons for AP plus AH were 1.8; and for CP plus CH, 0.32. There were higher male to female ratios for AH and CH, and less so for AP and CP. A markedly higher frequency of AP (63.5) and CP (11.3) was seen among blacks than among whites (AP, 29.6 and CP, 5.1), Hispanics (AP, 27.1 and CP, 3.7), Asians (AP, 12.8 and CP, 1.4), and American Indians (AP, 15.5 and CP, 2.3). This higher frequency remained stable between 1994 and 2004. Overall case fatality steadily decreased in all categories, but remains highest in CH (13.6%) with similar racial distributions. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, AP is the most common discharge diagnosis among alcohol-related liver or pancreas complications, while CH has the highest case fatality rate and male to female ratio. Blacks have the highest frequency of alcohol-related pancreatic disease.

Use of health care resources and cost of care for adults with constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Constipation is a multisymptom disorder that frequently compromises quality of life and leads patients to seek medical advice. To evaluate the clinical and fiscal effects of constipation, we assessed health care resource use by patients with constipation enrolled in a large state Medicaid program. METHODS: We identified 105,130 patients older than age 18 who saw a physician at least once for constipation and were enrolled in the California Medicaid program (Medi-Cal). We then studied health care resource use and costs (reimbursed by Medi-Cal) in 76,854 patients without supplementary insurance. The 15-month analysis period encompassed 3 months before and 12 months after the first visit. The prevalence of comorbid conditions was assessed in the sample of 105,130 patients. RESULTS: During the study period, 106,555 physician visits were for constipation; the total associated cost was $3,016,017 ($39/patient). The total cost for gastrointestinal procedures and laboratory testing was $14,052,503 ($183/patient). There were 41,723 over-the-counter and 1665 prescription drug purchases; the total cost was $388,780 ($5/patient). Approximately 0.6% of patients (n = 479) were admitted to the hospital for constipation; the total cost was $1,433,708 ($2993/admission). The total direct health care costs for patients with constipation in the Medi-Cal system for the 15-month period was $18,891,008 ($246/patient). Within 12 months of the first physician visit for constipation, 5657 of 105,130 patients had hemorrhoids and 2288 had intestinal impaction or obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Adults seeking treatment for constipation account for significant health care resource use and often have comorbid conditions. The clinical and fiscal burden of constipation in US adults cannot be disregarded or trivialized.