ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine whether a 100% healthy vending model would affect revenue, employee satisfaction, and nutrition in the workplace. DESIGN: This study compared revenue and nutrition data pre- and post-adoption of nutrition standards from the American Heart Association's (AHA) Healthy Workplace Food and Beverage Toolkit. Employee satisfaction was measured using a survey. SETTING: The AHA National Center which, over time, included 5 vending machines and a micromarket. MEASURES: Comparisons of monthly snack and beverage revenues; survey results assessing employee satisfaction; reduction in mean saturated fat (g) and sodium (mg) per snack sold; reduction in mean sugar (g) per beverage sold; monthly mean number of fruits, vegetable, and dairy sold. ANALYSIS: Paired t tests were used to compare monthly revenue while t tests were used to compare nutrition information pre- and post-adoption of nutrition standards. Survey results and food group purchases were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Mean monthly snack revenue increased (P = .002). Mean monthly beverage revenue did not decrease. Most survey respondents were satisfied with the healthy vending. Mean saturated fat and sodium content per snack sold decreased (P < .001). Mean sugar content per beverage sold decreased. The micromarket sold an average of 210 units of dairy, 85 units of fruit, and 87 units of vegetables per month. LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted at one workplace. CONCLUSION: Healthy vending did not decrease revenue but did decrease saturated fat and sodium per snack, decrease sugar per beverage, and provide fruits, vegetables, and fat-free/low-fat dairy. Employees were generally satisfied with healthy vending.
Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Diet, Healthy , Food Dispensers, Automatic , Consumer Behavior , Culture , Diet, Healthy/economics , Food Dispensers, Automatic/economics , Food Preferences , Health Promotion , Humans , Pilot Projects , Snacks , United StatesABSTRACT
A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Consensus , Engineering/ethics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Publishing/ethics , Science/ethics , Scientific Misconduct , Access to Information , Culture , Education, Professional , Ethics, Research , Humans , Peer Review , Policy , Reproducibility of Results , ResearchABSTRACT
Cardiovascular disease risk factor control as primary prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has changed substantially in the past few years. The purpose of this scientific statement is to review the current literature and key clinical trials pertaining to blood pressure and blood glucose control, cholesterol management, aspirin therapy, and lifestyle modification. We present a synthesis of the recent literature, new guidelines, and clinical targets, including screening for kidney and subclinical cardiovascular disease for the contemporary management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Primary Prevention/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Humans , Primary Prevention/trends , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/trends , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Cardiovascular disease risk factor control as primary prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has changed substantially in the past few years. The purpose of this scientific statement is to review the current literature and key clinical trials pertaining to blood pressure and blood glucose control, cholesterol management, aspirin therapy, and lifestyle modification. We present a synthesis of the recent literature, new guidelines, and clinical targets, including screening for kidney and subclinical cardiovascular disease for the contemporary management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/standards , Adult , American Heart Association , Cardiology/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preventive Medicine/standards , Risk Factors , United StatesSubject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Health Policy/trends , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Motor Activity , Physical Fitness , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , American Heart Association , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Child , Goals , Guideline Adherence , Health Behavior , Humans , Risk Factors , Sedentary Behavior , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A 2-day interactive forum was convened to discuss the current status and future implications of reducing sodium in the food supply and to identify opportunities for stakeholder collaboration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants included 128 stakeholders engaged in food research and development, food manufacturing and retail, restaurant and food service operations, regulatory and legislative activities, public health initiatives, healthcare, academia and scientific research, and data monitoring and surveillance. Presentation topics included scientific evidence for sodium reduction and public health policy recommendations; consumer sodium intakes, attitudes, and behaviors; food technologies and solutions for sodium reduction and sensory implications; experiences of the food and dining industries; and translation and implementation of sodium intake recommendations. Facilitated breakout sessions were conducted to allow for sharing of current practices, insights, and expertise. CONCLUSIONS: A well-established body of scientific research shows that there is a strong relationship between excess sodium intake and high blood pressure and other adverse health outcomes. With Americans getting >75% of their sodium from processed and restaurant food, this evidence creates mounting pressure for less sodium in the food supply. The reduction of sodium in the food supply is a complex issue that involves multiple stakeholders. The success of new technological approaches for reducing sodium will depend on product availability, health effects (both intended and unintended), research and development investments, quality and taste of reformulated foods, supply chain management, operational modifications, consumer acceptance, and cost. The conference facilitated an exchange of ideas and set the stage for potential collaboration opportunities among stakeholders with mutual interest in reducing sodium in the food supply and in Americans' diets. Population-wide sodium reduction remains a critically important component of public health efforts to promote cardiovascular health and prevent cardiovascular disease and will remain a priority for the American Heart Association.
Subject(s)
Food Industry/standards , Food Supply/standards , Restaurants/standards , Sodium, Dietary/standards , Sodium/standards , American Heart Association , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Public Health/standards , Risk Factors , Sodium/adverse effects , Sodium, Dietary/adverse effects , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Front-of-pack labeling systems may provide additional guidance to that already available to facilitate the identification of foods that improve diet quality. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between choosing foods that meet criteria of an established front-of-pack labeling system with food-group and nutrient intakes and cardiometabolic risk factors. DESIGN: The association between the consumption of foods that met 2014 American Heart Association (AHA) Heart-Check Food Certification Program criteria and 2005 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2005) scores, food-group intake, energy intake, nutrient intake, and cardiometabolic risk factors was analyzed in 11,296 men and women ≥ 19 y old by using 1-d dietary recall data from the NHANES 2007-2010. Individuals were categorized into consumers and nonconsumers of AHA Heart-Check Food Certification Program-certifiable foods and quartiles of intakes on the basis of the percentage of calories. RESULTS: The consumption of AHA Heart-Check Food Certification Program-certifiable foods was positively associated with HEI-2005 scores and fruit, vegetable, whole-grain, total sugar, fiber, potassium, calcium, and vitamin D intakes and inversely associated with the percentage of energy from saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, added sugars, alcohol, and intakes of cholesterol and sodium. The highest quartile of daily energy intake from AHA Heart-Check Food Certification Program-certifiable foods was associated with lower risk of obesity (26%), lower risk of elevated waist circumference (29%), and lower risk of metabolic syndrome (24%) than with lowest intakes (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The choice of foods meeting one front-of-pack labeling system positively influences food-group and nutrient intakes and is associated with a higher diet quality and lower risk of cardiometabolic syndrome.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diet , Food Labeling , Food Quality , Health Promotion , Metabolic Syndrome/prevention & control , Obesity/prevention & control , Adult , American Heart Association , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet Surveys , Female , Humans , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Nutrition Policy , Obesity/epidemiology , Patient Compliance , Recommended Dietary Allowances , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
Recent reports of selected observational studies and a meta-analysis have stirred controversy and have become the impetus for calls to abandon recommendations for reduced sodium intake by the US general population. A detailed review of these studies documents substantial methodological concerns that limit the usefulness of these studies in setting, much less reversing, dietary recommendations. Indeed, the evidence base supporting recommendations for reduced sodium intake in the general population remains robust and persuasive. The American Heart Association is committed to improving the health of all Americans through implementation of national goals for health promotion and disease prevention, including its recommendation to reduce dietary sodium intake to <1500 mg/d.
Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diet, Sodium-Restricted/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/administration & dosage , American Heart Association , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/diet therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Risk Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To examine the influence active-play video gaming (also referred to as exergaming, exertainment, and active gaming) might have on improving health-related skills, enhancing self-esteem and self-efficacy, promoting social support, and ultimately motivating positive changes in health behaviors, the American Heart Association convened The Power of Play: Innovations in Getting Active Summit. The summit, as well as a follow-up science panel, was hosted by the American Heart Association and Nintendo of America. METHODS AND RESULTS: The science panel discussed the current state of research on active-play video gaming and its potential to serve as a gateway experience that might motivate players to increase the amount and intensity of physical activity in their daily lives. The panel identified the need for continued research on the gateway concept and on other behavioral health outcomes that could result from active-play video games and considered how these games could potentially affect disparate populations. CONCLUSIONS: The summit represented an exciting first step in convening healthcare providers, behavioral researchers, and professionals from the active-play video game industry to discuss the potential health benefits of active-play video games. Research is needed to improve understanding of processes of behavior change with active games. Future games and technologies may be designed with the goal to optimize physical activity participation, increase energy expenditure, and effectively address the abilities and interests of diverse and targeted populations. The summit helped the participants gain an understanding of what is known, identified gaps in current research, and supported a dialogue for continued collaboration.
Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Motor Activity/physiology , Play and Playthings , Video Games , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./standards , Health Behavior , Humans , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/prevention & control , Obesity/therapy , United StatesSubject(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diet, Sodium-Restricted/standards , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/adverse effects , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/standards , Stroke/prevention & control , Humans , Kidney Diseases/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/administration & dosage , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A 2-day forum was convened to (1) discuss ways to translate the 2009 American Heart Association added sugars recommendations into actions in areas such as regulation, food labeling, nutrient content claims, and practical application in the American diet; (2) review surveillance methodology and metrics for tracking and understanding the impact of reducing added sugars in the diet; and (3) initiate the development of a framework for future collaboration to help Americans implement science-based guidance relative to added sugars. METHODS AND RESULTS: More than 100 multinational participants representing scientists from academia and government and stakeholders engaged in food production, development, and processing, food manufacturing and servicing, food and nutrition policy, and nutrition recommendations for the public attended the conference. Presentations included definitions and examples of added sugars, current US and international added sugars perspectives, added sugars in diets of individuals and in the food supply, food technology behind added sugars, added sugars and health, food manufacturer perspectives, added sugars food-labeling considerations, and examples of positive approaches to improve eating behaviors and the food environment. Facilitated breakout sessions were conducted after the plenary sessions to allow participants to contribute their expertise and thoughts. CONCLUSION: The American Heart Association Added Sugars Conference is the first step in an important process that facilitates collaboration across science, public health, and industry to foster innovation, partnerships, policy, and implementation of new products and services for the benefit of the health and well-being of the American public. Science has advanced in the area of added sugars and health, creating mounting pressure to use better methods for translation and dissemination of the science for consumer education and for food companies to respond by producing foods and beverages with fewer added sugars. The new science also reinforces the importance of preventing, rather than simply treating diseases, especially overweight and obesity, diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, heart disease, and stroke. Reducing added sugars consumption is a good target for addressing obesity, along with other sources of excess calories. However, the potential unintended consequences of substituting added sugars with ingredients that may not reduce calories and of increasing other macronutrients or food groups that may not result in a net health gain must be considered. Although there are many challenges to incorporating added sugars to the food label as was discussed during the conference, disclosure of added sugars content on food and beverage labels is an essential element in consumer education and can provide the information and motivation for making healthier food choices. This conference demonstrated the value of interactive dialogue among multiple sectors and disciplines. More disciplines should be at the table to bring expertise to discuss cross-cutting issues related to public policies and offer diverse insights to finding a solution.