A Contemporary Analysis of Mental Well-being Among Living Donor Kidney Applicants.

Background: Living donation is paramount for expanding the donor pool. The aim of this study was to assess changes over time in self-reported mental health of living donor kidney applicants in efforts to inform patient-centered discussions with potential donors. Methods: Kidney donor applications from 2017 through 2021 were compiled. Data included age, gender, race, ethnicity, applicant-recipient relationship, medical history, and medications. Trends over time were analyzed and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: During the study period, 2479 applicants to the living donor kidney program were evaluated; 73% of applicants were female individuals. More than half of applicants were not related to their intended recipient; this fraction increased from 46% in 2017 to 58% in 2021 (P < 0.01). A similar decline in family relations was not present among Black and Latino applicants. Of all applicants, 18% reported depression and 18% reported anxiety; 20% reported taking antidepressants or anxiolytics. Depression and anxiety increased 170% (P < 0.001) and 136% (P < 0.001) from 2018 to 2019, respectively; antidepressant and anxiolytic use rose 138% (P < 0.001) between 2018 and 2020. Conclusions: The profile of living donor applicants has changed in recent years, with approximately 1 in 5 requiring antidepressants or anxiolytics. Predonation counseling and postdonation monitoring are imperative to decrease adverse psychological outcomes for living donors.

Early Graft Failure After Living-Donor Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been increasing in the USA. While data exist on longer-term patient and graft outcomes, a contemporary analysis of short-term outcomes is needed. AIM: Evaluate short-term (30-day) graft failure rates and identify predictors associated with these outcomes. METHODS: Adult (≥ 18) LDLT recipients from 01/2004 to 12/2021 were analyzed from the United States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft status at 30 days was assessed with graft failure defined as retransplantation or death. Comparison of continuous and categorical variables was performed and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of early graft failure. RESULTS: During the study period, 4544 LDLTs were performed with a graft failure rate of 3.4% (155) at 30 days. Grafts from male donors (aOR: 0.63, CI 0.44-0.89), right lobe grafts (aOR: 0.40, CI 0.27-0.61), recipients aged > 60 years (aOR: 0.52, CI 0.32-0.86), and higher recipient albumin (aOR: 0.73, CI 0.57-0.93) were associated with superior early graft outcomes, whereas Asian recipient race (vs. White; aOR: 3.75, CI 1.98-7.10) and a history of recipient PVT (aOR: 2.7, CI 1.52-4.78) were associated with inferior outcomes. LDLTs performed during the most recent 2016-2021 period (compared to 2004-2009 and 2010-2015) resulted in significantly superior outcomes (aOR: 0.45, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that while short-term adult LDLT graft failure is uncommon, there are opportunities for optimizing outcomes by prioritizing right lobe donation, improving candidate nutritional status, and careful pre-transplant risk assessment of candidates with known PVT. Notably, a period effect exists whereby increased LDLT experience in the most recent era correlated with improved outcomes.

A contemporary analysis of 20,086 deceased donor liver biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplant deceased donor liver biopsy may impact decision making; however, interpretation of the results remains variable and depends on accepting center practice patterns. METHODS: In this cohort study, adult recipients from 04/01/2015-12/31/2020 were identified using the UNOS STARfile data. The deceased donor liver biopsies were stratified by risk based on degree of fibrosis, macrovesicular fat content, and level of portal infiltration (low-risk: no fibrosis, no portal infiltrates, and <30% macrosteatosis; moderate-risk: some fibrosis or mild infiltrates and <30% macrosteatosis; high-risk: most fibrosis, moderate/marked infiltrates, or ≥30% macrosteatosis). Graft utilization, donor risk profile, and recipient outcomes were compared across groups. RESULTS: Of the 51,094 donor livers available, 20,086 (39.3%) were biopsied, and 34,606 (67.7%) were transplanted. Of the transplanted livers, 14,908 (43.1%) were biopsied. The transplanted grafts had lower mean macrovesicular fat content (9.3% transplanted vs. 26.9% non-transplanted, P < 0.001) and less often had any degree of fibrosis (20.9% vs. 39.9%, P < 0.001) or portal infiltration (51.3% vs. 58.2%, P < 0.001) versus non-transplanted grafts. Post-transplant recipient LOS (14.2 days high-risk vs. 15.2 days low-risk, P = 0.170) and 1-year graft survival (90.5% vs. 91.7%, P = 0.137) did not differ significantly between high- versus low-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates further revealed no differences in the 5-year graft survival across risk strata (P = 0.833). Of the 5178 grafts biopsied and turned down, PSM revealed 1338 (26.0%) were potentially useable based on biopsy results and donor characteristics. CONCLUSION: Carefully matched deceased donor livers with some fibrosis, inflammation, or steatosis ≥30% may be suitable for transplantation. Further study of this group of grafts may decrease turndowns of potentially useable organs.

Effect of donor HSD17B13 genotype on patient survival after liver transplant: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Several genetic variants are associated with chronic liver disease. The role of these variants in outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine if donor genotype at risk-associated variants in PNPLA3 (rs738409 C>G, p.I148M) and HSD17B13 (rs72613567 T>TA; rs80182459, p.A192Lfs∗8) influences post-LT survival. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data on 2346 adults who underwent first-time LT between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2020 and who had donor DNA samples available at five large Transplant Immunology Laboratories in Texas, USA, were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Duplicates, patients with insufficient donor DNA for genotyping, those who were <18 years of age at the time of transplant, had had a previous transplant or had missing genotype data were excluded. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival after LT. The association between donor genotype and post-LT survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Findings: Median age of LT recipients was 57 [interquartile range (IQR), 50-62] years; 837 (35.7%) were women; 1362 (58.1%) White, 713 (30.4%) Hispanic, 182 (7.8%) Black/African-American. Median follow-up time was 3.95 years. Post-LT survival was not affected by donor PNPLA3 genotype but was significantly reduced among recipients of livers with two HSD17B13 loss-of-function (LoF) variants compared to those receiving livers with no HSD17B13 LoF alleles (unadjusted one-year survival: 82.6% vs 93.9%, P < 0.0001; five-year survival: 73.1% vs 82.9%, P = 0.0017; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.25; 95% CI, 1.61-3.15 after adjustment for recipient age, sex, and self-reported ethnicity). Excess mortality was restricted to those receiving steroid induction immunosuppression (crude 90-day post-LT mortality, 9.3% [95% CI, 1.9%-16.1%] vs 1.9% [95% CI, 0.9%-2.9%] in recipients of livers with two vs no HSD17B13 LoF alleles, P = 0.0012; age, sex, and ethnicity-adjusted HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.72-4.71, P < 0.0001). No reduction was seen among patients who did not receive steroid induction (90-day mortality 3.1% [95% CI, 0%-7.3%] vs 2% [95% CI, 0.9%-3.1%], P = 0.65; adjusted HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.66-2.08, P = 0.60). Interpretation: Donor HSD17B13 genotype adversely affects post-LT survival in patients receiving steroid induction. Additional studies are required to confirm this association. Funding: The National Institutes of Health and American Society of Transplant Surgeons Collaborative Scientist Grant.

From Patients to Providers: Assessing Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Liver Transplant Practices in the US.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of livers allows for the expansion of the donor pool and minimization of posttransplant complications. Results to date have focused on both donor and recipient outcomes, but there remains potential for NMP to also impact transplant providers. STUDY DESIGN: Using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis file data, adult deceased donors who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were identified. Transplanted livers were divided by preservation methods (static cold storage [SCS] and NMP) and case time (day-reperfusion 8 am to 6 pm ). Patient factors, transplant characteristics, and short-term outcomes were analyzed between Mahalanobis-metric-matched groups. RESULTS: NMP livers represented 742 (1.4%) of 52,132 transplants. NMP donors were more marginal with higher Donor Risk Index scores (1.78 ± 0.50 NMP vs 1.49 ± 0.38 SCS, p < 0.001) and donation after cardiac death frequency (36.9% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001). NMP recipients more often had model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception status (29.9% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001), lower laboratory MELD scores (20.7 ± 9.7 vs 24.3 ± 10.9, p < 0.001), and had been waitlisted longer (111.5 [21.0 to 307.0] vs 60.0 [9.0 to 245.0] days, p < 0.001). One-year graft survival (90.2% vs 91.6%, p = 0.505) was similar between groups, whereas length of stay was lower for NMP recipients (8.0 [6.0 to 14.0] vs 10.0 [6.0 to 16.0], p = 0.017) after adjusting for confounders. Notably, peak case volume occurred at 11 am with NMP livers (vs 9 pm with SCS). Overall, a higher proportion of transplants was performed during daytime hours with NMP (51.5% vs 43.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NMP results in increased use of marginal allografts, which facilitated transplantation in lower laboratory MELD recipients who have been waitlisted longer and often have exception points. Importantly, NMP also appeared to shift peak caseloads from nighttime to daytime, which may have significant effects on the quality of life for the entire liver transplant team.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Diseases in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest disparities exist in liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). As the incidence of ALD increases, we aimed to characterize recent trends in ALD LT frequency and outcomes, including racial and ethnic disparities. METHODS: Using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data (2015 through 2021), we evaluated LT frequency, waitlist mortality, and graft survival among US adults with ALD (alcohol-associated hepatitis [AH] and alcohol-associated cirrhosis [AAC]) stratified by race and ethnicity. We used adjusted competing-risk regression analysis to evaluate waitlist outcomes, Kaplan-Meier analysis to illustrate graft survival, and Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft survival. RESULTS: There were 1211 AH and 26 526 AAC new LT waitlist additions, with 970 AH and 15 522 AAC LTs performed. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients (NHWs) with AAC, higher hazards of waitlist death were observed for Hispanic (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.32), Asian (SHR = 1.22, 95% CI:1. 01-1.47), and American Indian/Alaskan Native (SHR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.76) candidates. Similarly, significantly higher graft failures were observed in non-Hispanic Black (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09-1.61) and American Indian/Alaskan Native (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.15-2.38) patients with AAC than NHWs. We did not observe differences in waitlist or post-LT outcomes by race or ethnicity in AH, although analyses were limited by small subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist for ALD LT frequency and outcomes in the United States. Compared with NHWs, racial and ethnic minorities with AAC experience increased risk of waitlist mortality and graft failure. Efforts are needed to identify determinants for LT disparities in ALD that can inform intervention strategies.

Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA.

Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (≥25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.

The effect of an organ procurement organization surgeon on pediatric organ utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Organ procurement organizations (OPO) have started to employ transplant-trained surgeons dedicated to organ procurement with the aim to increase allograft utilization and enhance the use of procured organs. We investigated the effects of an OPO-employed surgeon on the procurement and utilization of organs from pediatric donors within the Southwestern Transplant Alliance OPO. METHODS: OPO data were obtained for all procurements that were performed between 2014 and 2019. The analysis was performed to see if the presence of an OPO donor surgeon impacted the utilization of pediatric livers. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined between allografts procured with the presence of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Present) and those without an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). A p-value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 149 pediatric procurements, 91 included an OPO-donor surgeon. In procurements with OPO-Present, donors were younger (8.2 vs. 11.2, p < .05) and had longer distances to travel to the recipient center (334 vs. 175 miles p < .05), but had comparable cold ischemic times. In terms of organ share type, more OPO-Present livers were shared nationally and there was no difference in discard rate between OPO-Present and OPO-Absent procurements. Finally, OPO-Present livers were more likely to be transplanted to pediatric recipients compared to OPO-Absent (47.3% vs. 24.1% p < .05). CONCLUSION: The presence of an OPO surgeon has impacted organ utilization, leading to increased transplantation of pediatric livers in pediatric recipients, and has expanded the geographical share of pediatric livers.

Biliary atresia and liver transplantation in the United States: A contemporary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biliary atresia (BA) remains the number one indication for paediatric liver transplantation (LT) worldwide but is an uncommon indication for older LT recipients. The impact of recent donor allocation changes, pervasive organ shortage and evolving LT practices on the BA LT population is unknown. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2021 using the UNOS database. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with BA and those with non-BA cholestatic liver disease. Groups were stratified by age, <12 years (allocated via PELD system) and ≥12 years (allocated via MELD system). Waitlist outcomes were compared using competing-risk regression analysis, graft survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling provided adjusted estimates. RESULTS: There were 2754 BA LT waitlist additions and 2206 BA LTs (1937 <12 years [younger], 269 ≥12 years [older]). There were no differences in waitlist mortality between BA and non-BA cholestatic patients. Among BA LT recipients, there were 441 (20.0%) living-donor liver transplantations (LDLT) and 611 (27.7%) split deceased-donor LTs. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher among BA versus non-BA cholestatic patients in the older group (88.3% vs. 79.5%, p < .01) but not younger group (89.3% vs. 89.5%). Among BA LT recipients, improved graft outcomes were associated with LDLT (vs. split LT: HR: 2, 95% CI: 1.03-3.91) and higher transplant volume (volume >100 vs. <40 BA LTs: HR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.87-6.2). CONCLUSION: Liver transplant outcomes among BA patients are excellent, with LDLT and higher transplant centre volume associated with optimal graft outcomes.

Liver Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: Is Age Just a Number?

BACKGROUND: The proportion of older patients on the liver transplant waitlist continues to increase. With limited existing data to guide liver transplant evaluation of elderly patients, we aimed to study selection practices and outcomes of patients ≥70 years old. We hypothesized that 1-year patient and graft survival would not differ between appropriately selected elderly patients and those who are younger. METHODS: All patients referred for liver transplantation between 2018 and 2020 were stratified into elderly (age ≥70) and young (age <70) cohorts. Evaluation data pertaining to medical, surgical, and psychosocial risk assessment were reviewed. Recipient characteristics and post-operative outcomes, primarily 1-year graft and patient survival, were compared, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months. RESULTS: 322 patients underwent transplant out of 2331 referred. Elderly patients represented 230 of these referrals and 20 underwent transplant. The most common reasons for denial of elderly patients were multiple medical comorbidities (49%), cardiac risk (15%) and psychosocial barriers (13%). The median MELD of elderly recipients was lower (19 vs 24, P = .02), and proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma was higher (60% vs 23%, P < .001). There was no difference in 1-year graft (elderly 90.9% vs young 93.3%, P = .72) or patient survival (elderly 90.9% vs young 94.7%, P = .88). DISCUSSION: Liver transplant outcomes and survival are not affected by advanced age in carefully evaluated and selected recipients. Age should not be considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplant referral. Efforts should be made to develop guidelines for risk stratification and donor-recipient matching that optimize outcomes in elderly patients.

Normothermic machine perfusion for older transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients (≥65 years old) are increasingly undergoing liver transplantation and are more likely to be removed from the waitlist. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) holds promise in expanding the number of livers available for transplant and improving outcomes for marginal donors and recipients. We aimed to determine the impact of NMP on outcomes in elderly recipients at our institution and nationally using the UNOS database. METHODS: The use of NMP on outcomes in elderly recipients was reviewed using both the UNOS/SRTR database (2016-2022) and institutional data (2018-2020). Characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the NMP and static cold (control) groups within both populations. RESULTS: Nationally, using the UNOS/SRTR database, we identified 165 elderly recipients from 28 centers who received a liver allograft undergoing NMP and 4270 that underwent traditional cold static storage. NMP donors were older (48.3 vs. 43.4 years, p < 0.01), had similar rates of steatosis (8.5% vs 8.5%, p = 0.58), were more likely to be from a DCD (41.8% vs 12.3%, p < 0.01), and had a higher donor risk index (DRI; 1.70 vs. 1.60, p < 0.02). NMP recipients had similar age but had a lower MELD score at transplant (17.9 vs. 20.7, p = 0.01). Despite increased marginality of the donor graft, NMP recipients had similar allograft survival and decreased length of stay, even after accounting for recipient characteristics including MELD. Institutional data showed that 10 elderly recipients underwent NMP and 68 underwent cold static storage. At our institution, NMP recipients had a similar length of stay, rates of complications, and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: NMP may mitigate donor risk factors that are relative contraindications for transplantation in elderly liver recipients, increasing the donor pool. The application of NMP in older recipients should be considered.

Resection of NAFLD/NASH-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Clinical Features and Outcomes Compared with HCC Due to Other Etiologies.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Limited data exist on surgical outcomes for NAFLD/NASH-related HCC compared with other HCC etiologies. We evaluated differences in clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical resection for NAFLD/NASH-associated HCC compared with other HCC etiologies. METHODS: Demographic, clinicopathological features, and survival outcomes of patients with surgically resected HCC were collected. NAFLD activity score (NAS) and fibrosis score were assessed by focused pathologic review in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Among 492 patients screened, 260 met eligibility (NAFLD/NASH [n = 110], and other etiologies [n = 150]). Median age at diagnosis was higher in the NAFLD/NASH HCC cohort compared with the other etiologies cohort (66.7 vs. 63.4 years, respectively, P = .005), with an increased percentage of female patients (36% vs. 18%, P = .001). NAFLD/NASH-related tumors were more commonly >5 cm (66.0% vs. 45%, P = .001). There were no significant differences in rates of lymphovascular or perineural invasion, histologic grade, or serum AFP levels. The NAFLD/NASH cohort had lower rates of background liver fibrosis, lower AST and ALT levels, and higher platelet counts (P < .01 for all). Median overall survival (OS) was numerically shorter in NAFLD/NASH vs other etiology groups, however, not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NAFLD/NASH-related HCC more commonly lacked liver fibrosis and presented with larger HCCs compared with patients with HCC from other etiologies. No differences were seen in rates of other high-risk features or survival. With the caveat of sample size and retrospective analysis, this supports a similar decision-making approach regarding surgical resection for NAFLD/NASH and other etiology-related HCCs.

Delayed graft function in pediatric living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric recipients of living donor kidneys have a low rate of delayed graft function (DGF). We examined the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of DGF in pediatric patients who received a living donor allograft. METHODS: The STARfile was queried to examine all pediatric patients transplanted with a living donor kidney between 2000 and 2020. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined, as were survival and outcomes. Recipients were stratified into DGF and no DGF groups. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. RESULTS: 6480 pediatric patients received a living donor (LD) kidney transplant during the study period. 269 (4.2%) developed DGF post-transplant. Donors were similar in age, creatinine, and cold ischemia time. Recipients of kidneys with DGF were similar in age, sensitization status and HLA mismatch. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was the most common diagnosis in recipients with DGF, and allograft thrombosis was the most common cause of graft loss in this group. Small recipients (weight < 15 kg) were found to have a significantly higher rate of DGF. Length of stay doubled in recipients with DGF, and rejection rates were higher post-transplant. Recipients of LD kidneys who developed DGF had significantly worse 1 year allograft survival (67% vs. 98%, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric living donor kidney transplant recipients who experience DGF have significantly poorer allograft survival. Optimizing the donor and recipient matching to avoid compounding risks may allow for better outcomes.

No Stone Left Unturned: Utilization of an Organ Procurement Organization Donor Surgeon at Procurement Reduces Discards of Marginal Liver Allografts.

BACKGROUND: The recent trend of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) employing independent surgeons for organ procurement has been developed with the goal of improving the supply of suitable organs for transplantation. We investigated the effects that the addition of an OPO-employed, organ-procurement specialist has on liver allograft discard rate, marginal organ utilization, and graft survival. METHODS: Organ Procurement and Transplant Network and OPO data were retrospectively studied between April 1, 2014' and July 31, 2019' within the Southwest Transplant Alliance donor service area. Liver procurements with an OPO-surgeon present (OPO-Present) were compared to those without the involvement of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). Donor and recipient characteristics as well as outcomes were analyzed across groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total 869 OPO-Present liver allografts had similar rates of discard (5.2%) compared to 771 OPO-Absent livers (5.8%). However, after adjusting for donor risk, OPO-Present livers had a lower propensity of discard compared to OPO-Absent (3.4% versus 7.6%, P < 0.05). OPO-Present livers were more likely to be shared nationally (11.0% versus 4.8%, P < 0.001). Outcome analysis showed allograft survival of OPO-Present livers at 5 y was comparable to OPO-Absent livers (79.5% versus 80%, P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an OPO surgeon was associated with decreased liver allograft discard and increased utilization of marginal donor organs. The OPO surgeon's presence represents a potential strategy to increase organ utilization nationally.

Is there value in volume? An assessment of liver transplant practices in the United States since the inception of MELD.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has increased in volume and provides substantial survival benefit. However, there remains a need for value-based assessment of this costly procedure. METHODS: Model for end stage liver disease era adult recipients were identified using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis file data (n = 75,988) and compared across time periods (period A: February 2002 to January 2007; B: February 2007 to January 2013; C: February 2013 to January 2019). Liver centers were divided into volume tertiles for each period (small, medium, large). Value for the index transplant episode was defined as percentage graft survival ≥1 year divided by mean posttransplant duration of stay. RESULTS: All centers increased value over time due to ubiquitous improvement in 1-year graft survival. However, large centers demonstrated the most significant value change (large +17% vs small +7.0%, P < .001) due to a -8.5% reduction in large centers duration of stay from period A to C, while small centers duration of stay remained unchanged (-0.1%). Large centers delivered higher value despite more complex care: older recipients (54.8 ± 10.3 vs 53.0 ± 11.4 years P < .001), fewer model for end stage liver disease exceptions (34.0% vs 38.2%, P < .001), higher rates of candidate portal vein thrombosis (10.1% vs 8.5%, P < .001) and prior abdominal surgery (43.4% vs 37.4%, P < .001), and more marginal donor utilization (donor risk index 1.45 ± 0.38 vs 1.36 ± 0.33, P < .001). Mahalanobis metric matching demonstrated that compared with small centers, large centers progressively shortened recipient duration of stay per transplant in each period (A: -0.36 days, P = .437; B: -2.14 days, P < .001; C: -2.49 days, P < .001). CONCLUSION: There is value in liver transplant volume. Adoption of value-based practices from large centers may allow optimization of health care delivery for this costly procedure.

Short-term kidney transplant outcomes from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 lower respiratory tract positive donors.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to assess short-term allograft outcomes following deceased donor kidney transplantation from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) lower respiratory tract (LRT) nucleic acid testing (NAT) positive donors. METHODS: From September to December 2021, SARS-CoV-2 NAT positive organ donors, whose solid abdominal organs were transplanted at our academic medical center were identified. Donors were stratified into having tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in an upper respiratory tract (URT) or LRT sample. For this study, the SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive deceased kidney donors and their respective recipients were examined. Donor and recipient demographic data, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related history, patient outcomes, as well as postoperative graft function were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen SARS-CoV-2 positive deceased donors were identified. Of these, eight were LRT NAT positive and yielded nine kidneys. These allografts were successfully transplanted into vaccinated and unvaccinated recipients. All recipients received standard induction immunosuppression and did not receive any prophylactic therapy for SARS-CoV-2. Two recipients had delayed graft function. At 1-month post-transplant, there was no clinical evidence of donor-derived COVID-19 or graft loss, and all recipients were free from dialysis. CONCLUSION: We describe the first case series of SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive deceased kidney donors for vaccinated and unvaccinated recipients with excellent short-term allograft outcomes and no clinical evidence of donor-derived COVID-19 post-transplantation. Given the increasing prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the population, utilization of SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive deceased donors could be considered an acceptable source of organs for renal transplantation, especially as multi-center experiences and longer-term follow-up emerge.