Changes in inpatient brain arteriovenous malformation management in the United States following the ARUBA trial: analysis of an interrupted time series design.

The November 2013 online publication of ARUBA, the first multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), has sparked over 100 publications in protracted debates METHODS: This study sought to examine inpatient management patterns of brain AVMs from 2009 to 2016 and observe if changes in U.S. inpatient management were attributable to the ARUBA publication using interrupted time series of brain AVM studies from the National Inpatient Sample data 2009-2016. Outcomes of interest were use of embolization, surgery, combined embolization and microsurgery, radiotherapy, and observation during that admission. An interrupted time series design compared management trends before and after ARUBA. Segmented linear regression analysis tested for immediate and long-term impacts of ARUBA on management. RESULTS: Elective and asymptomatic patient admissions declined 2009-2016. In keeping with the ARUBA findings, observation for unruptured brain AVMs increased and microsurgery decreased. However, embolization, radiosurgery, and combined embolization and microsurgery also increased. For ruptured brain AVMs, treatment modality trends remained positive with even greater rates of observation, embolization, and combined embolization and microsurgery occurring after ARUBA (data on radiosurgery were scarce). None of the estimates for the change in trends were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The publication of ARUBA was associated with a decrease in microsurgery and increase in observation for unruptured brain AVMs in the US. However, inpatient radiotherapy, embolization, and combined embolization and surgery also increased, suggesting trends moved counter to ARUBA's conclusions. This analysis suggested that ARUBA had a small impact as clinicians rejected ARUBA's findings in managing unruptured brain AVMs.

Microemboli After Successful Thrombectomy Do Not Affect Outcome but Predict New Embolic Events.

Background and Purpose- We aimed to determine if microemboli after endovascular thrombectomy correlate with unfavorable outcomes despite successful recanalization. Methods- This is a prospective multicenter study of consecutive patients with ischemic stroke and occlusion of anterior circulation vessels (terminal internal carotid or main trunk of the middle cerebral artery/first-order branch of the main trunk of the middle cerebral artery segments of middle cerebral artery) after successful thrombectomy (modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia grades 2b-3). Microembolic signals (MES) were assessed by 30 minutes of transcranial Doppler monitoring within 72 hours of the last-seen-well time. Major outcomes included modified Rankin Scale at 90 days and infarct volume on head computed tomography at 24 hours. We also assessed early outcomes based on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale variation and recurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism within 90 days. Results- Among 111 patients, MES were detected in 43 (39%), with a median rate of 4 counts/h (interquartile range 2-12). The occurrence of MES was not associated with a significant difference in modified Rankin Scale (ordinal shift analysis, adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.48-2.34] P=0.85) nor in functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, 0-2: adjusted odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.19-1.39] P=0.19). Patients with and without MES had similar infarct volumes (adjusted beta, 11.2 [95% CI, -46.6 to +22.9] P=0.51) on 24-hour computed tomography. MES did predict new embolic events (adjusted Cox hazard ratio, 6.78 [95% CI, 1.63-27.8] P=0.01). Conclusions- MES detected by transcranial Doppler following endovascular treatment of anterior circulation occlusions do not predict clinical or radiological outcome. However, such emboli are an independent marker of recurrent embolic events within 90 days.

The role of cEEG as a predictor of patient outcome and survival in patients with intraparenchymal hemorrhages.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine if continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) results are associated with functional outcome and survival in critically ill patients with intraparenchymal hemorrhages (IPH). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with IPH were selected using a Critical Care EEG Monitoring Consortium Database at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Functional Outcome in Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage (FUNC) scores and Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) scores were calculated as covariates. Outcomes of interest were functional outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] <3 vs ≥3) and mortality at hospital discharge. cEEG features, as defined by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standard terminology, were assessed for association with outcome after accounting for known clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients admitted between March 2013 and December 2015 were selected. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the presence of Stage II Sleep is independently associated with good functional outcome at discharge after correcting for FUNC (p = 0.0080) and ICH (p = 0.0088). The absence of anteroposterior (AP) gradient in an EEG is associated with increased likelihood of mortality at discharge after correcting for FUNC (p = 0.013) and ICH (p = 0.019) scores. CONCLUSIONS: cEEG measures were significantly associated with functional and mortality outcome measures in patients with IPH even after accounting for known clinical and radiological covariates. Further research is needed to determine whether prediction models are improved by inclusion of cEEG features.

Direct Visualization of Arterial Emboli in Moyamoya Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic insufficiency is often considered the cause of ischemic stroke in patients with moyamoya syndrome. While high-intensity transient signals (HITS) on transcranial Doppler (TCD) have been reported in this population, the relationship between these signals and ischemic symptoms is not clearly established. Accordingly, current treatment is directed at improving perfusion. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We present two patients with symptoms of cerebral ischemia and angiographic findings of moyamoya syndrome. In each case, ischemia may have been caused by either hypoperfusion or embolization. Patient A presented with multifocal right middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory infarctions and angiographic findings consistent with moyamoya disease. She underwent right superficial temporal artery-MCA bypass. Intra-operatively, embolic material was observed and recorded traveling through the recipient MCA branch artery on two occasions. Postoperative TCD demonstrated HITS that resolved with uptitration of antiplatelet therapy. Patient B presented with multifocal, embolic-appearing left MCA infarctions, and unilateral angiographic moyamoya syndrome. She was found to have HITS in the left MCA, which eventually resolved with a combination of antiplatelets and anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic compromise may not be the only cause of brain infarction in patients with moyamoya syndrome. Observations from these two patients provide both direct visualization and TCD evidence of embolization as a potential etiology for brain ischemia. Future investigations into the role of antithrombotic agents should be considered.