Teaching Chest Tube Insertion by Blended Learning: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emerging technologies are being incorporated in surgical education. The use of such technology should be supported by evidence that the technology neither distracts nor overloads the learner and is easy to use. To teach chest tube insertion, we developed an e-learning module, as part of a blended learning program delivered prior to in-person hands-on simulation. This pilot study was aimed to assess learning effectiveness of this blended learning, and cognitive load and the usability of e-learning. METHODS: The interactive e-learning module with multimedia content was created following learning design principles. In advance of the standard simulation, 13 first-year surgical residents were randomized into two groups: 7 received the e-learning module and online reading materials (e-learning group); 6 received only the online reading materials (controls). Knowledge was evaluated by pre-and post-tests; technical performance was assessed using a Global Rating Scale by blinded assessors. Cognitive load and usability were evaluated using rating scales. RESULTS: The e-learning group showed significant improvement from baseline in knowledge (P = .047), while controls did not (P = .500). For technical skill, 100% of residents in the e-learning group reached a predetermined proficiency level vs 60% of controls (P = .06). The addition of e-learning was associated with lower extrinsic and greater germane cognitive load (P = .04, .03, respectively). Usability was evaluated highly by all participants in e-learning group. CONCLUSION: Interactive e-learning added to hands-on simulation led to improved learning and desired cognitive load and usability. This approach should be evaluated in teaching of other procedural skills.

Reciprocal peer coaching for practice improvement in surgery: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Peer coaching has been associated with much higher rates of practice changes and new skill implementation compared to common used modalities but bilateral peer coaching structures where seniority is not a requirement to coach have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a reciprocal peer coaching pilot program for practicing surgeons to inform future coaching program design. METHODS: A multicenter reciprocal peer surgical coaching program was designed according to the framework developed from previous studies by our group. The coach-coachee matching process was voluntary and autonomous. All participants received basic coaching skills training. Pairs were instructed to complete two coaching sessions, alternating between the coach or coachee role for each session. Data were collected through questionnaires and structured interviews. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants enrolled in the pilot study and completed the coach training (88% enrollment rate). During the first wave of COVID-19, 12 participants withdrew. Of the five pairs that completed the program, three pairs were composed of general surgeons, one of orthopedic surgeons, and one ophthalmologic surgeon. Three sessions were conducted live in the OR, five virtually, and one involved an in-person discussion. Overall satisfaction with the program was high and all participants expectations were met. Participants were significantly more likely to predict "routinely" asking for feedback from their partner after study completion (6, 66%) compared to pre-intervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This pilot study supports the feasibility of a peer coaching model for surgeons in practice that emphasized reciprocity and participant autonomy. These key elements should be considered when designing future coaching programs.

Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Surgical peer coaching has been associated with high rates of practice change but remains largely unutilized. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons internationally to investigate attitudes regarding peer coaching and to identify any international differences to inform the design of future coaching programs. METHODS: Practicing surgeons in general surgery or related subspecialties were eligible to participate. Invitations to complete the survey were distributed through 13 surgical associations, social media, and personal e-mail invitations. Responses were obtained between June 1st and August 31st, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 521 surveys were collected. The majority of participants practiced in North America (263; 50%) with remaining respondents from Asia (81; 16%), Europe (34;7%), South America (21; 4%), Africa (17; 3%), and Oceania (6; 1%). Duration of practice was equally distributed across 4 intervals (0-5 years; 6-15 years; 16-25 years; > 25 years). Respondents most frequently identified as general surgeons (290; 67%) and 325 (75%) were male. Awareness of peer coaching was reported by 275 (53%) respondents, with 197 (44%) never seeking formal feedback from peers. The majority of respondents (372; 84%) would be willing to participate in a peer coaching program, with monthly interactions the most desirable frequency reported (193; 51%). Coaching in the operating room was preferred by most participants (360; 86%). Few respondents (67; 14%) would accept coaching from someone unknown to them. Participants identified key coaching program elements as: feedback kept private and confidential (267; 63%); opportunity to provide feedback to the coach (247; 59%); personalized goal setting (244; 58%); and the option to choose one's own coach (205; 49%). The most commonly cited potential barrier to participation was logistical constraints (334; 79%). CONCLUSION: This international survey of practicing surgeons demonstrated that peer feedback is rarely used in practice, but there is high interest and acceptance of the peer coaching model for continuous professional development. Findings regarding preferred program structure may be useful to inform the design of future peer coaching programs.

Identifying optimal program structure, motivations for and barriers to peer coaching participation for surgeons in practice: a qualitative synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Continuous advancement of surgical skills is of utmost importance to surgeons in practice, but traditional learning activities without personalized feedback often do not translate into practice changes in the operating room. Peer coaching has been shown to lead to very high rates of practice changes and utilization of new skills. The purpose of this study was to explore the opinions of practicing surgeons regarding the characteristics of peer coaching programs, in order to better inform future peer coaching program design. METHODS: Using a convenience sample, practicing general surgeons were invited to participate in focus group interviews. Allocation into groups was according to years in practice. The interviews were conducted using open-ended questions by trained facilitators. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded into themes by two independent reviewers using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Of 52 invitations, 27 surgeons participated: 74% male; years in practice: < 5 years: 33%; 5-15 years: 26%; > 15 years: 41%. Three main themes emerged during coding: ideal program structure, motivations for participation, and barriers to implementation. For the ideal structure of a peer coaching program all groups agreed coaching programs should be voluntary, involve bidirectional learning, and provide CME credits. Live, in situ coaching was preferred. Motivations for coaching participation included: desire to learn new techniques (48%), remaining up to date with the evolution of surgical practice (30%) and improvement of patient outcomes (18%). Barriers to program implementation were categorized as: surgical culture (42%), perceived lack of need (26%), logistical constraints (23%) and issues of coach-coachee dynamics (9%). CONCLUSION: Peer coaching to refine or acquire new skills addresses many shortcomings of traditional, didactic learning modalities. This study revealed key aspects of optimal program structure, motivations and barriers to coaching which can be used to inform the design of successful peer coaching programs in the future.

Implementation and Effectiveness of Coaching for Surgeons in Practice - A Mixed Studies Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite recent changes to medical education, surgical training remains largely based on the apprenticeship model. However, after completing training, there are few structured learning opportunities available for surgeons in practice to refine their skills or acquire new skills. Personalized observation with feedback is rarely a feature of traditional continuing medical education learning. Coaching has recently been proposed as a modality to meet these educational gaps; however, data are limited, and few coaching programs presently exist. The purpose of this study is to summarize the characteristics of coaching programs for surgeons in practice including participant satisfaction, program outcomes, and barriers to implementation, in the published literature. METHODS: A mixed studies systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all original studies describing or investigating coaching for practicing surgeons up to 06/2019. Quantitative analysis was used to summarize numerical data, and qualitative analysis using grounded theory methodology for descriptive data was used to summarize the results into themes across studies. RESULTS: After identification of articles, 27 were included in the final synthesis. Twenty-six articles described execution of a coaching program. Programs varied widely with 18/26 focusing on teaching new skills, and the remainder on refinement of skills. Thematic analysis identified 2 major data categories that guided deeper analysis: outcomes of and barriers to coaching. Of the 16 (62%) programs that reported outcomes of coaching, 42% to 100% of participants reported changes in clinical practice directly associated with coaching. Positive satisfaction after completion of a program was reported by 82% to 100% of participants. Reported barriers to participating in a coaching program emerged along 3 main themes: logistical constraints, surgical culture, and perceived lack of need. CONCLUSIONS: Coaching for surgeons in practice is highly rated by participants and often results in clinical practice changes, while cultural and logistical issues were identified as barriers to implementation. A better understanding of these factors is required to guide coaching program development and implementation.

[Parathyroid disease: The full spectrum, from adenoma to carcinoma. Report of 3 cases]. / Enfermedad paratiroidea: el espectro completo, de adenoma a carcinoma. Reporte de 3 casos.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism is a disease characterised by the autonomous production of parathyroid hormone. The most common cause is an adenoma, followed by hyperplasia, and rarely carcinoma. CLINICAL CASES: Three cases are presented. The first case is associated with a brown tumour that was diagnosed as hyperplasia after study and surgery. The second case was related to pathological fractures, and a lower right adenoma 236 times bigger than a normal parathyroid was excised. The last case presented with abdominal pain and heartburn. Histopathology reported a carcinoma, which was removed using surgery en bloc. All patients have improved. CONCLUSION: Hyperparathyroidism symptoms are very difficult to identify and diagnose, thus a detailed and broad approach is needed when hyperparathyroidism is suspected.

Lo que debe saber un cirujano general sobre el uso de toxina botulínica serotipo A / What the general surgeon should know about the use of botulinum toxin serotype A

Objetivo: Presentar una revisión de la literatura médica acerca de las propiedades, características y múltiples usos de la toxina botulínica tipo A. Sede: Hospital de Atención de Tercer Nivel. Diseño: Revisión de la literatura. Material y métodos: Se realizó revisión de la literatura en los servidores de Medline, Ovid y Medigraphic, con las palabras clave Botulinum toxin type A y abdominal wall hernia. Resultados: La aplicación de la toxina botulínica tipo A, previo a la plastía abdominal permite lograr una parálisis en los músculos laterales de la pared abdominal y con ello una reducción en el tamaño del defecto herniario, lo que permite el cierre de pared abdominal con tensión mínima. Este agente biológico actúa por quimiodenervación de los músculos subyacentes. Conclusión: La preparación preoperatoria con la infiltración de toxina botulínica serotipo A provoca una parálisis flácida de la pared y permite el avance de los colgajos laterales sin debilitarlos en su conformación anatómica; no sólo es una herramienta más para asegurar la refuncionalización sino un recurso que no debilita la pared en forma permanente y que no genera dolor postoperatorio mayor del esperado a la cirugía de plastía de pared. Esta técnica de preparación permite en el preoperatorio generar mejores condiciones para planear la cirugía y no excluye a todos los demás recursos adicionales que en el transoperatorio pudieran ser necesarios para cumplir con el propósito de refuncionalización de la pared.