ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to describe the association between SLE and sexual function, analysing demographic variables, comorbidities and other disease-related factors. As an exploratory objective, the impact of asking about sexual function during outpatient consultation was evaluated. METHODS: From 2018 to 2019, we invited sexually active men diagnosed with SLE to complete questionnaires that evaluated their sexual function and quality of life. Additionally, patients were asked if they believed they had sexual dysfunction, whether they would be interested in receiving specialized sexual care, and if they considered SLE to be detrimental to their sexual function. Epidemiological and disease-related data were retrieved from the patients' clinical records. RESULTS: We included 124 men with SLE. Twenty-two (18%) patients answered positively when asked if they believed they had sexual dysfunction. These patients had lower overall erectile function scores and lower physical function scores than those who did not consider they had sexual dysfunction. In the multivariable analysis, factors that were associated with better sexual function were high physical function (B = 0.126, p = .031), lower BMI (B = 0.53, p = .010) and the patient's perception of normal sexual function (B = 13.0, p < .001). Comorbidities associated with worse sexual function were type 2 diabetes (B = -8.1, p = .017) and a history of thrombosis (B = -5.12, p = .019). CONCLUSION: Sexual function of male patients with SLE is impaired, independently of disease activity, chronic disease damage or pharmacological treatment. A simple question about perception of sexual function in the outpatient clinic can be used to help determine which patients could benefit from a multidisciplinary intervention to improve sexual health.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Male , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/epidemiology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify clinical and laboratory risk factors for ischemic stroke (IS) in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study with consecutive primary APS patients divided into two groups, those who presented with IS, vs. those with no history of stroke. Demographics, vascular risk factors, therapeutic approaches, laboratory, imaging and functional outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-three confirmed primary APS patients with IS and sixty-six non-stroke primary APS controls were recruited. Most patients were female (65.5 %), with a median age of 33 years. The main vascular risk factors for primary APS-associated stroke were hypertension (11.3 %), diabetes (11.3 %) and hypercholesterolemia (9.4 %). Among patients with stroke, median NIHSS score was 6; 15.1 % of these patients presented a recurrent stroke, and 88.8 % had a good functional outcome at the final follow-up. Positive lupus anticoagulant (OR = 6.1, 95 %CI 2.7-13.5), anti-ß2 glycoprotein IgG (OR = 3.6, 95 %CI 1.7-7.9), and anticardiolipin IgG (OR = 2.8, 95 %CI 1.3-5.9) were more prevalent in non-stroke primary APS, with a triple-positive antibody presence in 46.4 % of controls vs. 22.2 % of patients with stroke (OR = 3.0, 95 %CI 1.3-6.7). At the time of the index event (arterial or venous), 14 known primary APS patients were using vitamin K antagonists, but only 35.7 % of them had achieved therapeutic INR. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary APS and IS have similar vascular risk factors and lower antibody positivity than those with extracranial thrombosis.
Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome/epidemiology , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Adult , Antibodies, Anticardiolipin/immunology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/drug therapy , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Functional Status , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , International Normalized Ratio , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Ischemic Stroke/immunology , Ischemic Stroke/physiopathology , Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor/immunology , Male , Mesenteric Ischemia/epidemiology , Mesenteric Ischemia/etiology , Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion/epidemiology , Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion/etiology , Middle Aged , Portal Vein , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Risk Factors , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiologyABSTRACT
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) is an acute neurological syndrome clinically characterized by seizures, altered mental status, headache, and visual disturbances. It is caused by a variety of abnormalities in the endothelial function that ultimately result in vasogenic edema in the circulation of the central nervous system. This is reflected by the neuroimaging findings, that most often show reversible parieto-occipital edema. An important proportion of patients with PRES present with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and its complications, as their sole risk factors. This review describes the relationship between these two clinical entities and explains the pathophysiological models that have been proposed to describe the development of PRES. We explain how SLE can cause alterations in every pathway implicated in the development of PRES. Given the relatively high frequency and the distinct clinical course, PRES in the setting of SLE might be best described as a distinct neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with SLE.